Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Aims Early diuresis and natriuresis are commonly used to assess the efficacy of decongestive therapy following an acute heart failure episode. There is limited knowledge regarding which parameter better predicts adverse clinical outcomes, especially in the outpatient setting. This study investigated the prognostic value of both metrics in predicting 30-day adverse clinical events in an ambulatory worsening heart failure (WHF) scenario. Methods and results This is a post-hoc analysis of the SALT-HF trial involving 167 patients with ambulatory WHF randomized to receive intravenous furosemide with or without hypertonic saline solution. Early diuretic response was assessed through 3-h urine output and 3-h urinary sodium (uNa+) levels following intravenous (IV) diuretic infusion. We analysed their association with 30-day adverse events (defined as death, heart failure hospitalization, or the need for outpatient IV diuretics) using logistic regression analysis. Both exposures were examined along the continuum and dichotomized in their median. The discriminative ability between the exposures and endpoints was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC-ROC). Results The median age of participants was 81 years, predominantly male (69.5%). Patients with lower 3-h urinary sodium and diuresis were older and exhibited reduced kidney function and haemoglobin levels. At 30 days, 50 (29.9%) of the sample experienced the composite endpoint. Multivariate analyses revealed that lower 3-h uNa+ was associated with a higher risk of 30-day adverse events (P = 0.008). Conversely, 3-h diuresis did not significantly predict 30-day adverse outcomes (P = 0.424). There was a trend towards a higher AUC-ROC for the inverse of 3-h natriuresis compared with 3-h diuresis: 0.680 versus 0.601, P = 0.092. Conclusions In patients with ambulatory WHF treated with IV furosemide, 3-h urinary sodium predicted 30-day outcomes whereas 3-h diuresis did not.

Aims Hypertonic saline solution (HSS) plus intravenous (IV) loop diuretic appears to enhance the diuretic response in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). The efficacy and safety of this therapy in the ambulatory setting have not been evaluated. We aimed to describe the design and baseline characteristics of the SALT‐HF trial participants. Methods and results ‘Efficacy of Saline Hypertonic Therapy in Ambulatory Patients with HF’ (SALT‐HF) trial was a multicenter, double‐blinded, and randomized study involving ambulatory patients who experienced worsening heart failure (WHF) without criteria for hospitalization. Enrolled patients had to present at least two signs of volume overload, use ≥ 80 mg of oral furosemide daily, and have elevated natriuretic peptides. Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with a 1‐h infusion of IV furosemide plus HSS (2.6–3.4% NaCl depending on plasmatic sodium levels) versus a 1‐h infusion of IV furosemide at the same dose (125–250 mg, depending on basal loop diuretic dose). Clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were collected at baseline and after 7 days, and a telephone visit was planned after 30 days. The primary endpoint was 3‐h diuresis after treatment started. Secondary endpoints included (a) 7‐day changes in congestion data, (b) 7‐day changes in kidney function and electrolytes, (c) 30‐day clinical events (need of IV diuretic, HF hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, all‐cause mortality or HF‐hospitalization). Results A total of 167 participants [median age, 81 years; interquartile range (IQR), 73–87, 30.5% females] were randomized across 13 sites between December 2020 and March 2023. Half of the participants (n = 82) had an ejection fraction >50%. Most patients showed a high burden of comorbidities, with a median Charlson index of 3 (IQR: 2–4). Common co‐morbidities included diabetes mellitus (41%, n = 69), atrial fibrillation (80%, n = 134), and chronic kidney disease (64%, n = 107). Patients exhibited a poor functional NYHA class (69% presenting NYHA III) and several signs of congestion. The mean composite congestion score was 4.3 (standard deviation: 1.7). Ninety per cent of the patients (n = 151) presented oedema and jugular engorgement, and 71% (n = 118) showed lung B lines assessed by ultrasound. Median inferior vena cava diameter was 23 mm, (IQR: 21–25), and plasmatic levels of N‐terminal‐pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) and antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125) were increased (median NT‐proBNP 4969 pg/mL, IQR: 2508–9328; median CA125 46 U/L, IQR: 20–114). Conclusions SALT‐HF trial randomized 167 ambulatory patients with WHF and will determine whether an infusion of hypertonic saline therapy plus furosemide increases diuresis and improves decongestion compared to equivalent furosemide administration alone.

ABSTRACT Aims Effective decongestion is crucial in managing acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Persistent congestion post-diuretic therapy correlates with adverse outcomes. This study evaluates whether a strategy guided by intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) enhances decongestion compared to standard diuretic titration. Methods and results ABDOPOCUS-HF is a randomized, multicentre, open-label, pragmatic clinical trial involving 168 patients hospitalized with ADHF across 14 Spanish hospitals. Inclusion criteria encompass clinical signs of congestion and elevated natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP >1000 pg/mL or BNP > 250 pg/mL). Participants are randomized 1:1 to either standard care or an intervention arm where diuretic therapy is guided by baseline IAP measurements and POCUS assessments, including lung ultrasound, inferior vena cava diameter and VExUS score. The primary endpoint is the resolution of systemic congestion at 72 h, measured by the ADVOR score. Secondary endpoints include changes in pulmonary congestion (B-lines), intravascular congestion (VExUS and IVC), biomarkers (NT-proBNP and CA125), total diuretic dose, diuretic response, hospital length of stay and rates of cardiovascular death, rehospitalization and need for intravenous diuretics at 30 and 90 days. Safety endpoints encompass worsening renal function, electrolyte disturbances and catheter-related infections. Conclusions The ABDOPOCUS-HF trial investigates whether integrating IAP and POCUS into decongestion strategies improves diuretic response and clinical outcomes in ADHF patients. Findings may inform future protocols for volume management in acute heart failure. The ABDOPOCUS-HF trial is a randomized, single-blind, low-intervention clinical trial (n = 168) investigating the utility of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and point of care ultrasound to guide decongestive therapies during the first 72 hours after admission for acute heart failure. The primary endpoint is significant congestion reduction at 72 hours, assessed through ADVOR score. Secondary outcomes include readmission/cardiovascular death at 90 days and changes in congestion biomarkers (NT-proBNP and CA125) and ultrasound parameters (B-lines, VEXUS score). Safety endpoints include electrolyte disturbances and worsening renal function during admission.

