Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose The current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual uses tumor size, lymph node, and metastatic status to stage breast cancer across different subtypes. We examined the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC within the same stages and sub-stages to evaluate whether TNBC had worse prognosis than non-TNBC. Methods We reviewed the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data and identified 158,358 patients diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2012. The overall survival (OS) time and breast cancer cause-specific survival time were compared between patients with TNBC and non-TNBC in each stage and sub-stages. The results were validated using a dataset of 2049 patients with longer follow-up from our institution. Results Compared with patients with non-TNBC, patients with TNBC had worse OS and breast cancer cause-specific survival time in every stage and sub-stage in univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for age, race, tumor grade, and surgery and radiation treatments in the SEER data. The worse OS time in patients with TNBC was validated in our institutional dataset. Conclusions Patients with TNBC have worse survival than patients with non-TNBC. The new AJCC staging manual should consider breast cancer biomarker information.

Background Neoadjuvant dual human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab plus paclitaxel leads to an overall pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 46%. Dual HER2 blockade with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and lapatinib plus nab-paclitaxel has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. To test neoadjuvant effectiveness of this regimen, an open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase II trial was conducted comparing T-DM1, lapatinib, and nab-paclitaxel with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and paclitaxel in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods Stratification by estrogen receptor (ER) status occurred prior to randomization. Patients in the experimental arm received 6 weeks of targeted therapies (T-DM1 and lapatinib) followed by T-DM1 every 3 weeks, lapatinib daily, and nab-paclitaxel weekly for 12 weeks. In the standard arm, patients received 6 weeks of trastuzumab and pertuzumab followed by trastuzumab weekly, pertuzumab every 3 weeks, and paclitaxel weekly for 12 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients with residual cancer burden (RCB) 0 or I. Key secondary objectives included pCR rate, safety, and change in tumor size at 6 weeks. Hypothesis-generating correlative assessments were also performed. Results The 30 evaluable patients were well-balanced in patient and tumor characteristics. The proportion of patients with RCB 0 or I was higher in the experimental arm (100% vs. 62.5% in the standard arm, p  = 0.0035). In the ER-positive subset, all patients in the experimental arm achieved RCB 0-I versus 25% in the standard arm ( p  = 0.0035). Adverse events were similar between the two arms. Conclusion In early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, the neoadjuvant treatment with T-DM1, lapatinib, and nab-paclitaxel was more effective than the standard treatment, particularly in the ER-positive cohort. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02073487 , February 27, 2014.

Background Endocrine resistance is a major challenge in treating patients with ER+ /HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC) necessitating a switch from endocrine therapy to more toxic therapies. Mutations in ESR1 constitute a key mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy in ER+ /HER2− BC. Therapies that overcome endocrine resistance are needed. Palazestrant is a novel oral complete estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist (CERAN) and selective ER degrader (SERD) belonging to a new class of ER-targeting agents that completely blocks estrogen-induced transcriptional activity, regardless of ESR1 mutation status. This first-in-human, open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 dose-escalation/expansion study was designed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of palazestrant in patients with ER+ /HER2− MBC with disease progression on prior treatment. Methods Adults with ER+ /HER2‒ MBC who received ≥ 1 prior line of endocrine therapy for advanced disease and ≤ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease were eligible. Patients received once-daily oral palazestrant (30–300 mg) in 28-day cycles until progression or intolerable toxicity. Results This study enrolled 146 patients. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at doses up to 300 mg/day palazestrant. Confirmed partial responses were observed with 60 and 120 mg/day palazestrant. Both doses showed similar and tolerable safety profiles, favorable pharmacokinetics, and steady-state plasma concentrations above the predicted threshold for complete ER inhibition. Greater clinical benefit at palazestrant 120 mg/day (46%) versus 60 mg/day (19%) led to selection of 120 mg/day as RP2D and study expansion dose. At 120 mg/day, the median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.5–7.1) overall and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.8–NE) among patients with cancers with ESR1 mutations. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1–2. The most common TEAEs were nausea (62.8%), vomiting (29.1%), and fatigue (25.6%). The most common grade ≥ 3 TEAE was transient neutropenia (10.5%) managed by dose interruption and reduction. Conclusions Palazestrant demonstrated a manageable safety profile, with antitumor activity observed in patients with heavily pretreated cancers with wild-type and ESR1 -mutated BC. These data support the ongoing phase 3 study evaluating palazestrant in patients with ER+ /HER2 − MBC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04505826 . Registered August 6, 2020.

