Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
25 result(s) for "Mulder, Hillary"
Sort by:
Mass spectrometry-based peripheral blood proteomics for biomarker discovery in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Background The circulating proteome may provide insights into the pathobiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. We applied liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry to quantify the peripheral blood proteome in patients with IPF and identify proteins associated with disease severity and progression. Methods The IPF cohort comprised 299 patients from the IPF-PRO Registry. Controls ( n  = 99) without known lung disease had similar distributions of age, sex and smoking status to the IPF cohort. Proteins were measured in plasma collected at enrollment using an Evosep One coupled to an Orbitrap Exploris. Data were analyzed with Spectronaut 14 with a deep experimental spectral library and were log 2 transformed. Linear regression was used to compare protein abundances in the IPF versus control cohorts and identify proteins associated with disease severity measures at enrollment in the IPF cohort. Cox regression analyses were used to identify proteins associated with outcomes in the IPF cohort, split 75/25 into training and test sets. The false discovery rate was controlled at 5%. Results Overall, 761 protein groups corresponding to 736 unique genes were detected. Of these, 168 protein groups were significantly different in abundance in the IPF versus control cohorts, of which 39 were ≥ 1.3-fold different. Among the top differentially expressed proteins were surfactant protein B (SFTPB), secretoglobin family 3A member 1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, thrombospondin 1 and platelet factor 4. In patients with IPF, greater abundance of apolipoprotein A-1 was statistically significantly associated with higher forced vital capacity % predicted at enrollment, while greater abundance of fibulin-1 was statistically significantly associated with lower diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide % predicted. Multivariable models selected 4 proteins (SERPINA7, SFTPB, alpha 2 HS glycoprotein, kininogen 1) and 3 clinical factors that best discriminated the risk of respiratory death or lung transplant in patients with IPF, with a C-index of 0.78 in the training set and 0.72 in the test set. Conclusions Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of data from the IPF-PRO Registry confirmed proteins previously associated with the presence, severity and progression of IPF and revealed new candidate biomarkers. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov; No: NCT01915511; registered August 5, 2013; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov .
Impact of aspirin dose according to race in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a secondary analysis of the ADAPTABLE randomised controlled trial
ObjectivesTo evaluate whether the effectiveness and safety of low (81 mg daily) versus high-dose (325 mg daily) aspirin is consistent across races among patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).DesignA secondary analysis of the randomised controlled trial ADAPTABLE was performed.SettingThe study was conducted in 40 centres and one health plan participating in the National Patient-Centred Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) in the USA.ParticipantsAmong 15 076 participants with established ASCVD, 14 096 had self-reported race available and were included in the analysis. Participants were divided according to self-reported race as Black (n=1311, 9.3%), White (n=11 990, 85.1%) or other race (n=795, 5.6%).InterventionsParticipants were randomised to open-label daily aspirin doses of 81 mg versus 325 mg in a 1:1 ratio for a median of 26.2 months.Primary and secondary outcomes measuresThe primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of death from any cause, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction or hospitalisation for stroke. The primary safety endpoint was hospitalisation for bleeding requiring blood product transfusion.ResultsEstimated cumulative incidence of the primary effectiveness endpoint at median follow-up with the 81 mg and the 325 mg daily doses were 6.70% and 7.12% in White participants (adjusted HR: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.88 to 1.15]); 12.27% and 10.69% in Black participants (adjusted HR: 1.40 [95% CI: 1.02 to 1.93]); and 6.88% and 7.69% in other participants (adjusted HR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.54 to 1.39]) (p-interaction=0.12), respectively. There was no significant interaction between self-reported race and assigned aspirin dose regarding the secondary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoints.ConclusionRace is not an effect modifier on the impact of aspirin dosing on effectiveness and safety in patients with established ASCVD. In clinical practice, treatment decisions regarding aspirin dose in secondary prevention of ASCVD should not be influenced by race.Trial registration number NCT02697916.
