Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Findings from randomized clinical trials may have limited generalizability to patients treated in routine clinical practice. This study examined the effectiveness of first-line palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone on survival outcomes in patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor–negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated in routine clinical practice in the USA. Patients and methods This was a retrospective observational analysis of electronic health records within the Flatiron Health Analytic Database. A total of 1430 patients with ≥ 3 months of follow-up received palbociclib plus letrozole or letrozole alone in the first-line setting between February 3, 2015, and February 28, 2019. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results After sIPTW adjustment, median follow-up was 24.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 14.2–34.9) in the palbociclib group and 23.3 months (IQR, 12.7–34.3) in those taking letrozole alone. Palbociclib combination treatment was associated with significantly longer median rwPFS compared to letrozole alone (20.0 vs 11.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.49–0.69; P  < 0.0001). Median OS was not reached in the palbociclib group and was 43.1 months with letrozole alone (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.82; P  = 0.0002). The 2-year OS rate was 78.3% in the palbociclib group and 68.0% with letrozole alone. A propensity score matching analysis showed similar results. Conclusions In this “real-world” population of patients with HR+/HER2− MBC, palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy was associated with improved survival outcomes compared with patients treated with letrozole alone in the first-line setting. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04176354

Data on real-world effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor combination therapy versus endocrine therapy alone are limited. The Flatiron Health Analytic Database was used to assess overall survival (OS) in patients with hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with first-line palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) versus an AI alone in routine US clinical practice. In total, 2888 patients initiated treatment during February 3, 2015–March 31, 2020, with a potential ≥6-month follow-up (cutoff date, September 30, 2020). After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, median OS (95% CI) is significantly longer among palbociclib versus AI recipients (49.1 [45.2–57.7] versus 43.2 [37.6–48.0] months; hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65–0.87]; P < 0.0001). Progression-free survival (95% CI) is 19.3 (17.5–20.7) versus 13.9 (12.5–15.2) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.62–0.78]; P < 0.0001). These data support first-line palbociclib plus an AI treatment for HR+/HER2− MBC.(Trial number NCT05361655).

Palbociclib (PAL) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) is approved for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2− ) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is limited data on the effectiveness of PAL + ET in patients with MBC and low socioeconomic status. This retrospective study of the Flatiron Health database compared overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) in patients with MBC living in disadvantaged neighborhoods who received either first-line PAL with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or an AI alone. Of 723 patients, 394 received PAL + AI and 329 received AI alone. After stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, median OS was 57.1 months versus 38.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.70, P  = 0.0053) and median rwPFS was 19.1 months versus 14.0 months (hazard ratio, 0.66, P  = 0.0007) for PAL + AI versus AI alone, respectively. This real-world data analysis demonstrated that first-line PAL + AI versus AI alone was associated with survival benefit in patients with HR+/HER2− MBC living in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Trial registration number: NCT06495164.

Purpose Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, approved in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of women and men with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2− ABC). In the phase 2, open-label, PALOMA-1 trial, palbociclib plus letrozole significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus letrozole alone (hazard ratio, 0.488; 95% CI 0.319‒0.748; P  = 0.0004; median PFS, 20.2 vs 10.2 months, respectively) in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/HER2− ABC. Here, we present the final overall survival (OS) and updated safety results. Methods Postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2− ABC were randomized 1:1 to receive either palbociclib (125 mg/day, 3/1 schedule) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/day, continuous) or letrozole alone (2.5 mg/day, continuous). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS; secondary endpoints included OS and safety. Results A total of 165 patients were randomized. At the data cutoff date of December 30, 2016 (median duration of follow-up, 64.7 months), the stratified hazard ratio for OS was 0.897 (95% CI 0.623–1.294; P  = 0.281); median OS in the palbociclib plus letrozole and letrozole alone arms was 37.5 and 34.5 months, respectively. The median time from randomization to first subsequent chemotherapy use was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole than letrozole alone (26.7 and 17.7 months, respectively). The most frequently reported adverse event in the palbociclib plus letrozole arm was neutropenia (any grade, 75%; grade 3 or 4, 59%). Conclusions Palbociclib plus letrozole treatment led to a numerical but not statistically significant improvement in median OS. Pfizer Inc (NCT00721409)

