Explore the vast range of titles available.

Most consensus leukemia & lymphoma antibody panels consist of lists of markers based on expert opinions, but they have not been validated. Here we present the validated EuroFlow 8-color antibody panels for immunophenotyping of hematological malignancies. The single-tube screening panels and multi-tube classification panels fit into the EuroFlow diagnostic algorithm with entries defined by clinical and laboratory parameters. The panels were constructed in 2–7 sequential design–evaluation–redesign rounds, using novel Infinicyt software tools for multivariate data analysis. Two groups of markers are combined in each 8-color tube: (i) backbone markers to identify distinct cell populations in a sample, and (ii) markers for characterization of specific cell populations. In multi-tube panels, the backbone markers were optimally placed at the same fluorochrome position in every tube, to provide identical multidimensional localization of the target cell population(s). The characterization markers were positioned according to the diagnostic utility of the combined markers. Each proposed antibody combination was tested against reference databases of normal and malignant cells from healthy subjects and WHO-based disease entities, respectively. The EuroFlow studies resulted in validated and flexible 8-color antibody panels for multidimensional identification and characterization of normal and aberrant cells, optimally suited for immunophenotypic screening and classification of hematological malignancies.

The EU-supported EuroFlow Consortium aimed at innovation and standardization of immunophenotyping for diagnosis and classification of hematological malignancies by introducing 8-color flow cytometry with fully standardized laboratory procedures and antibody panels in order to achieve maximally comparable results among different laboratories. This required the selection of optimal combinations of compatible fluorochromes and the design and evaluation of adequate standard operating procedures (SOPs) for instrument setup, fluorescence compensation and sample preparation. Additionally, we developed software tools for the evaluation of individual antibody reagents and antibody panels. Each section describes what has been evaluated experimentally versus adopted based on existing data and experience. Multicentric evaluation demonstrated high levels of reproducibility based on strict implementation of the EuroFlow SOPs and antibody panels. Overall, the 6 years of extensive collaborative experiments and the analysis of hundreds of cell samples of patients and healthy controls in the EuroFlow centers have provided for the first time laboratory protocols and software tools for fully standardized 8-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping of normal and malignant leukocytes in bone marrow and blood; this has yielded highly comparable data sets, which can be integrated in a single database.

Precise classification of acute leukemia (AL) is crucial for adequate treatment. EuroFlow has previously designed an AL orientation tube (ALOT) to guide towards the relevant classification panel (T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL and/or acute myeloid leukemia (AML)) and final diagnosis. Now we built a reference database with 656 typical AL samples (145 T-ALL, 377 BCP-ALL, 134 AML), processed and analyzed via standardized protocols. Using principal component analysis (PCA)-based plots and automated classification algorithms for direct comparison of single-cells from individual patients against the database, another 783 cases were subsequently evaluated. Depending on the database-guided results, patients were categorized as: (i) typical T, B or Myeloid without or; (ii) with a transitional component to another lineage; (iii) atypical; or (iv) mixed-lineage. Using this automated algorithm, in 781/783 cases (99.7%) the right panel was selected, and data comparable to the final WHO-diagnosis was already provided in >93% of cases (85% T-ALL, 97% BCP-ALL, 95% AML and 87% mixed-phenotype AL patients), even without data on the full-characterization panels. Our results show that database-guided analysis facilitates standardized interpretation of ALOT results and allows accurate selection of the relevant classification panels, hence providing a solid basis for designing future WHO AL classifications.

