Explore the vast range of titles available.

In the last few years, there has been a wave of articles related to behavioral addictions; some of them have a focus on online pornography addiction. However, despite all efforts, we are still unable to profile when engaging in this behavior becomes pathological. Common problems include: sample bias, the search for diagnostic instrumentals, opposing approximations to the matter, and the fact that this entity may be encompassed inside a greater pathology (i.e., sex addiction) that may present itself with very diverse symptomatology. Behavioral addictions form a largely unexplored field of study, and usually exhibit a problematic consumption model: loss of control, impairment, and risky use. Hypersexual disorder fits this model and may be composed of several sexual behaviors, like problematic use of online pornography (POPU). Online pornography use is on the rise, with a potential for addiction considering the “triple A” influence (accessibility, affordability, anonymity). This problematic use might have adverse effects in sexual development and sexual functioning, especially among the young population. We aim to gather existing knowledge on problematic online pornography use as a pathological entity. Here we try to summarize what we know about this entity and outline some areas worthy of further research.

The multinational, open-label COMPLETE study (NCT03835715) investigated the effectiveness of vortioxetine in alleviating emotional blunting in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) experiencing inadequate response and emotional blunting while being treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI). This paper presents results for the subgroup of patients enrolled in Spain. Patients with MDD (n = 67) experiencing partial response and emotional blunting during monotherapy with an SSRI or SNRI were switched to vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day) for 8 weeks. The primary study outcome was emotional blunting, assessed by the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ). After 8 weeks of vortioxetine, the mean (SE) change in ODQ total score from baseline was -26.0 (2.9) ( < 0.001). Respective changes in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Motivation and Energy Inventory, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total scores were -14.9 (0.8), +34.2 (4.5), +6.3 (1.6), and ‒9.0 (1.3) (all < 0.001 vs baseline). At week 8, 70.4% of patients no longer reported emotional blunting and 53.7% had achieved remission from their depressive symptoms (defined as a MADRS total score ≤10). Mediation analysis showed 77.1% of the change in SDS total score to be a direct effect of the improvement in ODQ total score after switching to vortioxetine. Adverse events were reported by 35 patients (52.2%), most commonly nausea (14 patients, 20.9%). At week 8, 33/54 patients (61.1%) were receiving vortioxetine 20 mg/day. In this study investigating the effectiveness of vortioxetine in Spanish patients with MDD who experienced inadequate response and emotional blunting on SSRI/SNRI monotherapy, significant improvements in emotional blunting, core depressive symptoms (including anhedonia), sleep duration, motivation and energy, cognitive performance, and overall patient functioning were observed during the 8 weeks of treatment. Two-thirds of patients no longer reported emotional blunting and over half were in remission from their depressive symptoms at week 8.

Background Schizophrenia is a complex psychiatric disorder frequently complicated by comorbidities that contribute to functional impairment, poor treatment adherence, and elevated mortality. Among the most prevalent and burdensome are affective symptoms, sexual dysfunction, metabolic disturbances, and substance use disorders, which remain underrecognized and insufficiently addressed in routine care. Objectives This expert consensus aimed to develop comorbidity-informed pharmacological strategies for schizophrenia, grounded in real-world challenges and individualized treatment needs. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of 10 European psychiatrists convened for an in-person meeting. Four expert-led presentations, each addressing a key comorbidity, were followed by open discussion. A modified two-round Delphi process was subsequently used to validate the consensus statements, which were thematically synthesized into actionable recommendations. Results Consensus-based recommendations were developed across four comorbidity domains, integrating current evidence with real-world clinical expertise. The panel emphasized the importance of individualized, patient-centered pharmacological strategies that balance efficacy, tolerability, and long-term functional outcomes. Partial dopamine agonists and other metabolically or hormonally favorable agents were identified as clinically useful across several comorbid profiles. Recommendations also addressed the optimization of antipsychotic selection, management of treatment-emergent side effects, and coordinated care for patients with dual diagnosis (also referred to as co-occurring disorders). Measurement-based monitoring and integrated service models were consistently highlighted as essential for improving outcomes. Conclusions Effective management of schizophrenia requires a shift toward comorbidity-informed, recovery-oriented pharmacological care. These expert recommendations provide practical strategies to support individualized treatment planning in real-world clinical settings.

