Explore the vast range of titles available.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy shares clinical features with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, a disorder associated with mutations in more than 40 genes. This study shows that mutations in some of these genes, notably TTN, also have a strong association with this condition. Peripartum cardiomyopathy is marked by the development of maternal systolic heart failure late in pregnancy or early in the postpartum period. 1 , 2 The incidence varies from 1 in 100 to 1 in 300 in geographic hot spots, including Nigeria and Haiti, to 1 in 1000 to 1 in 4000 in Europe and the United States. The strongest known risk factors are the presence of preeclampsia, twin gestation, and advanced maternal age. Among patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy, heart failure can resolve but often does not: rates of death of 5 to 10% are common, and 4% of cardiac transplantations in the . . .

Background International guidelines for variant interpretation in Mendelian disease set stringent criteria to report a variant as (likely) pathogenic, prioritising control of false-positive rate over test sensitivity and diagnostic yield. Genetic testing is also more likely informative in individuals with well-characterised variants from extensively studied European-ancestry populations. Inherited cardiomyopathies are relatively common Mendelian diseases that allow empirical calibration and assessment of this framework. Methods We compared rare variants in large hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cohorts (up to 6179 cases) to reference populations to identify variant classes with high prior likelihoods of pathogenicity, as defined by etiological fraction (EF). We analysed the distribution of variants using a bespoke unsupervised clustering algorithm to identify gene regions in which variants are significantly clustered in cases. Results Analysis of variant distribution identified regions in which variants are significantly enriched in cases and variant location was a better discriminator of pathogenicity than generic computational functional prediction algorithms. Non-truncating variant classes with an EF ≥ 0.95 were identified in five established HCM genes. Applying this approach leads to an estimated 14–20% increase in cases with actionable HCM variants, i.e. variants classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic that might be used for predictive testing in probands’ relatives. Conclusions When found in a patient confirmed to have disease, novel variants in some genes and regions are empirically shown to have a sufficiently high probability of pathogenicity to support a “likely pathogenic” classification, even without additional segregation or functional data. This could increase the yield of high confidence actionable variants, consistent with the framework and recommendations of current guidelines. The techniques outlined offer a consistent and unbiased approach to variant interpretation for Mendelian disease genetic testing. We propose adaptations to ACMG/AMP guidelines to incorporate such evidence in a quantitative and transparent manner.

Accurate discrimination of benign and pathogenic rare variation remains a priority for clinical genome interpretation. State-of-the-art machine learning variant prioritization tools are imprecise and ignore important parameters defining gene–disease relationships, e.g., distinct consequences of gain-of-function versus loss-of-function variants. We hypothesized that incorporating disease-specific information would improve tool performance. We developed a disease-specific variant classifier, CardioBoost, that estimates the probability of pathogenicity for rare missense variants in inherited cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias. We assessed CardioBoost’s ability to discriminate known pathogenic from benign variants, prioritize disease-associated variants, and stratify patient outcomes. CardioBoost has high global discrimination accuracy (precision recall area under the curve [AUC] 0.91 for cardiomyopathies; 0.96 for arrhythmias), outperforming existing tools (4–24% improvement). CardioBoost obtains excellent accuracy (cardiomyopathies 90.2%; arrhythmias 91.9%) for variants classified with >90% confidence, and increases the proportion of variants classified with high confidence more than twofold compared with existing tools. Variants classified as disease-causing are associated with both disease status and clinical severity, including a 21% increased risk (95% confidence interval [CI] 11–29%) of severe adverse outcomes by age 60 in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A disease-specific variant classifier outperforms state-of-the-art genome-wide tools for rare missense variants in inherited cardiac conditions (https://www.cardiodb.org/cardioboost/), highlighting broad opportunities for improved pathogenicity prediction through disease specificity.

