Explore the vast range of titles available.

Uncontrolled hypertension is an important cardiovascular risk factor and therefore requires effective approaches to patient management. This study assessed approaches to the management of patients with Stage 2 hypertension by cardiologists in India. This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational, case-based questionnaire study. Data on demographic characteristics, risk factors associated with Stage 2 hypertension, use of antihypertensive medications, side effects, and approaches to education for 2,540 patients were extracted from questionnaire responses provided by 508 cardiologists. The study population of patients with Stage 2 hypertension had a mean age of 55.0 years. Most of the patients (62.6%) were aged 30 to 60 years and diabetes mellitus was the most prevalent comorbidity (48.9%). Triple antihypertensive therapy was being used by 760 patients, and 634 and 1,146 patients were receiving 4 and 5 different antihypertensive medications, respectively. Telmisartan, amlodipine, chlorthalidone, hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone, metoprolol, and prazosin were the commonly prescribed drugs. Ankle edema (27.7%) was the most frequent side effect of therapy. Pharmacotherapy was supported by patient education and lifestyle modifications for better blood pressure control. The standardized approach to the collection and assessment of these contemporary data provides useful insights into the characteristics and treatment of patients with Stage 2 hypertension in India.

Vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor is effective in reducing HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) when administered as monotherapy, dual or triple combination therapy. In India, Vildagliptin is commonly prescribed in T2DM patients because it reduces mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), has lower risk of hypoglycemia and is weight neutral. Early combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin is effective and well-tolerated in patients with T2DM, regardless of age or ethnicity. In view of already existing data on vildagliptin and the latest emerging clinical evidence, a group of endocrinologists, diabetologists and cardiologists convened for an expert group meeting to discuss the role and various combinations of vildagliptin in T2DM management. This practical document aims to guide Physicians and Specialists regarding the different available strengths and formulations of vildagliptin for the initiation and intensification of T2DM therapy.

Background The effectiveness of amlodipine has been reported in clinical trials in India. However, real-world data on the effectiveness of amlodipine in India is limited. Objective To provide real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness of amlodipine as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) in Indian patients with essential hypertension. Methods Electronic medical record data of adult patients who were diagnosed with essential hypertension (≥ 140/90 mmHg) and were prescribed amlodipine as monotherapy or add-on therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified based on the number of AHD classes prescribed on initiation of amlodipine. Change in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure from baseline was the primary endpoint. Evaluation of proportion of patients who achieved treatment goals as per 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension guidelines was the secondary endpoint. Readings were obtained before initiating amlodipine and after at least a month of therapy with amlodipine. Results Among the 462 included patients, the majority (90.7%) were on amlodipine monotherapy or amlodipine + 1AHD. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change in the amlodipine monotherapy group was: SBP (− 12.1 [− 14.9, − 9.3] mmHg) and DBP (− 7.5 [− 8.9, − 6.1] mmHg) and mean (95% CI) change in the amlodipine + 1AHD group was: SBP (− 17.8 [− 21.0, − 14.6] mmHg) and DBP (− 9.5 [− 11.0, − 8.0] mmHg) ( P  < 0.001 for all). SBP and DBP goals were achieved by 31.4% and 42.9% of patients on amlodipine monotherapy and by 38.9% and 51.8% of patients on amlodipine + 1AHD, respectively. Among patients aged ≤ 45 years, mean (95% CI) change in the amlodipine monotherapy group was: SBP (− 11.7 [− 16.0, − 7.4] mmHg; P  < 0.001) and DBP (− 7.2 [− 9.7, − 4.7] mmHg; P  < 0.001) and mean (95% CI) change in the amlodipine + 1AHD group was: SBP (− 14.6 [− 21.9, − 7.3] mmHg; P  < 0.05) and DBP (− 10.6 [− 14.8, − 6.4] mmHg; P  < 0.01). SBP and DBP goals were achieved by 35.4% and 33.8% of patients on amlodipine monotherapy and by 48.0% and 56.0% of patients on amlodipine + 1AHD, respectively. Among patients aged ≥ 65 years, mean (95% CI) change in the amlodipine monotherapy group was: SBP (− 13.9 [− 20.2, − 7.6] mmHg; P  < 0.01) and DBP (− 8.5 [− 11.4, − 5.7] mmHg; P  < 0.001) and mean (95% CI) change in the amlodipine + 1AHD group was: SBP (− 22.4 [− − 28.8, − 16.0] mmHg; P  < 0.001) and DBP (− 10.8 [− 14.0, − 7.6] mmHg; P  < 0.001). SBP and DBP goals were achieved by 25.5% and 13.7% of patients on amlodipine monotherapy and by 29.8% and 14.0% of patients on amlodipine + 1AHD. Conclusion Amlodipine prescribed as monotherapy or add-on therapy during routine clinical practice significantly reduced BP in ≤ 45- and ≥ 65-year-old Indian patients with mild to moderate hypertension, emphasizing that amlodipine may be a good candidate for BP control in Indian patients with essential hypertension in these age groups.

Purpose A systematic epidemiological study on intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired candidemia across India. Method A prospective, nationwide, multicentric, observational study was conducted at 27 Indian ICUs. Consecutive patients who acquired candidemia after ICU admission were enrolled during April 2011 through September 2012. Clinical and laboratory variables of these patients were recorded. The present study is an analysis of data specific for adult patients. Results Among 1,400 ICU-acquired candidemia cases (overall incidence of 6.51 cases/1,000 ICU admission), 65.2 % were adult. Though the study confirmed the already known risk factors for candidemia, the acquisition occurred early after admission to ICU (median 8 days; interquartile range 4–15 days), even infecting patients with lower APACHE II score at admission (median 17.0; mean ± SD 17.2 ± 5.9; interquartile range 14–20). The important finding of the study was the vast spectrum of agents (31 Candida species) causing candidemia and a high rate of isolation of Candida tropicalis (41.6 %). Azole and multidrug resistance were seen in 11.8 and 1.9 % of isolates. Public sector hospitals reported a significantly higher presence of the relatively resistant C. auris (8.2 vs. 3.9 %; p  = 0.008) and C. rugosa (5.6 vs. 1.5 %; p  = 0.001). The 30-day crude and attributable mortality rates of candidemia patients were 44.7 and 19.6 %, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed significant independent predictors of mortality including admission to public sector hospital, APACHE II score at admission, underlying renal failure, central venous catheterization and steroid therapy. Conclusion The study highlighted a high burden of candidemia in Indian ICUs, early onset after ICU admission, higher risk despite less severe physiology score at admission and a vast spectrum of agents causing the disease with predominance of C. tropicalis.

The rate of KOH positivity in fungal keratitis is around 30-34% (32%). [...] in clinical practice of 100 cases of corneal ulcers, only 16 cases may be KOH positive.