Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
2
result(s) for
"Mohammed Alkheir, Seddig Alkazem"
Sort by:
Improving the Quality of Follow-Up Checklists in Rabak Teaching Hospital: A Two-Cycle Clinical Audit
by
Mohammed Alkheir, Seddig Alkazem
,
Mohamed, Abdullah
,
Eisa, Asim
in
Accuracy
,
Audit cycles
,
Audits
2025
Follow-up checklists are essential tools in ensuring comprehensive patient care, promoting clear communication among healthcare professionals, and enhancing patient safety. This two-cycle clinical audit aimed to evaluate and improve the quality of follow-up checklists in Rabak Teaching Hospital by assessing adherence to standardized documentation practices based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
A retrospective and prospective observational study was conducted over two cycles, with 50 follow-up notes evaluated in each cycle. The first cycle (baseline) was conducted between June 10, 2024, and July 12, 2024, and the second cycle (re-audit) was conducted from August 13, 2024, to August 24, 2024. Data were collected using a premade questionnaire based on NICE guidelines and analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods.
The second cycle revealed significant improvements in the completeness and accuracy of follow-up documentation compared to the first cycle. Key areas such as patient history, vital signs, physical examination, and management plans showed enhanced adherence to guidelines.
The findings demonstrate that structured follow-up checklists, combined with staff training and regular audits, can significantly improve documentation quality, thereby optimizing patient care. Continued re-auditing is recommended to sustain these improvements.
Journal Article
Improving Quality and Compliance of Surgical Hand Scrubbing Practices: A Clinical Audit
by
Ahmed Elamin Elnour, Mohey Aldien
,
Ahmed Mohmed, Mohmed Hussien
,
Mohammed Alkheir, Seddig Alkazem
in
Alcohol
,
Audit cycles
,
Audits
2025
Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a critical concern in healthcare, particularly in developing countries, where they are among the most prevalent and challenging hospital-acquired infections. Adherence to proper hand hygiene practices is essential to prevent SSIs. However, compliance among surgical teams remains suboptimal due to factors such as time constraints, lack of training, and resource limitations. This study evaluates and enhances adherence to surgical hand scrubbing protocols at Osman Degna Teaching Hospital using World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Methods An observational cross-sectional audit was conducted in two cycles between August and October 2024, with 54 observations per cycle. Baseline adherence was assessed in the first cycle. Targeted interventions, including video demonstrations, hands-on training, and feedback, were implemented before the second cycle. Data were collected using a structured checklist and analyzed quantitatively to compare compliance rates and qualitatively to identify barriers to adherence. Results Compliance with hand scrubbing protocols improved significantly from 63.1% in the first cycle to 94.3% in the second. The most notable improvement (51.5%) was observed in rotational rubbing with clasped fingers. Other areas, including scrubbing palms and rinsing hands, showed substantial increases (30.3-42%). These findings highlight the effectiveness of structured training and feedback in enhancing adherence. Conclusion Targeted educational interventions significantly improved compliance with surgical hand scrubbing protocols, contributing to better infection control practices. While these improvements demonstrate the potential of training programs, continued efforts and long-term strategies are necessary to sustain progress and further reduce the risk of SSIs.
Journal Article