Association of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the EUCLID Trial
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk of developing lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) and suffering PAD-related morbidity and mortality. However, the effect and burden of COPD on patients with PAD is less well defined. This post hoc analysis from EUCLID aimed to analyze the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE) in patients with PAD and concomitant COPD compared with those without COPD, and to describe the adverse events specific to patients with COPD. EUCLID randomized 13,885 patients with symptomatic PAD to monotherapy with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel for the prevention of MACE. In this analysis, MACE, MALE, mortality, and adverse events were compared between groups with and without COPD using unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Of the 13,883 patients with COPD status available at baseline, 11% (n=1538) had COPD. Patients with COPD had a higher risk of MACE (6.02 vs 4.29 events/100 patient-years; p<0.001) due to a significantly higher risk of myocardial infarction (MI) (3.55 vs 1.85 events/100 patient-years; p<0.001) when compared with patients without COPD. These risks persisted after adjustment (MACE: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.52; p<0.001; MI: aHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.18-1.77; p<0.001). However, patients with COPD did not have an increased risk of MALE or major bleeding. Patients with COPD were more frequently hospitalized for dyspnea and pneumonia (2.66 vs 0.9 events/100 patient-years; aHR 2.77, 95% CI 2.12-3.63; p<0.001) and more frequently discontinued study drug prematurely (19.36 vs 12.54 events/100 patient-years; p<0.001; aHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.22-1.47; p<0.001). In patients with comorbid PAD and COPD, the risks of MACE, respiratory-related adverse events, and premature study drug discontinuation were higher when compared with patients without COPD. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01732822.
Assessing the utility of molecular diagnostic classification for cancers of unknown primary
Background Roughly 5% of metastatic cancers present with uncertain origin, for which molecular classification could influence subsequent management; however, prior studies of molecular diagnostic classifiers have reported mixed results with regard to clinical impact. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the utility of a novel molecular diagnostic classifier by assessing theoretical changes in treatment and additional testing recommendations from oncologists before and after the review of classifier predictions. Methods We retrospectively analyzed de‐identified records from 289 patients with a consensus diagnosis of cancer of uncertain/unknown primary (CUP). Two (or three, if adjudication was required) independent oncologists separately reviewed patient clinical information to determine the course of treatment before they reviewed results from the molecular diagnostic classifier and subsequently evaluated whether the predicted diagnosis would alter their treatment plan. Results Results from the molecular diagnostic classifier changed the consensus oncologist‐reported treatment recommendations for 235 out of 289 patients (81.3%). At the level of individual oncologist reviews (n = 414), 64.7% (n = 268) of treatment recommendations were based on CUP guidelines prior to review of results from the molecular diagnostic classifier. After seeing classifier results, 98.1% (n = 207) of the reviews, where treatment was specified (n = 211), were guided by the tissue of origin‐specific guidelines. Overall, 89.9% of the 414 total reviews either expressed strong agreement (n = 242) or agreement (n = 130) that the molecular diagnostic classifier result increased confidence in selecting the most appropriate treatment regimen. Conclusions A retrospective review of CUP cases demonstrates that a novel molecular diagnostic classifier could affect treatment in the majority of patients, supporting its clinical utility. Further studies are needed to prospectively evaluate whether the use of molecular diagnostic classifiers improves clinical outcomes in CUP patients.
Outcomes of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and multi-morbidity: Insights from the ARISTOTLE trial
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often have multi-morbidity, defined as ≥3 comorbid conditions. Multi-morbidity is associated with polypharmacy, adverse events, and frailty potentially altering response to anticoagulation. We sought to describe the prevalence of multi-morbidity among older patients with AF and determine the association between multi-morbidity, clinical outcomes, and the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin. In this post-hoc subgroup analysis of the ARISTOTLE trial, we studied enrolled patients age ≥ 55 years (n = 16,800). Patients were categorized by the number of comorbid conditions at baseline: no multi-morbidity (0–2 comorbid conditions), moderate multi-morbidity (3–5 comorbid conditions), and high multi-morbidity (≥6 comorbid conditions). Association between multi-morbidity and clinical outcomes were analyzed by treatment with a median follow-up of 1.8 (1.3–2.3) years. Multi-morbidity was present in 64% (n = 10,713) of patients; 51% (n = 8491) had moderate multi-morbidity, 13% (n = 2222) had high multi-morbidity, and 36% (n = 6087) had no multi-morbidity. Compared with the no multi-morbidity group, the high multi-morbidity group was older (74 vs 69 years), took twice as many medications (10 vs 5), and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (4.9 vs 2.7) (all P < .001). Adjusted rates per 100 patient-years for stroke/systemic embolism, death, and major bleeding increased with multi-morbidity (Reference no multi-morbidity; moderate multi-morbidity 1.42 [1.24–1.64] and high multi-morbidity 1.92 [1.59–2.31]), with no interaction in relation to efficacy or safety of apixaban. Multi-morbidity is prevalent among the population with AF; efficacy and safety of apixaban is preserved in this subgroup supporting extension of trial results to the most complex AF patients.
