Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is secondary to a cerebrospinal fluid leak at the spinal level without obvious causative events. Several signs on brain and cervical spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) have been associated with SIH but can be equivocal or negative. This retrospective study sought to identify characteristic SIH signs on thoracic spinal MRI. Methods Cranial and spinal MR images of 27 consecutive patients with classic SIH symptoms, who eventually received epidural autologous blood patches (EBPs), were analyzed. Results The most prevalent findings on T2-weighted MRI at the thoracic level were anterior shift of the spinal cord (96.3%) and dorsal dura mater (81.5%), probably caused by dural sac shrinkage. These dural sac shrinkage signs (DSSS) were frequently accompanied by cerebrospinal fluid collection in the posterior epidural space (77.8%) and a prominent epidural venous plexus (77.8%). These findings disappeared in all six patients who underwent post-EBP spinal MRI. Dural enhancement and brain sagging were minimum or absent on the cranial MR images of seven patients, although DSSS were obvious in these seven patients. For 23 patients with SIH and 28 healthy volunteers, a diagnostic test using thoracic MRI was performed by 13 experts to validate the usefulness of DSSS. The median sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value, and accuracy of the DSSS were high (range, 0.913–0.931). Conclusions Detection of DSSS on thoracic MRI facilitates an SIH diagnosis without the use of invasive imaging modalities. The DSSS were positive even in patients in whom classic cranial MRI signs for SIH were equivocal or minimal.

Background We showed that ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt and lumboperitoneal (LP) shunt surgeries are beneficial for patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) in the Study of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus on Neurological Improvement (SINPHONI; a multicenter prospective cohort study) and in SINPHONI-2 (a multicenter randomized trial). Although therapeutic efficacy is important, cost-effectiveness analysis is equally valuable. Methods Using both a set of assumptions and using the data from SINPHONI and SINPHONI-2, we estimated the total cost of treatment for iNPH, which consists of medical expenses (e.g., operation fees) and costs to the long-term care insurance system (LCIS) in Japan. Regarding the natural course of iNPH patients, 10% or 20% of patients on each modified Rankin Scale (mRS) show aggravation (aggravation rate: 10% or 20%) every 3 months if the patients do not undergo shunt surgery, as described in a previous report. We performed cost-effectiveness analyses for the various scenarios, calculating the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER). Then, based on the definition provided by a previous report, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of shunt surgery for iNPH. Results In the first year after shunt surgery, the ICER of VP shunt varies from 29,934 to 40,742 USD (aggravation rate 10% and 20%, respectively) and the ICER of LP shunt varies from 58,346 to 80,392 USD (aggravation rate 10% and 20%, respectively), which indicates that the shunt surgery for iNPH is a cost-effective treatment. In the 2nd postoperative year, the cost to the LCIS will continue to decrease because of the lasting improvement of the symptoms due to the surgery. The total cost for iNPH patients will show a positive return on investment in as soon as 18 months (VP) and 21 months (LP), indicating that shunt surgery for iNPH is a cost-effective treatment. Conclusions Because the total cost for iNPH patients will show a positive return on investment within 2 years, shunt surgery for iNPH is a cost-effective treatment and therefore recommended. The SINPHONI-2 study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials registry: UMIN000002730) SINPHONI was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00221091.

Background : During lumboperitoneal shunt operation, we may inadvertently pull and displace the spinal catheter after the catheter placement into the spinal canal. The authors introduce an easy and efficient technique for repositioning a prolapsed catheter into correct place. Methods: After the confirmation of cerebrospinal fluid outflow from the end of the catheter, a guidewire for angiogram was gently inserted into the catheter until its tip reached the end of the catheter. The guidewire-inserted catheter was able to be pushed back manually and adequately placed in the spinal canal under the fluoroscope guidance. Results: Three patients underwent repositioning using this \"rescue wire technique\" without complications. Conclusion: This \"rescue wire technique\" is useful for repositioning of the displaced catheter into the spinal canal.