Explore the vast range of titles available.

The serine/threonine kinase AKT is a key component of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway as it exerts a pivotal role in cell growth, proliferation, survival, and metabolism. Deregulation of this pathway is a common event in breast cancer including hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease, HER2-amplified, and triple negative tumors. Hence, targeting AKT represents an attractive treatment option for many breast cancer subtypes, especially those resistant to conventional treatments. Several AKT inhibitors have been recently developed and two ATP-competitive compounds, capivasertib and ipatasertib, have been extensively tested in phase I and II clinical trials either alone, with chemotherapy, or with hormonal agents. Additionally, phase III trials of capivasertib and ipatasertib are already under way in HR+ and triple-negative breast cancer. While the identification of predictive biomarkers of response and resistance to AKT inhibition represents an unmet need, new combination strategies are under investigation aiming to boost the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs. As such, trials combining capivasertib and ipatasertib with CDK4/6 inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and PARP inhibitors are currently ongoing. This review summarizes the available evidence on AKT inhibition in breast cancer, reporting both efficacy and toxicity data from clinical trials along with the available translational correlates and then focusing on the potential use of these drugs in new combination strategies.

Human trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) is a membrane glycoprotein involved in cell proliferation and motility, frequently overexpressed in epithelial tumors. Thus, it represents an attractive target for anticancer therapies. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a third-generation antibody-drug conjugate, consisting of an anti-Trop-2 monoclonal antibody (hRS7), a hydrolyzable linker, and a cytotoxin (SN38), which inhibits topoisomerase 1. Specific pharmacological features, such as the high antibody to payload ratio, the ultra-toxic nature of SN38, and the capacity to kill surrounding tumor cells (the bystander effect), make SG a very promising drug for cancer treatment. Indeed, unprecedented results have been observed with SG in patients with heavily pretreated advanced triple-negative breast cancer and urothelial carcinomas, and the drug has already received approval for these indications. These results are coupled with a manageable toxicity profile, with neutropenia and diarrhea as the most frequent adverse events, mainly of grades 1–2. While several trials are exploring SG activity in different tumor types and settings, potential biomarkers of response are under investigation. Among these, Trop-2 overexpression and the presence of BRCA1/2 mutations seem to be the most promising. We review the available literature concerning SG, with a focus on its toxicity spectrum and possible biomarkers of its response.

Obesity is a strong risk factor for cancer progression, posing obesity-related cancer as one of the leading causes of death. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms that endow cancer cells with metastatic properties in patients affected by obesity remain unexplored. Here, we show that IL-6 and HGF, secreted by tumor neighboring visceral adipose stromal cells (V-ASCs), expand the metastatic colorectal (CR) cancer cell compartment (CD44v6 + ), which in turn secretes neurotrophins such as NGF and NT-3, and recruits adipose stem cells within tumor mass. Visceral adipose-derived factors promote vasculogenesis and the onset of metastatic dissemination by activation of STAT3, which inhibits miR-200a and enhances ZEB2 expression, effectively reprogramming CRC cells into a highly metastatic phenotype. Notably, obesity-associated tumor microenvironment provokes a transition in the transcriptomic expression profile of cells derived from the epithelial consensus molecular subtype (CMS2) CRC patients towards a mesenchymal subtype (CMS4). STAT3 pathway inhibition reduces ZEB2 expression and abrogates the metastatic growth sustained by adipose-released proteins. Together, our data suggest that targeting adipose factors in colorectal cancer patients with obesity may represent a therapeutic strategy for preventing metastatic disease. Obesity is a major risk factor for cancer related death. Here, the authors show that visceral adipose-derived factors promote vasculogenesis and metastatic dissemination by activation of STAT3, which inhibits miR-200a and enhances ZEB2 expression, effectively reprogramming colorectal cancer cells into a highly metastatic phenotype.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an effective class of agents for the treatment of several tumor types, including breast cancer (BC), featuring approved molecules such as trastuzumab-emtansine, trastuzumab-deruxtecan, and sacituzumab-govitecan. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) also showed activity in selected BC subtypes, and two agents, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, are currently approved for the treatment of triple-negative BC patients. The potential synergy between ADCs and immunotherapy in BC remains an area of active investigation. Preclinical studies suggest that ADCs promote immune surveillance, modulating tumor microenvironment, inducing immunogenic cell death, and enhancing antitumor immunity. Translational evidence has shown potential predictive biomarkers for ADCs alone or in combination with immunotherapy, including expression of target antigen, oncogenic pathways, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Given this background, several clinical trials evaluated ADC-ICI combinations in BC patients, demonstrating promising outcomes with an overall manageable toxicity profile, and many studies are currently ongoing to confirm the efficacy and feasibility of this therapeutic approach. In the present review, we summarized the available evidence about the integration of ADCs and immunotherapy for the management of BC, emphasizing the need for further translational and clinical investigations to optimize this treatment strategy and elucidate predictive biomarkers, eventually improving patient outcomes.