Introduction For patients with locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the standard of care is to administer the KEYNOTE-522 (K522) regimen, including chemotherapy and immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) given in the neoadjuvant setting. Pathological complete response (pCR) is more likely in patients who receive the K522 regimen than in patients who receive standard chemotherapy. Studies have shown that pCR is a strong predictor of long-term disease-free survival. However, factors predicting pCR to K522 are not well understood and require further study in real-world populations. Methods We evaluated 76 patients who were treated with the K522 regimen at our institution. Twenty-nine pre-treatment biopsy slides were available for pathology review. Nuclear grade, Nottingham histologic grade, Ki-67, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were evaluated in these 29 cases. For the cases that did not have available slides for review from pre-treatment biopsies, these variables were retrieved from available pathology reports. In addition, clinical staging, race, and BMI at the time of biopsy were retrieved from all 76 patients’ charts. Binary logistic regression models were used to correlate these variables with pCR. Results At the current time, 64 of 76 patients have undergone surgery at our institution following completion of K522 and 31 (48.4%) of these achieved pCR. In univariate analysis, only TIL was significantly associated with pCR ( p  = 0.014) and this finding was also confirmed in multivariate analysis, whereas other variables including age, race, nuclear grade, Nottingham grade, Ki-67, lymphovascular invasion, BMI, pre-treatment tumor size, and lymph node status were not associated with pCR ( p  > 0.1). Conclusion Our real-world data demonstrates high TIL is significantly associated with pCR rate in the K522 regimen and may potentially serve as a biomarker to select optimal treatment. The pCR rate of 48.4% in our study is lower than that reported in K522, potentially due to the smaller size of our study; however, this may also indicate differences between real-world data and clinical trial results. Larger studies are warranted to further investigate the role of immune cells in TNBC response to K522 and other treatment regimens.

Molecular testing is increasingly being integrated into cancer management. Despite rapid advancements, little work has been done to explore strategies for communicating with patients undergoing molecular tumor testing. This study evaluated the impact of genetic counseling educational tools on improving patients’ understanding of key terms related to molecular testing. A genetic counseling intern designed a picture book to explain six words found in prior research to be difficult to understand (mutation, germline mutation, somatic mutation, biomarker, molecular testing, and targeted therapy). Participants who had previously discussed molecular testing with their oncologist were asked to define the terms. The same participants then received an explanation of each term either from the intern using the picture book in person or from a video presentation of the picture book. They were then asked to redefine each term afterward. The difference between the number of terms defined correctly pre- and post-intervention was compared between presentations. Sixty-three patients with melanoma, colon, lung, or breast cancer were recruited. After both interventions, correct understanding rates improved for all six terms, with significant improvement for germline mutation (p < 0.001), somatic mutation (p < 0.001), biomarker (p < 0.001), and molecular testing (p < 0.001). Understanding of targeted therapy improved significantly (p = 0.011) for the video presentation only. Mean change in knowledge scores did not differ between the two interventions (intern presentation 3.2 vs. video 2.9, p = 0.428). Our data suggest that genetic counseling educational tools can increase patient understanding of terms used to describe molecular testing.

