Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We conducted a multi-center randomized phase II study comparing a sequential HAIC-sorafenib regimen versus sorafenib alone as an initial therapy for HCC. Methods Patients were randomly assigned (ratio, 1:1) to receive sequential HAIC with cisplatin followed by sorafenib (HAIC group, n  = 35) or sorafenib alone (sorafenib group, n  = 33) as an initial therapy. The primary endpoint was the one-year survival rate. Secondary endpoint included overall survival (OS), the 2-year survival rate, the time-to-progression (TTP), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results For the primary endpoint, the one-year survival rates were 46% in the HAIC group and 58% in the sorafenib group. The median OS period was 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.0–18.8) in the HAIC group and 15.2 months (95% CI, 8.2–19.7) in the sorafenib group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.86, P  = 0.78). The median TTP, ORR and DCR in the HAIC group were 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.7–5.5), 14.3, and 45.7%, respectively, while those in the sorafenib group were 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.3–6.8), 9.1, and 45.5%, respectively. No unexpected adverse events related to HAIC or sorafenib were observed in either group. Conclusions Sequential HAIC with cisplatin and sorafenib does not improve the survival benefit, compared with sorafenib alone, when used as an initial therapy for advanced HCC. However, this study was underpowered in regard to its primary and secondary endpoints, so the results should be interpreted with caution. Trial registration UMIN ID 000006147 , registration data: August 11, 2011.

Background Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] B). However, it often leads to a poor prognosis and decreased hepatic function especially in patients with BCLC substage B2. Lenvatinib (LEN) was demonstrated to be efficacious in these patients in the REFLECT phase 3 trial. We therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEN as a first-line treatment for the patients with HCC at BCLC substage B2. Methods This prospective observational study used LEN in TACE-naïve patients with HCC at BCLC substage B2 and preserved hepatic function. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A one-year survival rate threshold of 60% and an expected survival rate of 78%, based on previous reports of TACE, was assumed for setting the sample size. With a one-sided α-type error of 5% and 70% detection power, 25 patients were required over a 2-year enrollment period and 10-month follow-up period. Results Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this study from June 2018 to June 2020. The 1-year survival rate was 71.0% (90% confidence interval, 68.4–73.6%). Median overall and progression-free survival periods were 17.0 and 10.4 months, and the objective response rates according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1 and modified RECIST criteria were 22.6% and 70.0%, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (68%), hypertension (65%), anorexia (61%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (39%), and thrombocytopenia (32%) of any grade; aspartate aminotransferase increased (23%), alanine aminotransferase increased (16%), and grade ≥ 3 proteinuria (13%). Treatment interruption and dose reduction were required in 61% and 81% of patients, respectively. LEN was discontinued in 29 patients due to disease progression ( n  = 17), AEs ( n  = 9), conversion to curative treatments ( n  = 2), and sudden death ( n  = 1), whereas post-LEN treatments were administered in 18 patients, including systemic chemotherapy ( n  = 11), TACE ( n  = 6), transarterial infusion ( n  = 1) and clinical trial ( n  = 1). Conclusions The results suggest that LEN provides treatment benefits as an initial therapeutic in patients with BCLC substage B2 HCC with a safety profile comparable to that previously reported.

BackgroundA new device with metallic wires for scrape cytology was developed.AimsTo compare the diagnostic performance of scrape cytology and conventional cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary strictures.MethodsA total of 420 cases with biliary stricture underwent transpapillary bile cytology. Among them, there are 79 cases with scrape cytology using the new device (scrape group) and 341 cases with conventional cytology (control group). Seventy-two and 174 cases underwent biliary biopsy at the same time as bile cytology in the scrape and control group, respectively.ResultsThe sensitivity for malignancy of bile cytology in the scrape and control group was 41.2% [pancreatic cancer (PC): 23.1%, biliary cancer (BC): 52.5%] and 27.1% (PC: 16.3%, BC: 38.0%), respectively (P = 0.023). When analyzed PC and BC, respectively, there was no significant difference between the two groups. In the both groups, the sensitivity was significantly higher for BC than PC. In the scrape group, there was no difference in the sensitivity between cytology and biopsy [39.7% (PC: 17.4%, BC: 55.3%)], but in the control group, a significantly lower sensitivity was observed with cytology than biopsy (36.4% (PC: 19.7%, BC: 50.0%)) (P = 0.046). When analyzed PC and BC, respectively, there was no significant difference between cytology and biopsy. The sensitivity of combined cytology and biopsy was 55.6% (PC: 30.4%, BC: 71.1%) in the scrape group and 47.0% (PC: 24.6%, BC: 64.3%) in the control group.ConclusionScrape bile cytology for biliary strictures may be superior to conventional cytology.

