Explore the vast range of titles available.

Neuroblastomas harbor ALK aberrations clinically resistant to crizotinib yet sensitive pre-clinically to the third-generation ALK inhibitor lorlatinib. We conducted a first-in-child study evaluating lorlatinib with and without chemotherapy in children and adults with relapsed or refractory ALK-driven neuroblastoma. The trial is ongoing, and we report here on three cohorts that have met pre-specified primary endpoints: lorlatinib as a single agent in children (12 months to <18 years); lorlatinib as a single agent in adults (≥18 years); and lorlatinib in combination with topotecan/cyclophosphamide in children (<18 years). Primary endpoints were safety, pharmacokinetics and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints were response rate and 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) response. Lorlatinib was evaluated at 45–115 mg/m 2 /dose in children and 100–150 mg in adults. Common adverse events (AEs) were hypertriglyceridemia (90%), hypercholesterolemia (79%) and weight gain (87%). Neurobehavioral AEs occurred mainly in adults and resolved with dose hold/reduction. The RP2D of lorlatinib with and without chemotherapy in children was 115 mg/m 2 . The single-agent adult RP2D was 150 mg. The single-agent response rate (complete/partial/minor) for <18 years was 30%; for ≥18 years, 67%; and for chemotherapy combination in <18 years, 63%; and 13 of 27 (48%) responders achieved MIBG complete responses, supporting lorlatinib’s rapid translation into active phase 3 trials for patients with newly diagnosed high-risk, ALK-driven neuroblastoma. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03107988 . In children, adolescents and adults with mutated ALK-driven relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, a third-generation ALK inhibitor with or without chemotherapy was well tolerated, and recommended phase 2 doses were successfully identified in all patient groups.

In this single-arm, non-randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03363373), 74 patients with relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma and residual disease in bone/bone marrow (BM) received naxitamab on Days 1, 3, and 5 (3 mg/kg/day) with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Days -4 to 5) every 4 weeks, until complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) followed by 5 additional cycles every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint in the prespecified interim analysis was overall response (2017 International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria). Among 26 responders (CR + PR) in the efficacy population ( N  = 52), 58% had refractory disease, and 42% had relapsed disease. Overall response rate (ORR) was 50% (95% CI: 36-64%), and CR and PR were observed in 38% and 12%, respectively. With the 95% CI lower limit for ORR exceeding 20%, the primary endpoint of overall response was met. Patients with evaluable bone disease had a 58% (29/50) bone compartment response (CR, 40%; PR, 18%). BM compartment response was 74% (17/23; CR, 74%). One-year overall survival and progression-free survival (secondary endpoints) were 93% (95% CI: 80-98%) and 35% (95% CI: 16-54%), respectively. Naxitamab-related Grade 3 adverse events included hypotension (58%) and pain (54%). Overall, naxitamab demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy with manageable safety in patients with residual neuroblastoma in bone/BM. Neuroblastoma is an aggressive childhood cancer with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Here the authors report the results of a phase 2 trial of the anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody naxitamab plus GM-CSF for relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma.

BackgroundWe report dose-escalation results from an open-label, phase 1/2 trial evaluating avelumab (anti-PD-L1) in paediatric patients with refractory/relapsed solid tumours.MethodsIn phase 1, patients aged < 18 years with solid (including central nervous system [CNS]) tumours for which standard therapy did not exist or had failed were enrolled in sequential cohorts of 3–6 patients. Patients received avelumab 10 or 20 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). ResultsAt data cut-off (27 July 2021), 21 patients aged 3–17 years had received avelumab 10 mg/kg (n = 6) or 20 mg/kg (n = 15). One patient had three events that were classified as a DLT (fatigue with hemiparesis and muscular weakness associated with pseudoprogression; 20 mg/kg cohort). Grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in five (83%) and 11 (73%) patients in the 10 and 20 mg/kg cohorts, respectively, and were treatment-related in one patient (7%; grade 3 [DLT]) in the 20 mg/kg cohort. Avelumab exposure in paediatric patients receiving 20 mg/kg dosing, but not 10 mg/kg, was comparable or higher compared with approved adult dosing (10 mg/kg or 800 mg flat dose). No objective responses were observed. Four patients with CNS tumours (20 mg/kg cohort) achieved stable disease, which was ongoing in two patients with astrocytoma at cut-off (for 24.7 and 30.3 months).ConclusionIn paediatric patients with refractory/relapsed solid tumours, avelumab monotherapy showed a safety profile consistent with previous adult studies, but clinical benefits were limited.

