Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: In a phase I dose-escalation study, regorafenib demonstrated tolerability and antitumour activity in solid tumour patients. The study was expanded to focus on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Patients received oral regorafenib 60–220 mg daily (160 mg daily in the extension cohort) in cycles of 21 days on, 7 days off treatment. Assessments included toxicity, response, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Results: Thirty-eight patients with heavily pretreated CRC (median 4 prior lines of therapy, range 0–7) were enrolled in the dose-escalation and extension phases; 26 patients received regorafenib 160 mg daily. Median treatment duration was 53 days (range 7–280 days). The most common treatment-related toxicities included hand–foot skin reaction, fatigue, voice change and rash. Twenty-seven patients were evaluable for response: 1 achieved partial response and 19 had stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 107 days (95% CI, 66–161). At steady state, regorafenib and its active metabolites had similar systemic exposure. Pharmacodynamic assessment indicated decreased tumour perfusion in most patients. Conclusion: Regorafenib showed tolerability and antitumour activity in patients with metastatic CRC. This expanded-cohort phase I study provided the foundation for further clinical trials of regorafenib in this patient population.

Background: BI 2536, a novel Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitor, was assessed in patients with unresectable advanced exocrine adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Methods: The study employed a two-stage design. Randomised first-line patients received BI 2536 200 mg on day 1 ( n =43) or 60 mg on days 1–3 ( n =43) every 21 days. Recruitment of second-line patients was planned for a second stage dependent on an interim analysis demonstrating ⩾2 responses in the first 18 evaluable patients following 12 weeks of treatment and/or tumour control ⩾12 weeks in 5 patients per schedule. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Results: By independent review, ORR was 2.3% (all partial) and 24.4% had stable disease as confirmed best response. The second stage was not initiated. Median overall and progression-free survivals were 149 (95% confidence interval (CI), 91–307) and 46 days (95% CI, 44–56). Most common drug-related adverse events were neutropenia (37.2%), leukopenia (29.1%), fatigue (29.1%) and nausea (22.1%); most common grade 3/4-related events were neutropenia (36.0%), leukopenia (27.9%) and thrombocytopenia (8.1%). Conclusion: Given the low ORR and poor survival, further development of BI 2536 monotherapy is not warranted in this population.

Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic and antiproliferative activity. The activity of sorafenib in progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients was investigated in a phase II clinical study. Progressive HRPC patients received sorafenib 400 mg bid p.o. continuously. Only patients with no prior chemotherapy, and either one-unidimensional measurable lesion according to RECIST-criteria or increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values reflecting a hormone-refractory situation, were eligible for study entry. The primary study objective was the rate of progression-free survival of ⩾12 weeks (PFS12). Secondary end points were overall response, overall survival, and toxicity. Fifty-seven patients with PC were enrolled. Two patients had to be withdrawn from the set of eligible patients. According to RECIST criteria, 4 patients out of 55 evaluable patients showed stable disease (SD). According to PSA–response, we saw 11 patients with SD PSA and 2 patients were responders at 12 weeks (PFS12=17/55=31%). Among the 257 adverse events, 15 were considered drug related of maximum CTC-grade 3. Twenty-four serious adverse events occurred in 14 patients (14/55=26%). Seven of them were determined to be drug related. No treatment-related death was observed. Sorafenib has antitumour activity in HRPCP when evaluated for RECIST- and PSA-based response. Further investigation as a component of combination regimens is necessary to evaluate its definite or overall clinical benefit for HRPCP.

Summary Introduction Nimotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the EGFR. Based on phase I data, the recommended dose has been established at 200 mg weekly. This study was aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of nimotuzumab monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods Pts who failed first line standard chemotherapy for advanced disease and had at least one measurable lesion were eligible for the study. Nimotuzumab was given intravenously at 200 mg once weekly for 6 weeks (wks). Follow up by CT scan was performed after 8 weeks. Pts continued receiving treatment 3-weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Endpoints included tumor response (RECIST), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results A total of 56 pts were enrolled for treatment (ECOG status of 1 [ n  = 41] or 0 [ n  = 15]), the majority (47 pts) had metastatic disease. Nearly half of the pts [ n  = 26] received ≥2 regimens. Pts evaluable for response: n  = 36; CR: 0; PR: 0; SD: 6 pts. Median PFS for pts with SD was 19.2 weeks, for all pts 6.7 weeks (95% CI: 6.43–7.14 weeks). PFS after 1 year was 10.3% with a median overall survival of 18.1 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events were generally mild including rash grade 1 in 5 pts. After a single dose of 200 mg, the t 1/2 was calculated to 45 h. Conclusion These data confirm that nimotuzumab is safe and very well tolerated. To improve efficacy, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with Gem has been initiated.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib is used as first‐line therapy in patients with metastasized renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), given in fixed‐dose regimens despite its high variability in pharmacokinetics (PKs). Interindividual variability of drug exposure may be responsible for differences in response. Therefore, dosing strategies based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models may be useful to optimize treatment. Plasma concentrations of sunitinib, its active metabolite SU12662, and the soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptors sVEGFR‐2 and sVEGFR‐3, were measured in 26 patients with mRCC within the EuroTARGET project and 21 patients with metastasized colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the C‐II‐005 study. Based on these observations, PK/PD models with potential influence of genetic predictors were developed and linked to time‐to‐event (TTE) models. Baseline sVEGFR‐2 levels were associated with clinical outcome in patients with mRCC, whereas active drug PKs seemed to be more predictive in patients with mCRC. The models provide the basis of PK/PD‐guided strategies for the individualization of anti‐angiogenic therapies.