In the case of serotonergic antidepressants (SSRIS), sexual dysfunction, a relevant but almost unnoticed adverse effect in clinical trials, has been subsequently identified by patients and clinicians as the most frequent adverse effect in the medium and long term. Hyperprolactinemia can be divided according to its severity: mild (50 ng/ml), moderate (51–75 ng/ml), and severe (>100 ng/ml) showing relevant clinical consequences in the short, medium and long term, such as bone mineralization, osteopenia and osteoporosis, increasing cardiovascular risk, and deteriorating sexual function. [...]the safety and tolerability of psychotropic compounds should always be present as an essential element in the prescription process.

In recent decades, hormonal contraceptives (HC) has made a difference in the control of female fertility, taking an unequivocal role in improving contraceptive efficacy. Some side effects of hormonal treatments have been carefully studied. However, the influence of these drugs on female sexual functioning is not so clear, although variations in the plasma levels of sexual hormones could be associated with sexual dysfunction. Permanent hormonal modifications, during menopause or caused by some endocrine pathologies, could be directly related to sexual dysfunction in some cases but not in all of them. HC use seems to be responsible for a decrease of circulating androgen, estradiol, and progesterone levels, as well as for the inhibition of oxytocin functioning. Hormonal contraceptive use could alter women’s pair-bonding behavior, reduce neural response to the expectation of erotic stimuli, and increase sexual jealousy. There are contradictory results from different studies regarding the association between sexual dysfunction and hormonal contraceptives, so it could be firmly said that additional research is needed. When contraceptive-related female sexual dysfunction is suspected, the recommended therapy is the discontinuation of contraceptives with consideration of an alternative method, such as levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems, copper intrauterine contraceptives, etonogestrel implants, the permanent sterilization of either partner (when future fertility is not desired), or a contraceptive ring.

Background Schizophrenia is a highly heterogeneous disease, and a high percentage of patients are at high risk of developing somatic comorbidities, which must be taken into account in disease management and treatment selection. Main body Antipsychotics are often associated with side effects that worsen the somatic comorbidities. Among the different options, cariprazine is generally safe and usually well tolerated in both acute and long-term treatment and is often a good choice when balancing clinical benefits and side effects. Given the lack of consensus on the priority of symptoms to treat and the reasons for switching therapy based on the balance between side effects and symptom resolution, twelve psychiatrists met for an expert meeting to discuss the most common and worrisome antipsychotic side effects leading to switching, the most important somatic comorbidities, and the best way to address specific symptoms in both the acute and maintenance phases of treatment in schizophrenia. Special attention was given to metabolic comorbidities, sexual dysfunction, and cardiovascular disease. This paper aims to examine the relationship between schizophrenia and specific somatic comorbidities, to discuss how the balance between efficacy and tolerability influences treatment choice in the acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia, and how these two variables may have different priorities at different stages of treatment. Conclusion The choice of treatment is based primarily on efficacy and tolerability. Cariprazine is beneficial in patients with positive and negative symptoms, and it has a side-effect profile with low rates of metabolic side effects, sedation, and sexual dysfunction.

Background/Objectives: Sexuality is a frequently overlooked but clinically significant dimension in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Beyond comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms, OCD can substantially affect sexual functioning and include obsessions and compulsions relating to sexual content. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on sexual dysfunction in OCD and the role of sexuality in OCD symptom dimensions, as well as associated neurobiological, cognitive, and clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a review of the literature including studies published in the last 20 years using the PubMed and Cochrane databases. Our search strategy used the terms “sexual AND (Obsessive-compulsive disorder OR OCD)”, retrieving a total of 582 articles. After a screening and eligibility assessment based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 200 studies were included. Additional papers were retrieved through citation tracking. Results: Sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent in OCD patients, particularly among women, ranging from low desire and arousal to anorgasmia and pain during intercourse. Sexual obsessions affect a large proportion of OCD patients and are associated with an early onset, male sex, greater symptom severity, poorer insight, and suicidality. These obsessions often co-occur with aggressive or religious themes. Neuroimaging studies indicate distinct patterns of brain activation in patients with sexual obsessions. Treatment with SSRIs and CBT is often less effective in this subgroup, suggesting the need for targeted interventions. Conclusions: Sexuality-related symptoms in OCD patients constitute a distinct and clinically relevant domain that affects functioning, prognosis, and treatment response. Recognizing and addressing these symptoms is essential for the holistic and effective care of patients with OCD.

