Explore the vast range of titles available.

Over the last two decades, molecular-targeted agents have become mainstream treatment for many types of malignancies and have improved the overall survival of patients. However, most patients eventually develop resistance to these targeted therapies. Recently, immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment paradigm for many types of malignancies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for treatment of melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, bladder cancer and gastric cancer. However, oncologists have been faced with immune-related adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors; these are generally mild but can be fatal in some cases. Because immune checkpoint inhibitors have distinct toxicity profiles from those of chemotherapy or targeted therapy, many oncologists are not familiar with the principles for optimal management of immune-related adverse events, which require early recognition and appropriate treatment without delay. To achieve this, oncologists must educate patients and health-care workers, develop checklists of appropriate tests for immune-related adverse events and collaborate closely with organ specialists. Clinical questions that remain include whether immune checkpoint inhibitors should be administered to patients with autoimmune disease and whether patients for whom immune-related adverse events lead to delays in immunotherapy should be retreated. In addition, the predicted use of combination immunotherapies in the near future means that oncologists will face a higher incidence and severity of immune-related adverse events. This review provides an overview of the optimal management of immune-related adverse events attributed to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BackgroundEndoscopic resection has been limited to intestinal-type gastric cancer (cT1a) with a low risk of lymph node metastasis (T1a ≤2 cm, without ulcers). This single-arm confirmatory trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for >2 cm ulcer-negative and ≤3 cm ulcer-positive intestinal-type gastric cancer (cT1a).MethodsThe eligibility criteria included endoscopically diagnosed cT1a, a single primary intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma, an ulcer-negative lesion of any size or a ≤3 cm ulcer-positive lesion, cN0M0, and no prior treatment. If ESD resulted in noncurative resection, surgical resection was added. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS) (planned sample size was 470, with a one-sided alpha level of 2.5%). The threshold 5-year OS was 86.1%.ResultsWe enrolled 470 early gastric cancer patients [median tumor size, 25 (5–130) mm] from 29 institutions between June 2007 and October 2010. These patients had 152 ulcer-negative lesions (>2 and ≤3 cm), 111 ulcer-negative lesions (>3 cm), and 207 ulcer-positive lesions (≤3 cm). The success rate for en block resection was 99.1% (466/470). Additional gastrectomy was conducted in 131 patients (28%) who did not fulfill the curative resection criteria. The 5-year OS of all patients was 97.0% (95% confidence interval, 95.0–98.2%), which was higher than the threshold 5-year OS (86.1%). The 317 patients who satisfied the curative resection criteria had no recurrence. There were no ESD-related grade 4 adverse events.ConclusionESD for early gastric cancers that met the expanded criteria for intestinal-type gastric cancer (cT1a) was acceptable and should be the standard treatment instead of gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION:The early detection of gastric neoplasms (GNs) leads to favorable treatment outcomes. The latest endoscopic system, EVIS X1, includes third-generation narrow-band imaging (3G-NBI), texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI), and high-definition white-light imaging (WLI). Therefore, this randomized phase II trial aimed to identify the most promising imaging modality for GN detection using 3G-NBI and TXI.METHODS:Patients with scheduled surveillance endoscopy after a history of esophageal cancer or GN or preoperative endoscopy for known esophageal cancer or GN were randomly assigned to the 3G-NBI, TXI, or WLI groups. Endoscopic observations were performed to detect new GN lesions, and all suspected lesions were biopsied. The primary endpoint was the GN detection rate during primary observation. Secondary endpoints were the rate of missed GNs, early gastric cancer detection rate, and positive predictive value for a GN diagnosis. The decision rule had a higher GN detection rate between 3G-NBI and TXI, outperforming WLI by >1.0%.RESULTS:Finally, 901 patients were enrolled and assigned to the 3G-NBI, TXI, and WLI groups (300, 300, and 301 patients, respectively). GN detection rates in the 3G-NBI, TXI, and WLI groups were 7.3, 5.0, and 5.6%, respectively. The rates of missed GNs were 1.0, 0.7, and 1.0%, the detection rates of early gastric cancer were 5.7, 4.0, and 5.6%, and the positive predictive values for the diagnosis of GN were 36.5, 21.3, and 36.8% in the 3G-NBI, TXI, and WLI groups, respectively.DISCUSSION:Compared with TXI and WLI, 3G-NBI is a more promising modality for GN detection.

This is the first half of English edition of Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 12th Edition that was published by the Japan Esophageal Society in 2022.

BackgroundMagnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBI) is effective for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, magnifying endoscopy is not yet popular globally because of the required level of skill and lack of availability. To overcome these problems, dual-focus endoscopy (standard- and near-focus (NF) modes) has been developed. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of NF with second-generation (2G)-NBI (NF-NBI) for the diagnosis of EGC.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 4523 high-risk patients who underwent gastroscopies at 13 institutions in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned to white-light imaging (WLI) followed by 2G-NBI or to 2G-NBI followed by WLI. Lesions suspicious for EGC, newly detected by non-magnifying WLI or 2G-NBI, were subsequently observed with NF-NBI. All detected lesions were biopsied or resected. The diagnostic performance of NF-NBI was compared with the final histology.ResultsA total of 870 detected lesions (145 EGC, 725 non-EGC) were analyzed. Overall diagnostic performance for EGC using NF-NBI was accuracy 87.7%, sensitivity 60.7%, specificity 93.1%, positive predictive value 63.8%, and negative predictive value 92.2%. There were no significant differences in diagnostic performance between lesions detected by WLI or 2G-NBI. For lesions diagnosed with high (333 lesions) and low (537 lesions) confidences, accuracy was 92.2% and 84.9%, sensitivity was 64.7% and 58.5%, and specificity was 90.5% and 88.8%, respectively.ConclusionThe diagnostic performance of NF-NBI is good and acceptable for diagnosis of EGC in combination with either WLI or 2G-NBI.

In Japan, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been reimbursed under the national health care system for solid cancer patients who have finished standard treatment. More than 50,000 patients have taken the test since June 2019. We performed a nation‐wide questionnaire survey between March 2021 and July 2022. Questionnaires were sent to 80 designated Cancer Genomic Medicine Hospitals. Of the 933 responses received, 370 (39.7%) were web based and 563 (60.3%) were paper based. Most patients (784, 84%) first learned about CGP tests from healthcare professionals, and 775 (83.1%) gave informed consent to their treating physician. At the time of informed consent, they were most worried about test results not leading to novel treatment (536, 57.4%). On a scale of 0–10, 702 respondents (75.2%) felt that the explanations of the test result were easy to understand (7 or higher). Ninety‐one patients (9.8%) started their recommended treatment. Many patients could not receive recommended treatment because no approved drugs or clinical trials were available (102/177, 57.6%). Ninety‐eight patients (10.5%) did not wish their findings to be disclosed. Overall satisfaction with the CGP test process was high, with 602 respondents (64.5%) giving a score of 7–10. The major reason for choosing 0–6 was that the CGP test result did not lead to new treatment (217/277, 78.3%). In conclusion, satisfaction with the CGP test process was high. Patients and family members need better access to information. More patients need to be treated with genomically matched therapy. In Japan, where comprehensive genomic profiling tests are given as part of the national healthcare system, patient satisfaction of the test process was high. More patients need to be treated with genomically matched therapy.

Curative management after endoscopic resection (ER) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), which invades the muscularis mucosa (pMM-ESCC) or shallow submucosal layer (pSM1-ESCC), has been controversial. We identified patients with pMM-ESCC and pSM1-ESCC treated by ER. Outcomes were the predictive factors for regional lymph node and distant recurrence, and survival data were based on the depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and additional treatment immediately after ER. A total of 992 patients with pMM-ESCC (n = 749) and pSM1-ESCC (n = 243) were registered. According to the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, pSM1-ESCC (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.15-3.07, P = 0.012) and LVI (hazard ratio = 6.92, 95% confidence interval 4.09-11.7, P < 0.0001) were associated with a risk of regional lymph node and distant recurrence. In the median follow-up period of 58.6 months (range 1-233), among patients with risk factors (pMM-ESCC with LVI or pSM1-ESCC), the 5-year overall survival rates, relapse-free survival rates, and cause-specific survival rates of patients with additional treatment were significantly better than those of patients without additional treatment; 85.4% vs 61.5% ( P < 0.0001), 80.5% vs 53.3% ( P < 0.0001), and 98.5% vs 93.1% ( P = 0.004), respectively. There was no difference in survival rate between the chemoradiotherapy and surgery groups. pSM1 and LVI were risk factors for metastasis after ER for ESCC. To improve the survival, additional treatment immediately after ER, such as chemoradiotherapy or surgery, is effective in patients with these risk factors.

This is the second half of English edition of Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 12th Edition that was published by the Japan Esophageal Society in 2022.