Background Naxitamab is a humanized GD2‐binding monoclonal antibody that received accelerated approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for refractory or relapsed high‐risk neuroblastoma limited to bone or bone marrow. Trial 201 (NCT03363373) is an ongoing global clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of naxitamab in combination with granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor in this population. Aims Here, we review the safety profile and adverse event (AE) management associated with naxitamab administration in a pediatric population, based on Trial 201 protocol guidelines and clinical trial experience. Methods and Results At least 50% of patients experienced pain, hypotension, bronchospasm, cough, vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, and tachycardia, with the following reported at grade ≥3 AEs for at least 10% of patients: pain, hypotension, urticaria, and bronchospasm. These AEs were generally manageable in the outpatient setting using premedications, supportive therapies, and appropriate monitoring post‐infusion. Algorithms were established for infusion‐related AEs, including hypotension and bronchospasm, to provide guidance to investigators for early recognition and timely intervention, including medication and infusion rate modification or interruption, or treatment discontinuation, based on AE severity. Educating patients and caregivers on what to expect regarding premedication at home, experience during the infusion cycle, and post‐infusion monitoring helps optimize naxitamab treatment and supportive therapies and may reduce treatment burden. Conclusion This article highlights the protocol‐based recommendations for the management of acute AEs associated with outpatient naxitamab treatment in Trial 201. The authors recommend close monitoring and timely implementation of measures to ensure that patients can remain on treatment and obtain maximum clinical benefit from naxitamab therapy.

We conducted integrative somatic–germline analyses by deeply sequencing 864 cancer-associated genes, complete genomes and transcriptomes for 300 mostly previously treated children and adolescents/young adults with cancer of poor prognosis or with rare tumors enrolled in the SickKids Cancer Sequencing (KiCS) program. Clinically actionable variants were identified in 56% of patients. Improved diagnostic accuracy led to modified management in a subset. Therapeutically targetable variants (54% of patients) were of unanticipated timing and type, with over 20% derived from the germline. Corroborating mutational signatures (SBS3/BRCAness) in patients with germline homologous recombination defects demonstrates the potential utility of PARP inhibitors. Mutational burden was significantly elevated in 9% of patients. Sequential sampling identified changes in therapeutically targetable drivers in over one-third of patients, suggesting benefit from rebiopsy for genomic analysis at the time of relapse. Comprehensive cancer genomic profiling is useful at multiple points in the care trajectory for children and adolescents/young adults with cancer, supporting its integration into early clinical management.

Venetoclax is a highly selective, potent BCL-2 inhibitor that is approved for some patients previously treated for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and has shown promising activity in adult studies across several hematologic malignancies. Preclinical studies have demonstrated venetoclax activity in pediatric patient-derived xenograft models and cell lines; however, clinical studies in pediatric patients have yet to be conducted. The prognosis is poor for children with most relapsed/refractory malignancies, and limited treatment options result in unmet clinical need. Herein, we describe the rationale and design of the first study of venetoclax in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory malignancies: a Phase I trial investigating the safety and pharmacokinetics of venetoclax monotherapy followed by the addition of chemotherapy (Trial registration: EudraCT 2017-000439-14; NCT03236857).

