Explore the vast range of titles available.

Despite opioid analgesics being essential for pain relief, use has been inadequate in many countries. We aim to provide up-to-date worldwide, regional, and national data for changes in opioid analgesic use, and to analyse the relation of impediments to use of these medicines. We calculated defined daily doses for statistical purposes (S-DDD) per million inhabitants per day of opioid analgesics worldwide and for regions and countries from 2001 to 2013, and we used generalised estimating equation analysis to assess longitudinal change in use. We compared use data against the prevalence of some health disorders needing opioid use. We surveyed 214 countries or territories about impediments to availability of these medicines, and used regression analyses to establish the strength of associations between impediments and use. The S-DDD of opioid analgesic use more than doubled worldwide between 2001–03 and 2011–13, from 1417 S-DDD (95% CI −732 to 3565; totalling about 3·01 billion defined daily doses per annum) to 3027 S-DDD (−1162 to 7215; totalling about 7·35 billion defined daily doses per annum). Substantial increases occurred in North America (16 046 S-DDD [95% CI 4032–28 061] to 31 453 S-DDD [8121–54 785]), western and central Europe (3079 S-DDD [1274–4883] to 9320 S-DDD [3969–14 672]), and Oceania (2275 S-DDD [763–3787] to 9136 S-DDD [2508–15 765]). Countries in other regions have shown no substantial increase in use. Impediments to use included an absence of training and awareness in medical professionals, fear of dependence, restricted financial resources, issues in sourcing, cultural attitudes, fear of diversion, international trade controls, and onerous regulation. Higher number of impediments reported was significantly associated with lower use (unadjusted incidence rate ratio 0·39 [95% CI 0·29–0·52]; p<0·0001), but not when adjusted for gross domestic product and human development index (0·91 [0·73–1·14]; p=0·4271). Use of opioid analgesics has increased, but remains low in Africa, Asia, Central America, the Caribbean, South America, and eastern and southeastern Europe. Identified impediments to use urgently need to be addressed by governments and international agencies. International Narcotics Control Board, UN.

The increasing burden of cancer represents a substantial problem for Latin America and the Caribbean. Two Lancet Oncology Commissions in 2013 and 2015 highlighted potential interventions that could advance cancer care in the region by overcoming existing challenges. Areas requiring improvement included insufficient investment in cancer control, non-universal health coverage, fragmented health systems, inequitable concentration of cancer services, inadequate registries, delays in diagnosis or treatment initiation, and insufficient palliative services. Progress has been made in key areas but remains uneven across the region. An unforeseen challenge, the COVID-19 pandemic, strained all resources, and its negative effect on cancer control is expected to continue for years. In this Series paper, we summarise progress in several aspects of cancer control since 2015, and identify persistent barriers requiring commitment of additional resources to reduce the cancer burden in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Background Given the rising cancer burden, the capacity of Mexico’s healthcare system to effectively address cancer care through its current available infrastructure becomes increasingly critical. Limited availability of diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure leads to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Countries like Mexico, should undertake comprehensive assessments of infrastructure and human resources available for cancer, including its quantification and geolocation, to understand the service gaps. This study seeks to map oncological infrastructure in Mexico in five types of cancer: breast, lung, prostate, colon, and cervix. Methods Through a realist evaluation of publicly available databases from the High Specialty Medical Equipment National Inventory and the General Direction of Health Information , a comprehensive identification and classification of cancer resources was conducted with the intended outcome to map cancer care infrastructure in Mexico. Guided by the literature, resources necessary for diagnosis and treatment were selected by an expert consensus. Thereafter, facilities were classified by service scope into either diagnostic or diagnostic and therapeutic, and by infrastructure level into core or enhanced and then mapped geographically. Results From N  = 14,133 unique healthcare facilities that deliver any type of healthcare, only 5% provided cancer care. Cancer-specific infrastructure that can provide diagnosis and treatment at the national level included N  = 10 brachytherapy, N  = 11 cobalt-60, N  = 21 linear particle accelerators and N  = 188 operating rooms. Five issues were found: (1) low availability of core therapeutic infrastructure across all cancer types; (2) regional and national centralization of available therapeutic infrastructure for all cancer types, whilst no centralization found in diagnostic resources; (3) inconsistent allocation of resources in densely populated areas; (4) infrastructure disparities per cancer type i.e., Lung, prostate, and breast cancer require significant investments in diagnostic infrastructure compared to cervical and colon cancer, and (5) lack of precise and updated infrastructure data from the public health system that requires either new codes or subcodes. Conclusions Addressing disparities in cancer resources distribution in Mexico is a dual imperative—ensuring equity while seizing an opportunity to fortify the overall health system for people without social security coverage.

