Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background and objectives: A deeper comprehension of the role that environmental risk factors play in the development of adolescent Bipolar Disorder (BD), as well as in the evolution of high-risk states for BD, may entangle further prevention and treatment advances. The present systematic review is aimed at critically summarizing evidence about the role that environmental risk factors play in the development of BD in adolescence and their interaction with BD high-risk states. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE/Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science datasets were systematically searched until 4 September 2020. Original studies that reported information about the role of environmental risk factors in the development of BD during adolescence, or assessing their influence on the development of psychopathology in high-risk states for BD, were considered for inclusion. Two blind researchers performed title/abstract, full-text screening, and hand-screening of relevant references. The risk of bias was assessed by means of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Fourteen studies were included in the review. Negative stressful life events, particularly sexual and physical abuse, but also emotional mistreatment, were associated with more severe psychopathology in adolescents with BD, as well as with higher risk for developing mood disorders in BD offspring. Similar findings were detected for familial environment-related features, such as parental rejection and low perceived care, while no univocal results were found when analyzing familial functioning. Conclusions: The present systematic review confirmed the relevant role that environmental risk factors, particularly negative stressful live events and family-related features, play in the development of BD psychopathology during adolescence. Future studies are expected to clarify possible further environmental factors that may be implicated in the development of BD during youth that may serve as target of prevention and early treatment strategies.

Background: Youth mental health services increasingly encounter adolescents and young adults with complex affective presentations and trauma histories. Dissociation has been proposed as a clinically relevant marker within bipolar vulnerability pathways but remains underrecognized in early-intervention settings. This pilot study investigated the prevalence and clinical correlates of bipolar at-risk (BAR) status in a help-seeking youth sample, with specific focus on dissociative symptoms in this vulnerable population. Methods: A pilot study with a cross-sectional design was conducted in a specialized outpatient clinic for 14–25-year-olds. Seventy-six participants without Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision bipolar disorder completed a multidimensional assessment, including dissociative (Dissociative Experiences Scale version 2 [DES-II], Adolescent-DES [A-DES], Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Dissociative Disorders [SCID-D]), affective, anxiety, impulsivity, and prodromal symptom measures. BAR status (BAR+) was determined via clinical interview according to Bechdolf criteria. Clinically significant dissociation (DES+) was defined by established cut-offs at the DES-II and A-DES scales. Group comparisons, binary logistic regression and exploratory mediation analysis were performed. Results: In our sample, 44.7% of the participants met BAR+ criteria and 42.9% displayed clinically significant dissociation. Patients with BAR+ status more frequently reported familiar history of affective disorders, previous antidepressant use, loneliness, and non-suicidal self-injury. They displayed more severe depressive symptoms and impulsivity, as well as higher scores at all the affective temperament subscale except for hyperthymic. BAR+ patients displayed higher prevalence of dissociative symptoms than BAR− (51.6% vs. 24.2%; p = 0.045). Among the BAR+ subgroup, DES+ youths showed greater traumatic burden, depressive symptoms, and anxious temperament scores. Dissociation was associated with BAR+ status (OR 3.2) after adjusting for age, gender, and loneliness, while attentional impulsivity did not mediate this relationship. Conclusions: Dissociative symptomatology is highly prevalent among help-seeking youths and is directly associated with subthreshold bipolar-spectrum vulnerability. A dissociative BAR phenotype, marked by emotional instability and trauma exposure, may delineate a clinically complex subgroup, supporting the integration of dissociation-focused assessment into youth bipolar-risk staging and early-intervention protocols.

Background: The present study aimed to investigate the clinical correlates of treatment response to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder (BD), with a specific focus on trait-related characteristics such as impulsivity and affective temperaments. Methods: In- and outpatients diagnosed with BD were recruited at the Section of Psychiatry of the General Hospital/University of Perugia. Socio-demographic, clinical, and current psychopathological characteristics were collected. The treatment response was retrospectively assessed using the Alda Scale. Trait characteristics were evaluated through the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) and the Brief Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, and San Diego—Münster version (briefTEMPS-M). Bivariate analyses and a general linear model were employed to analyze the correlates of treatment response to mood stabilizers. Results: Among the investigated variables, trait impulsivity showed a significant negative association with treatment response. A similar effect was observed for depressive temperament, while other affective temperaments were not significantly associated with treatment outcomes. Patients with good treatment responses exhibited higher illness duration and lower severity of BD, higher prevalence of comorbid anxiety disorders, lower diurnal variation in depressive symptoms, and lower functional impairment in autonomy and occupational domains. The main limitations of this study were represented by the small sample size, the retrospective assessment of treatment response, and the inclusion of patients from a single center. Conclusions: The present findings suggest that impulsivity and depressive temperament should be investigated as potential predictors of poor response to mood stabilizers in BD. These trait dimensions, together with other clinical markers, may serve as useful targets for patient stratification and the development of personalized treatment strategies.

