Explore the vast range of titles available.

Children in Malawi with chest-indrawing pneumonia were randomly assigned to a 3-day or a 5-day regimen of amoxicillin. The 3-day regimen was noninferior to the 5-day regimen with respect to the incidence of treatment failure (5.9% vs. 5.2%). The frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups.

Malaria remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Malawi, with an estimated 18–19% prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum in children 2–10 years in 2015–2016. While children report the highest rates of clinical disease, adults are thought to be an important reservoir to sustained transmission due to persistent asymptomatic infection. The 2015–2016 Malawi Demographic and Health Survey was a nationally representative household survey which collected dried blood spots from 15,125 asymptomatic individuals ages 15–54 between October 2015 and February 2016. We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction on 7,393 samples, detecting an overall P. falciparum prevalence of 31.1% (SE = 1.1). Most infections (55.6%) had parasitemias ≤ 10 parasites/µL. While 66.2% of individuals lived in a household that owned a bed net, only 36.6% reported sleeping under a long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN) the previous night. Protective factors included urbanicity, greater wealth, higher education, and lower environmental temperatures. Living in a household with a bed net (prevalence difference 0.02, 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.05) and sleeping under an LLIN (0.01; − 0.02 to 0.04) were not protective against infection. Our findings demonstrate a higher parasite prevalence in adults than published estimates among children. Understanding the prevalence and distribution of asymptomatic infection is essential for targeted interventions.

Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality in children <5 years globally. Early identification of hospitalized children with pneumonia who may fail antibiotics could improve outcomes. We conducted a secondary analysis from the Malawi CPAP IMPACT trial evaluating risk factors for antibiotic failure among children hospitalized with pneumonia. Participants were 1-59 months old with World Health Organization-defined severe pneumonia and hypoxemia, severe malnutrition, and/or HIV exposure/infection. All participants received intravenous antibiotics per standard care. First-line antibiotics were benzylpenicillin and gentamicin for five days. Study staff assessed patients for first-line antibiotic failure daily between days 3-6. When identified, patients failing antibiotics were switched to second-line ceftriaxone. Analyses excluded children receiving ceftriaxone and/or deceased by hospital day two. We compared characteristics between patients with and without treatment failure and fit multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate associations between treatment failure and admission characteristics. From June 2015-March 2018, 644 children were enrolled and 538 analyzed. Antibiotic failure was identified in 251 (46.7%) participants, and 19/251 (7.6%) died. Treatment failure occurred more frequently with severe malnutrition (50.2% (126/251) vs 28.2% (81/287), p<0.001) and amongst those dwelling ≥10km from a health facility (22.3% (56/251) vs 15.3% (44/287), p = 0.026). Severe malnutrition occurred more frequently among children living ≥10km from a health facility than those living <10km (49.0% (49/100) vs 35.7% (275/428), p = 0.014). Children with severe malnutrition (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.2 (95% CI 1.52, 3.24), p<0.001) and pre-hospital antibiotics ((aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.01, 2.14), p = 0.043) had an elevated aOR for antibiotic treatment failure. Severe malnutrition and pre-hospital antibiotic use predicted antibiotic treatment failure in this high-risk severe pneumonia pediatric population in Malawi. Our findings suggest addressing complex sociomedical conditions like severe malnutrition and improving pneumonia etiology diagnostics will be key for better targeting interventions to improve childhood pneumonia outcomes.

BackgroundPneumonia is the leading infectious cause of death in children under 5 years of age in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with most deaths among infants. In children with pneumonia, aspiration events have been implicated in fatalities; however, physiological data on normative infant feeding patterns and validated techniques for detecting dysphagia and aspiration risk in LMICs are lacking. We aimed to establish a baseline of normative physiological and behavioural feeding-related variables in healthy, well, breastfeeding infants in Malawi to begin developing dysphagia risk scoring tools for infants with severe pneumonia.MethodsWe enrolled healthy breastfeeding infants (<12 months) without known dysphagia risk factors who presented to a vaccination clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi. We incorporated key variables from the literature and expert opinion to create a feeding evaluation protocol. We collected sociodemographic and clinical information and evaluated infants during 5 minutes of breastfeeding. Descriptive statistics and distributions of feeding variables were used to develop two dysphagia risk scoring tools for predicting wet breath sounds during feeding, a proxy for increased aspiration risk. We assessed initial tool performance by calculating test statistics.ResultsWe enrolled 100 infants and analysed data from 95 healthy, well participants. The median age was 4 months (IQR 1–6) and 60% (57/95) were female. During feeding, 55% (52/95) had more than one wet breath sound and 17% (16/95) had more than one cough. The two scoring tools classified 2.1% (2/95) and 3.2% (3/95) of participants as ‘at risk’ for dysphagia. The specificity of each scoring tool was 100% in detecting wet breath sounds during feeding.ConclusionWe demonstrated that healthy, well Malawian infants exhibit variable vital signs and feeding behaviours during breastfeeding, and these data can be used to develop dysphagia risk scoring tools. Our next steps include evaluating and refining the tools to predict wet breath sounds in infants with severe pneumonia.

