Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeHerein, we report the clinical outcomes of a multicenter study evaluating the role of SBRT in a cohort of patients affected by oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective multicenter observational study including eleven centers. Inclusion criteria of the current study were: (a) Karnofsky performance status > 80, (b) histologically proven diagnosis of PC, (c) 1–5 oligoprogressive metastases, defined as progressive disease at bone or nodes levels (detected by means of choline PET/CT or CT plus bone scan) during ADT, (d) serum testosterone level under 50 ng/ml during ADT, (e) controlled primary tumor, (f) patients treated with SBRT with a dose of at least 5 Gy per fraction to a biologically effective dose (BED) of at least 80 Gy using an alpha-to-beta ratio of 3 Gy, (g) at least 6 months of follow-up post-SBRT.ResultsEighty-six patients for a total of 117 lesions were treated with SBRT. The median follow-up was 30.7 months (range 4–91 months). The median new metastasis-free survival after SBRT was 12.3 months (95% CI 5.5–19.1 months). One- and two-year distant progression-free survival was 52.3% and 33.7%, respectively. Twenty-six out of 86 patients underwent a second course of SBRT due to further oligoprogressive disease: This resulted in a median systemic treatment-free survival of 21.8 months (95% CI 17.8–25.8 months). One-year systemic treatment-free survival was 72.1%.ConclusionSBRT appears to be a promising approach in oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Further investigations are warranted.

Introduction Historically, the management of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r-DLBCL) involved chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant, though outcomes were often suboptimal. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed the therapeutic landscape for r/r-DLBCL, achieving high response rates and improving progression-free and overall survival. However, a significant proportion of patients relapse after CAR-T, and optimal treatment strategies for post-CAR-T relapse remain unclear. Radiotherapy (RT), a highly effective treatment for lymphoma, is increasingly recognized for its potential role as both a bridging therapy and a salvage option following CAR-T relapse. Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted using databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, with search terms combining “radiotherapy,” “radiation therapy,” “lymphoma,” and “CAR T-cell.” A total of 690 records were screened, and 14 studies were included in the analysis after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results RT demonstrates high response rates in CAR-T relapsed DLBCL, with overall response rates (ORR) ranging from 35% to 82.4% and complete response rates (CRR) from 17% to 59%. One-year local control rates ranged between 62% and 84%. Salvage RT showed comparable or superior outcomes to systemic therapies in multiple studies, particularly in patients with localized relapses. The toxicity profile of RT was favorable, particularly when modern techniques such as IMRT were employed. Case reports and retrospective series highlighted its effectiveness in achieving durable responses and controlling localized disease progression. Conclusions Radiotherapy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with DLBCL relapsed or refractory after CAR-T therapy. It achieves high local control rates and favorable outcomes, particularly in patients with localized relapse. Incorporating RT into the therapeutic workflow may enhance the management of this challenging population. Further prospective studies are needed to define its role and optimize treatment sequencing.

Historically, non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) has been considered a radio-resistant disease, excluding radiotherapy (RT) from curative strategies. However, case series exploring the use of radiation treatment in this setting are often outdated, and prospective ongoing studies testing new radiotherapeutic approaches in NSGCT are lacking. Considering that tremendous advances in radiotherapy technology have enabled improved precision in RT delivery as well as dose escalation while decreasing treatment-related morbidity, we overviewed the currently available literature to explore the radiobiological basis, the technical issues, and potential strategies for implementation of RT in the management of this clinical entity. The purpose of the present overview is to provide insight for future research in this unexplored scenario. In summary, the biological rationale for RT use and potential implementation with systemic therapies exist, especially considering the advantage of new technologies, which were unavailable in the era of early literature reports. The NSGCT radioresistance paradigm could be based only on the fact that effective treatment schedules were simply undeliverable with older RT techniques due to toxicity issues, but the availability of actual techniques may prompt further exploration to offer treatment alternatives to these patients. Ongoing trials on this issue are lacking, but potential areas of research are platinum-refractory disease and consolidation therapy for residual masses after PST.