Objectives To identify patients suitable for endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) by evaluating their portal hemodynamics and liver function. Methods We selected 58 patients with esophagogastric varices (EGV) and liver cirrhosis (LC) related to either hepatitis C virus (C) (n = 19), hepatitis B virus (n = 2), alcohol (AL) (n = 20), C + AL (n = 6), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (n = 6), others (n = 3), or non-LC (n = 2). All patients underwent EIS. We measured their portal venous tissue blood flow (PVTBF) and hepatic arterial tissue blood flow (HATBF) using xenon computed tomography before and after EIS. We classified them into increased group and decreased group according to the PVTBF to identify the predictors that contribute to PVTBF increase post-EIS. Results Low value of indocyanine green retention at 15 min (ICG-R 15 ), the absence of paraesophageal veins, and low baseline PVTBF/HATBF (P/A) ratio predicted increased PVTBF in the multivariate logistic analysis (odds ratio (OR) 10.46, p  = 0.0391; OR 12.45, p  = 0.0088; OR 13.57, p  = 0.0073). The protein synthetic ability improved 1 year post-EIS in increased group. Cox proportional hazards regression identified alcohol drinking (hazard ratio; 3.67, p  = 0.0261) as an independent predictor of EGV recurrence. Conclusions Patients with low ICG-R 15 , low P/A ratio, and the absence of paraesophageal veins were probable predictors of PVTBF improvement post-EIS. In addition, the improvement of hepatic hemodynamics likely enhanced liver function following EIS.

Background Recent improvements in stone extraction implements and apparatus have lessened the complexity of the endoscopic bile duct stone treatment. However, despite confirmation of complete removal, cases of residual stones have been reported, which can result in recurrent biliary symptoms, cholangitis, and pancreatitis and considerably increase cost given the need for repeat imaging and/or procedures. To date, risk factors for residual bile duct stones following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) extraction have not been thoroughly evaluated. This study retrospectively investigated the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones following extraction via ERCP. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all ERCP cases that underwent endoscopic bile duct stone extraction between April 2014 and March 2019. A total of 505 patients were enrolled and evaluated for the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones after ERCP. Results The rate of residual stones was 4.8% (24/505). Residual stones were detected by computed tomography (12/24) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (12/24). In univariate analyses, a large number of stones ( P  = 0.01), long procedure time ( P  = 0.005), and performance of the pancreatic duct guidewire placement method (P-GW) for selective bile duct cannulation (P = 0.01) were the factors involved in residual stones. In multiple logistic regression analysis, performing P-GW was retained as the only independent factor of residual stones (adjusted odds ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.19–9.88; P  = 0.02). Conclusions When removing bile duct stones with a pancreatic guidewire in place, paying attention to residual stones is necessary.

Introduction Effective noninvasive tests that can distinguish early-stage nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) from simple steatosis (SS) have long been sought. Our aim was to determine the possibility of noninvasively distinguishing early-stage NASH from SS. Materials and methods We used Fick’s principle and the Kety–Schmidt equation to determine the hepatic tissue blood flow (TBF) in 65 NASH patients who underwent xenon computed tomography (Xe-CT). We calculated the lambda value (LV), i.e., Xe gas solubility coefficient, in liver and blood. We assessed the histological severity of fatty changes and fibrosis on the basis of Brunt’s classification. Liver biopsy revealed SS in 9 patients and NASH in 56 patients. NASH stages 1 and 2 were classified as early-stage NASH (Ea-NASH; 38 patients) and stages 3 and 4 as advanced-stage NASH (Ad-NASH; 18 patients). We evaluated the differences in LV and TBF among the 3 groups. Results LV was significantly lower in the Ad-NASH group than in the SS and Ea-NASH groups. Portal venous TBF (PVTBF) was significantly lower in the Ea-NASH group than in the SS group, and PVTBF was lower in the Ad-NASH group than in the Ea-NASH group. Total hepatic TBF (THTBF) was significantly different between the SS and Ea-NASH groups and between the SS and Ad-NASH groups. Conclusions In conclusion, measurements of TBF and LV are useful for evaluating the pathophysiological progression of NASH. In addition, these measurements can facilitate the differential diagnosis of SS and Ea-NASH, which may not be distinguishable by other means.

Decreased hemoglobin (Hb) level has been supposed to be a relatively rare side effect of a combination therapy against hepatitis C virus that consists of the NS5A inhibitor daclatasvir (DCV) and the NS3/4A protease inhibitor asunaprevir (ASV). The study was conducted in 75 patients with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C virus infection who had started combination therapy with DCV and ASV at St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital between September 2014 and December 2014. Among the patients examined, decreased Hb level by ≥1.5 g/dL from the values at treatment initiation was observed in 11 individuals. This was accompanied by decreased mean corpuscular volume, and iron and ferritin levels. These findings suggest that the mechanism of the phenomenon is caused by iron deficiency. The underlying mechanism and clinical impacts will need to be further examined.

