Explore the vast range of titles available.

Health literacy is the extent to which patients are able to understand and act upon health information. This concept is important for surgeons as their patients have to comprehend the nature, risks and benefits of surgical procedures, adhere to perioperative instructions, and make complex care decisions about interventions. Our review aimed to determine the prevalence of limited health literacy of the surgical patient population. A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed from inception until January 14th 2017 for experimental and observational studies reporting surgical patients’ health literacy measurement. Overall pooled proportion of surgical patients with limited health literacy was calculated using a random-effects model and methodologic quality was assessed. A total of 40 studies representing 18,895 surgical patients were included in our quantitative synthesis. Pooled estimate of limited health literacy was 31.7% (95%CI 24.7–39.2%, I 2 99.0%). There was low risk of bias among the majority of the 51 studies included in the qualitative synthesis. Statistical heterogeneity could not be fully accounted for by methodologic quality or patient and surgical characteristics. However, some of the heterogeneity was accounted by measurement tool [combined proportions with the REALM and NVS of 35.6 (95%CI 31.5–39.9, I 2 73.0%)]. A number of different health literacy measurement tools were used (19 overall). Our review demonstrates a high prevalence of limited health literacy among surgical patients with considerable heterogeneity. Our findings suggest the importance of recognizing and addressing surgical patients with limited health literacy and the need for standardization in measurement tools.

Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common cause of pain, weakness, sensory loss, and activity limitations. Currently, the most common initial treatment is use of a rigid splint immobilizing the wrist, usually during night-time, for several weeks. Evidence regarding the efficacy and effect durability of wrist splinting is weak. The treatment is associated with costs and may cause discomfort and limit daily and work activities. No placebo-controlled trials have been performed. Methods This is a randomized controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of a rigid wrist splint compared with soft wrist bandage (placebo) in patients with primary idiopathic CTS. The trial will be conducted at an orthopedic department. Patients, 25 to 65 years old, who seek primary health-care with symptoms of CTS will be screened, and potentially eligible patients will be referred to the study center. Patients who fulfill the trial’s eligibility criteria will be invited to participate. A total of 112 patients who provide informed consent will be randomly assigned to treatment with either a rigid wrist splint or a soft bandage to be used initially for 6 weeks at night and, if possible, during the day. The splints and bandages will be fitted with a temperature-monitoring device to measure the total time during which they have actually been worn. The trial participants will complete a questionnaire that includes the 6-item CTS symptoms scale (CTS-6); the 11-item disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand ( Quick DASH) scale; and the EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) health status and quality-of-life measure at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after treatment start. The participants will undergo physical examination and nerve conduction testing at baseline and at 52 weeks. The trial’s primary outcomes are the change in the CTS-6 score from baseline to 12 weeks and the rate of carpal tunnel release surgery at 52 weeks. Discussion This is the first placebo-controlled randomized trial with electronic monitoring of actual splint use and will provide evidence regarding the efficacy of wrist splinting in patients with CTS. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN81836603 . Registered on May 5, 2018.

Rates of surgical management of distal radius fractures are increasing internationally despite the higher cost and limited outcome evidence to support this shift. This study examines the epidemiology of distal radius fractures and asks if the same shift has occurred in Ontario, Canada (population 13.9 million). This population-based, retrospective cohort study examined distal radius fractures in people aged 18 years and older over a 10-year period (2004–2013). The incidence analyses were based on the first occurrence of a fracture within a 2-year time period. The number of fractures, age-adjusted incidence rates and frequency of fracture treatment type by year were assessed. We used a Poisson regression with robust standard errors to determine if there was a statistically significant change in the frequency of fracture treatment type over time. There were 25 355 distal radius fractures among Ontarians 18 years of age and older in 2013. Between 2004 and 2013, the age-adjusted incidence rate for people 35 years of age and older was stable, between 2.32 and 2.70 per 1000 population. Rates of cast immobilization remained stable between 82% and 84%. Of those patients treated surgically, the rate of open reduction and internal fixation rose from 7% in 2004 to 13% in 2013 at the expense of other types of surgical management. In Ontario, rates of cast immobilization are stable and there has been a movement toward open reduction and internal fixation among patients treated surgically. Le taux de prise en charge chirurgicale des fractures du radius distal augmente partout dans le monde, malgré le coût supérieur de l’intervention et le manque de données probantes sur les issues. Cette étude se penche sur l’épidémiologie des fractures du radius distal et cherche à savoir si cette augmentation se reflète en Ontario, au Canada (population: 13,9 millions). Cette étude de cohorte rétrospective basée sur la population examinait les fractures du radius distal chez les personnes âgées de 18 ans et plus sur une période de 10 ans (de 2004 à 2013). Les analyses de l’incidence étaient fondées sur la première occurrence de fracture en 2 ans. Le nombre de fractures, le taux d’incidence ajusté en fonction de l’âge et la fréquence annuelle des types de traitement des fractures ont été évalués. Nous avons utilisé une régression de Poisson avec des erreurs types robustes pour déterminer s’il y avait des changements statistiquement significatifs dans la fréquence des types de traitement des fractures au fil du temps. Il y a eu 25 355 fractures du radius distal chez les Ontariens de 18 ans et plus en 2013. Entre 2004 et 2013, le taux d’incidence ajusté en fonction de l’âge pour les personnes de 35 ans et plus était stable, entre 2,32 et 2,70 pour 1000 personnes. Le taux d’immobilisation plâtrée est demeuré stable entre 82 % et 84 %. Chez les patients traités par chirurgie, le taux de réduction chirurgicale et de fixation interne est passé de 7 % en 2004 à 13 % en 2013, au détriment des autres types de prise en charge chirurgicale. En Ontario, le taux d’immobilisation plâtrée est demeuré stable et il y a eu une augmentation de la réduction chirurgicale et de la fixation interne chez les patients traités par chirurgie.