Aims The aim of the LAICA study was to evaluate the long‐term effectiveness and safety of intermittent levosimendan infusion in patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF). Methods and results This was a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial of intermittent levosimendan 0.1 μg/kg/min as a continuous 24‐h intravenous infusion administered once monthly for 1 year in patients with AdHF. The primary endpoint [incidence of rehospitalization (admission to the emergency department or hospital ward for >12 h) for acute decompensated HF or clinical deterioration of the underlying HF] occurred in 23/70 (33%) of the levosimendan group (Group I) and 12/27 (44%) of the placebo group (Group II) (P = 0.286). The incidence of hospital readmissions for acute decompensated HF (Group I vs. Group II) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 4.2% vs. 18.2% (P = 0.036); 12.8% vs. 33.3% (P = 0.02); 25.7% vs. 40.7% (P = 0.147); 32.8% vs. 44.4% (P = 0.28), respectively. In a secondary pre‐specified time‐to‐event analysis no differences were observed in admission for acute decompensated HF between patients treated with levosimendan compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.66; 95% CI, 0.32–1.32; P = 0.24). Cumulative incidence for the aggregated endpoint of acute decompensation of HF and/or death at 1 and 3 months were significatively lower in the levosimendan group than in placebo group [5.7% vs. 25.9% (P = 0.004) and 17.1% vs. 48.1% (P = 0.001), respectively], but not at 6 and 12 months [34.2% vs. 59.2% (P = 0.025); 41.4% vs. 66.6% (P = 0.022), respectively]. Survival probability was significantly higher in patients who received levosimendan compared with those who received placebo (log rank: 4.06; P = 0.044). There were no clinically relevant differences in tolerability between levosimendan and placebo and no new safety signals were observed. Conclusions In our study, intermittent levosimendan in patients with AdHF produced a statistically non‐significant reduction in the incidence of hospital readmissions for acute decompensated HF, a significantly lower cumulative incidence of acute decompensation of HF and/or death at 1 and 3 month of treatment and a significant improvement in survival during 12 months of treatment.

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) plays a role in the improvement of cardiac function and remodeling. Their serum levels are strongly related with mortality in chronic systolic heart failure (HF). The aim of this study was to study prognostic value of HGF in acute HF, interaction with ejection fraction, renal function, and natriuretic peptides. We included 373 patients (age 76 ± 10 years, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 46 ± 14%, 48% men) consecutively admitted for acute HF. Blood samples were obtained at admission. All patients were followed up until death or close of study (>1 year, median 371 days). HGF concentrations were determined using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (human HGF immunoassay). The predictive power of HGF was estimated by Cox regression with calculation of Harrell C-statistic. HGF had a median of 1,942 pg/ml (interquartile rank 1,354). According to HGF quartiles, mortality rates (per 1,000 patients/year) were 98, 183, 375, and 393, respectively (p <0.001). In Cox regression analysis, HGF (hazard ratio1SD = 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.1, p = 0.002) and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; hazard ratio1SD = 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.6, p = 0.002) were independent predictors of mortality. Interaction between HGF and LVEF, origin, and renal function was nonsignificant. The addition of HGF improved the predictive ability of the models (C-statistic 0.768 vs 0.741, p = 0.016). HGF showed a complementary value over NT-proBNP (p = 0.001): mortality rate was 490 with both above the median versus 72 with both below. In conclusion, in patients with acute HF, serum HGF concentrations are elevated and identify patients at higher risk of mortality, regardless of LVEF, ischemic origin, or renal function. HGF had independent and additive information over NT-proBNP.

Aims The role of non‐invasive telemedicine (TM) combining telemonitoring and teleintervention by videoconference (VC) in patients recently admitted due to heart failure (HF) (‘vulnerable phase’ HF patients) is not well established. The aim of the Heart failure Events reduction with Remote Monitoring and eHealth Support (HERMeS) trial is to assess the impact on clinical outcomes of implementing a TM service based on mobile health (mHealth), which includes remote daily monitoring of biometric data and symptom reporting (telemonitoring) combined with VC structured, nurse‐based follow‐up (teleintervention). The results will be compared with those of the comprehensive HF usual care (UC) strategy based on face‐to‐face on‐site visits at the vulnerable post‐discharge phase. Methods and results We designed a 24 week nationwide, multicentre, randomized, controlled, open‐label, blinded endpoint adjudication trial to assess the effect on cardiovascular (CV) mortality and non‐fatal HF events of a TM‐based comprehensive management programme, based on mHealth, for patients with chronic HF. Approximately 508 patients with a recent hospital admission due to HF decompensation will be randomized (1:1) to either structured follow‐up based on face‐to‐face appointments (UC group) or the delivery of health care using TM. The primary outcome will be a composite of death from CV causes or non‐fatal HF events (first and recurrent) at the end of a 6 month follow‐up period. Key secondary endpoints will include components of the primary event analysis, recurrent event analysis, and patient‐reported outcomes. Conclusions The HERMeS trial will assess the efficacy of a TM‐based follow‐up strategy for real‐world ‘vulnerable phase’ HF patients combining telemonitoring and teleintervention.