Background and Aim The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with liver‐related and non‐liver‐related mortality of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) after sustained virologic response (SVR) to direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Methods We conducted a retrospective, single‐center cohort study of HCV patients cured by DAAs. Results A total of 330 patients with SVR to DAAs were eligible. The median follow‐up period was 3.38 years (inter‐quartile range: 2.03–4.58). The cumulative liver‐related or non‐liver‐related mortality rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.00 or 1.29%, 2.87 or 3.60%, and 5.10 or 9.46, respectively. Among the liver‐related deaths, 9 of the 10 were from liver cancer. Among the non‐liver‐related deaths, the most common cause was malignancy. Through multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model, diabetes mellitus (DM, hazard ratio 13.1, 95% confidence interval 2.81–61.3) and a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 12.8, 2.76–59.2), independently predicted liver‐related death. No variables were associated with non‐liver‐related death. Conclusion Our findings suggest that DM and a history of HCC are risk factors for liver‐related mortality of HCV patients cured by DAAs. These results indicate that early management of HCV and HCC surveillance of diabetic patients after SVR are important to increase the chance of survival. Further studies are needed to confirm the association of DM and HCC history with survival. Very few studies have assessed the factors associated with liver‐related mortality in patients with sustained virologic response (SVR) following direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAA) treatment. The findings of our cohort study are that diabetes mellitus and a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are risk factors for the liver‐related mortality of HCV patients cured by DAA. The results indicate that early management of HCV and HCC surveillance of diabetic patients after SVR are important to increase the chance of survival.

Background Oxaliplatin is a key drug for the chemotherapy of colorectal cancer; however, it is also known to cause non‐cirrhotic portal hypertension. We aimed to identify the characteristics of patients who developed esophagogastric varices (EGVs) after treatment with oxaliplatin. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed patients with colorectal cancer who were treated with chemotherapy including oxaliplatin between 2010 and 2016. All patients were evaluated by contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CE‐CT) every 3 months both during and after treatment; and endoscopy was performed when appearance of portal hypertension was suspected. Results A total of 106 patients were divided into two groups: EGV formation (n = 6) and EGV non‐formation (n = 100). In the EGV group, platelet counts decreased and the size of the spleen calculated by CT (CT spleen index; CT‐SI) increased markedly. The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the change in platelet counts was 0.81 (80% sensitivity and 83% specificity) at 3 months post treatment, and the maximum AUC for CT‐SI was 0.89 (79% sensitivity and 83% specificity) at 6 months post treatment. Conclusions EGV formation could be predicted by the assessment of platelet counts and spleen size. If progressive splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia are observed not only during but also after completion of the oxaliplatin‐containing chemotherapy, EGVs should be confirmed by endoscopy for avoiding subsequent rupture. We aimed to identify the characteristics of patients who developed esophagogastric varices (EGV) after treatment with oxaliplatin. If progressive splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia are observed not only during but also after completion of the oxaliplatin‐containing chemotherapy, EGV should be confirmed by endoscopy for avoiding subsequent rupture.

Aims There is a paucity of comparative data on the use of sorafenib and lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. We assessed the real‐world treatment outcomes between using sorafenib and lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the multiple molecular‐targeted therapy era. Methods and Results We enrolled 386 patients treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib as the first‐line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma at multiple centers. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in baseline and tumor characteristics between the two groups. Propensity score matching identified 110 patients in each treatment group. The median overall survival was similar between lenvatinib and sorafenib (14.8 and 13.0 months, respectively; P = 0.352). The median progression‐free survival was longer with lenvatinib than with sorafenib (7.6 and 3.9 months, respectively; P < 0.001). The overall response rate (P < 0.001) and disease control rate (P = 0.015), as defined by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, were significantly better with lenvatinib than with sorafenib. The median overall survival was longer in patients who received subsequent treatment than in those who did not in the sorafenib group (23.1 and 5.7 months, respectively; P < 0.001), whereas the median overall survival with or without subsequent treatment did not differ significantly in the lenvatinib group (17.8 and 14.7 months, respectively; P = 0.439). Conclusion Overall survival with sorafenib and lenvatinib was not significantly different. However, patients who received subsequent treatments had longer overall survival than those who received only first‐line treatment with sorafenib, whereas lenvatinib did not show this effect. This study compares the outcomes of sorafenib and lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma using propensity score matching. Overall survival with sorafenib and lenvatinib was not significantly different. However, patients who received subsequent treatments had longer overall survival than those who received only first‐line treatment with sorafenib, whereas lenvatinib did not show this effect.