Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
3
result(s) for
"Mendelow, Alexander David"
Sort by:
Traumatic Brain Injury and Coenzyme Q10: An Overview
by
Mendelow, Alexander David
,
Hargreaves, Iain P.
,
Mantle, David
in
Animals
,
Antioxidants
,
Antioxidants - therapeutic use
2025
The incidence of morbidity and mortality in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury (TBI) is such that novel therapeutic strategies are currently required. There is good evidence that ischaemia is the primary, and sometimes the secondary, cause of brain damage in TBI. This ischaemia may lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, with associated oxidative stress and inflammation, in the pathogenesis of brain injury following head trauma. This, in turn, provides a rationale for the use of supplemental coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) in the management of TBI, given its key roles in normal mitochondrial function and as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent. In this article, we, therefore, review the use of supplemental CoQ10 in animal models of TBI and its potential application in the management of TBI patients. The problem of blood–brain barrier access is discussed, and how this might be circumvented via the use of an intranasal route to provide direct access of CoQ10 to the brain. In addition, there is evidence that TBI patients have an increased risk of developing cardiac dysfunction and that this may be mediated by aberrant immune action. Given the role of CoQ10 in promoting normal cardiac function and normal immune function, the administration of CoQ10 to prevent cardiovascular complications may improve outcomes in TBI patients.
Journal Article
Acute care bundles should be used for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage: An expert consensus statement
by
Klijn, Catharina JM
,
Toni, Danilo
,
Steiner, Thorsten
in
blood pressure
,
care bundles
,
Cerebral Hemorrhage - therapy
2024
Purpose:
Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is the most devastating form of stroke and a major cause of disability. Clinical trials of individual therapies have failed to definitively establish a specific beneficial treatment. However, clinical trials of introducing care bundles, with multiple therapies provided in parallel, appear to clearly reduce morbidity and mortality. Currently, not enough patients receive these interventions in the acute phase.
Methods:
We convened an expert group to discuss best practices in ICH and to develop recommendations for bundled care that can be delivered in all settings that treat acute ICH, with a focus on European healthcare systems.
Findings:
In this consensus paper, we argue for widespread implementation of formalised care bundles in ICH, including specific metrics for time to treatment and criteria for the consideration of neurosurgical therapy.
Discussion:
There is an extraordinary opportunity to improve clinical care and clinical outcomes in this devastating disease. Substantial evidence already exists for a range of therapies that can and should be implemented now.
Graphical abstract
Journal Article
Swiss trial of decompressive craniectomy versus best medical treatment of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (SWITCH): an international, multicentre, randomised-controlled, two-arm, assessor-blinded trial
by
Schaller, Karl
,
Z’Graggen, Werner
,
Arnold, Marcel
in
Adult
,
Aged
,
Cerebral Hemorrhage - surgery
2024
Rationale:
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is beneficial in people with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Whether DC improves outcome in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is unknown.
Aim:
To determine whether DC without haematoma evacuation plus best medical treatment (BMT) in people with ICH decreases the risk of death or dependence at 6 months compared to BMT alone.
Methods and design:
SWITCH is an international, multicentre, randomised (1:1), two-arm, open-label, assessor-blinded trial. Key inclusion criteria are age ⩽75 years, stroke due to basal ganglia or thalamic ICH that may extend into cerebral lobes, ventricles or subarachnoid space, Glasgow coma scale of 8–13, NIHSS score of 10–30 and ICH volume of 30–100 mL. Randomisation must be performed <66 h after onset and DC <6 h after randomisation. Both groups will receive BMT. Participants randomised to the treatment group will receive DC of at least 12 cm in diameter according to institutional standards.
Sample size:
A sample of 300 participants randomised 1:1 to DC plus BMT versus BMT alone provides over 85% power at a two-sided alpha-level of 0.05 to detect a relative risk reduction of 33% using a chi-squared test.
Outcomes:
The primary outcome is the composite of death or dependence, defined as modified Rankin scale score 5–6 at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include death, functional status, quality of life and complications at 180 days and 12 months.
Discussion:
SWITCH will inform physicians about the outcomes of DC plus BMT in people with spontaneous deep ICH, compared to BMT alone.
Trial registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02258919
Graphical abstract
Journal Article