Abemaciclib (ABE) in combination with endocrine therapy represents the mainstay treatment for either endocrine-resistant metastatic or high-risk early-stage HR+/HER2− breast cancer patients. Hence, an adequate knowledge of this agent pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and of its drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is crucial for an optimal patients management. Additionally, ABE interference with food and complementary/alternative medicines should be taken into account in the clinical practice. Several online tools allow to freely check DDIs and can be easily consulted before prescribing ABE. According to one of this instruments, ABE display the lowest number of interactions among the available cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Still, clinicians should be aware that online tools cannot replace the technical datasheet of the drug as well as a comprehensive clinical assessment for each patient. Here we critically review the main pharmacological features of ABE, then focusing on its potential interactions with drugs, food, and alternative medicine, in order to provide a guide for its optimal use in the treatment of HR+/HER2− breast cancer patients. Plain language summary Pharmacological features and drug interactions of abemaciclib Why was the review done? Abemaciclib, paired with hormone therapy, is a key treatment for breast cancer patients whose cancer cells respond to hormones but not to a protein called HER2. Understanding how this medication functions in the body, how it interacts with other drugs, and how the body processes it is crucial for providing optimal care. What did the authors do? The authors looked for published evidence about the way abemaciclib works into the body and about how it interacts with other drugs (including alternative medicines) or food. Then they summarized these findings. What did the authors find? Abemaciclib absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion is well known and it is here described. What people eat and any alternative medications they take can affect how abemaciclib works. Online tools are available for doctors to check potential interactions between abemaciclib and other drugs a patient might be using. It’s advisable for doctors to consult abemaciclib data sheet and use online tools before prescribing the drug. Notably, compared to similar treatments, abemaciclib has fewer interactions with other drugs. What does the review mean? This review delves into how abemaciclib works in the body and explore its potential interactions with other drugs, food, and alternative medicines. This information will aid doctors in using abemaciclib effectively for treating breast cancer patients.

Thyroid cancer comprises different clinical and histological entities. Whereas differentiated (DTCs) malignancies are sensitive to radioiodine therapy, anaplastic (ATCs) and medullary (MTCs) tumors do not uptake radioactive iodine and display aggressive features associated with a poor prognosis. Moreover, in a majority of DTCs, disease evolution leads to the progressive loss of iodine sensitivity. Hence, iodine-refractory DTCs, along with ATCs and MTCs, require alternative treatments reflective of their different tumor biology. In the last decade, the molecular mechanisms promoting thyroid cancer development and progression have been extensively studied. This has led to a better understanding of the genomic landscape, displayed by thyroid malignancies, and to the identification of novel therapeutic targets. Indeed, several pharmacological compounds have been developed for iodine-refractory tumors, with four multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors already available for DTCs (sorafenib and lenvatinib) and MTCs (cabozantib and vandetanib), and a plethora of drugs currently being evaluated in clinical trials. In this review, we will describe the genomic alterations and biological processes intertwined with thyroid cancer development, also providing a thorough overview of targeted drugs already tested or under investigation for these tumors. Furthermore, given the existing preclinical evidence, we will briefly discuss the potential role of immunotherapy as an additional therapeutic strategy for the treatment of thyroid cancer.

Abemaciclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor approved in combination with endocrine therapy for treating hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early and advanced breast cancer patients. The safety profile of abemaciclib is characterized by frequent gastrointestinal toxicity, especially diarrhea. Therefore, we performed an exploratory analysis of clinical factors that may be potentially associated with diarrhea in patients treated with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy. Factors potentially predisposing to diarrhea were selected, such as age ≥70 years, concomitant medications and diseases, diet, and use of laxatives. These variables were correlated with the onset of grade 2/3 diarrhea in a cohort of patients treated with abemaciclib from advanced breast cancer. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. Sensitivity and specificity were tested using the ROC curve. Eighty women with advanced breast cancer were included in the study. The univariate analysis found a statistically significant correlation between grade 2/3 diarrhea and age ≥70 years, polypharmacy, and concomitant gastrointestinal diseases (p<0.05). In the multivariate analysis, the number of risk factors significantly correlated with the outcome of interest (p<0.0001). ROC analysis showed our model's 82% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Taking into account specific pre-existing factors, it is possible to estimate the risk of diarrhea in hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative - advanced breast cancer patients, candidates for abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy. In these subjects, implementing proactive prevention and adopting a dose-escalation strategy may represent practical approaches to decrease the abemaciclib toxicity burden.