Purpose: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and tumour volumes to differentiate between malignant (neuroblastoma (NB)) and benign types of neuroblastic tumours (ganglioneuroma (GN) and ganglioneuroblastoma (GNB)) using different region-of-interest (ROI) sizes. Materials and Methods: This single-centre retrospective study included malignant and benign paediatric neuroblastic tumours that had undergone DW MRI at diagnosis. The outcome was diagnostic accuracy of the tumour volume from structural and ADC DW MRI, in comparison to histopathology (reference standard). Results: Data from 40 patients (NB, n = 24; GNB, n = 6; GN, n = 10), 18 (45%) females and 22 (55%) males, with a median age at diagnosis of 21 months (NB), 64 months (GNB), and 133 months (GN), respectively, ranging from 0 to 193 months, were evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for ADC for discriminating between neuroblastic tumours’ histopathology for a small ROI was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75–0.98), and for a large ROI, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.71–0.96). An ADC cut-off value of 1.06 × 10−3 mm2/s was able to distinguish malignant from benign tumours with 83% (68–98%) sensitivity and 75% (95% CI: 54–98%) specificity. Tumour volume was not indicative of malignant vs. benign tumour diagnosis. Conclusions: In this study, both small and large ROIs used to derive ADC DW MRI metrics demonstrated high accuracy to differentiate malignant from benign neuroblastic tumours, with the ADC AUROC for the averaged multiple small ROIs being slightly greater than that of large ROIs, but with overlapping 95% CIs. This should be taken into consideration for standardisation of ROI-related data analysis by international initiatives.

Abstract Cancer is the leading cause of disease-related death in children, adolescents, and young adults beyond the newborn period in North America. Improving survival rates for patients with hard-to-cure cancer remains a challenge. One approach that has gained particular traction is ‘precision oncology’, whereby next-generation sequencing is used to identify genomic or transcriptomic changes that can help clarify the diagnosis, refine prognosis, define an underlying genetic cause, or identify a unique treatment target for a patient’s cancer. In this primer, we provide a brief overview of the evolution of precision paediatric oncology, its current application to clinical oncology practice, and its future potential as a foundational approach to paediatric oncology care in Canada and around the world. We also address the many challenges and limitations inherent to the implementation of precision oncology as the standard of care, including ethical and economic considerations.

Background The need for new therapies to improve survival and outcomes in pediatric oncology along with the lack of approval and accessible clinical trials has led to “out‐of‐trial” use of innovative therapies. We conducted a retrospective analysis of requests for innovative anticancer therapy in Canadian pediatric oncology tertiary centers for patients less than 30 years old between 2013 and 2020. Methods Innovative therapies were defined as cancer‐directed drugs used (a) off‐label, (b) unlicensed drugs being used outside the context of a clinical trial, or (c) approved drugs with limited evidence in pediatrics. We excluded cytotoxic chemotherapy, cellular products, and cytokines. Results We retrieved data on 352 innovative therapy drug requests. Underlying diagnosis was primary CNS tumor 31%; extracranial solid tumor 37%, leukemia/lymphoma 22%, LCH 2%, and plexiform neurofibroma 6%. RAS/MAP kinase pathway inhibitors were the most frequently requested innovative therapies in 28% of all requests followed by multi‐targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (17%), inhibitors of the PIK3CA‐mTOR‐AKT pathway (8%), immune checkpoints inhibitors (8%), and antibody drug conjugates (8%). In 112 out of 352 requests, innovative therapies were used in combination with another anticancer agent. 48% of requests were motivated by the presence of an actionable molecular target. Compassionate access accounted for 52% of all requests while public insurance was used in 27%. Mechanisms of funding varied between provinces. Conclusion This real‐world data collection illustrates an increasing use of “out‐of‐trial” innovative therapies in pediatric oncology. This new field of practice warrants further studies to understand the impact on patient trajectory and equity in access to innovative therapies.

Abstract Innovative therapeutic approaches are needed to alleviate the burden of life-limiting, rare, and chronic conditions affecting children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA). This includes a need for improved access to both clinical research and to non-approved or off-label therapies, together with, ultimately, more therapies achieving regulatory approval in Canada. The single patient study (SPS), also known as an open label individual patient (OLIP) study, was introduced by Health Canada to open access to non-marketed drugs where a clinical trial is not readily available, but the drug is considered too investigational to be managed on a standard Special Access Program. SPS is designed for patients who have a serious or life-threatening condition and have exhausted available treatment options. Our report summarizes this relatively new development in the Canadian regulatory environment and highlights the opportunities and challenges as identified by regulators, pharmaceutical representatives, academic researchers, and patient/parent advocates.