In this Policy Review, we examine cancer incidence and mortality rates across Latin America and the Caribbean, focusing on national cancer control plans (NCCPs) as frameworks for reducing the cancer burden in the region. By 2022, only 16 countries had active NCCPs, with eight being cancer specific and eight being integrated into public health plans. Our analysis found that dedicated NCCPs were linked to reduced cancer incidence but not reduced mortality. Broader socioeconomic indicators, such as universal health coverage and a higher Human Development Index, were more strongly associated with improved cancer outcomes, including reduced mortality-to-incidence ratios. Prevention measures such as cervical cancer screening and compliance with WHO's MPOWER tobacco control strategies also reduced cancer incidence, underscoring the importance of public health policies. However, challenges including insufficient cancer registries, underfunding, and health-care inequities hinder NCCP implementation. Addressing these gaps requires sustainable registries, regional evaluation frameworks, global collaboration, and stronger political commitment to ensure the success of NCCPs.

Background: Young women with breast cancer (YWBC) typically undergo intensive treatment that negatively impacts their quality of life (QoL). However, limited information is available on how their QoL changes, as most research has focused on older patients. Objectives: To assess changes in QoL among YWBC, identify the most affected QoL domains, and identify the factors associated with these changes. Design: Joven & Fuerte is a multicenter cohort of women aged ⩽40 in Mexico with newly diagnosed BC from 2014 to 2020. Methods: Participants completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer module QLQ-BR23 questionnaire at five different time points from enrollment until year 5 postdiagnosis. Clinical and treatment data were also collected. Group-based multivariate trajectory modeling was used to analyze longitudinal changes across QoL domains and classify patients into appropriate groups. Logistic models were then employed to identify associations between variables and group classification. Results: A total of 477 women (median age: 36 years; interquartile range 32–38) were included. Most had public health insurance (87%) and were diagnosed with stage II (49%) or III (39%) BC. Two trajectory groups, namely, “good” and “poor,” were identified based on QLQ-BR23 scores. Most patients (n = 294, 62%) were in the poor group. In the good group, sexual enjoyment scores remained stable from baseline to year 5 (51.4), whereas those in the poor group decreased (51.0–37.3). Distress related to hair loss over time declined, with scores decreasing from 36.3 to 27.0 in the good trajectory group and from 43.4 to 31.2 in the poor trajectory group. For future perspective, the good group improved from 56.4 to 79.0, while the poor group increased from 39.3 to 57.2. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive BC (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35–0.94, p = 0.028) and those with public health insurance (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.16–0.90, p = 0.035) were less likely to belong to the poor trajectory group. Conclusion: A high proportion of YWBC experience a poor QoL trajectory over time, particularly in areas related to sexual health, future perspective, and hair loss.

Breast cancer is a major public health issue in low-income and middle-income countries. In Mexico, incidence and mortality of breast cancer have risen in the past few decades. Changes in health-care policies in Mexico have incorporated programmes for access to early diagnosis and treatment of this disease. This Review outlines the status of breast cancer in Mexico, regarding demographics, access to care, and strategies to improve clinical outcomes. We identify factors that contribute to the existing disease burden, such as low mammography coverage, poor quality control, limited access to diagnosis and treatment, and insufficient physical and human resources for clinical care.