Switches from the lymphoid to myeloid lineage during B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) treatment are considered rare and thus far have been detected in MLL-rearranged leukemia. Here, we describe a novel BCP-ALL subset, switching BCP-ALL or swALL, which demonstrated monocytosis early during treatment. Despite their monocytic phenotype, ‘monocytoids’ share immunoreceptor gene rearrangements with leukemic B lymphoblasts. All swALLs demonstrated BCP-ALL with CD2 positivity and no MLL alterations, and the proportion of swALLs cases among BCP-ALLs was unexpectedly high (4%). The upregulation of CEBPα and demethylation of the CEBPA gene were significant in blasts at diagnosis, prior to the time when most of the switching occurs. Intermediate stages between CD14 neg CD19 pos CD34 pos B lymphoblasts and CD14 pos CD19 neg CD34 neg ‘monocytoids’ were detected, and changes in the expression of PAX5, PU1, M-CSFR, GM-CSFR and other genes accompanied the switch. Alterations in the Ikaros and ERG genes were more frequent in swALL patients; however, both were altered in only a minority of swALLs. Moreover, switching could be recapitulated in vitro and in mouse xenografts. Although children with swALL respond slowly to initial therapy, risk-based ALL therapy appears the treatment of choice for swALL. SwALL shows that transdifferentiating into monocytic lineage is specifically associated with CEBPα changes and CD2 expression.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is an essential tool for risk group stratification in current treatment protocols for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Although quantitative detection of clonal immunoglobulin ( Ig ) and T-cell receptor ( TCR ) gene rearrangements is currently considered to be the standard method, leukaemia fusion genes provide other possible targets for MRD follow-up, as already demonstrated in TEL/AML1 -positive ALLs. We analysed and compared MRD levels quantified by BCR/ABL transcript detection and by the standard Ig/TCR -based method in 218 bone marrow specimens from 17 children with BCR/ABL -positive ALL. We found only a limited overall correlation of MRD levels as assessed by the two methods (correlation coefficient R 2 =0.64). The correlation varied among patients from excellent ( R 2 =0.99) to very poor ( R 2 =0.17). Despite identical sensitivity of the approaches, 20% of the samples were negative by the Ig/TCR approach whereas positive by the BCR/ABL method. We show that multilineage involvement is at least partly responsible for the discrepancy. Moreover, our data demonstrate that BCR/ABL monitoring enables better and earlier prediction of relapse compared to the standard Ig/TCR methodology. We conclude that BCR/ABL -based MRD monitoring of childhood ALL is a clinically relevant tool and should be performed in parallel with the standard Ig/TCR follow-up.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection using quantification of clone-specific Ig or TCR rearrangements before and after transplantation in children with high-risk ALL is an important predictor of outcome. The method and guidelines for its interpretation are very precise to avoid both false-negative and -positive results. In a group of 21 patients following transplantation, we observed detectable MRD positivities in Ig/TCR-based real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) leading to no further progression of the disease (11 of 100 (11%) total samples). We hypothesized that these positivities were mostly the result of nonspecific amplification despite the application of strict internationally agreed-upon measures. We applied two non-self-specific Ig heavy chain assays and received a similar number of positivities (20 and 15%). Nonspecific products amplified in these RQ-PCR systems differed from specific products in length and sequence. Statistical analysis proved that there was an excellent correlation of this phenomenon with B-cell regeneration in BM as measured by flow cytometry and Ig light chain-κ excision circle quantification. We conclude that although Ig/TCR quantification is a reliable method for post transplant MRD detection, isolated positivities in Ig-based RQ-PCR systems at the time of intense B-cell regeneration must be viewed with caution to avoid the wrong indication of treatment.

The ALL IC-BFM 2002 protocol was created as an alternative to the MRD-based AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study, to integrate early response criteria into risk-group stratification in countries not performing routine PCR-based MRD testing. ALL IC stratification comprises the response to prednisone, bone marrow (BM) morphology at days 15 and 33, age, WBC and BCR/ABL or MLL/AF4 presence. Here, we compared this stratification to the MRD-based criteria using MRD evaluation in 163 patients from four ALL IC member countries at days 8, 15 and 33 and week 12. MRD negativity at day 33 was associated with an age of 1–5 years, WBC<20 000 μl −1 , non-T immunophenotype, good prednisone response and non-M3 morphology at day 15. There were no significant associations with gender or hyperdiploidy in the study group, or with TEL/AML1 fusion within BCP-ALL. Patients with M1/2 BM at day 8 tended to be MRD negative at week 12. Patients stratified into the standard-risk group had a better response than intermediate-risk group patients. However, 34% of them were MRD positive at day 33 and/or week 12. Our findings revealed that morphology-based ALL IC risk-group stratification allows the identification of most MRD high-risk patients, but fails to discriminate the MRD low-risk group assigned to therapy reduction.

Data on secondary acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (sALL) following ALL treatment are very rare. However, the incidence might be underestimated as sALLs without a significant lineage shift might automatically be diagnosed as relapses. Examination of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements brought a new tool that can help in discrimination between relapse and sALL. We focused on the recurrences of childhood ALL to discover the real frequency of the sALL after ALL treatment. We compared clonal markers in matched presentation and recurrence samples of 366 patients treated according to the Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM)-based protocols. We found two cases of sALL and another three, where the recurrence is suspicious of being sALL rather than relapse. Our proposal for the 'secondary ALL after ALL' diagnostic criteria is as follows: (A) No clonal relationship between diagnosis and recurrence; (B) significant immunophenotypic shift--significant cytogenetic shift--gain/loss of a fusion gene. For the sALL (A) plus at least one (B) criterion should be fulfilled. With these criteria, the estimated frequency of the sALL after ALL is according to our data 0.5-1.5% of ALL recurrences on BFM-based protocols. Finally, we propose a treatment strategy for the patients with secondary disease.