Abstract Background Disparities in survival and clinical outcomes between African American and White patients with breast cancer (BC) are well documented, but African American patients have not been well represented in randomized clinical trials of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Real-world studies can provide evidence for effective treatment strategies for underreported patient populations. Patients and Methods This retrospective analysis of African American patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer (mBC) from the Flatiron Health longitudinal database evaluated treatments for patients with BC in routine clinical practice in the US. Patients initiated first-line therapy with palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or AI alone between February 2015 and March 2020. Outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) until September 2020. Results Of 270 eligible patients, 127 (median age 64 years) were treated with palbociclib + AI, and 143 (median age 68 years) were treated with an AI. Median follow-up was 24.0 months for palbociclib + AI and 18.2 months for AI-treated patients. Median OS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 38.2-NR) in the palbociclib + AI group versus 28.2 months (95% CI, 19.2-52.8) in the AI group (adjusted HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.89; P = .013). Median rwPFS was 18.0 months (95% CI, 12.4-26.7) in the palbociclib + AI group and 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.0-13.4) in the AI group (adjusted HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.47-1.17; P = .199). Conclusion This comparative analysis of palbociclib + AI versus AI alone indicates that palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy in the first line is associated with improved effectiveness for African American patients with HR+/HER2− mBC in real-world settings. Trial number NCT05361655 The results reported in this article provide evidence of the effectiveness of palbociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor for first-line treatment of African American patients with HR+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer.

Abstract Background Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidities are often excluded from participating in breast cancer clinical trials. Consequently, data to inform treatment decisions for patients with hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and CVD are limited. Objective We compared the effectiveness of first-line palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) vs an AI alone and evaluated palbociclib treatment patterns in patients with HR+/HER2− mBC and CVD in routine clinical practice. Methods Data from the Flatiron Health Analytic Database were captured for patients with HR+/HER2− mBC and CVD who initiated first-line treatment with palbociclib plus an AI or an AI alone between February 2015 and March 2020 (data cutoff: September 30, 2020). Overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment patterns were evaluated. Results Of the 469 patients with identifiable CVD, 160 received palbociclib plus an AI, and 309 received an AI alone. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, both median OS (40.7 vs 26.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.732 [95% CI, 0.537-0.997]; P = .048) and median real-world PFS (20.0 vs 12.5 months; HR, 0.679 [95% CI, 0.512-0.900]; P = .007) were significantly prolonged in patients treated with palbociclib plus an AI vs an AI alone. Among patients with a documented palbociclib starting dose, 78.5% started palbociclib at 125 mg/day, and 38.6% experienced dose adjustment. Conclusions In this real-world analysis, first-line palbociclib plus an AI was associated with improved effectiveness compared with an AI alone in patients with HR+/HER2– mBC and CVD. Trial Registration NCT05361655 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Patients with cardiovascular disease comorbidities are often excluded from participating in breast cancer clinical trials. This study evaluated palbociclib clinical outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer and cardiovascular disease in routine clinical practice. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract

BackgroundLimited information exists regarding tumor response to palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) versus AI alone in real-world practice.ObjectiveTo evaluate the real-world tumor response of palbociclib plus letrozole (PAL+LET) versus LET alone as first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2‒ MBC) in routine US clinical practice.Patients and MethodsThis retrospective analysis included HR+/HER2‒ MBC patients who initiated PAL+LET or LET as first-line treatment between February 2015 and September 2018 in the Flatiron Health Analytics database. Patients were followed until December 2018. Real-world best tumor response (rwBTR) was determined based on physicians’ assessment of radiologic evidence for change in burden of disease.ResultsOf the 1383 eligible patients who initiated PAL+LET or LET as first-line therapy in the Flatiron database, 968 patients had ≥ 1 tumor response assessment (662 received PAL+LET and 306 received LET). The rwBTR rate (complete response+partial response) in the first-line setting was 59.8% in the PAL+LET group and 39.2% in the LET group (odds ratio 2.31 (95% CI 1.75‒3.04), P < 0.0001). After 1:1 propensity-score matching, the rwBTR rate was 58.6% in the PAL+LET group versus 39.1% in the LET group (odds ratio 2.21 (95% CI 1.50‒3.25), P < 0.0001).ConclusionsThis real-world analysis demonstrated that HR+/HER2‒ MBC patients were more likely to respond to PAL+LET compared to LET. These findings further showed the effectiveness of PAL+LET therapy in the real-world setting and support the combination as a standard of care for MBC.Study RegistrationPfizer; NCT04176354; registered November 25, 2019Plain Language SummaryPalbociclib (Ibrance®; PAL) is a treatment for advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC for short). Metastatic means that the cancer has spread from breast tissue to other areas of the body. PAL is taken with medications known as hormone therapy, such as letrozole (LET), to treat people with a type of MBC called hormone receptor‒positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+/HER2‒). Researchers wanted to understand more about how treatment with PAL+LET affected tumor response (i.e., if the tumor shrinks or disappears) in women with HR+/HER2– MBC. We looked at tumor response to PAL+LET in a real-life setting using anonymous medical record information from a database of about 2.4 million US patients with cancer. This study included 1383 patients with HR+/HER2‒ MBC who started PAL+LET (754 patients) or LET alone (629 patients) as their first MBC treatment from 2015‒2018. Among people who took PAL+LET, 60% people had a tumor response compared with 39% of people who took LET alone. Of the people who took PAL+LET, half of the people lived with their cancer without it getting worse for at least 20 months compared with 15 months for people who took LET alone. These results add to what is known about PAL+LET treatment based on routine clinical practice and clinical trials. Both types of information provide support for PAL+LET treatment as the standard care for women with HR+/HER2‒ MBC.Video abstract841fdm5FoNEydFo58rG55PVideo Abstract (MP4 90112 kb)