We report on a patient with tardive dyskinesia (TDK) treated with aripiprazole, a third-generation antipsychotic with partial D2 agonist-antagonist activity at both the dopamine and serotonin receptors. The patient's condition improved with administration of a combination of tetrabenazine, botulinum toxin, and clozapine, which has previously not been used. We suggest that this treatment combination may have potential benefits for patients with TDK. After aripiprazole discontinuation, the patient was treated with clozapine (150 mg/day) and biperiden (8 mg/day). Due to a lack of improvement, we administered 300 units (intramuscularly; IM) of botulinum toxin into the paravertebral muscles every 3 months and 1,000 units IM every 4 months in addition to tetrabenazine (75 mg/day) and biperiden (8 mg/day). The patient stopped this treatment, at which point TDK reappeared. After starting a treatment regimen of clozapine (100 mg/day), tetrabenazine (75 mg/day), and botulinum toxin (300 units IM), the patient's symptoms remitted.

Background Systematic screening for depression in high-risk patients is recommended but remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of such screening in everyday clinical practice on depression recognition. Methods A pragmatic, cluster randomized, controlled study that randomized primary care physicians (PCPs) in Spain either to an intervention or control group. The intervention group (35-PCPs) received training in depression screening and used depression screening routinely for at least 6 months. The control group (34-PCPs) managed depression in their usual manner. Adherence to (1–6; never-very frequently), feasibility (1–4; unfeasible-very feasible), and acceptance (1–5; very poor-very good) of the screening were evaluated. Underrecognition (primary outcome) and undertreatment rates of major depressive disorder (MDD) in the two groups were compared 6 months after randomization in a random sample of 3737 patients assigned to these PCPs using logistic regression adjusting for the clustering effect. Results No significant differences were found for recognition rates (58.0% vs. 48.1% intervention vs. control; OR [95%CI] 1.40 [0.73-2.68], p = 0.309). The undertreatment rate did not differ significantly either (p = 0.390). The mean adherence to depression screening was 4.4 ± 1.0 (‘occasionally’), the mean feasibility was 3.1 ± 0.5 (‘moderately feasible’), and the mean acceptance was 4.2 ± 0.6 (‘good’). Conclusions This research was not able to show effectiveness of the systematic screening for MDD in high-risk patients on depression recognition in primary care. The poor adherence to screening implementation could partially explain the results. These reflect the difficulties of putting into practice the clinical guidelines usually based on interventional research. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01662817

Major depressive disorder is a serious mental disorder in which treatment with antidepressant medication is often associated with sexual dysfunction (SD). Given its intimate nature, treatment emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) has a low rate of spontaneous reports by patients, and this side effect therefore remains underestimated in clinical practice and in technical data sheets for antidepressants. Moreover, the issue of TESD is rarely routinely approached by clinicians in daily praxis. TESD is a determinant for tolerability, since this dysfunction often leads to a state of patient distress (or the distress of their partner) in the sexually active population, which is one of the most frequent reasons for lack of adherence and treatment drop-outs in antidepressant use. There is a delicate balance between prescribing an effective drug that improves depressive symptomatology and also has a minimum impact on sexuality. In this paper, we detail some management strategies for TESD from a clinical perspective, ranging from prevention (carefully choosing an antidepressant with a low rate of TESD) to possible pharmacological interventions aimed at improving patients’ tolerability when TESD is present. The suggested recommendations include the following: for low sexual desire, switching to a non-serotoninergic drug, lowering the dose, or associating bupropion or aripiprazole; for unwanted orgasm delayal or anorgasmia, dose reduction, “weekend holiday”, or switching to a non-serotoninergic drug or fluvoxamine; for erectile dysfunction, switching to a non-serotoninergic drug or the addition of an antidote such as phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PD5-I); and for lubrication difficulties, switching to a non-serotoninergic drug, dose reduction, or using vaginal lubricants. A psychoeducational and psychotherapeutic approach should always be considered in cases with poorly tolerated sexual dysfunction.