Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background and Objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with severe coronary calcification and increased procedural risks. We aimed to evaluate the impact of CKD on contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), bleeding, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA). Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 652 patients who underwent RA for calcified coronary lesions from the multicenter ROCK registry and a single-center extension between 2010 and 2025. Patients were classified into CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 66) and non-CKD (n = 586) groups, excluding those on dialysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of CIN and in-hospital bleeding. Secondary endpoints included 3-year target vessel failure (TVF), myocardial infarction (MI), and total bleeding. Results: The primary composite outcome occurred more frequently in the CKD group (16.7% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.001). Specifically, CIN was significantly higher in CKD patients (15.2% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001), while in-hospital bleeding did not differ significantly. In multivariate analysis, CKD was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (adjusted OR 3.02; 95% CI 1.36–6.69; p = 0.006). At 3-year follow-up, total bleeding (10.6% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.008) and MI (6.1% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.024) were higher in the CKD group, whereas TVF and cardiac death showed no significant difference. Conclusions: CKD is a robust independent risk factor for CIN and long-term bleeding in patients undergoing RA. However, comparable clinical efficacy outcomes suggest that RA remains a feasible strategy in CKD patients when early complications are carefully managed with contrast-minimizing strategies.

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of chronic total occlusion (CTO) on clinical outcomes in patients with calcified coronary lesions receiving rotational atherectomy (RA). This multi-center registry enrolled consecutive patients with calcified coronary artery disease who underwent RA during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 9 tertiary centers in Korea between January 2010 and October 2019. The primary outcome was target-vessel failure (TVF) which included the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and target-vessel revascularization (TVR). A total of 583 lesions were enrolled in this registry and classified as CTO ( n  = 42 lesions, 7.2%) and non-CTO ( n  = 541 lesions, 92.8%). The CTO group consisted of younger patients who were more likely to have a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The incidence of the primary outcome was 14.1% and 16.7% for the non-CTO group and CTO group, respectively. The primary outcomes observed in the two groups were not significantly different (log-rank p  = 0.736). The 18-month clinical outcomes of the CTO group were comparable to those of the non-CTO group in multivariate analysis. About 7% of patients requiring RA have CTO lesions and these patients experience similar clinical outcomes compared with those having non-CTO lesions. Use of RA for CTO lesions was safe despite higher procedural complexity.

High-degree atrioventricular block (AVB), including complete AVB in acute inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), is not uncommon. However, there is no study evaluating the clinical differences between patients who have undergone temporary pacing (TP) and patients who have not. The present study was designed to investigate whether TP has any prognostic significance in inferior STEMI complicated by complete AVB. From January 2009 to December 2014, 295 consecutive patients diagnosed with inferior wall STEMI in a university hospital were reviewed. All of them underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among the 295 patients, there were 72 patients with complete AVB. The clinical characteristics, procedural data, and long-term major adverse cardiocerebrovascular events were compared in patients with and without TP. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were similar between patients with and without TP. Patients with TP were more likely to present with cardiogenic shock; thus, additional interventions were attempted via a femoral approach, as patients received further treatment with intra-aortic balloon pumps and were subjected to additional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Most cases of complete AVB were primarily caused by right coronary artery occlusion. After a median follow-up period of 344 (range, 105.5-641) days, major adverse cardiocerebrovascular events did not differ between the groups (P=0.528). We conclude that primary PCI without TP is acceptable in complete AVB-complicated acute inferior STEMI. To avoid delay in reperfusion, we suggest that primary PCI should be the first priority therapy rather than treating patients initially with TP.

Background: Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is a disease commonly diagnosed in patients undergoing coronary angiography. However, little is known regarding the long-term clinical impact of multi-vessel non-obstructive CAD. Therefore, the object of this study was to investigate the long-term clinical impact of multi-vessel non-obstructive CAD. Method: A total of 2083 patients without revascularization history and obstructive CAD were enrolled between January 2010 and December 2015. They were classified into four groups according to number of vessels involved in non-obstructive CAD (25% ≤ luminal stenosis < 70%): zero, one, two, or three diseased vessels (DVs). We monitored the patients for 5 years. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as a composite of cardiac death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI). Result: The occurrence of MACCEs increased as the number of non-obstructive DVs increased, and was especially high in patients with three DVs. After adjustment, patients with three DVs still showed significantly poorer clinical outcomes of MACCEs, stroke, and MI compared those with zero DVs. Conclusion: Multi-vessel non-obstructive CAD, especially in patients with non-obstructive three DVs, is strongly associated with poor long-term clinical outcomes. This finding suggests that more intensive treatment may be required in this subset of patients.