Background. In recent years, the role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in the imaging and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) has been extensively investigated. However, despite its name, PSMA is not exclusively specific to PCa. It has been found to be expressed in the neo-vasculature of various solid tumors, including breast cancer (BC), in which it is associated with tumor angiogenesis. Methods. This review aims to assess the potential of PSMA-based radiopharmaceuticals for BC diagnosis and treatment. It explores the current landscape by analyzing preclinical and clinical studies, as well as ongoing clinical trials, to provide insights into the PSMA-targeted approaches in BC management. Results. Early studies suggest PSMA-based imaging could improve BC lesion detection, especially in TNBC. The available data remains too preliminary to conclusively assess whether PSMA-based imaging or therapy will offer a significant advantage in BC. However, some preclinical findings suggest that this approach may hold promise as a novel strategy for managing this widespread malignancy. Conclusions. PSMA-based strategies show potential for BC diagnosis and treatment, but further research is needed. Ongoing and future clinical trials are expected to provide deeper insights into the potential utility of this approach.

Luminal Androgen Receptor Breast Cancers (LAR BCs) are characterized by a triple negative phenotype and by the expression of Androgen Receptor (AR), coupled with luminal-like genomic features. This unique BC subtype, accounting for about 10% of all triple negative BC, has raised considerable interest given its ill-defined clinical behavior and the chance to exploit AR as a therapeutic target. The complexity of AR activity in BC cells, as revealed by decades of mechanistic studies, holds promise to offer additional therapeutic options beyond mere AR inhibition. Indeed, preclinical and translational evidence showed that several pathways and mediators, including PI3K/mToR, HER2, BRCA1, cell cycle and immune modulation, can be tackled in LAR BCs. Moving from bench to bedside, several clinical trials tested anti-androgen therapies in LAR BCs, but their results are inconsistent and often disappointing. More recently, studies exploring combinations of anti-androgen agents with other targeted therapies have been designed and are currently ongoing. While the results from these trials are awaited, a concerted effort will be needed to find the biological vulnerabilities of LAR BCs which may disclose new and effective therapeutic targets, eventually improving patients' outcomes.

Background: Hormone-receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer (BC) is characterized by low immunogenicity and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. These features likely contribute to the inconsistent clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in this BC subtype. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials evaluating ICIs in HR+/HER2− BC patients, focusing on potential biomarkers of response and resistance to these drugs. Methods: We systematically searched in Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for phase II/III clinical trials published between 2013 and 2023, testing ICIs alone or in combination with other agents in HR+/HER2− BC patients at any stage. All the searches were performed up to 27 January 2024. Data on study characteristics, clinical outcomes, and biomarker profiles were extracted, and due to study heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed, without risk-of-bias assessment or meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-five studies were included, with 3298 patients enrolled overall. Eighteen of these trials enrolled patients with advanced disease. All trials investigated ICI combination regimens, more frequently with chemotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors, or other immunotherapeutic agents. Most of the studies enrolling patients with advanced disease failed to show a significant clinical activity of ICIs. In the early setting, neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab increased the rate of complete responses compared to chemotherapy alone. Moreover, high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, low ER (estrogen receptor), and high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels correlated with improved outcomes. Consistently, markers indicating enhanced immune activation, such as the MammaPrint High 2 (MP2) genomic signature, were associated with increased ICI sensitivity. Discussion: Despite the limited overall efficacy, ICIs may represent a viable therapeutic option for a selected subset of HR+/HER2− BC patients. However, this systematic review is limited by study heterogeneity and the inclusion of ongoing or immature trials, which prevents quantitative analysis and may affect future conclusions on ICIs in HR+/HER2− breast cancer. Finally, optimized combination strategies could enhance tumor immunogenicity, while predictive biomarkers such as PD-L1, TILs, or specific genomic signatures could identify responsive patients.