Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Country Of Publication
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Target Audience
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
147 result(s) for "Murphy, Maggie"
Sort by:
Unframing the Visual
Twenty-four full color chapters present a range of theoretical and practical approaches to visual literacy pedagogy that illustrate, connect with, extend, and criticize concepts from the Framework for Visual Literacy in Higher Education: Companion Document to the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Topics include using TikTok to begin a conversation on academic honesty and marginalization; supporting disciplines to move to multimodal public communication assignments; critical data visualization; and exclusionary practices in visual media.
On the same page: collaborative research assignment design with graduate teaching assistants
Purpose This paper aims to explore how collaborative research assignment design consultations between instruction librarians and new graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) have the potential to improve the design of research assignments for first-year writing courses. Design/methodology/approach The author conducted a small number of questionnaires and structured interviews with first-time GTAs who serve as first-year composition instructors to explore their conceptions about teaching researched writing. Thematic analysis of the results of these qualitative instruments led to the design of a new framework for working with incoming cohorts of GTAs at her institution prior to the start of each fall semester. Findings New GTAs often emphasize strict source type parameters in research assignment design and expect their students to engage in expert research behaviors. Emphasizing the assignment design expertise of instruction librarians during new GTA orientation may lead to more assignment design consultations with first-time college writing instructors. Collaborative assignment design consultations between librarians and GTAs can improve the alignment of research assignment parameters with their shared goals for students' research and writing skills and habits of mind, including seeing research and writing as iterative and inquiry-based processes. Research limitations/implications While not every instruction librarian works with GTAs, working with instructors to collaboratively design research assignments that shift focus away from using specific search tools and locating particular types of sources opens possibilities for what librarians are able to achieve in one-shot instruction sessions, in terms of both lesson content and pedagogical strategies used. Originality/value The existing literature on first-year writing addressing faculty and librarian assignment design collaborations, and research assignments more generally, does not often explicitly examine the experiences of librarians who primarily work with GTAs. This paper adds to this literature by highlighting specific obstacles and unique opportunities in librarian–GTA teaching partnerships in first-year writing courses.
Consensus development methods: a review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines
Background: Although there is debate about the appropriate place of guidelines in clinical practice, guidelines can be seen as one way of assisting clinicians in decision-making. Given the likely diversity of opinion that any group of people may display when considering a topic, methods are needed for organising subjective judgements. Three principal methods (Delphi, nominal group technique, consensus development conference) exist which share the common objective of synthesising judgements when a state of uncertainty exists. Objectives: To identify the factors that shape and influence the clinical guidelines that emerge from consensus development methods and to make recommendations about best practice in the use of such methods. Methods: Five electronic databases were searched: Medline (1966-1996), PsychLIT (1974–1996), Social Science Citation Index (1990–1996), ABI Inform and Sociofile. From the searches and reference lists of articles a total of 177 empirical and review articles were selected for review. Results: The output from consensus development methods may be affected by: the way the task is set (choice of cues, recognition of contextual cues, the focus of the task, the comprehensiveness of the scenarios); the selection of participants (choice of individuals, degree of homogeneity of the group, their background, their number); the selection and presentation of scientific information (format, extent to which its quality and content is assessed); the way any interaction is structured (number of rating rounds, ensuring equitable participation, physical environment for meetings); and the method of synthesising individual judgements (definition of agreement, rules governing outliers, method of mathematical aggregation). Conclusions: Although a considerable amount of research has been carried out, many aspects have not been investigated sufficiently. For the time being at least, advice on those aspects has, therefore, to be based on the user's own commonsense and the experience of those who have used or participated in these methods. Even in the long term, some aspects will not be amenable to scientific study. Meanwhile, adherence to best practice will enhance the validity, reliability and impact of the clinical guidelines produced.
The ethics of care and the Newfoundland Paid Family Caregiver Program
The ethics of care has gained traction as a feminist normative lens from which to examine policies and policy issues (Hankivksy 2004; Mahon and Robinson 2011; Sevenhuijsen 2003; Sevenhuijsen et al. 2006). This paper aims to contribute to this growing literature by employing a critical ethics of care lens to assess a long-term care initiative in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. This initiative, called the Newfoundland Paid Family Caregiver Program (NPFCP), allows eligible participants to pay family members for some care services. This analysis uncovers numerous tensions, both practical and theoretical, related to the way this program (re)shapes the caring relations of participants. Specifically, the paper discusses the ways in which this program downloads caring responsibilities onto the family, characterizes care as a private concern, and fails to facilitate competent and consistent care. L’éthique du care (voir aussi éthique de la sollicitude) a gagné en popularité en tant que notion féministe qui examine les politiques et les enjeux politiques (Hankivksy 2004; Mahon and Robinson 2011; Sevenhuijsen 2003; Sevenhuijsen et al. 2006). Cet article a pour but de contribuer à cette littérature grandissante en abordant l’éthique du care d’un œil critique afin d’interpréter l’initiative de soin de longue durée dans la province de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador au Canada. Cette initiative, appelée Newfoundland Paid Family Caregiver Program (NPFCP) est un programme permettant aux participants admissibles d’obtenir des soins rémunérés d’un membre de sa famille. Cette analyse décèle de nombreuses tensions, pratiques et théoriques, liées à la manière dont le programme redéfinit la sollicitude des participants. Plus précisément, cet article aborde la façon dont ce programme transfert la responsabilité des soins à la famille, traite les soins comme une affaire privée et ne facilite pas les soins professionnels et continus.
Getting to Yes or How to Encourage Person-Centered Dementia Care in Hospitals
The Affordable Care Act's and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid's funding changes highlight how to make acute care more affordable and efficient, particularly for vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries. The focus has largely been on preventing admission or readmission for those with pneumonia, congestive heart failure, and obstructive pulmonary disease. But the missing link is that many of these people also have dementia, which complicates their hospital stay and results in poor outcomes. The time has come to transform hospitals into dementia-friendly environments in which staff are well-trained in the best practices that could reduce adverse outcomes, involve families, and tap into their wisdom, while reducing costly incidents and functional decline involving persons with dementia. This article describes one model addressing this issue.