Background Incident HIV during the perinatal period significantly impedes elimination of Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission (eMTCT) efforts. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces HIV acquisition, and new agents like injectable Cabotegravir (CAB-LA) offer potential advantages for pregnant and breastfeeding women. The Pregnancy, Infant, and Maternal health Outcomes (PrIMO) study will compare rates of composite adverse pregnancy outcomes, and infant adverse events, growth and neurodevelopment between mother-infant dyads receiving CAB-LA and those receiving oral PrEP in Malawi. Methods PrIMO is an observational cohort study involving: (1) the development of a PrEP Pregnancy Registry for longitudinal surveillance of pregnant women on PrEP in Malawi; and (2) the enrolment of a prospective safety cohort of 621 pregnant women initiating oral PrEP or CAB-LA and their subsequent infants. The registry will include all women continuing or initiating PrEP during pregnancy across targeted sites in Lilongwe and Blantyre districts. The safety cohort will enrol a subset of those women and their infants from Bwaila District Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. We hypothesize that CAB-LA’s safety will be comparable to daily oral PrEP regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes, maternal/infant adverse events, and infant development. Participants in the cohort will choose either oral PrEP or CAB-LA and will be followed until 52 weeks post-delivery. Safety data will be collected from all mother-infant pairs and qualitative interviews will be conducted with a subset of purposively selected women ( n  = 50) to assess the acceptability of each PrEP modality. Discussion The PrIMO study will provide critical data on the safety of CAB-LA in pregnant and breastfeeding women and their infants. Results will guide clinical recommendations as the Malawi Ministry of Health prepares for the rollout of CAB-LA to this population. Evaluation of Registry implementation will inform its expansion to a nationwide safety monitoring system for PrEP use during pregnancy, with implications for similar systems in the region. Trial Registration number NCT06158126. The study was prospectively registered (5 December 2023) in ClinicalTrials.gov.

ObjectiveTo determine caregiver knowledge of, attitudes towards, and perceptions of feeding practices for infants admitted to a tertiary referral hospital with severe pneumonia, and to identify community feelings about nasogastric tube feeding in Malawi.SettingThe paediatric ward of a government tertiary referral hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi.MethodsFrom March through April 2023, we conducted in-depth interviews with 14 mothers of infants 0–12 months of age hospitalised with severe pneumonia who had been enrolled in an observational study evaluating feeding and swallowing in breastfed infants. In-depth interviews assessed mothers’ attitudes towards hospital feeding practices including nasogastric tube feeding, along with community perceptions of nasogastric tubes. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach to assess themes and subthemes of transcripts.ResultsMothers understood that children with pneumonia are at risk of ‘choking’ during oral feeding; however, they had substantial worries about both withholding breastfeeding and providing nasogastric feeds to their infants through a nasogastric tube. Community perceptions of nasogastric tubes were widely negative and included beliefs that nasogastric tubes cause children to ‘choke’ and die and that medical providers want to harm children. Mothers held strong beliefs about the benefits of breastfeeding.ConclusionThere are alarming misconceptions in the community around nasogastric tubes and the intentions of medical providers. This leads to maternal concerns about this hospital feeding practice, poor adherence to medical recommendations, and mistrust in the broader healthcare system. To improve hospital outcomes of children with severe pneumonia, caregiver and community education is needed.

Background RTS,S/AS01 has been recommended by WHO for widespread implementation in medium to high malaria transmission settings. Previous analyses have noted lower vaccine efficacies in higher transmission settings, possibly due to the more rapid development of naturally acquired immunity in the control group. Methods To investigate a reduced immune response to vaccination as a potential mechanism behind lower efficacy in high transmission areas, we examine initial vaccine antibody (anti-CSP IgG) response and vaccine efficacy against the first case of malaria (to exclude the effect of naturally acquired immunity) using data from three study areas (Kintampo, Ghana; Lilongwe, Malawi; Lambaréné, Gabon) from the 2009–2014 phase III trial (NCT00866619). Our key exposures are parasitemia during the vaccination series and background malaria incidence. We calculate vaccine efficacy (one minus hazard ratio) using a cox-proportional hazards model and allowing for the time-varying effect of RTS,S/AS01. Results We find that antibody responses to the primary three-dose vaccination series were higher in Ghana than in Malawi and Gabon, but that neither antibody levels nor vaccine efficacy against the first case of malaria varied by background incidence or parasitemia during the primary vaccination series. Conclusions We find that vaccine efficacy is unrelated to infections during vaccination. Contributing to a conflicting literature, our results suggest that vaccine efficacy is also unrelated to infections before vaccination, meaning that control-group immunity is likely a major reason for lower efficacy in high transmission settings, not reduced immune responses to RTS,S/AS01. This may be reassuring for implementation in high transmission settings, though further studies are needed.