When facing a traumatic event, some people may experience positive changes, defined as posttraumatic growth (PTG). Understanding the possible positive consequences of the pandemic on the individual level is crucial for the development of supportive psychosocial interventions. The present paper aims to: 1) evaluate the levels of PTG in the general population; 2) to identify predictors of each dimension of post-traumatic growth. The majority of the sample (67%, N = 13,889) did not report any significant improvement in any domain of PTG. Participants reported the highest levels of growth in the dimension of \"appreciation of life\" (2.3 ± 1.4), while the lowest level was found in the \"spiritual change\" (1.2 ± 1.2). Female participants reported a slightly higher level of PTG in areas of personal strength (p < .002) and appreciation for life (p < .007) compared to male participants, while no significant association was found with age. At the multivariate regression models, weighted for the propensity score, only the initial week of lockdown (between 9-15 April) had a negative impact on the dimension of \"relating to others\" (B = -.107, 95% CI = -.181 to -.032, p < .005), while over time no other effects were found. The duration of exposure to lockdown measures did not influence the other dimensions of PTG. The assessment of the levels of PTG is of great importance for the development of ad hoc supportive psychosocial interventions. From a public health perspective, the identification of protective factors is crucial for developing ad-hoc tailored interventions and for preventing the development of full-blown mental disorders in large scale.

COVID-19 pandemic and its related containment measures have been associated with increased levels of stress, anxiety and depression in the general population. While the use of digital media has been greatly promoted by national governments and international authorities to maintain social contacts and healthy lifestyle behaviors, its increased access may also bear the risk of inappropriate or excessive use of internet-related resources. The present study, part of the COVID Mental hEalth Trial (COMET) study, aims at investigating the possible relationship between social isolation, the use of digital resources and the development of their problematic use. A cross sectional survey was carried out to explore the prevalence of internet addiction, excessive use of social media, problematic video gaming and binge watching, during Italian phase II (May–June 2020) and III (June–September 2020) of the pandemic in 1385 individuals (62.5% female, mean age 32.5 ± 12.9) mainly living in Central Italy (52.4%). Data were stratified according to phase II/III and three groups of Italian regions (northern, central and southern). Compared to the larger COMET study, most participants exhibited significant higher levels of severe-to-extremely-severe depressive symptoms (46.3% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.01) and extremely severe anxiety symptoms (77.8% vs. 7.5%; p < 0.01). We also observed a rise in problematic internet use and excessive gaming over time. Mediation analyses revealed that COVID-19-related general psychopathology, stress, anxiety, depression and social isolation play a significant role in the emergence of problematic internet use, social media addiction and problematic video gaming. Professional gamers and younger subjects emerged as sub-populations particularly at risk of developing digital addictions. If confirmed in larger and more homogenous samples, our findings may help in shedding light on possible preventive and treatment strategies for digital addictions.

Pharmacological antipsychotic drug interventions represent the cornerstone of the management of patients with schizophrenia and other psychotic spectrum disorders. The choice of the “best” treatment should be made on the basis of several clinical domains. However, despite available treatments, the quality of life reported by patients with schizophrenia taking antipsychotics is still very poor, and this outcome is rarely taken into account in trials assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments. Therefore, we performed a systematic review in order to assess the impact of antipsychotic treatment on patients’ quality of life. In particular, we aimed to identify any differences in the improvement in quality of life according to the (a) type of formulation of antipsychotic drugs (i.e., oral vs. depot vs. long-acting injectable); (b) type of the drug (first vs. second vs. third generation); and (c) patients’ clinical characteristics. One hundred and eleven papers were included in the review. The main findings were as follows: (1) quality of life is usually considered a secondary outcome in trials on the efficacy and effectiveness of drugs; (2) second-generation antipsychotics have a more positive effect on quality of life; and (3) long-acting injectable antipsychotics are associated with a more stable improvement in quality of life and with a good safety and tolerability profile. Our systematic review confirms that quality of life represents a central element for selecting the appropriate treatment for people with schizophrenia. In particular, the availability of new treatments with a better tolerability profile, a proven effectiveness on patients’ cognitive and social functioning, and with a more stable blood concentration might represent the appropriate strategy for improving the quality of life of people with schizophrenia.

