Explore the vast range of titles available.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal polymerase chain reaction implementation combined with pharmacist oversight across four hospitals resulted in a 20.2% reduction in anti-MRSA agent standardized antimicrobial administration ratios with significant reductions across 17 of 23 patient care units, further supporting this approach as an effective, multi-center, antimicrobial stewardship strategy.

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant has been associated with increased transmissibility and less severe disease than the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. Low rates of secondary infections and excess empiric antimicrobial use were reported early in the pandemic. Comparisons between later variants are not as well documented. We evaluated outcomes for SARS-CoV-2 delta- and omicron-variant surges with emphases on COVID-19–related treatment, secondary infections, and antimicrobial utilization. Methods: A single-center, observational, retrospective study was conducted for SARS-CoV-2–positive patients admitted to our 548-bed community teaching hospital between November and December 2021 (SARS-CoV-2 delta-variant–predominant phase) and January–February 2022 (SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant–predominant phase). Demographic and outcome data were obtained from the institutional data warehouse and were compared between groups. Secondary infections were defined as positive blood and respiratory culture results during admission, with likely contaminants excluded. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluate continuous variables, and t tests were used to analyze categorical variables. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In total, 1,297 patients were included: 787 (60.7%) in SARS-CoV-2 delta-variant–predominant phase and 510 (39.3%) in SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant–predominant phase. Patients in SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant–predominant phase were more often vaccinated (37.7% vs 55%; P < .001), required lower rates of ICU care (16.0% vs 11.6%; P = .025), and required less intubation (13% vs 6.3%; P < .001). Utilization of remdesivir (51.0% vs 32.2%; P < .001), dexamethasone (70.8% vs 43.3%; P < .001), and tocilizumab or baricitinib (14.5% vs 5.3%; P < .001) decreased during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant–predominant phase. Length of stay (5 days vs 4 days; P < .001) and 30-day mortality also decreased during this period (16.40% vs 9.8%; P = .001). Infectious diseases consultation increased during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant–predominant phase (39.8% vs 45.5%; P = .042). There was no significant difference in patients with positive blood cultures (3.4% vs 1.8%; P = .074), but there was a significant decrease in positive respiratory cultures (5.8% vs 2.7%; P = .009), combining for an overall reduction (8.4% vs 4.1%; P = .003). The incidence of overall antimicrobial use increased during the omicron-predominant phase (36.1% vs 41.8%; P = .04), and duration was lower (5 days vs 4 days; P < .001). Antimicrobial class-specific duration was unchanged, with the exception of decreased gram-positive agents (3 days vs 2 days; P = .012). Conclusions: Our results confirm previous reports of reduced disease severity during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant–predominant period. The incidence of secondary infections decreased, driven by a reduction in respiratory infections. Antimicrobials were used at increased rates and for shorter durations during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant–predominant period. Disclosures: None

Background: COVID-19 is associated with symptoms, clinical findings, and laboratory abnormalities that raise concern for secondary infections. Excess antimicrobial use despite low rates of secondary infections has been reported and presents a continuing challenge for antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), particularly during COVID-19 surges. The objective of this study was to analyze the appropriateness of antimicrobial use in patients with extended antimicrobial therapy during 2 distinct COVID-19 hospital surges. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, cohort study of COVID-19 patients admitted to our 548-bed community teaching hospital between November and December 2021 (ie, the SARS-CoV-2 delta-variant predominant phase) and January–February 2022 (ie, the SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant predominant phase) and who received antibiotics for >4 days without positive cultures. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the institutional data warehouse. Infectious diseases–trained researchers evaluated the appropriateness of antimicrobials based on diagnostic and clinical reporting and institutional antimicrobial stewardship guidelines. Patients were considered to have probable secondary bacterial infection if they had 2 of the following symptoms: fever, unexplained leukocytosis, worsening secretions, or hypoxia and/or imaging. The outcomes of interest included confirmed infections and excess antimicrobial days. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using χ 2 tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ .05. Results: In total, 87 patients were included in the study. Moreover, 56 patients were identified in the SARS-CoV-2 delta-variant predominant phase and 31 patients were identified in the SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant predominant phase. The groups were similar, with higher vaccination rates in the SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant predominant group (37.5% vs 64.5%; P = .016). Patients in the SARS-CoV-2 omicron-variant predominant group required less mechanical ventilation (39.3% vs 16.1%; P = .025). There were no significant differences in infectious diseases consultation, immunomodulator or remdesivir use, antimicrobials classes prescribed, or antimicrobial days of therapy or duration between cohorts. There were no significant differences in length of stay, 30-day mortality, or 30-day readmissions. Infections were confirmed in 78.6% in the delta-variant group versus 83.9% in the omicron-variant group ( P = .55). Pneumonias accounted for 60.7% in the delta-variant group and 40.9%, in the omicron-variant group. Excess antibiotic use occurred in 14.3% of patients in the delta-variant group and in 3.1% of patients in the omicron-variant group ( P = .149). There was no significant difference in the duration of inappropriate antimicrobial use between groups in patients without infections: 5 days in the delta-variant group versus 5 days in the omicron-variant group ( P = .24). Conclusions: Results demonstrated that most antimicrobial use was appropriate in a challenging patient population lacking positive cultures to guide therapy. Inappropriate antimicrobial utilization occurred demonstrating continued opportunities for our institutional ASP. Disclosures: None