Decisional conflict represents a state of uncertainty regarding an action one must take. It is a concept inherent to shared decision-making and can help promote high-quality and patient-centred decisions in surgical care, leading to better outcomes. Specific elements may cause more uncertainty or decisional conflict for patients: lack of knowledge about risks and benefits, poorly defined personal values about the importance of those risks and benefits, perception of a lack of support, unpredictable outcomes, or the impression that an inadequate decision has been made. Decisional conflict can be measured in the surgical setting using the 16-item validated patient-reported Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Better understanding of the reasons behind high decisional conflict can help surgeons support high-quality decisions and lead to more satisfactory outcomes and less decisional regret.

Decisional confict represents a state of uncertainty regarding an action one must take. It is a concept inherent to shared decision-making and can help promote high-quality and patient-centred decisions in surgical care, leading to better outcomes. Specific elements may cause more uncertainty or decisional confict for patients: lack of knowledge about risks and benefits, poorly defined personal values about the importance of those risks and benefits, perception of a lack of support, unpredictable outcomes, or the impression that an inadequate decision has been made. Decisional confict can be measured in the surgical setting using the 16-item validated patient-reported Decisional Confict Scale (DCS). Better understanding of the reasons behind high decisional confict can help surgeons support high-quality decisions and lead to more satisfactory outcomes and less decisional regret.

Decisional conflict represents a state of uncertainty regarding an action one must take. It is a concept inherent to shared decision-making and can help promote high-quality and patient-centred decisions in surgical care, leading to better outcomes. Specific elements may cause more uncertainty or decisional conflict for patients: lack of knowledge about risks and benefits, poorly defined personal values about the importance of those risks and benefits, perception of a lack of support, unpredictable outcomes, or the impression that an inadequate decision has been made. Decisional conflict can be measured in the surgical setting using the 16-item validated patient-reported Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Better understanding of the reasons behind high decisional conflict can help surgeons support high-quality decisions and lead to more satisfactory outcomes and less decisional regret.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate how the ultrasound examination in the carpal tunnel diagnosis could contribute to the clinical and neurophysiological evaluation. This was done by evaluating the cross-sectional area (CSA) and its correlation with symptoms and functionality data assessed by the BTQC questionnaire. Methods: 60 patients were subjected to open CTR for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. The median nerve CSA was assessed both pre-operatively and in follow-up at 4 and 12 weeks. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionanaire (BCTQ) was proposed at the same time. Results: BCTQ score significantly improved after 4 weeks, but there was a less significant increase at 12 weeks for both the BCTQ-S and the BCTQ-F. The 4-week CSA, however, did not appear to have markedly improvement, where as the 12-week CSA turned out to be statistically significant. The correlation between BCTQ and CSA shows that post-surgery, the reduction of CSA of the median nerve is correlated with the symptomatic and functional reduction in patients. Conclusions: The study shows that the symptomatology and the functionality of the hand after surgery for the carpal tunnel resolves quickly. Furthermore, the reduction of the CSA proves to show that the use of ultrasound can help in the evaluation of patients with this state.

Decisional conflict represents a state of uncertainty regarding an action one must take. It is a concept inherent to shared decision-making and can help promote high-quality and patient-centred decisions in surgical care, leading to better outcomes. Specific elements may cause more uncertainty or decisional conflict for patients: lack of knowledge about risks and benefits, poorly defined personal values about the importance of those risks and benefits, perception of a lack of support, unpredictable outcomes, or the impression that an inadequate decision has been made. Decisional conflict can be measured in the surgical setting using the 16-item validated patient-reported Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Better understanding of the reasons behind high decisional conflict can help surgeons support high-quality decisions and lead to more satisfactory outcomes and less decisional regret.