Explore the vast range of titles available.

Previous reports have shown favorable performance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems for diagnosing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) compared with endoscopists. However, these findings don’t reflect performance in clinical situations, as endoscopists classify lesions based on both magnified and non-magnified videos, while AI systems often use only a few magnified narrow band imaging (NBI) still images. We evaluated the performance of the AI system in simulated clinical situations. We used 25,048 images from 1433 superficial ESCC and 4746 images from 410 noncancerous esophagi to construct our AI system. For the validation dataset, we took NBI videos of suspected superficial ESCCs. The AI system diagnosis used one magnified still image taken from each video, while 19 endoscopists used whole videos. We used 147 videos and still images including 83 superficial ESCC and 64 non-ESCC lesions. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for the classification of ESCC were, respectively, 80.9% [95% CI 73.6–87.0], 85.5% [76.1–92.3], and 75.0% [62.6–85.0] for the AI system and 69.2% [66.4–72.1], 67.5% [61.4–73.6], and 71.5% [61.9–81.0] for the endoscopists. The AI system correctly classified all ESCCs invading the muscularis mucosa or submucosa and 96.8% of lesions ≥ 20 mm, whereas even the experts diagnosed some of them as non-ESCCs. Our AI system showed higher accuracy for classifying ESCC and non-ESCC than endoscopists. It may provide valuable diagnostic support to endoscopists.

BackgroundInactivated alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) are related to esophageal carcinogenesis. We aimed to clarify the clinical features associated with the alcohol-degrading enzyme genotypes, ADH1B and ALDH2. We also investigated the risk factors for metachronous esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and head and neck SCC (HNSCC).MethodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective study including patients with ESCC treated by endoscopic resection. Patients were recruited between October 2020 and September 2021. Buccal mucosal swabs were obtained from them to analyze the genetic polymorphisms affecting ADH (ADH1B) and ALDH (ALDH2) activity. Patients were categorized into three groups: both inactivated = double-inactivated group; inactivated ADH1B or ALDH2 = single-inactivated group; and both activated = activated group.ResultsAmong the 297 enrolled patients, patients in the double-inactivated group were significantly younger (P < 0.001) and 60% of them were ≤ 50 years old. This group also had more ESCCs located in the upper esophagus (P < 0.001) and more simultaneous multiple ESCCs (P = 0.044). More than half of the patients had multiple Lugol-voiding lesions (LVLs) (P < 0.001) and heavy alcohol consumers (P = 0.012). Metachronous ESCC and HNSCC were more common in the double-inactivated group (P < 0.001, P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified located in the upper esophagus, multiple LVLs and history of HNSCC as risk factors for metachronous ESCC.ConclusionsActivation patterns of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes were related to age at ESCC onset, lesion location, and metachronous ESCC and HNSCC. Different approaches to the prophylaxis and treatment of esophageal cancer should be considered, depending on the enzyme activity pattern.

Endoscopic resection (ER) is the mainstay of treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) instead of esophagectomy because of its minimal invasiveness and favorable clinical outcomes. Developments in endoscopic submucosal dissection have enabled en bloc resection of SESCCs regardless of size, thus reducing the risk of local recurrence. Although ER for SESCC is effective, metastasis may subsequently occur. Additionally, extensive esophageal ER confers a risk of postoperative esophageal stricture. Therefore, accurate assessment of the invasion depth and circumferential extent of SESCCs is important in determining the indications for ER. Diagnostic accuracies for SESCC invasion differ between epithelial (EP)/lamina propria (LPM), muscularis mucosa (MM)/submucosal (SM1), and SM2 cancers. ER is strongly indicated for clinically diagnosed (c)EP/LPM cancers because 90% of these are as pathologically diagnosed (p)EP/LPM, which has a very low risk of metastasis. Remarkably, the diagnostic accuracy for cMM/SM1 differs significantly with lateral spread of cancer. Eighty percent of cMM/SM1 cancers with ≤3/4 circumferential spread prove to be pEP/LPM or pMM/SM1, which have very low or low risk of metastasis. Thus, these are adequate candidates for ER. However, given the relatively low proportion of pEP/LPM or pMM/SM1 and high risk of subsequent stricture, ER is not recommended for whole circumferential cMM/SM1 cancers. For cMM/SM1 cancers that involve >3/4 but not the whole circumference, ER should be considered on a lesion-by-lesion basis because the risk of post-ER stricture is not very high, but the proportion of pEP/LPM or pMM/SM1 is relatively low. ER is contraindicated for cSM2 cancers because 75% of them are pSM2, which has high risk of metastasis.