Background/Objectives: Diabetes mellitus is a substantial risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). Diabetes duration is linked to clinical outcomes in CAD patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of diabetes duration on major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes, as well as all-cause mortality, in Korean patients diagnosed with non-obstructive CAD. Methods: This non-randomized, retrospective, single-center study was based on the medical records of 4287 patients who underwent coronary angiography from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2015. Of these patients, 517 with non-obstructive CAD—defined as 20–49% coronary artery stenosis—were identified and categorized into three groups based on diabetes duration: those without diabetes, those with diabetes for <10 years, and those with diabetes for ≥10 years. Results: Over a median follow-up period of 60 months, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) increased nearly fourfold in patients who had non-obstructive CAD and diabetes for ≥10 years compared to those without diabetes, even after adjusting for covariates (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 4.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04–10.40, p < 0.001). The risks of cardiovascular death and non-fatal stroke were also significantly higher in patients who had diabetes for ≥10 years compared to non-diabetic patients (adjusted HR 12.42, 95% CI 2.33–66.22, p = 0.003, adjusted HR 4.97, 95% CI 1.88–13.19, p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Patients with non-obstructive CAD and a longer duration of diabetes exhibited a higher risk of MACCEs. Diabetes duration could be an important factor in predicting mortality in patients with non-obstructive CAD.

The goal of this study was to compare the lipid-lowering efficacy of the combination of ezetimibe and low- or intermediate-intensity statin therapy versus that of high-intensity statin monotherapy. This study is a post hoc analysis of an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial. Patients who had hypercholesterolemia and required lipid-lowering treatment were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 treatment groups: rosuvastatin 5 mg (R5, n = 68), rosuvastatin 10 mg (R10, n = 67), rosuvastatin 20 mg (R20, n = 69), and ezetimibe 10 mg combined with rosuvastatin 5 mg (R5 + E10, n = 67), rosuvastatin 10 mg (R10 + E10, n = 68), and rosuvastatin 20 mg (R20 + E10, n = 68) daily. The effects of coadministration of ezetimibe and a low dose of rosuvastatin on lipid parameters and the target achievement rate were compared between the R5 + E10 and R10 treatment groups, the R5 + E10 and R20 treatment groups, and the R10 + E10 and R20 treatment groups. Reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, the apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio, and non–HDL-C were not different between the R5 + E10 and R10 treatment groups (all, P > 0.017), the R5 + E10 and R20 treatment groups (all, P > 0.017), and the R10 + E10 and R20 treatment groups (all, P > 0.017). R5 + E10 treatment showed efficacy comparable to that of R10 or R20 in affording LDL levels <50% of the baseline level (R5 + E10 vs R10, 73.13% vs 62.69% [P = 0.1952]; R5 + E10 vs R20, 73.13% vs 73.91% [P = 0.9180]), LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL (R5 + E10 vs R10, 64.18% vs 55.22% [P = 0.2906]; R5 + E10 vs R20, 64.18% vs 62.32% [P = 0.8220]), and LDL-C levels <50% of the baseline level or <70 mg/dL (R5 + E10 vs R10, 77.61% vs 70.15% [P = 0.3255]; R5 + E10 vs R20, 77.61% vs 78.26% [P = 0.9273]). The R10 + E10 treatment group was better than the R20 treatment group in achieving the target LDL-C level <70 mg/dL (83.82% vs 62.32%; P = 0.0046), even among participants with a baseline LDL-C level >135 mg/dL (77.5% vs 48.8%, respectively; P = 0.0074). Ezetimibe combined with low- or intermediate-intensity statin therapy has lipid-lowering efficacy comparable to or better than that of high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy. The results of the present study indicate that the combination treatment with ezetimibe is advantageous in that it permits dose reduction of rosuvastatin without compromising the lipid-lowering efficacy of rosuvastatin. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02205606.

