Explore the vast range of titles available.

The majority of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) will have disease progression of a uniformly fatal disease. mCRPC is driven by both activated androgen receptors and elevated intratumoural androgens; however, the current standard of care is therapy that targets a single androgen signalling mechanism. We aimed to investigate the combination treatment using apalutamide plus abiraterone acetate, each of which suppresses the androgen signalling axis in a different way, versus standard care in mCRPC. ACIS was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study done at 167 hospitals in 17 countries in the USA, Canada, Mexico, Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, Africa, and South America. We included chemotherapy-naive men (aged ≥18 years) with mCRPC who had not been previously treated with androgen biosynthesis signalling inhibitors and were receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and a Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form question 3 (ie, worst pain in the past 24 h) score of 3 or lower. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a centralised interactive web response system with a permuted block randomisation scheme (block size 4) to oral apalutamide 240 mg once daily plus oral abiraterone acetate 1000 mg once daily and oral prednisone 5 mg twice daily (apalutamide plus abiraterone–prednisone group) or placebo plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (abiraterone–prednisone group), in 28-day treatment cycles. Randomisation was stratified by presence or absence of visceral metastases, ECOG performance status, and geographical region. Patients, the investigators, study team, and the sponsor were masked to group assignments. An independent data-monitoring committee continually monitored data to ensure ongoing patient safety, and reviewed efficacy data. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was reported for all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is completed and no longer recruiting and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02257736. 982 men were enrolled and randomly assigned from Dec 10, 2014 to Aug 30, 2016 (492 to apalutamide plus abiraterone–prednisone; 490 to abiraterone–prednisone). At the primary analysis (median follow-up 25·7 months [IQR 23·0–28·9]), median radiographic progression-free survival was 22·6 months (95% CI 19·4–27·4) in the apalutamide plus abiraterone–prednisone group versus 16·6 months (13·9–19·3) in the abiraterone–prednisone group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·58–0·83; p<0·0001). At the updated analysis (final analysis for overall survival; median follow-up 54·8 months [IQR 51·5–58·4]), median radiographic progression-free survival was 24·0 months (95% CI 19·7–27·5) versus 16·6 months (13·9–19·3; HR 0·70, 95% CI 0·60–0·83; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse event was hypertension (82 [17%] of 490 patients receiving apalutamide plus abiraterone–prednisone and 49 [10%] of 489 receiving abiraterone–prednisone). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 195 (40%) patients receiving apalutamide plus abiraterone–prednisone and 181 (37%) patients receiving abiraterone–prednisone. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events with fatal outcomes occurred in three (1%) patients in the apalutamide plus abiraterone–prednisone group (2 pulmonary embolism, 1 cardiac failure) and five (1%) patients in the abiraterone–prednisone group (1 cardiac failure and 1 cardiac arrest, 1 mesenteric arterial occlusion, 1 seizure, and 1 sudden death). Despite the use of an active and established therapy as the comparator, apalutamide plus abiraterone–prednisone improved radiographic progression-free survival. Additional studies to identify subgroups of patients who might benefit the most from combination therapy are needed to further refine the treatment of mCRPC. Janssen Research & Development.

We examined the impact of starting treatment on clinical outcomes in men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). This retrospective observational cohort study used claims data from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) hospital-based administrative dataset in Japan. All patients with newly diagnosed mCSPC from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2024 were enrolled and followed up until 30 September 2024. Time-to-event analyses used Kaplan-Meier methods. The risk of death, onset of castration resistance, time to ≥ 50% PSA decline (PSA50), ≥ 90% PSA decline (PSA90), and undetectable PSA level (≤ 0.2 ng/mL) was compared between androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and combined androgen blockade (CAB) or androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) alone using a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, body mass index, co-morbidities, visceral metastases, and baseline PSA. 22,559 patients with mCSPC had received relevant treatment of whom 15,797 were included in the analysis: 1167 (5.2%) started on apalutamide (APA) + ADT, 1407 (6.2%) on enzalutamide + ADT, 1262 (5.6%) on abiraterone acetate plus prednisone + ADT, and 11,961 (53.0%) on CAB/ADT alone. The median age was between 74 and 78 years in each group. Bone metastases were present in 60.5% to 72.6% of patients, visceral metastases in 2.8% to 5.7%, and nodal metastases in 19.3% to 29.4%. Overall survival and castration resistance-free survival were significantly longer in patients initially treated with APA + ADT compared to CAB/ADT ( p  < 0.0001 for both comparisons). In patients with regular PSA assessment, a higher percentage of patients starting with APA + ADT achieved PSA50, PSA90 and undetectable PSA at 3 months compared with CAB/ADT ( p  < 0.0001, p  = 0.0005, p  < 0.0001, respectively). Use of APA + ADT as a starting treatment for mCSPC was associated with better clinical outcomes versus traditional CAB or ADT in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