Topotecan, a water-soluble analogue of camptothecin, is a newly available cytotoxic agent which acts as an inhibitor of topoisomerase I, an enzyme necessary for DNA replication. Topotecan is a semisynthetic product derived from camptothecin, which was discovered during a National Cancer Institute cytotoxic drug screening program almost 30 years ago. It acts by forming a stable covalent complex with the DNA/topoisomerase I aggregate, the so-called ‘cleavable complex’. This process leads to breaks in the DNA strand resulting in apoptosis and cell death. Topotecan possesses a serum half-life of approximately 3 h, a high volume of distribution with high tissue uptake and a low protein binding. The chemical structure is based on a lactone ring. Topotecan undergoes reversible hydrolysis from its biologically active lactone form to the open ring inactive carboxylate form. It is also able to penetrate the intact blood-brain barrier. Since most of the agent is excreted by the kidneys, dose adjustment is necessary when renal function is impaired. In contrast, pharmacokinetic behavior is unchanged in patients with limited hepatic function. The principal toxicity of topotecan when administered at standard doses is neutropenia, but thrombocytopenia and anemia occur as well, while the nonhematological toxicities are usually mild. Alopecia is frequently observed and some patients may suffer from pronounced fatigue. Most clinical data available are based on the following schedule: 1.5 mg/m 2 topotecan given as a 30-min infusion, days 1–5. There are currently only minimal data available regarding a dose–antitumor activity relationship. Other topotecan administration schedules are currently being investigated. Preclinical data suggest that continuous-infusion schedules may be a better application form in terms of both, toxicity and antitumor activity. However, clinical trials could not confirm these results to date. Results of phase II studies suggest considerable antitumor activity of single agent topotecan in small cell lung cancer and ovarian cancer patients. A randomized phase III trial of topotecan versus paclitaxel in ovarian cancer patients pretreated with cisplatin/cyclophosphamide has demonstrated that topotecan is as effective as paclitaxel in the second-line treatment of these patients. Activity of topotecan was also observed in non-small-cell lung cancer, refractory leukemias/myelodysplastic syndromes and in childhood sarcomas. Due to its unique mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance, cisplatin, etoposide, cytarabine and paclitaxel are potential interacting partners for combination chemotherapy regimens. However, the best combination regimen as well as the optimal combination schedule have yet to be conclusively determined. The potential of topotecan in a variety of solid tumors, as well as its use in combination regimens for ovarian and small cell lung cancer is currently being investigated.

Telatinib (BAY 57-9352) is an orally available, small-molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 2 and 3 (VEGFR-2/-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor β tyrosine kinases. In this multicentre phase I dose escalation study, 71 patients with refractory solid tumours were enroled into 14 days on/7 days off (noncontinuous dosing) or continuous dosing groups to receive telatinib two times daily (BID). Hypertension (23%) and diarrhoea (7%) were the most frequent study drug-related adverse events of CTC grade 3. The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached up to a dose of 1500 mg BID continuous dosing. Telatinib was rapidly absorbed with median t max of 3 hours or less. Geometric mean C max and AUC 0−12 increased in a less than dose-proportional manner and plateaued in the 900–1500 mg BID dose range. Two renal cell carcinoma patients reached a partial response. Tumour blood flow measured by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and sVEGFR-2 plasma levels decreased with increasing AUC 0−12 of telatinib. Telatinib is safe and well tolerated up to a dose of 1500 mg BID continuous dosing. Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic criteria, 900 mg telatinib BID continuously administered was selected as the recommended phase II dose.

Purpose This phase I study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of the Aurora B kinase inhibitor BI 811283 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods BI 811283 was administered via 24-h infusion on Days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle (schedule A) or Day 1 of a 3-week cycle (schedule B) in a modified 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Pharmacodynamic assessments included immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated histone H3 (pHH3) on skin biopsies to determine Aurora B kinase inhibition and plasma concentrations of caspase-cleaved CK-18 (apoptosis marker). Results A total of 121 patients were treated. The MTDs of BI 811283 were 125 mg (schedule A) and 230 mg (schedule B). Dose-limiting toxicities were primarily hematological (febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia); the most common drug-related adverse effects included neutropenia, fatigue, leukopenia, nausea, alopecia, diarrhea, and decreased appetite. A trend toward a decrease in pHH3 was observed, with increasing BI 811283 doses, indicating target engagement; there was no consistent trend regarding caspase-cleaved CK-18 levels. No objective response was observed although 19 patients in each schedule achieved clinical benefit (stable disease). Conclusions BI 811283 demonstrated a generally manageable safety profile and disease stabilization in some patients. Trial registration EudraCT No: 2007-000191-17, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00701324.

To characterize the disposition of paclitaxel (PAC) after a 1-h infusion in humans and define if possible a pharmacodynamic relationship between PAC disposition and the observed toxicity. PAC pharmacokinetics were studied in 43 courses of therapy in 30 patients (30 first course, 13 PK third course). PAC was administered at 150, 175, 200, 225 and 250 mg/m2 by a 1-h infusion to patients with advanced cancer (lung, breast, ovarian, cervix, and head and neck). PAC was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental and model-dependent methods. Increases in the area under the curve and the peak plasma concentration were not proportional to increases in the dose. However, the deviation from linearity is rather moderate. The dose-limiting toxicity was central neuropathy which was not associated with pharmacokinetic deviations. Owing to the absence of grade 3 or 4 myelotoxicity, no clear correlation between this toxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters could be established. Within the evaluated dose range of the 1-h infusion there was only a moderate nonlinear disposition of PAC in humans and therefore a dose of 225 mg/m2 is recommended as safe. The observation of central neuropathy could not be directly related to a pharmacokinetic parameter. The complexity of the formulation which included Cremophor EL and ethanol may offer an explanation for the observed central neurotoxicity.