In an effort to explore new knowledge and to develop meaningful collaborations for improving child health, the First Pan African Workshop on Newborn Screening was convened in June 2019 in Rabat, Morocco. Participants included an informal network of newborn screening stakeholders from across Africa and global experts in newborn screening and sickle cell disease. Over 150 attendees, representing 20 countries, were present including 11 African countries. The agenda focused on newborn screening rationale, techniques, system development, implementation barriers, ongoing research, and collaborations both globally and across Africa. We provide an overview of the workshop and a description of the newborn screening activities in the 11 African countries represented at the workshop, with a focus on sickle cell disease.

Background RTS,S/AS01 is the first vaccine against malaria to undergo pilot implementation, beginning in 2019 and vaccinating 360,000 children per year in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya. The four-dose vaccine is given as a primary three-dose series with a fourth dose given approximately 18 months later. The efficacy of RTS,S/AS01 was variable among the 11 sites participating in the 2009–2014 phase III trial (MALARIA-055, NCT00866619 ), possibly due to differences in transmission intensity. However, a within-site examination of environmental factors related to transmission intensity and their impact on vaccine efficacy has yet to be conducted. Methods We implemented the phase III RTS,S/AS01 trial at the Malawi site, which enrolled 1578 infants (6–12 weeks) and children (5–17 months) living in the Lilongwe District in Central Malawi and followed them for 3 years between 2009 and 2014. A global positioning system survey and an ecological questionnaire were conducted to collect participant household locations and characteristics, while additional data on background malaria prevalence were obtained from a concurrent Malaria Transmission Intensity (MTI) survey. Negative binomial regression models were used to assess whether the efficacy of the vaccine varied by estimated background malaria prevalence, household roof type, or amount of nearby vegetation. Results Vaccine efficacy did not significantly vary by estimated malaria prevalence or by roof type. However, increased vegetation cover was associated with an increase in the efficacy of the three-dose primary RTS,S/AS01 series in the 18 months before the fourth dose and a decrease in the efficacy of the primary vaccine series in the second 18 months following, if the fourth dose was not given. Vegetation cover did not alter the efficacy of the fourth dose in a statistically or practically significant manner. Conclusions Vegetation coverage in this study site might be a proxy for nearness to rivers or branching, shallow wetlands called “dambos” which could serve as breeding sites for mosquitoes. We observed statistically significant modification of the efficacy of RTS,S/AS01 by forest cover, suggesting that initial vaccine efficacy and the importance of the fourth dose varies based on ecological context. Trial registration Efficacy of GSK Biologicals’ Candidate Malaria Vaccine (257049) Against Malaria Disease Caused by P. falciparum Infection in Infants and Children in Africa. NCT00866619 prospectively registered 20 March 2009.

Due to increasing antimicrobial resistance in low-resource settings, strategies to rationalize antibiotic treatment of children unlikely to have a bacterial infection are needed. This study's objective was to utilize a database of placebo treated Malawian children with World Health Organization (WHO) fast breathing pneumonia to develop a prognostic risk score that could aid antibiotic decision making. We conducted a secondary analysis of children randomized to the placebo group of the Innovative Treatments in Pneumonia (ITIP) fast breathing randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Participants were low-risk HIV-uninfected children 2-59 months old with WHO fast breathing pneumonia in Lilongwe, Malawi. Study endpoints were treatment failure, defined as either disease progression at any time on or before Day 4 of treatment or disease persistence on Day 4, or relapse, considered as the recurrence of pneumonia or severe disease among previously cured children between Days 5 and 14. We utilized multivariable linear regression and stepwise model selection to develop a model to predict the probability of treatment failure or relapse. Treatment failure or relapse occurred in 11.5% (61/526) of children included in this analysis. The final model incorporated the following predictors: heart rate terms, mid-upper arm circumference, malaria status, water source, family income, and whether or not a sibling or other child in the household received childcare outside the home. The model's area under the receiver operating characteristic score was 0.712 (95% confidence interval 0.66, 0.78) and it explained 6.1% of the variability in predicting treatment failure or relapse (R2, 0.061). For the model to categorize all children with treatment failure or relapse correctly, 77% of children without treatment failure or relapse would require antibiotics. The model had inadequate discrimination to be appropriate for clinical application. Different strategies will likely be required for models to perform accurately among similar pediatric populations.