Background: Next-generation imaging (NGI) technologies such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and total-body NGI (tbNGI) methodologies including choline, fluciclovine or PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), whole-body MRI (wbMRI), and PET/MRI are becoming increasingly available, but their use in different prostate cancer (PCa) settings is under debate. The Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord-Est (GUONE) designed a survey to explore the current clinical practice of NGI utilization in a specific macro-region in North-Eastern Italy. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by administering an anonymous online multiple-choice questionnaire to uro-oncologists practicing in North-Eastern Italy, using the Google Forms® platform. The use of NGI was investigated in the following settings: primary staging of PCa; management of biochemical (BCR) and local recurrence (LR); re-staging in metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), non-metastatic CRPC (nmCRPC), and oligometastatic PCa (OMPC). Results: In all, 100 uro-oncologists accessed and completed the survey. In primary N/M staging, the use of tbNGI increases in accordance with NCCN risk groups. Re-staging with choline and PSMA PET/CT is the prevalent choice in the case of BCR after radical prostatectomy. Moreover, when the PSA value rises, there is a parallel increased use of tbNGI. When an LR is suspected, PSMA PET/CT plus mpMRI is the most selected option. Re-staging with tbNGI (PSMA PET/CT) is preferred in mHSPC, mCRPC, and nmCRPC patients in case of progression of disease. Overall, there is a limited use of wbMRI and PET/MRI in all the settings investigated. Conclusion: Our survey describes the expanding role of NGI modalities in the management of PCa patients, from primary staging and re-staging to management of advanced PCa and assessment of treatment response. Several controversial issues have emerged, which need to be addressed in prospective studies to develop a standardized and cost-effective NGI utilization.

Although systemic therapy represents the standard of care for polymetastatic kidney cancer, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may play a relevant role in the oligometastatic setting. We conducted a multicenter study including oligometastatic kidney cancer treated with SBRT. We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients who underwent 245 SBRT treatments on 385 lesions, including 165 (42.9%) oligorecurrent (OR) and 220 (57.1%) oligoprogressive (OP) lesions. Most common sites were lung (30.9%) for OR group, and bone (32.7%) for OP group. Among 78 (31.8%) patients receiving concomitant systemic therapy, sunitinib (61.5%) and pazopanib (15.4%) were the most common for OR patients, while sunitinib (49.2%) and nivolumab (20.0%) for OP patients. End points were local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to next systemic therapy (TTNS) and toxicity. Median follow-up was 18.6 months. 1, 2 and 3-year LC rates were 89.4%, 80.1% and 76.6% in OR patients, and 82.7%, 76.9% and 64.3% in those with OP, respectively. LC for OP group was influenced by clear cell histology (p = 0.000), total number of lesions (p = 0.004), systemic therapy during SBRT (p = 0.012), and SBRT dose (p = 0.012). Median PFS was 37.9 months. 1, 2- and 3-year OS was 92.7%, 86.4% and 81.8%, respectively. Median TTNS was 15.8 months for OR patients, and 13.9 months for OP patients. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported for both groups. SBRT may be considered an effective safe option in the multidisciplinary management of both OR and OP metastases from kidney cancer.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has gained increasing interest in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), although its effectiveness has not been defined in randomized trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicity between SBRT and CFRT in LAPC. Methods: This analysis was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251128943). MEDLINE and Scopus were searched for comparative studies published between January 2015 and July 2025. Five retrospective studies comprising 768 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while risk ratios (RRs) were estimated for severe (grade ≥ 3) acute toxicity using random-effects models. Study quality was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: No significant OS or PFS differences were observed between SBRT and CFRT. SBRT was associated with a lower incidence of severe acute toxicity. The overall risk of bias across studies was moderate. Conclusions: SBRT appears to achieve survival outcomes comparable to CFRT with a favorable acute toxicity profile in patients with LAPC. Nevertheless, the current evidence is limited by retrospective designs and heterogeneity, highlighting the need for prospective randomized trials to define the role of SBRT in this setting.

Background: The optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for prostate cancer (PCa) in patients aged ≥75 years (mild-old and oldest-old) are still contentious. Resource allocation and ideal treatment for older patients are challenges, mainly due to their comorbidities and reduced life expectancy. This survey aims to assess current clinical practices and the experiences of healthcare providers in the diagnosis and management of elderly patients with PCa. Materials and Methods: In Northeast Italy, members of the Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord-Est (GUONE) conducted a survey involving 104 physicians of different specialties (Nuclear Medicine, Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Radiology, Urology) between 1 November 2024 and 30 November 2024. The survey encompassed 51 questions, evaluating various diagnostic and therapeutic scenarios. Results: Digital rectal exam (DRE) was recommended by 35.9% of physicians for patients aged 75 or older at risk of PCa. PSA testing was continued in 76.3% of these patients. For 36.5% of the physicians, there should be no age limit for prostate biopsy. Moreover, 42.6% of physicians recommended a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate biopsy regardless of age. A prostate biopsy was deemed mandatory before initiating any form of hormonal therapy by 57.7% of the participants. For 22.3% and 34.7% of physicians, there should be no age limit for prostate MRI and PET/CT for staging purposes. Interestingly, PET/CT was not recommended in 52% of cases as a staging tool for patients older than 85 years. For patients without comorbidities, the age limit to consider radical prostatectomy (RP) was 75, with 58.6% of physicians in favor. There were no definitive limits for radiotherapy (RT). Chemotherapy had an age limit for 81.6% of the respondents; for 18.4%, 22.5%, and 26.5% of physicians, age limits were 75, 80, and 85 years, respectively. The use of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) had no definitive age limits for 46.5% of respondents. For patients with no comorbidities and low-volume metastatic PCa, the preferred option was androgen deprivation therapy + ARPIs + RT. The follow-up schedule after RP or RT exhibited heterogeneity with no consensus regarding the frequency of PSA testing or the age at which it should be discontinued. Conclusions: This survey highlights the need for consensus guidelines in diagnosing and managing mild-old and oldest-old elderly PCa patients. With the aging population, standardized protocols are essential to ensure optimal care.

Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men, for which Radiotherapy (RT) is used as a radical or post-surgical treatment. Actinic proctitis is one of the most disabling side effects of RT. Intestinal microbiome studies have highlighted the importance of short-chain fatty acids, in particular butyric acid, for their beneficial effects over intestinal epithelial cells. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate if treatment with micro-encapsulated sodium butyrate (MESB) can reduce the incidence of actinic proctitis during RT in prostate cancer patients. Methods: In total, 122 consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated in Radiotherapy Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS Aviano, were enrolled. Patients received MESB (3 tablets/day) from one week before until four weeks after RT. They completed a diary, tracking daily bowel movements, rectal bleeding, abdominal pain, and perceived health status before, at the end, and one month after RT. Results: Although an improvement in symptoms was observed, when comparing interpatient data before RT vs. one month after the end of RT, statistically significant differences emerged only regarding abdominal pain (94.2% vs. 81.6% vs. 81.6%) (McNemar’s test p < 0.002). Conclusions: MESB appears effective in reducing radiation-induced bowel toxicity during RT, minimizing stool changes, incontinence, and abdominal pain. Although patients’ health perception declined at RT completion, it improved after one month, suggesting MESB may support clinical recovery post-treatment.

The aim of the present study was to explore the potential impact of upfront metastases-directed therapy (MDT) in terms of prolongation of castration-sensitive phase in a series of oligorecurrent castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PC) patients. The present article is a multicenter retrospective study. The population of interest was castrate-sensitive oligorecurrent PC, defined as the presence of 1–3 uptakes in non-visceral sites such as bones or nodes detected by means of 18F-Choline PET/CT or 68-Gallium PSMA PET/CT. Primary endpoint was the time to castration resistance. Secondary endpoints were ADT-free survival, local progression-free survival, and overall survival. Eighty-two patients and 118 lesions were analyzed. The median time to castration resistance for the entire population of the study was 49 months (95% CI 43.6–54.4 months). The 1- and 2-year TTCR-free survival rates were 94% and 82%, respectively. At the time of analysis, 52 patients were still in the castration-sensitive phase of the disease. In this cohort of patients, the median ADT-free survival was 20 months (range 3–69 months). On the other hand, during follow-up 30 patients switched to the castration-resistant phase of disease. In this last group of patients, the median ADT-free survival was 20 months (range 4–50 months). After the ADT administration, the median castration-sensitive phase was 29 months (range 5–71 months). Castration resistance generally occurs at a median follow-up of 24–36 months following ADT. In the current study, upfront MDT does not decrease the time from initiation of ADT to castration resistance.

Although high sensitive imaging modalities such as MRI and PSMA PET/CT are becoming available for prostate cancer (PCa), the clinical benefit of an earlier detection of subclinical disease remains yet undetermined. Given these uncertainties, univocal recommendations are often lacking. The present survey was therefore developed by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) to collect the opinion of expert radiation oncologists and delineate a representation of current clinical practice in our country. A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted in Italy by administering an anonymous questionnaire to experienced radiation oncologists, representative of the genitourinary (GU) tumor board at their Institution, using the cloud-based platform SurveyMonkey®. For each question, a consensus was achieved when ≥ 75% of the responders agreed on the same response. Thirty nine AIRO members from different Italian centers who were deemed experts in GU field accessed the proposed survey and completed all sections. Explored topics included staging of organ-confined disease, management of biochemical and local recurrence, imaging in the metastatic setting, imaging following metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), and future considerations. Response rate for single item of the questionnaire ranged between 51.2% and 100%. Expert GU AIRO members agree that advanced molecular and functional imaging are expanding their role in local and distant staging of PCa, as well as in the oncologic management and in the assessment of treatment response. However, many controversial issues still exist on the best timing for a diagnostic evaluation and the most appropriate imaging to aim at this purpose.