The association between severe adverse events (SAEs) and prior radiotherapy or stent type remains controversial. Patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junctional cancer who underwent stent placement (2005–2019) were enrolled in this retrospective study conducted at a tertiary cancer institute in Japan. The exclusion criteria were follow-up period of < 1 month and insufficient data on stent type or cancer characteristics. We used Mann–Whitney’s U test for quantitative data and Fisher’s exact test for categorical data. Multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression model. 107 stents were placed. Low radial-force stents (L group) were used in 51 procedures and high radial-force stents (H group) in 56 procedures. SAEs developed after nine procedures, the median interval from stent placement being 6 days (range, 1–141 days). SAEs occurred more frequently in the H (14%: 8/56) than in the L group (2%: 1/51) (P = 0.03). In patients who had undergone prior radiotherapy, SAEs were more frequent in the H (36%: 4/11) than in the L group (0%: 0/13) (P = 0.03). Re-obstruction and migration occurred after 16 and three procedures, respectively; these rates did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.59, P = 1, respectively). Low radial-force stents may reduce the risk of SAEs after esophageal stenting.

The rare incidence of submucosal invasive non-ampullary duodenal carcinoma has led to scant information in literature; therefore, we compared the clinicopathological features between submucosal invasive carcinoma (SM-Ca), mucosal carcinoma (M-Ca), and advanced carcinoma (Ad-Ca). We retrospectively analyzed 165 patients with sporadic non-ampullary duodenal carcinomas (SNADCs) from four institutions between January 2003 and December 2018. The SNADCs were divided to three groups according to histological diagnosis: SM-Ca, M-Ca, and Ad-Ca. The clinicopathological characteristics and mucin phenotypes were compared between groups. Among the 165 SNADCs, 11 (7%) were classified as SM-Ca, 70 (42%) as M-Ca, and 84 (51%) as Ad-Ca. We found that all SM-Ca (P = 0.013) and most Ad-Ca (P = 0.020) lesions were located on the oral-Vater; however, an almost equal distribution of M-Ca lesions was found between the oral- and anal-Vater. No significant difference was observed between the tumor diameter of M-Ca and SM-Ca; however, 45% (5/11) of SM-Ca were ≤10 mm. A total of 73% (8/11) of SM-Ca were classified as gastric phenotype and no lesions were classified as intestinal phenotype; whereas most M-Ca were classified as intestinal phenotype (67%, 8/12). SM-Ca lesions were all located on the oral-Vater and were highly associated with the gastric mucin phenotype, which were different from the features of most M-Ca.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare type of stomach cancer, classified into well‐differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Gastric NETs (G‐NETs) originate from endocrine progenitor cells in the basal layer of the mucosa, primarily in the setting of chronic atrophic gastritis, such as autoimmune gastritis. They generally exhibit low malignancy and a favorable prognosis. By contrast, gastric NECs (G‐NECs), a rare subtype of gastric cancers, arise from endocrine precursor cell clones that dedifferentiate in the deep portion of pre‐existing differentiated‐type adenocarcinomas. G‐NECs are characterized by rapid growth, frequent lymphovascular invasion, high metastatic potential, and aggressive biological behavior. Most G‐NEC cases are therefore diagnosed at advanced stages, often with lymph node or distant metastases, leading to a poorer prognosis than gastric adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, endoscopic diagnosis of G‐NECs remains challenging because of the low sensitivity of biopsy‐based techniques. While it is well established that G‐NETs and G‐NECs have distinct clinicopathological characteristics, information on their endoscopic features, particularly those observed with magnifying narrow‐band imaging, remains limited. This review aims to summarize the characteristic endoscopic findings of G‐NETs and G‐NECs in relation to their clinicopathological findings.