Background: Periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) occurs more frequently in patients with heavily calcified lesion and undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA). However, there are limited studies addressing prognostic impact of PMI in patients requiring RA due to severe coronary artery calcification (CAC). Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of PMI in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using RA. Methods: A total of 540 patients (583 lesions) who received PCI using RA were enrolled between January 2010 and October 2019. PMI was defined as elevations of creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) >10 times the upper limited normal. Patients were divided into a PMI group and a non-PMI group. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and cerebrovascular accident. Results: Although in-hospital events occurred more frequently in the PMI group than in the non-PMI group (15 [3.0%] vs. 6 [13.3%], p = 0.005), the incidence of MACCEs at 1 month, 1–12 months, or 12 months failed to show a significant difference between the two groups (1 month, 10 [2.0%] vs. 1 [2.2%], p > 0.999; 1–12 months, 39 [7.9%] vs. 7 [15.6%], p = 0.091; 12 months, 49 [9.9%] vs. 8 [17.8%], p = 0.123). Conclusions: This study shows that PMI after RA in patients with severe CAC was associated with more frequent in-hospital events and a nonsignificant trend for more events during 1 year follow-up.

Background and Objectives: Rotational atherectomy (RA) is a crucial method for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of heavily calcified coronary lesions. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RA via the radial versus femoral approach. Methods: The Rotational Atherectomy in Calcified Lesions in Korea (ROCK) registry included consecutive patients with severely calcified coronary artery disease who received RA during PCI at nine tertiary centers in Korea. A total of 540 patients who underwent PCI with RA were enrolled between October 2019 and January 2010. We retrospectively investigated the clinical outcomes between the transradial and transfemoral approaches. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) within 36 months of follow-up. Results: Of the 540 patients, 248 patients (45.9%) were in the transradial group, and 292 patients (54.1%) were in the transfemoral group. There were no significant differences in MACCE (11.3% vs. 17.8%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.520; 95% confidence interval: 0.889–2.600; p = 0.126) and procedural success (97.6% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.145). The occurrence of in-hospital bleeding was numerically higher in the transfemoral group, but the difference was not statistically significant (8 [3.2%] vs. 19 [6.5%], p = 0.081) Conclusions: In this study, the transradial approach did not show a significant difference in clinical outcomes but tended to have lower bleeding events compared to the transfemoral approach. RA via the transradial approach can be a useful vascular access option compared to the transfemoral approach.

Background and Objectives: Although both rotational atherectomy (RA) and atrial fibrillation (AF) have a high thrombotic risk, there have been no previous studies on the prognostic impact of AF in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using RA. Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic impact of AF in patients undergoing PCI using RA. Materials and Methods: A total of 540 patients who received PCI using RA were enrolled between January 2010 and October 2019. Patients were divided into AF and sinus rhythm groups according to the presence of AF. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACEs) defined as a composite outcome of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, cerebrovascular accident, or total bleeding. Results: Although in-hospital adverse events showed no difference between those with AF and those without AF (in-hospital events, 54 (11.0%) vs. 6 (12.2%), p = 0.791), AF was strongly associated with an increased risk of NACE at 3 years (NACE: hazard ratio, 1.880; 95% confidence interval, 1.096–3.227; p = 0.022). Conclusions: AF in patients who underwent PCI using RA was strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes. Thus, more attention should be paid to thrombotic and bleeding risks.

Complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) in acute inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with poor clinical outcomes after noninvasive treatment. This study was designed to determine the effect of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with CAVB complicating acute inferior STEMI, at a single center. We enrolled 138 consecutive patients diagnosed with STEMI involving the inferior wall; of these, 27 patients had CAVB. All patients received primary PCI. The clinical characteristics, procedural data, and clinical outcomes were compared in patients with versus without CAVB. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between patients with and without CAVB. Patients with CAVB were more likely to present with cardiogenic shock, and CAVB was caused primarily by right coronary artery occlusion. Door-to-balloon time was similar between those two groups. After primary PCI, CAVB was reversed in all patients. The peak creatinine phosphokinase level, left ventricular ejection fraction and in-hospital mortality rate were similar between the two groups. After a median follow up of 318 days, major adverse cardiac events did not differ between the groups (8.1% in patients without CAVB; 11.1% in patients with CAVB) (P=0.702). We conclude that primary PCI can ameliorate CAVB-complicated acute inferior STEMI, with an acceptable rate of major adverse cardiac events, and suggest that primary PCI should be the preferred reperfusion therapy in patients with CAVB complicating acute inferior myocardial infarction.