Background Apalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) improved outcomes in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and non-metastatic castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC) in the Phase 3 randomised TITAN and SPARTAN studies, respectively, and maintained health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Apalutamide treatment effect by patient age requires assessment. Methods Post-hoc analysis assessed patients receiving 240 mg/day apalutamide (525 TITAN and 806 SPARTAN) or placebo (527 TITAN and 401 SPARTAN) with ongoing ADT, stratified by age groups. Prostate-specific antigen declines, radiographic progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, overall survival (OS), HRQoL and safety were assessed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional-hazards model and mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Results Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) generally favoured apalutamide plus ADT versus ADT alone across all endpoints regardless of age; e.g., OS values were 0.57 (0.40–0.80), 0.70 (0.54–0.91) and 0.74 (0.40–1.39) (TITAN) and 0.39 (0.19–0.78), 0.89 (0.69–1.16) and 0.81 (0.58–1.15) (SPARTAN) in patients aged <65, 65–79 and ≥80 years. Regardless of age, apalutamide also maintained HRQoL and was tolerated well with a potential trend in rates of adverse events increasing with age. Limitations include post-hoc nature and variability in sample size of age groups. Conclusions Apalutamide plus ADT was an effective and well-tolerated option maintaining HRQoL in patients with mCSPC and nmCRPC regardless of age. Clinical trial registration TITAN (NCT02489318); SPARTAN (NCT01946204).

PurposeMen with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (LPC/LAPC) are at risk of progression after radiotherapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). Using real-world data, we evaluated patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in LPC/LAPC.MethodsOptum claims and electronic health records (EHR) data from January 2010 to December 2021 were queried for men with LPC/LAPC who received primary RT, RP, or androgen deprivation therapy alone within 180 days after diagnosis. Survival outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Kaplan–Meier curves. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was compared in patients with and without evidence of disease (i.e., disease recurrence, metastasis, diagnosis of castration-resistant PC) at defined time points.Results61,772 and 62,361 men in claims and EHR cohorts met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 719 and 901 days, respectively. Most men received primary RT (51.0% claims, 35.0% EHR) or RP (39.4% claims, 53.8% EHR). Survival was greatest among men treated with RP, followed by RT. Adjusted for age and comorbidity, rwOS was shorter among men with evidence of disease within 1, 3, 4, and 5 years after primary treatment than those without at the same time points.ConclusionReal-world claims and EHR data show that survival among men with LPC/LAPC differs by primary treatment and time point of disease recurrence thereafter. Poor outcomes in men with LPC/LAPC who progress early indicate an unmet medical need for more effective primary treatment. If validated for surrogacy, no evidence of disease at specific time points could represent an intermediate efficacy endpoint in future trials.

The final analysis of the phase 3 Targeted Investigational Treatment Analysis of Novel Anti-androgen (TITAN) trial showed improvement in overall survival (OS) and other efficacy endpoints with apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus ADT alone in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). As ethnicity and regional differences may affect treatment outcomes in advanced prostate cancer, a post hoc final analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of apalutamide in the Asian subpopulation. Event-driven endpoints were OS, and time from randomization to initiation of castration resistance, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, and second progression-free survival (PFS2) on first subsequent therapy or death. Efficacy endpoints were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards models without formal statistical testing and adjustment for multiplicity. Participating Asian patients received once-daily apalutamide 240 mg (n = 111) or placebo (n = 110) plus ADT. After a median follow-up of 42.5 months and despite crossover of 47 placebo recipients to open-label apalutamide, apalutamide reduced the risk of death by 32% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-1.13), risk of castration resistance by 69% (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.21-0.46), PSA progression by 79% (HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.13-0.35) and PFS2 by 24% (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.44-1.29) relative to placebo. The outcomes were comparable between subgroups with low- and high-volume disease at baseline. No new safety issues were identified. Apalutamide provides valuable clinical benefits to Asian patients with mCSPC, with an efficacy and safety profile consistent with that in the overall patient population.

Patients with high-risk localized and locally advanced prostate cancer (HR-LPC/LAPC) have increased risk of metastasis, leading to reduced survival rates. Segmenting the disease course [time to recurrence, recurrence to metastasis, and post-metastasis survival (PMS)] may identify disease states for which the greatest impacts can be made to ultimately improve survival. Evaluate real-world PMS of patients with HR-LPC/LAPC who received primary radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Electronic health records from an oncology database were used to assess PMS. Risk of death was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to analyze the impact of treatment and time to metastasis (TTM) on PMS. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for patients with HR-LPC/LAPC versus the US general male population. Overall, 5008 patients with HR-LPC/LAPC were identified, and 1231 developed metastases after primary treatment (RP, n = 885; RT only, n = 262; RT+ADT, n = 84). Age-adjusted PMS HR between the RP and RT only cohorts was 1.19 (p = 0.077) and between RP and RT+ADT cohorts was 1.32 (p = 0.078). TTM was unrelated to PMS in unadjusted (HR 1.01, p = 0.2) and age-adjusted models (HR 0.99, p = 0.3). Relative to pre-metastasis SMRs, post-metastasis SMRs increased eightfold and fivefold in patients treated with RP and RT±ADT, respectively. PMS was unrelated to TTM in patients with HR-LPC/LAPC, suggesting PMS may be independent of the trajectory to development of metastases. Given PMS may be a fixed length of time, delaying the development of metastasis may improve survival in patients with HR-LPC/LAPC.

