Explore the vast range of titles available.

An analysis of national cardiovascular data showed that median door-to-balloon times for primary PCI declined from 83 minutes in 2005 to 67 minutes in 2009, whereas in-hospital mortality remained unchanged during this period. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently the preferred treatment for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Previous observational studies have shown a strong association between prompt performance of primary PCI, as assessed in terms of the door-to-balloon time (the interval from the patient's arrival at the hospital to inflation of the balloon to restore flow), and reduced mortality. 1 – 3 On the basis of these data, current joint clinical practice guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC–AHA) endorse a door-to-balloon time of 90 minutes or less as the goal, giving it a Class I (highest . . .

The final report from the HORIZONS-AMI trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction shows that the early benefits of bivalirudin and paclitaxel-eluting stents are sustained at 3 years. Bivalirudin, thrombus aspiration, and drug-eluting stents might be the new standard of care for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Few studies have examined the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) for reducing aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass graft (SVG) failure compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients undergoing stenting of de-novo SVG lesions. We assessed the risks and benefits of the use of DES versus BMS in de-novo SVG lesions. Patients were recruited to our double-blind, randomised controlled trial from 25 US Department of Veterans Affairs centres. Eligible participants were aged at least 18 years and had at least one significant de-novo SVG lesion (50–99% stenosis of a 2·25–4·5 mm diameter SVG) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention with intent to use embolic protection devices. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, by phone randomisation system to receive a DES or BMS. Randomisation was stratified by presence or absence of diabetes and number of target SVG lesions requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (one or two or more) within each participating site by use of an adaptive scheme intended to balance the two stent type groups on marginal totals for the stratification factors. Patients, referring physicians, study coordinators, and outcome assessors were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was the 12-month incidence of target vessel failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation. The DIVA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01121224. Between Jan 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2015, 599 patients were randomly assigned to the stent groups, and the data for 597 patients were used. The patients' mean age was 68·6 (SD 7·6) years, and 595 (>99%) patients were men. The two stent groups were similar for most baseline characteristics. At 12 months, the incidence of target vessel failure was 17% (51 of 292) in the DES group versus 19% (58 of 305) in the BMS group (adjusted hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·63–1·34, p=0·70). Between-group differences in the components of the primary endpoint, serious adverse events, or stent thrombosis were not significant. Enrolment was stopped before the revised target sample size of 762 patients was reached. In patients undergoing stenting of de-novo SVG lesions, no significant differences in outcomes between those receiving DES and BMS during 12 months of follow-up were found. The study results have important economic implications in countries with high DES prices such as the USA, because they suggest that the lower-cost BMS can be used in SVG lesions without compromising either safety or efficacy. US Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program.

To the Editor: On the basis of registry data from July 2005 through June 2009, Menees et al. (Sept. 5 issue) 1 report no reduction in mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), despite a decrease in door-to-balloon time of 16 minutes. There was a nonsignificant reduction in risk-adjusted mortality from 5.0% to 4.7% (P=0.34), an absolute 0.3-percentage-point effect size that is consistent with a previous report from the same registry. 2 Although we are unable to calculate the exact 95% confidence interval for the study by Menees et al., a . . .

Background Adenoma detection rate (ADR) and sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SSPDR) data in surveillance colonoscopy are limited. Aims Our aim was to determine surveillance ADR and SSPDR and identify associated predictors. Methods A retrospective review of subjects who underwent surveillance colonoscopy for adenoma and/or SSP at an academic center was performed. The following exclusion criteria were applied: prior colonoscopy ≤ 3 years, incomplete examination, or another indication for colonoscopy. Patient, endoscopist, and procedure characteristics were collected. Predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results Of 3807 colonoscopies, 2416 met inclusion criteria. Surveillance ADR was 49% and, SSPDR was 8%. Higher ADR was associated with: age per year (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.02–1.04), male gender (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.29–1.88), BMI per kg/m 2 (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.04), withdrawal time per minute (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.07–1.10), and endoscopists’ screening ADR (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00–1.03). Years since training (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.98–0.99) was associated with lower ADR. Family history of CRC (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.02–2.27) and endoscopists’ screening ADR (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.15–1.74) were associated with higher SSPDR. African-American race (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.10–0.75) and diabetes (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.21–0.76) were associated with lower SSPDR. Conclusions For surveillance colonoscopy, nearly half of patients had an adenoma and one in twelve had an SSP. In addition to established factors, BMI, endoscopists’ screening ADR, and years since training were associated with ADR, whereas African-American race and diabetes were inversely associated with SSPDR. Further studies are needed prior to integrating surveillance ADR and SSPDR into quality metrics.

Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has expanded the proportion of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who are candidates for valve replacement, some patients remain untreated, and their outcomes are not clear. We evaluated 172 consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS referred for TAVR who declined (n = 55) or were not candidates for (n = 117) intervention. We examined clinical and echocardiographic variables associated with mortality. There were 77 deaths, and mean follow-up was 17.9 ± 10.9 months for survivors. Mortality rate at 1 and 2 years was 39.2% and 52.6%, respectively. There was a significant difference in mortality rate between patients who declined the procedure and those who were not candidates (p = 0.001), with 1-year mortality rates of 20.6% and 48.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, 4 variables were independently associated with all-cause mortality: New York Heart Association Class IV heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6 to 4.2, p <0.001), glomerular filtration rate <48 ml/min (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.4, p = 0.002), albumin <3.9 g/dl (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.1, p = 0.007), and ejection fraction <50% (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.0, p = 0.01). In this new era with expanded treatment options, patients with severe symptomatic AS who remain untreated after referral for TAVR experience a mortality rate of 39% at 1 year. The presence of advanced heart failure, renal dysfunction, low albumin, and/or left ventricular dysfunction identifies patients at higher risk of mortality.

Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most common heart valve conditions and its incidence and prevalence increases with age. With the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), racial and ethnic disparities in AS diagnosis, treatment and outcomes is poorly understood. In this study we assessed racial and ethnic disparities in AS diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries. We conducted a population-based cohort study of inpatient, outpatient, and professional claims from a 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Incidence and Prevalence was determined among Medicare Beneficiaries. Outcomes in this study included management; the number of (non)-interventional cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery evaluation and management (E&M) visits, and number of transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) performed. Treatment, which was defined as Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Transthoracic Aortic Valve Replacement. And outcomes described as All-cause Hospitalizations, Heart Failure Hospitalization and 1-year mortality. A total of 1,513,455 Medicare beneficiaries were diagnosed with AS (91.3% White, 4.5% Black, 1.1% Hispanic, 3.1% Asian and North American Native) between 2010 and 2018. Annual prevalence of AS diagnosis was lower for racial and ethnic minorities compared with White patients, with adjusted rate ratios of 0.66 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.68) for Black patients, 0.67 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.70) for Hispanic patients and 0.75 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.77) for Asian and North American Native patients as recent as 2018. After adjusting for age, sex and comorbidities, cardiothoracic surgery E&M visits and treatment rates were significantly lower for Black, Hispanic and Asian and North American Native patients compared with White patients. All-cause hospitalization rate was higher for Black and Hispanic patients compared with White patient. 1-year mortality was higher for Black patients, while Hispanic and Asian and North American Native patients had lower 1-year mortality compared with White patients. We demonstrated significant racial and ethnic disparities in the diagnosis, management and outcomes of AS. The factors driving the persistence of these disparities in AS care need to be elucidated to develop an equitable health care system.

A random sample of 632 female head of household welfare recipients in two California counties was interviewed three times in the period between 1999 and 2001 to assess the correlates of substance abuse. Results suggest that a need for substance abuse services is associated with going on and off welfare more than once, leaving welfare for negative reasons, failing to find employment, and a low trajectory of earned income. These findings suggest that welfare administrators might usefully work with substance abuse providers to identify and serve welfare recipients with substance abuse problems.