Recent studies demonstrate that rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (RPEP) in international travelers is suboptimal, with only 5-20% of travelers receiving rabies immune globulin (RIG) in the country of exposure when indicated. We hypothesized that travelers may not be receiving RIG appropriately, and practices may vary between countries. We aim to describe the characteristics of travelers who received RIG and/or RPEP during travel. We conducted a multi-center review of international travelers exposed to potentially rabid animals, collecting information on RPEP administration. Travelers who started RPEP before (Group A) and at (Group B) presentation to a GeoSentinel clinic during September 2014-July 2017 were included. We included 920 travelers who started RPEP. About two-thirds of Group A travelers with an indication for rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) did not receive it. Travelers exposed in Indonesia were less likely to receive RIG in the country of exposure (relative risk: 0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.73; P = 0.01). Travelers exposed in Thailand [Relative risk (RR) 1.38, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): 1.0-1.8; P = 0.02], Sri Lanka (RR 3.99, 95% CI: 3.99-11.9; P = 0.013), and the Philippines (RR 19.95, 95% CI: 2.5-157.2; P = 0.01), were more likely to receive RIG in the country of exposure. This analysis highlights gaps in early delivery of RIG to travelers and identifies specific countries where travelers may be more or less likely to receive RIG. More detailed country-level information helps inform risk education of international travelers regarding appropriate rabies prevention.

Abstract Background We conducted a comprehensive investigation to update our knowledge of traveler’s diarrhea (TD) etiology and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Nepal. Methods A case–control study of TD etiology was conducted at the CIWEC Clinic Travel Medicine Center in Kathmandu from 2012 to 2014. Stool samples were tested by microscopy, culture and molecular techniques for identification of bacterial, viral and parasitic enteric pathogens, and AMR. We analysed patient demographic data, pre-treatment information and clinical outcomes. Results We enrolled 433 TD cases and 209 non-diarrhea controls. At least one of enteric pathogens was identified among 82% of cases and 44% of controls (P < 0.001). Multiple pathogens were observed among 35% of cases and 10% of controls. The most common pathogens significantly identified among cases in comparison with controls were Campylobacter (20%), norovirus (17%), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) (12%), rotavirus (9%) and Shigella (8%) (P < 0.001). We noted Campylobacter, Shigella and ETEC resistance to azithromycin at 8, 39 and 22% and to ciprofloxacin at 97, 78 and 23%, respectively. Conclusion Among travellers to Nepal with TD, viral pathogens were commonly found and norovirus was the second most common pathogen after campylobacter. We noted increased AMR to fluoroquinolones (FQs) and azithromycin (AZM). There is heightened concern for AZM treatment failures, though this continues to remain the drug of choice for TD treatment in our setting where FQs should not be used.

Despite direct-acting antivirals (DAA), aims to \"eradicate\" viral hepatitis by 2030 remain unlikely. In Nepal, an expert consortium was established to treat HCV through Nepal earthquakes aftermath offering a model for HCV treatment expansion in a resource-poor setting. In 2015, we established a network of hepatologists, laboratory experts, and community-based leaders at 6 Opioid Substitution Treatment (OST) sites from 4 cities in Nepal screening 838 patients for a treatment cohort of 600 individuals with HCV infection and past or current drug use. During phase 1, patients were treated with interferon-based regimens (n = 46). During phase 2, 135 patients with optimal predictors (HIV controlled, without cirrhosis, low baseline HCV viral load) were treated with DAA-based regimens. During phase 3, IFN-free DAA treatment was expanded, regardless of HCV disease severity, HIV viremia or drug use. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was assessed at 12 weeks. Median age was 37 years and 95.5% were males. HCV genotype was 3 (53.2%) or 1a (40.7%) and 32% had cirrhosis; 42.5% were HIV-HCV coinfected. The intention-to-treat (ITT) SVR rates in phase 2 and 3 were 97% and 81%, respectively. The overall per-protocol and ITT SVR rates were 97% and 85%, respectively. By multivariable analysis, treatment at the Kathmandu site was protective and substance use, treatment during phase 3 were associated with failure to achieve SVR. Very high SVR rates may be achieved in a difficult-to-treat, low-income population whatever the patient's profile and disease severity. The excellent treatment outcomes observed in this real-life community study should prompt further HCV treatment initiatives in Nepal.