BackgroundThe phase III SPARTAN study demonstrated that apalutamide significantly improves metastasis-free survival and overall survival vs. placebo in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). However, patients receiving apalutamide experienced falls more frequently vs. those receiving placebo (15.6% vs. 9.0%).Methods806 patients with nmCRPC randomized to apalutamide in SPARTAN and treated with apalutamide in addition to ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were included in this post-hoc analysis investigating clinical variables associated with a subsequent fall. Time to a fall was assessed with Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for baseline characteristics and time-varying factors. Statistical inference was based on final multivariable models.ResultsFalls were reported for 125/803 (15.6%) patients treated with apalutamide and ADT. Most falls were grade 1 or 2 and did not require hospitalization. Median time from randomization to first fall was 9.2 months (range 0.1–25.3 months). In the final multivariable model of both baseline and after-baseline covariates, baseline patient characteristics (older age, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, history of neuropathy, and α-blocker use before study treatment) remained significantly associated with fall; after-baseline clinical characteristics significantly associated with time to fall were development of neuropathy, arthralgia, and weight loss before fall.ConclusionsThis analysis identified risk factors for fall among nmCRPC patients treated with apalutamide. Clinical management can minimize these identified risks while enhancing patient outcomes. Preventive interventions should be considered when the identified baseline conditions and post-treatment neuropathy, arthralgia, or weight decrease are present, to reduce risk of fall.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01946204

Ethnicity might be associated with treatment outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with apalutamide in East Asians with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). The original phase 3 Targeted Investigational Treatment Analysis of Novel Anti-androgen (TITAN) trial was conducted at 260 sites in 23 countries. This subgroup analysis included patients enrolled in 62 participating centers in China, Japan, and Korea. Radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, and PSA changes from baseline were compared between groups in the East Asian population. The intent-to-treat East Asian population included 111 and 110 participants in the apalutamide and placebo groups, respectively. The 24-month radiographic PFS rates were 76.1% and 52.3% in the apalutamide and placebo groups, respectively (apalutamide vs placebo: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.506; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.302-0.849; P = 0.009). Median time to PSA progression was more favorable with apalutamide than placebo (HR = 0.210; 95% CI, 0.124-0.357; P < 0.001). Median maximum percentages of PSA decline from baseline were 99.0% and 73.9% in the apalutamide and placebo groups, respectively. The most common adverse event (AE) was rash in the apalutamide group, with a higher rate than that in the placebo group (37.3% vs 9.1%). The most common grade 3 or 4 AEs were rash (12 [10.9%]) and hypertension (12 [10.9%]) for apalutamide. The efficacy and safety of apalutamide in the East Asian subgroup of the TITAN trial are consistent with the global results.

The present meta-analysis was undertaken to (1) assess erythroid response rates in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients treated with epoetin alfa as a monotherapy, (2) gain further insights into predictors of response rates, and (3) compare the erythroid response rates observed with epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa. A systematic review of studies from 1990 to 2006 in MDS patients treated with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa was performed and yielded 30 studies evaluating a total of 1,314 patients (epoetin alfa: 22 studies, 925 patients; darbepoetin alfa: eight studies, 389 patients). Pooled estimates of erythroid response rates, stratified by the International Working Group criteria (IWGc) and treatment group, were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis methods. Univariate meta-regression analyses were further conducted to identify study characteristics associated with erythroid response rate. The pooled estimate of erythroid response rate was significantly higher for epoetin alfa IWGc studies (57.6%) as compared to non-IWGc studies (31.6%; p  < 0.001). Study factors predictive of higher response rate in the epoetin alfa IWGc studies included higher proportion of patients with RA/RARS ( p  < 0.001), lower mean baseline serum erythropoietin level ( p  = 0.007), and fixed dosing regimen ( p  < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the pooled erythroid response rates between the two agents (epoetin alfa: 57.6% vs. darbepoetin alfa: 59.4%; p  = 0.828). The current study reported significantly higher erythroid response rates predominantly in the more recent studies that primarily utilized IWGc to define response. With the use of standardized patient selection and response evaluation methods, epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa yielded comparable erythroid response rates in MDS patients.