Explore the vast range of titles available.

RationaleThe potential value of rescue intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains to be validated in randomised trials.AimThe Chemical Optimization of Cerebral Embolectomy 2 (CHOICE 2) trial is designed to confirm whether adjunctive intra-arterial alteplase, administered after successful MT, improves clinical outcomes in patients with LVO stroke.Sample size estimatesA total of 440 patients (220 per group) randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive intra-arterial thrombolysis or not intra-arterial thrombolysis provides 80% statistical power to detect a 14% absolute benefit in the primary endpoint (the proportion of patients achieving modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–1 at 90 days), assuming a rate of 40% in the control group, a 5% two-sided type I error. The sample size also provides >95% power for detecting an 18% absolute benefit in secondary imaging endpoints, assuming a 58% rate in the control group.Methods and designMulticentre, randomised, open, blinded end-point assessment phase III trial. Eligible patients are adults (≥18 years) with symptomatic LVO who undergo MT with successful or complete reperfusion at end of the procedure. Patients in the intervention group will receive a 15 min intra-arterial infusion of alteplase (1.0 mg/mL, maximum dose 20 mg).Study outcome(s)The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1) at 90 days. Key secondary outcomes are the presence of hypoperfusion on brain CT perfusion at 36±24 hours post randomisation, infarct expansion, Barthel Index and quality of life. Mortality and symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage will also be evaluated.DiscussionThis trial will provide evidence whether rescue intra-arterial thrombolysis improves clinical outcome in patients with LVO stroke who achieve successful or complete angiographic reperfusion following MT.

Introduction: Although stentrievers (SRs) have been a mainstay of mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and current guidelines recommend the use of SRs in the treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke (LVO), there is a paucity of studies in the literature comparing SRs directly against each other in terms of mechanical and functional properties. Timely access to endovascular therapy and the ability to restore intracranial flow in a safe, efficient, and efficacious manner have been critical to the success of MT. This study aimed to investigate the impact of contemporary SR characteristics, including model, brand, size, and length, on the first-pass effect (FPE) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Consecutive patients with M1 occlusion treated with a single SR+BGC were recruited from the ROSSETTI registry. The primary outcome was the FPE that was defined as modified (mFPE) or true (tFPE) for the achievement of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) grades 2b-3 or 3 after a single device pass, respectively. We compared patients who achieved mFPE with those who achieved tFPE according to SR characteristics. Results: We included 610 patients (52.3% female and 47.7% male, mean age 75.1 ± 13.62 years). mFPE was achieved in 357 patients (58.5%), whereas tFPE was achieved in 264 (43.3%). There was no significant association between SR characteristics and mFPE or tFPE. Specifically, the SR size did not show a statistically significant relationship with improvement in FPE. Similarly, the length of the SR did not yield significant differences in the mFPE and tFPE, even when the data were grouped. Conclusions: Our data indicate that contemporary SR-mediated thrombectomy characteristics, including model, brand, size, and length, do not significantly affect the FPE.