High density lipoproteins, disease severity and clinical outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Background Dysregulation of lipid metabolism is implicated in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We assessed associations between circulating levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and its components apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA1) and paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) and disease severity and outcomes in patients with IPF. Methods The cohort comprised 284 patients enrolled in the IPF-PRO Registry. We analyzed associations between HDL-C, ApoA1 and PON-1 levels at enrollment and measures of disease severity at enrollment (using linear regression) and outcomes during follow-up (using Cox models). Models were adjusted for demographic and clinical variables, including cardiovascular disease and statin use, assessed at enrollment. Results In unadjusted models, higher ApoA1 and lower PON-1 were associated with higher FVC % predicted at enrollment. Median follow-up was 40 months. In unadjusted models, higher ApoA1 at enrollment was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.32 [95% CI: 0.16, 0.64] per unit higher log 2 ApoA1) and respiratory hospitalization (HR 0.25 [0.11, 0.57] per unit higher log 2 ApoA1). In analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical variables, the association with respiratory hospitalization remained significant (HR 0.30 [95% CI: 0.10, 0.88; p  = 0.029]), but the association with all-cause mortality was no longer significant (HR 0.44 [95% CI: 0.18, 1.08; p  = 0.074]). Levels of PON-1 or HDL-C were not associated with all-cause mortality or respiratory hospitalization. Conclusion In a real-world cohort of patients with IPF, a higher circulating level of ApoA1 was associated with a lower risk of respiratory hospitalization. ApoA1 is a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with IPF.
Association Between Triglycerides and Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Established Cardiovascular Disease (From the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes BARI 2D Trial)
Triglyceride (TG) levels encompass several lipoproteins that have been implicated in atherogenic pathways. Whether TG levels independently associate with cardiovascular disease both overall and, in particular among patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM), remains controversial. Data from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial was used to evaluate patients with T2DM and CAD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between TG levels and outcomes. Stepwise adjustment was performed for demographics, clinical factors, lipid profile and statin treatment. The primary composite outcome was time to CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke and secondary outcome was CV death. Among 2,307 patients with T2DM and CAD, the mean (±SD) TG levels were 181 (±136) with a median (Q1–Q3) 148mg/dL (104–219). Overall, 51% of patients had TG <150 mg/dL, 18% 150–199 mg/dL, 28% 200–499 mg/dL and 3% ≥500 mg/dL. Participants with elevated TG levels (≥150 mg/dL) were younger (61 vs 63 years, p <0.001), had higher BMI (32 vs 30 kg/m2, p <0.001), more likely to have had prior MI (34.2 vs 30.1%, p = 0.033) and revascularization (25.8 vs 21.4%, p = 0.013), had lower HDL-C (34 vs 39 mg/dL, p <0.001) and higher HbA1c (8 vs 7%, p <0.001). In unadjusted analyses, baseline TG levels were linearly associated with both the primary composite and secondary outcomes. In fully adjusted analyses, every 50 mg/dL increase in TG level was associated with a 3.8% (HR 1.038, 95%CI 1.004–1.072, p <0.001) increase in the primary composite outcome and a 6.4% (HR 1.064 95%CI 1.018–1.113, p <0.001) increase in the secondary outcome. There was no interaction between TG and outcomes within key subgroups including female sex, additional non-coronary atherosclerotic disease, CKD or low LDL (<100 mg/dL). In conclusion, among patients with T2DM and CAD, elevated TG were independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, even after adjustment for clinical and simple biochemical covariates.