Background Since 2022, the Commission on Cancer (CoC) has developed three new breast cancer quality measures (QMs): time to surgery (BCSdx) and radiation (BCSRT) and the use of neoadjuvant therapy for triple negative and HER2/neu positive breast cancer (BneoCT). This study assesses CoC center historical performance for these measures and facility factors associated with low performance. Methods We examined the median number of days for time to surgery and radiation, and the proportion of facilities that achieved an estimated performance rate (EPR) of 70%, 80%, and 90% from 2004 to 2020 for all three measures. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between facility factors and not achieving 80% EPR for all three measures. Results The median number of days to surgery and radiation in 2004 were 16 and 43, respectively, compared with 34 and 48 in 2020 ( p < 0.01). For BneoCT, BCSdx, and BCSRT measures, the proportion of facilities that attained ≥ 80% EPR was 68.5%, 72.2%, and 35.2%, respectively. The proportion of facilities that attained ≥ 80% EPR in 2004 was 92.3% for BCSdx and 49.8% for BCSRT compared with 69.6% and 39.4%, respectively, in 2020. BneoCT performance improved over time. Academic facilities and facilities serving a larger proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients were approximately twice as likely to be unable to achieve compliance with all three QMs. Conclusions Performance levels for BCSRT are the lowest of all three measures. Academic centers and centers with a higher proportion of Medicaid patients are more likely to have lower adherence with all three QMs.

Abstract Objectives: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer, and there is no approved targeted therapy. We studied the expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) in TNBC. Methods: Full-face sections from 136 TNBC cases without neoadjuvant therapy between 2004 and 2013 were stained and evaluated for immune cell PD-1 staining and stromal or tumoral PD-L1 staining using the H-score (staining percentage × intensity). Nottingham histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), mitotic count, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated. Tumor size, lymph node status, Ki-67 score, metastasis, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were retrieved from medical records. Results: Of the 136 TNBC cases, 69 (51%) had any PD-L1 staining and 35 (26%) had PD-L1 staining with an H-score of 5 or more; 117 (86%) had any PD-1 staining and 68 (50%) had PD-1 staining with an H-score of 5 or more. Tumor size and LVI were significantly associated with worse OS and DFS, and TILs and LVI were significantly associated with metastasis in univariate analysis. Stromal PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with better DFS in multivariate analysis. PD-1 expression was not associated with DFS, OS, or metastasis. Conclusions: PD-L1 expression is seen in a high proportion of TNBCs and associated with better DFS.

Purpose To explore the feasibility of imaging amino-acid transport and PSMA molecular pathways in the detection of metastatic breast invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and if there is superior detection compared to standard-of-care imaging [computed tomography (CT)/bone scan, or 18 F-FDG positron-emission-tomography (PET)-CT]. Methods 20 women with de-novo or suspected metastatic ILC underwent two PET-CT scans with 18 F-fluciclovine and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 on separate days. Uptake per patient and in 3 regions per patient - ipsilateral axillary lymph node (LN), extra-axillary LN (ipsilateral supraclavicular or internal mammary), or distant sites of disease - was compared to standard-of-care imaging (CT/bone scan in 13 patients and 18 F-FDG PET-CT in 7 patients). Results were correlated to a composite standard of truth. Confirmed detection rate (cDR) was compared using McNemar’s test. Mean SUVmax of 18 F-fluciclovine and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 in the most avid lesion for each true positive metastatic region and intact primary lesion were compared by t-test. Results The cDR for standard-of-care imaging was 5/20 patients in 5/60 regions. 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT detected metastasis in 7/20 patients in 7/60 regions. 18 F-fluciclovine PET-CT detected metastasis in 9/20 patients in 12/60 regions. The cDR for 18 F-fluciclovine PET-CT was significantly higher versus standard-of-care imaging on the patient and combined region levels, while there were no significant differences between 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and standard-of care imaging. 18 F-fluciclovine cDR was also significantly higher than 68 Ga-PSMA-11 on the combined region level. Mean SUVmax for true positive metastatic and primary lesions with 18 F-fluciclovine ( n  = 18) was significantly greater than for 68 Ga-PSMA-11 ( n  = 11) [5.5 ± 1.8 versus 3.5 ± 2.7 respectively, p  = 0.021]. Conclusion In this exploratory trial, 18 F-fluciclovine PET-CT has a significantly higher cDR for ILC metastases compared to standard-of-care imaging and to 68 Ga-PSMA-11. Mean SUVmax for true positive malignancy was significantly higher with 18 F-fluciclovine than for 68 Ga-PSMA-11. Exploratory data from this trial suggests that molecular imaging of amino acid metabolism in patients with ILC deserves further study. Clinical trial registration Early phase (I-II) clinical trial (NCT04750473) funded by the National Institutes of Health (R21CA256280).