Deep nucleotide sequencing enables the unbiased, broad-spectrum detection of viruses in clinical samples without requiring an a priori hypothesis for the source of infection. However, its use in clinical research applications is limited by low cost-effectiveness given that most of the sequencing information from clinical samples is related to the human genome, which renders the analysis of viral genomes challenging. To overcome this limitation we developed ViroFind, an in-solution target-enrichment platform for virus detection and discovery in clinical samples. ViroFind comprises 165,433 viral probes that cover the genomes of 535 selected DNA and RNA viruses that infect humans or could cause zoonosis. The ViroFind probes are used in a hybridization reaction to enrich viral sequences and therefore enhance the detection of viral genomes via deep sequencing. We used ViroFind to detect and analyze all viral populations in the brain of 5 patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and of 18 control subjects with no known neurological disease. Compared to direct deep sequencing, by using ViroFind we enriched viral sequences present in the clinical samples up to 127-fold. We discovered highly complex polyoma virus JC populations in the PML brain samples with a remarkable degree of genetic divergence among the JC virus variants of each PML brain sample. Specifically for the viral capsid protein VP1 gene, we identified 24 single nucleotide substitutions, 12 of which were associated with amino acid changes. The most frequent (4 of 5 samples, 80%) amino acid change was D66H, which is associated with enhanced tissue tropism, and hence likely a viral fitness advantage, compared to other variants. Lastly, we also detected sparse JC virus sequences in 10 of 18 (55.5%) of control samples and sparse human herpes virus 6B (HHV6B) sequences in the brain of 11 of 18 (61.1%) control subjects. In sum, ViroFind enabled the in-depth analysis of all viral genomes in PML and control brain samples and allowed us to demonstrate a high degree of JC virus genetic divergence in vivo that has been previously underappreciated. ViroFind can be used to investigate the structure of the virome with unprecedented depth in health and disease state.

IntroductionDilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is genetically heterogeneous, with >100 purported disease genes tested in clinical laboratories. However, many genes were originally identified based on candidate-gene studies that did not adequately account for background population variation. Here we define the frequency of rare variation in 2538 DCM patients across protein-coding regions of 56 commonly tested genes and compare this to both 912 confirmed healthy controls and a reference population of 60,706 individuals in order to identify clinically interpretable genes robustly associated with dominant monogenic DCM.MethodsWe used the TruSight Cardio sequencing panel to evaluate the burden of rare variants in 56 putative DCM genes in 1040 DCM patients and 912 healthy volunteers processed with identical sequencing and bioinformatics pipelines. We further aggregated data from 1498 DCM patients sequenced in diagnostic laboratories and the ExAC database for replication and meta-analysis.ResultsSpecific variant classes in TTN, DSP, MYH7 and LMNA were associated with DCM in all comparisons. Variants in BAG3, TNNT2, TPM1, NEXN and VCL were significantly enriched specific patient subsets, with the last 3 genes likely contributing primarily to early-onset forms of DCM. Overall, rare variants in these 9 genes potentially explained 19–26% of cases. Whilst the absence of a significant excess in other genes cannot preclude a role in disease, such genes have limited diagnostic value since novel variants will be uninterpretable and therefore non-actionable, and their diagnostic yield is minimal.ConclusionIn the largest sequenced DCM cohort yet described, we observe robust disease association with 9 genes, highlighting their importance in DCM and translating into high interpretability in diagnostic testing. The other genes evaluated have limited value in diagnostic testing in DCM. This data will contribute to community gene curation efforts, and will reduce erroneous and inconclusive findings in diagnostic testing.Conflict of InterestNone

Distinguishing pathogenic variants from those that are rare but benign remains a key challenge in clinical genetics, especially for variants not previously observed and characterised in humans. In vitro and in vivo functional characterisation are typically resource intensive, and model systems may not accurately predict influence on human disease. Many in silico tools have been developed to predict which variants are disease-causing, but typically lack precision. Here we demonstrate the applicability of a framework, called Paralogue Annotation, that draws on information from previously-characterised variants in homologous proteins to predict whether variants in a gene of interest are likely disease causing. We assessed the performance of Paralogue Annotation through three orthogonal approaches: (1) comparison to established in silico variant prediction tools using 47,360 missense variants from ClinVar across 3,524 genes representing a broad range of diverse protein classes, by calculating precision and sensitivity; (2) evaluation against large-scale functional assays of variant effect in TP53 and PPARG; and (3) comparing odd ratios calculated from case-control association tests for inherited cardiac arrhythmia syndromes, and neurodevelopmental disorders with epilepsy, stratifying variants by Paralogue Annotation. Paralogue Annotation correctly annotates 4,328 ClinVar pathogenic variants, with 245 false positives, yielding a precision of 0.95. This increases to 0.99 with more stringent annotation parameters (requiring greater conservation of amino acids between annotated orthologues) at the expense of sensitivity. Compared to established tools, Paralogue Annotation has higher precision for identification of pathogenic variants, albeit with lower sensitivity across diverse test sets. Extending the technique by transferring annotations between homologous protein domains, rather than full-length protein paralogues, increases sensitivity. Rare variants predicted pathogenic by Paralogue Annotation were more strongly disease-associated (increased odds ratio) than unstratified rare variants for six out of eight genes tested with case-control cohort approaches. Paralogue Annotation has high precision for detection of pathogenic missense variants, outperforming in silico methods where data are available to make a prediction. As the number of characterised variants increases in reference datasets such as ClinVar, Paralogue Annotation will further increase in sensitivity and applicability.