Background Use of social media (SM) has exponentially grown particularly among youths in the past two years, due to COVID-19-related changing lifestyles. Based on the Italian COvid Mental hEalth Trial (COMET), we investigated the association between SM use and depressive symptoms among Italian young adults (aged 18–24). Methods The COMET is a nationwide multi-center cross-sectional study that investigated socio-demographic data, social networking addiction (BSNAS), depression, anxiety, and stress (DASS-21), as well as impulsiveness (BIS-15) and aggressiveness (AQ) in a large sample of youngsters, in order to assess the association between BSNAS and DASS-21 indices. Mediation analyses were performed to evaluate the role of impulsiveness and aggressive personality traits in the association between SM use (SMU) and depression. Results 75.8% of the sample ( n  = 491) had a problematic SMU. SMU was reduced by high AQ and high DASS-21 scores ( F  = 42.338, p  < 0.001, R 2  = 0.207). Mediation analyses showed that SMU negatively predicted depressive symptomatology with the interaction mediated by AQ total ( ß  = − 0.1075), physical ( ß  = − 0.207) and anger ( ß  = − 0.0582), BIS-15 total ( ß  = − 0.0272) and attentional ( ß  = − 0.0302). High depressive levels were predicted by high AQ scores, low SMU levels, low verbal and physical AQ, and low attentional BIS-15 ( F  = 30.322, p  < 0.001, R 2  = 0.273). Depressive symptomatology negatively predicted SMU with their interaction mediated by AQ total ( ß  = − 0.1640), verbal ( ß  = 0.0436) and anger ( ß  = − 0.0807), BIS-15 total ( ß  = − 0.0448) and attentional ( ß  = − 0.0409). Conclusions SMU during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic could have a beneficial role in buffering negative consequences linked to social isolation due to quarantine measures, despite this association being mediated by specific personality traits.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a crisis worldwide, due to both its public health impact and socio-economic consequences. Mental health was consistently affected by the pandemic, with the emergence of newly diagnosed psychiatric disorders and the exacerbation of pre-existing ones. Urban areas were particularly affected by the virus spread. In this review, we analyze how the urban environment may influence mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, considering two factors that profoundly characterize urbanization: air pollution and migration. Air pollution serves as a possibly risk factor for higher viral spread and infection severity in the context of urban areas and it has also been demonstrated to play a role in the development of serious mental illnesses and their relapses. The urban environment also represents a complex social context where minorities such as migrants may live in poor hygienic conditions and lack access to adequate mental health care. A global rethinking of the urban environment is thus required to reduce the impact of these factors on mental health. This should include actions aimed at reducing air pollution and combating climate change, promoting at the same time a more inclusive society in a sustainable development perspective.

Impairment in both psychosocial functioning and neurocognition (NC) performance is present in bipolar disorder (BD) yet the role of sex differences in these deficits remains unclear. The present systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether males and females with BD demonstrate differences in psychosocial functioning and NC performance. The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception until November 20, 2023. Twenty studies published between 2005 and 2023 with a total sample size of 2286 patients with BD were included. A random effects meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant result with a small effect (SMD = 0.313) for sex differences in verbal learning and memory as well as visual learning and memory (SMD = 0.263). Females outperformed males in both domains. No significant sex differences were observed for any other NC outcome or psychosocial functioning. High heterogeneity and differences in assessment scales used should be considered when interpreting these findings, given their potential impact on results. Future research should adopt a more homogenous, standardized approach using longitudinal designs to gain a clearer insight into sex differences in this population. This approach so may increase the use of preventative therapeutic options to address the difficult clinical challenge of reaching cognitive and functional recovery.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health are now well documented, however, few studies have been focused on the role of coping strategies and resilience in counterbalancing these detrimental effects. Data are derived from the COvid Mental hEalth Trial (COMET), a national multicentric trial carried out in the Italian general population. The final sample consisted of 20,720 participants, 53.1% (n = 11,000) of the sample reported low levels of resilience. Adaptive coping strategies and resilience levels did not have any significant protective impact on the levels of depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Only self-distraction was a risk factor for poor mental health (Beta Coefficient, B = 0.1, 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 0.003 to 0.267 for stress symptoms; B = 0.2; 95% CI: 0.077 to 0.324 for anxiety symptoms and B = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.105 to 0.382 for depressive symptoms). High levels of resilience were predicted by adaptive coping strategies, such as acceptance (B = 1.8, CI 95% = 1.4–2.7). Exposure to the different weeks of lockdown, being infected by COVID-19, and being a healthcare professional did not influence the levels of resilience. Our findings should be carefully considered, since the low levels of resilience may represent the missing link between the pandemic and the current increase in mental health problems.