Real-world exploration of LDL-cholesterol management in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
Although guidelines recommend low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to be < 70 mg/dL in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), the rate of achieving this goal remains suboptimal. We sought to understand real world contemporary practice patterns of LDL-C management in patients with ASCVD, and whether LDL-C testing influenced management across US health systems. A retrospective cohort study utilizing electronic medical record data from five health systems participating in the CardioHealth Alliance was performed on patients with an LDL-C measurement in 2021 and prior ASCVD. Multivariable regression modeling was used to determine the relationship of clinical factors with achievement of guideline directed LDL-C target. Changes in lipid lowering therapy (LLT) after LDL-C testing were also described. Among 216,074 patients with ASCVD, 129,886 (60.1%) had uncontrolled LDL-C (i.e. ≥ 70 mg/dL). Compared with participants with controlled LDL-C (< 70 mg/dL), those with uncontrolled LDL-C were more frequently female (50.9% vs. 35.1%), or Black (13.7% vs. 10.3%), and less commonly had coronary artery disease as the form of vascular disease (73.0% vs. 83.5% %), heart failure (21.3% vs. 29.1% %), diabetes (34.1% vs. 48.2%), atrial fibrillation (19.3% vs. 26.1%), or chronic kidney disease (25.1% vs. 32.2%). In multivariable analyses, the factors most strongly associated with failure to achieve LDL-C control were female sex (RR 1.13 [95% CI 1.12-1.14] P < .001) and Black race (1.15 [1.14-1.17] P < .001). Among the 53,957 (41.5%) of those with uncontrolled LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL not on lipid lowering therapy (LLT) at baseline, only 21% were initiated on any LLT within 6 months of the uncontrolled LDL-C value. Within 5 diverse large health systems in the CardioHealth Alliance, more than half of the patients with ASCVD had uncontrolled LDL-C with significant disparities based on sex and race at baseline. The vast majority were not initiated on any lipid lowering therapy within 6 months of an elevated test result indicating persistent gaps in care that will likely worsen health inequities in outcomes. This highlights the urgent need for implementation efforts to improve equitable care.
Improving patient risk communication: Translating cardiovascular risk into standardized risk percentiles
Current cholesterol guidelines recommend using 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) to guide informed decisions regarding statin therapy, yet patients may have difficulty conceptualizing absolute risk estimates. Peer comparisons may provide an improved tool for patient risk comprehension. Using data from the 2009–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we estimated standardized risk percentiles for various age-, sex-, and race-specific subgroups based on their 10-year ASCVD risks using the Pooled Cohort Equations. We examined 9160 adults in NHANES who were free of cardiovascular disease and had complete clinical data. Among specific age, sex, and race groups, we estimated the distribution of 10-year risk, calculating the 10-year risk corresponding to each percentile in order to generate standardized cardiovascular risk percentiles. Estimated 10-year ASCVD absolute risk varied markedly by age, sex, and race subgroups. A 10-year risk of 7.0% would put a 55 year-old black male in the 20th percentile relative to his peers (ie, at lower risk than 80% of his peers), whereas a 10-year risk of 7.0% would put a 55 year-old white female in the 95th percentile (i.e., only 5% of her peers would have higher risk). Standardized cardiovascular risk percentiles by age, race, and sex are available online at populationrelativerisk.dcri.org. Cardiovascular risk varies substantially by age, sex, and race. These data allow for 10-year absolute risks of ASCVD to be translated into a standardized cardiovascular risk percentile, providing patients with information that is easy to understanding regarding how their personal risk of cardiovascular disease compares with their age-, sex-, and race-matched peers.
Kidney and Cardiovascular Effectiveness of Empagliflozin Compared With Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Placebo-controlled trials of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors demonstrate kidney and cardiovascular benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We used real-world data to compare the kidney and cardiovascular effectiveness of empagliflozin to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), a commonly prescribed antiglycemic medication, in a diverse population with and without CKD. Using electronic health record data from 20 large US health systems, we leveraged propensity overlap weighting to compare the outcomes for empagliflozin and DPP4i initiators with type 2 diabetes between 2016 and 2020. The primary composite kidney outcome included 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease, incident end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality through 2 years or censoring. We also assessed cardiovascular and safety outcomes. Of 62,197 new users, 20,279 initiated empagliflozin and 41,918 initiated DPP4i. Over a median follow-up of 1.1 years, empagliflozin prescription was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65 to 0.87) than DPP4is. The risks for mortality (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.92) and a cardiovascular composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.95) were also lower for empagliflozin initiators. No difference in heart failure hospitalization risk between groups was observed. Genital mycotic infections were more common in patients prescribed empagliflozin (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.88). Empagliflozin was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome in patients with CKD (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.88) and those without CKD (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.94). In conclusion, the initiation of empagliflozin was associated with a significantly lower risk of kidney and cardiovascular outcomes than DPP4is over a median of just over 1 year. The association with a lower risk for clinical outcomes was apparent even for patients without known CKD at baseline.