Background: Accurate discrimination of benign and pathogenic rare variation remains a priority for clinical genome interpretation. State-of-the-art machine learning tools are useful for genome-wide variant prioritisation but remain imprecise. Since the relationship between molecular consequence and likelihood of pathogenicity varies between genes with distinct molecular mechanisms, we hypothesised that a disease-specific classifier may outperform existing genome-wide tools. Methods: We present a novel disease-specific variant classification tool, CardioBoost, that estimates the probability of pathogenicity for rare missense variants in inherited cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias, trained with variants of known clinical effect. To benchmark against state-of-the-art genome-wide pathogenicity classification tools, we assessed classification of hold-out test variants using both overall performance metrics, and metrics of high-confidence (>90%) classifications relevant to variant interpretation. We further evaluated the prioritisation of variants associated with disease and patient clinical outcomes, providing validations that are robust to potential mis-classification in gold-standard reference datasets. Results: CardioBoost has higher discriminating power than published genome-wide variant classification tools in distinguishing between pathogenic and benign variants based on overall classification performance measures with the highest area under the Precision-Recall Curve as 91% for cardiomyopathies and as 96% for inherited arrhythmias. When assessed at high-confidence (>90%) classification thresholds, prediction accuracy is improved by at least 120% over existing tools for both cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias, with significantly improved sensitivity and specificity. Finally, CardioBoost improves prioritisation of variants significantly associated with disease, and stratifies survival of patients with cardiomyopathies, confirming biologically relevant variant classification. Conclusions: We demonstrate that a disease-specific variant pathogenicity prediction tool outperforms state-of-the-art genome-wide tools for the classification of rare missense variants of uncertain significance for inherited cardiac conditions. To facilitate evaluation of CardioBoost, we provide pre-computed pathogenicity scores for all possible rare missense variants in genes associated with cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias (https://www.cardiodb.org/cardioboost/). Our results also highlight the need to develop and evaluate variant classification tools focused on specific diseases and clinical application contexts. Our proposed model for assessing variants in known disease genes, and the use of application-specific evaluations, is broadly applicable to improve variant interpretation across a wide range of Mendelian diseases.

Background: International guidelines for variant interpretation in Mendelian disease set stringent criteria to report a variant as (likely) pathogenic, prioritising control of false positive rate over test sensitivity and diagnostic yield. Genetic testing is also more likely informative in individuals with well-characterised variants from extensively studied European-ancestry populations. Inherited cardiomyopathies are relatively common Mendelian diseases that allow empirical calibration and assessment of this framework. Results: We compared rare variants in large hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cohorts to reference populations to identify variant classes with high prior likelihoods of pathogenicity, as defined by etiological fraction (EF). Analysis of variant distribution identified regions in which variants are significantly enriched in cases and variant location was a better discriminator of pathogenicity than generic computational functional prediction algorithms. Non-truncating variant classes with an EF>0.95, and therefore clinically actionable, were identified in 5 established HCM genes. Applying this approach leads to an estimated 14-20% increase in cases with actionable HCM variants. Conclusions: When found in a patient confirmed to have disease, novel variants in some genes and regions are empirically shown to have a sufficiently high probability of pathogenicity to support a \"likely pathogenic\" classification, even without additional segregation or functional data. This could increase the yield of high confidence actionable variants, consistent with the framework and recommendations of current guidelines. The techniques outlined offer a consistent, unbiased and equitable approach to variant interpretation for Mendelian disease genetic testing. We propose adaptations to ACMG/AMP guidelines to incorporate such evidence in a quantitative and transparent manner.