Explore the vast range of titles available.

Point-of-care ultrasound is increasingly used at the bedside to integrate the clinical assessment of the critically ill; in particular, lung ultrasound has greatly developed in the last decade. This review describes basic lung ultrasound signs and focuses on their applications in critical care. Lung semiotics are composed of artifacts (derived by air/tissue interface) and real images (i.e., effusions and consolidations), both providing significant information to identify the main acute respiratory disorders. Lung ultrasound signs, either alone or combined with other point-of-care ultrasound techniques, are helpful in the diagnostic approach to patients with acute respiratory failure, circulatory shock, or cardiac arrest. Moreover, a semiquantification of lung aeration can be performed at the bedside and used in mechanically ventilated patients to guide positive end-expiratory pressure setting, assess the efficacy of treatments, monitor the evolution of the respiratory disorder, and help the weaning process. Finally, lung ultrasound can be used for early detection and management of respiratory complications under mechanical ventilation, such as pneumothorax, ventilator-associated pneumonia, atelectasis, and pleural effusions. Lung ultrasound is a useful diagnostic and monitoring tool that might in the near future become part of the basic knowledge of physicians caring for the critically ill patient.

PurposeTo provide consensus, and a list of experts’ recommendations regarding the basic skills for head-to-toe ultrasonography in the intensive care setting.MethodsThe Executive Committee of the European Society of Intensive Care (ESICM) commissioned the project and supervised the methodology and structure of the consensus. We selected an international panel of 19 expert clinicians–researchers in intensive care unit (ICU) with expertise in critical care ultrasonography (US), plus a non-voting methodologist. The panel was divided into five subgroups (brain, lung, heart, abdomen and vascular ultrasound) which identified the domains and generated a list of questions to be addressed by the panel. A Delphi process based on an iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements. Statements were classified as a strong recommendation (84% of agreement), weak recommendation (74% of agreement), and no recommendation (less than 74%), in favor or against.ResultsThis consensus produced a total of 74 statements (7 for brain, 20 for lung, 20 for heart, 20 for abdomen, 7 for vascular Ultrasound). We obtained strong agreement in favor for 49 statements (66.2%), 8 weak in favor (10.8%), 3 weak against (4.1%), and no consensus in 14 cases (19.9%). In most cases when consensus was not obtained, it was felt that the skills were considered as too advanced. A research agenda and discussion on training programs were implemented from the results of the consensus.ConclusionsThis consensus provides guidance for the basic use of critical care US and paves the way for the development of training and research projects.

PurposeWeaning failure from mechanical ventilation may be due to lung de-recruitment or weaning-induced pulmonary oedema (WIPO). Both can be diagnosed by lung ultrasound (LUS) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), respectively. We conducted a prospective observational study, combining TTE and LUS, to determine if LUS alone may identify elderly patients at high risk of weaning or extubation failure.MethodsBefore and at the end of spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) in 40 elderly patients, we prospectively performed LUS and TTE. Extubation was decided by an independent operator. LUS included global and anterolateral LUS score. TTE included measurement of E/A and E/Ea ratios to determine LV filling pressures. SBT LUS scores for prediction of weaning outcome and for the diagnosis of WIPO were studied.ResultsWeaning or extubation failure was observed in 45% (95% CI 28–61) of patients. ROC analysis for ability of global SBT LUS to predict weaning/extubation failure and extubation failure found AUC of 0.80 and 0.81, respectively. AUC for anterolateral SBT LUS to predict weaning/extubation failure and extubation failure was 0.79 and 0.81, respectively. Increased LV filling pressure during SBT was observed without increase of anterolateral LUS score. Inversely, increase of anterolateral LUS was observed without increased filling pressure and was associated with extubation failure. Global and anterolateral SBT LUS were not correlated to E/Ea.ConclusionIn elderly patients, global and anterolateral LUS scores were associated with weaning and extubation failures while echocardiographic indices of filling pressures were not.Clinical trial number and registry URLClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT03261440.

Background In ARDS, the PEEP level associated with the best respiratory system compliance is often selected; however, intra-tidal recruitment can increase compliance, falsely suggesting improvement in baseline mechanics. Tidal lung hysteresis increases with intra-tidal recruitment and can help interpreting changes in compliance. This study aims to assess tidal recruitment in ARDS patients and to test a combined approach, based on tidal hysteresis and compliance, to interpret decremental PEEP trials. Methods A decremental PEEP trial was performed in 38 COVID-19 moderate to severe ARDS patients . At each step, we performed a low-flow inflation-deflation manoeuvre between PEEP and a constant plateau pressure, to measure tidal hysteresis and compliance. Results According to changes of tidal hysteresis, three typical patterns were observed: 10 (26%) patients showed consistently high tidal-recruitment, 12 (32%) consistently low tidal-recruitment and 16 (42%) displayed a biphasic pattern moving from low to high tidal-recruitment below a certain PEEP. Compliance increased after 82% of PEEP step decreases and this was associated to a large increase of tidal hysteresis in 44% of cases. Agreement between best compliance and combined approaches was accordingly poor (K = 0.024). The combined approach suggested to increase PEEP in high tidal-recruiters, mainly to keep PEEP constant in biphasic pattern and to decrease PEEP in low tidal-recruiters. PEEP based on the combined approach was associated with lower tidal hysteresis (92.7 ± 20.9 vs. 204.7 ± 110.0 mL; p  < 0.001) and lower dissipated energy per breath (0.1 ± 0.1 vs. 0.4 ± 0.2 J; p  < 0.001) compared to the best compliance approach. Tidal hysteresis ≥ 100 mL was highly predictive of tidal recruitment at next PEEP step reduction (AUC 0.97; p  < 0.001). Conclusions Assessment of tidal hysteresis improves the interpretation of decremental PEEP trials and may help limiting tidal recruitment and energy dissipated into the respiratory system during mechanical ventilation of ARDS patients.