Objectives The endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G‐NETs) remain unclarified. The present study investigated the endoscopic features of G‐NETs in relation to the clinicopathological findings. Methods This retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients with G‐NETs who received endoscopic or surgical treatment between January 2005 and December 2023. The endoscopic and clinicopathological findings of the lesions were analyzed to provide diagnostic information. Results Among 29 patients, the characteristic endoscopic findings of G‐NETs on white‐light images were reddish color (66%), dilated vessels (83%), submucosal tumor‐like marginal elevation (59%), and central depression (48%). The gross appearance of G‐NETs was classified into two macroscopic subtypes: reddish polypoid lesions (n = 17) and submucosal tumor‐like lesions (n = 9). Magnifying narrow‐band imaging endoscopy revealed an absent microsurface pattern plus an irregular microvascular pattern in all cases of reddish polypoid lesions with central depressions (100%, 9/9). The findings of a reddish polypoid lesion and an absent microsurface pattern plus an irregular microvascular pattern corresponded to the subepithelial NET component close to the non‐neoplastic surface epithelium. Additionally, reddish polypoid lesions were significantly more frequent in type 1 G‐NETs than in type 3 G‐NETs (80% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), while submucosal tumor‐like lesions were significantly more frequent in type 3 G‐NETs than in type 1 G‐NETs (78% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). Conclusions These endoscopic features should increase the index of suspicion and help clinicians to correctly diagnose G‐NETs through the pathological examination of biopsy specimens.

Background The optimal radiation dose for treating non-metastatic superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is unknown. In this retrospective observational study, we investigated the influence of radiation dose and pretreatment endoscopic prediction of tumor invasion depth on local recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods We analyzed 134 patients with clinical Tis–T1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent chemoradiotherapy at our institution between 2006 and 2019. Patients were grouped into standard-dose (50.0–50.4 Gy) and high-dose (60.0 Gy) radiotherapy groups. The outcomes of interest were local recurrence and major local recurrence (endoscopically unresectable local recurrent tumors). Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used with propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to identify predictors of local recurrence and major local recurrence. Results The median follow-up times were 52 and 84 months for the standard-dose and high-dose groups, respectively. The adjusted 3-year local recurrence and major local recurrence rates in the standard-dose and high-dose groups were 33.8 and 9.6% (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.00 [95% confidence interval: 1.64–9.73]; adjusted log-rank p  = 0.001) and 12.5 and 4.7% (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.13 [95% confidence interval: 0.91–10.81]; adjusted log-rank p  = 0.098), respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that standard-dose radiotherapy and endoscopic findings of deep submucosal invasion are independently associated with local recurrence and major local recurrence. Conclusions High-dose radiotherapy is more beneficial for local tumor control than standard-dose radiotherapy in patients with non-metastatic superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The use of high-dose radiotherapy may merit consideration for tumors with deep submucosal invasion.

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and radiotherapy (RT) are treatment options for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but local residual/recurrent cancer after CRT/RT is a major problem. Endoscopic resection (ER) is an effective treatment option for local residual/recurrent cancer. To ensure the efficacy of ER, complete removal of endoscopically visible lesions with cancer-free vertical margins is desired. This study aimed to identify the endoscopic parameters associated with the complete endoscopic removal of local residual/recurrent cancer. In this single-center, retrospective study, we used a prospectively maintained database to identify esophageal lesions that were diagnosed as local residual/recurrent cancer after CRT/RT and treated by ER between January 2012 and December 2019. We evaluated the associations of endoscopic R0 resection with findings on conventional endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). In total, 98 lesions (83 cases) were identified from our database. The rate of endoscopic R0 resection was higher for flat lesions (100% versus 77%, P = 0.00014). EUS was performed for 24 non-flat lesions, and endoscopic R0 resection was achieved for 94% of lesions with an uninterrupted fifth layer. Flat lesions on conventional endoscopy and lesions with an uninterrupted fifth layer on EUS are good candidates for ER.