The prevalence and contribution of BRCA1/2 (BRCA) pathogenic variants (PVs) to the cancer burden in Latin America are not well understood. This study aims to address this disparity. BRCA analyses were performed on prospectively enrolled Latin American Clinical Cancer Genomics Community Research Network participants via a combination of methods: a Hispanic Mutation Panel (HISPANEL) on MassARRAY; semiconductor sequencing; and copy number variant (CNV) detection. BRCA PV probability was calculated using BRCAPRO. Among 1,627 participants (95.2% with cancer), we detected 236 (14.5%) BRCA PVs; 160 BRCA1 (31% CNVs); 76 BRCA2 PV frequency varied by country: 26% Brazil, 9% Colombia, 13% Peru, and 17% Mexico. Recurrent PVs (seen ≥3 times), some region-specific, represented 42.8% (101/236) of PVs. There was no ClinVar entry for 14% (17/125) of unique PVs, and 57% (111/196) of unique VUS. The area under the ROC curve for BRCAPRO was 0.76. In summary, we implemented a low-cost BRCA testing strategy and documented a significant burden of non-ClinVar reported BRCA PVs among Latin Americans. There are recurrent, population-specific PVs and CNVs, and we note that the BRCAPRO mutation probability model performs adequately. This study helps address the gap in our understanding of BRCA-associated cancer in Latin America.

There is paucity of data regarding the knowledge and understanding of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) about their disease stage and treatment goals. This study assessed these patients’ awareness of MBC incurability, topics reviewed with their oncologist, perceptions of having enough knowledge to participate in treatment decision-making, most helpful information source, and satisfaction with the information they received. For this purpose, 185 patients with MBC who attended follow-up medical appointments at a Mexican referral cancer center completed a survey designed by the Metastatic Breast Cancer Alliance. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. Descriptive statistics were applied, and associations between qualitative and quantitative variables were assessed with χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively. Half (52%) of the patients were aware that their disease was incurable, while 31% were not sure, and 17% thought it was curable. Forty percent found it difficult to talk about treatments because they did not understand the options that were available to them. The medical staff was the most helpful information source for 74% of participants, and 64% scored their satisfaction with information ≥9 of 10. A significant association was found between higher satisfaction and knowing that MBC is incurable, as well as being older than 40 years. These results illustrate the significant lack of understanding patients with MBC have regarding their cancer, even when reporting high satisfaction with the provided information, and identify a critical need for improved patient education to enhance their comprehension and promote their participation in decision-making processes, treatment adherence, and, ultimately, outcomes.

Communication challenges related to the delivery of bad news are present in oncologists’ daily practice. Hence, communication skills are essential for clinicians to handle these situations as appropriately and compassionately as possible. The aim of this study was to identify Mexican oncologists’ perceptions on the most important and hardest issues to discuss with patients and their families, as well as the challenges they most commonly encounter when communicating bad news. Physicians from various oncology centers were invited to anonymously complete an electronical survey designed by our multidisciplinary oncology team. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software v25; descriptive statistics were used for the analysis of the survey’s answers. In total, 115 physicians were included; most were medical oncologists. Treatment objectives and prognosis were the topics most of them considered relevant to address; while end-of-life care and treatment objectives were the hardest ones to discuss. The most difficult challenges they faced when breaking bad news were being honest without taking away hope and dealing with patients’ emotions. Remarkably, we detected a lack of training in delivering bad news to patients among our participants, as a minority of them had formal training in the matter. However, most desired to receive communication skills training and believed a session of 2–5 h would be sufficient. Mexican oncologists face diverse communication challenges when disclosing bad news to patients. Our findings reveal an opportunity to develop formal training programs tailored for Mexican oncologists and to ultimately improve outcomes and patient-centered care.

Background. Although chemotherapy added to rituximab is a standard of care for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), treatment of patients ≥65 years of age remains controversial due to comorbidities. Methods. This is a retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized study of patients ≥65 years of age, who were diagnosed with DLBCL but not previously treated. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities were analyzed. Three rituximab-containing treatment regimens (standard RCHOP, anthracycline dose-reduced RChOP, and RCOP) were compared. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared with the log-rank test. Results. In total, 141 patients with a median age of 73.9 years were studied. The three treatment groups had comparable demographic characteristics. The overall response was 77%, 72.5%, and 59% in groups treated with RCHOP, RChOP, and RCOP, respectively. After multivariate analysis, the factors influencing the overall survival were the presence of B symptoms, poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 3), and febrile neutropenia. Factors influencing disease-free survival were febrile neutropenia, high-intermediate and high-risk IPI scores, and treatment without anthracycline. Conclusion. A higher ORR (overall response rate) was achieved with standard RCHOP, which influenced DFS and OS, although it was not statistically significant compared with the other groups. Interventional phase 3 trials testing new molecules in patients aged 70 to 80 years and older are required to improve the prognosis within this growing population.