Older individuals represent a substantial proportion of international travelers. Because of physiological changes and the increased probability of underlying medical conditions, older travelers might be at higher risk for at least some travel-associated diseases. With the aim of describing the epidemiology of travel-associated diseases in older adults, medical data were prospectively collected on ill international travelers presenting to GeoSentinel sites from 1997 to 2009. Seven thousand thirty-four patients aged 60 years and over were identified as older travelers and were compared to 56,042 patients aged 18-45 years, who were used as the young adult reference population. The proportionate morbidity of several etiological diagnoses was higher in older ill travelers compared to younger ill, including notably lower respiratory tract infections, high-altitude pulmonary edema, phlebitis and pulmonary embolism, arthropod bites, severe malaria, rickettsiosis, gastritis, peptic ulcers, esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease, trauma and injuries, urinary tract infections, heart disease, and death. In contrast, acute diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infections, flu and flu-like illnesses, malaria, dengue, genital infections, sexually transmitted diseases, and schistosomiasis proportionate morbidities were lower among the older group. Older ill travelers are more likely to suffer from certain life-threatening diseases and would benefit from reinforcement of specific preventive measures including use of anti-thrombosis compression stockings and sufficient hydration and exercises during long-distance flights, hand hygiene, use of disposable handkerchiefs, consideration of face-masks in crowded conditions, influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, progressive acclimatization to altitude, consideration of acetazolamide, and use of repellents and mosquito nets. Antibiotics for the presumptive treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections may be considered, as well as antacid medications. At-risk patients should be referred to a specialist for medical evaluation before departing, and optimal control of co-morbidities such as cardiovascular and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases should be achieved, particularly for high-altitude travel.

To the Editor—Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly in homeless shelters across the United States.1,2 An investigation in 5 cities identified 37% and 21% severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positivity among residents and staff, respectively.3 In response, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged testing all residents and staff of homeless shelters on April 22.4 Delonis Center is the only adult shelter for Washtenaw County (population, 350,000) with 5,000 homeless persons countywide, serving >1,100 people annually. [...]where prior reports of COVID-19 among homeless shelters and other congregate settings have been concerning, our experience is hopeful. Acknowledgments We acknowledge the contributions of Delonis Shelter Staff, Office of Community Economic Development, Washtenaw County Health Department and St Joseph Mercy Hospital.

Representatives for dentists are required for many governing committees, local and national, that contribute to many aspects of the profession related to politics, the workplace, education, or community-building. Developing skills as a representative can begin as an undergraduate in student representation systems as part of UK university governance structures. At one UK dental institution, there was a plan to explore the learning and skill development of current student representatives, review the training, identify any areas where there were gaps or where they should be strengthened, and consider whether a new training programme could be developed. Training gaps in the representation process and preference for peer mentoring in training were identified as students acknowledged learning 'on the job' through observation of experienced peers. Current representation training also fell short of highlighting the relevance to their future dental profession. Staff and students co-designed a bespoke programme of training to help students develop their representation skills, as well as align them to the development of professional skills which were determined to be relevant for their future dental career. Key points Outlines a selection of representation opportunities in the UK dental community. Explores professional skills developed by students through representation activities. Outlines a method for developing representation skills and the relevance of these.

Background More than 30,000 malaria cases are reported annually among international travellers. Despite improvements in malaria control, malaria continues to threaten travellers due to inaccurate perception of risk and sub-optimal pre-travel preparation. Methods Records with a confirmed malaria diagnosis after travel from January 2003 to July 2016 were obtained from GeoSentinel, a global surveillance network of travel and tropical medicine providers that monitors travel-related morbidity. Records were excluded if exposure country was missing or unascertainable or if there was a concomitant acute diagnosis unrelated to malaria. Records were analyzed to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of international travellers with malaria. Results There were 5689 travellers included; 325 were children <18 years. More than half (53%) were visiting friends and relatives (VFRs). Most (83%) were exposed in sub-Saharan Africa. The median trip duration was 32 days (interquartile range 20–75); 53% did not have a pre-travel visit. More than half (62%) were hospitalized; children were hospitalized more frequently than adults (73 and 62%, respectively). Ninety-two per cent had a single Plasmodium species diagnosis, most frequently Plasmodium falciparum (4011; 76%). Travellers with P. falciparum were most frequently VFRs (60%). More than 40% of travellers with a trip duration ≤7 days had Plasmodium vivax . There were 444 (8%) travellers with severe malaria; 31 children had severe malaria. Twelve travellers died. Conclusion Malaria remains a serious threat to international travellers. Efforts must focus on preventive strategies aimed on children and VFRs, and chemoprophylaxis access and preventive measure adherence should be emphasized.