This study reported the prevalence of financial distress (financial toxicity (FT)) and COVID-19-related economic stress in patients with breast cancer (BC). Patients with BC were recruited from the Ciitizen platform, Breastcancer.org, and patient advocacy groups between 30 March and 6 July 2021. FT was assessed with the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) instrument. COVID-19-related economic stress was assessed with the COVID-19 Stress Scale. Among the 669 patients, the mean age was 51.6 years; 9.4% reported a COVID-19 diagnosis. The prevalence rates of mild and moderate/severe FT were 36.8% and 22.4%, respectively. FT was more prevalent in patients with metastatic versus early BC (p < 0.001). The factors associated with FT included income ≤ USD 49,999 (adjusted odds ratio (adj OR) 6.271, p < 0.0001) and USD 50,000–USD 149,999 (adj OR 2.722, p < 0.0001); aged <50 years (adj OR 3.061, p = 0.0012) and 50–64 years (adj OR 3.444, p = 0.0002); living alone (adj OR 1.603, p = 0.0476); and greater depression severity (adj OR 1.155, p < 0.0001). Black patients (adj OR 2.165, p = 0.0133), patients with income ≤ USD 49,999 (adj OR 1.921, p = 0.0432), or greater depression severity (adj OR 1.090, p < 0.0001) were more likely to experience COVID-19-related economic stress. FT was common in patients with BC, particularly metastatic disease, during COVID-19. Multiple factors, especially lower income and greater depression severity were associated with financial difficulties during COVID-19.

PurposeTo assess and describe patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in women with locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic breast cancer (aBC/mBC) with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR + /HER2 −) status receiving palbociclib combination therapy in a US real-world setting.MethodsA prospective, noninterventional, multicenter longitudinal study was conducted in US patients initiating treatment with palbociclib combination therapy for HR + /HER2 − aBC/mBC. PRO data (SF-12; CES-D-10; mood; pain; fatigue; interference of aBC/mBC or its treatment on family life, social life, physical activity, energy, and productivity; overall health rating; and quality of life [QOL]) were collected via a custom-developed mobile application at daily, weekly, and cycle-based intervals. Patient medical information (demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment information, and adverse events) was collected from medical records at baseline and at the end of the 6-month follow-up period.ResultsPatients’ general health status (SF-12) remained consistent throughout treatment and was generally consistent with published norms for individuals diagnosed with cancer. The presence of depression (CES-D-10) was low and did not change substantially over time. Mean pain and fatigue scores using an 11-point numeric rating scale were low and remained stable. Patients, on average, reported neutral or positive moods. Patient-reported QOL and overall health was primarily “Good,” “Very good,” or “Excellent.” Findings were consistent regardless of patient experience with neutropenia.ConclusionsPatients treated with palbociclib, on average, reported consistently low levels of pain and fatigue as well as good QOL and overall health that remained stable throughout the first 6 months of treatment regardless of episodes of neutropenia.

To understand and compare preferences for dosing- and toxicity-related attributes associated with selective cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors regimens among US oncologists and patients. Oncologists and patients with mBC participated in an internet-based survey that included a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and a best-worst scaling (BWS) exercise. For the DCE, participants chose between two hypothetical treatment profiles, each with seven attributes: risk of dose reduction due to adverse events (AEs), risk of diarrhea, risk of abdominal pain, need for electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring to assess heart function, risk of Grade 3/4 neutropenia, dosing regimen, and dosing schedule. The BWS exercise assessed the relative prioritization of a larger set of 16 attributes. Hierarchical Bayesian models were used to estimate preference weights for each attribute level. Oncologists (N=209) and patients (N=304) rated risks of diarrhea (25% each) and Grade 3/4 neutropenia (20% and 24%, respectively) as the most important attributes for treatment choice. The risks of diarrhea and Grade 3/4 neutropenia were 1.8 to 2.3 times (oncologists: 25% and 20%, respectively vs 11%) and 2.4 to 2.5 times (patients: 25% and 24%, respectively vs 10%) higher in relative importance than the risk of dose reduction due to AEs. Oncologists placed greater importance on the risk of dose reduction due to AEs and the need for ECG monitoring, whereas patients placed greater importance on the risk of Grade 3/4 neutropenia (all, p<0.05). The BWS exercise results were largely consistent with those from the DCE. The risks of diarrhea and Grade 3/4 neutropenia were key drivers of both oncologist and patient preferences. Overall, the palbociclib + aromatase inhibitor (AI) profile was most preferred, due to its association with a lower risk of diarrhea and no ECG monitoring, compared with abemaciclib + AI and ribociclib + AI profiles, respectively.