Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundThere are limited studies on the results of comprehensive genomic profiling testing for pancreatic cancer tissue specimens by endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA). This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of specimens obtained by EUS-TA using a 19-gauge (G) fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle for unresectable pancreatic cancer (UR-PC) that met the OncoGuide™ NCC Oncopanel System (NOP) analysis suitability criteria.MethodsIn this single-arm, prospective, phase II study, EUS-TA was performed using a 19G FNB biopsy needle in patients with suspected UR-PC based on a contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who met the NOP analysis suitability criteria, with a threshold, expected value, α-error, and power of 40%, 70%, 0.025, and 0.9, respectively, and the planned number of enrolled patients was 33. The NOP analysis suitability criteria were defined as tumor cell content ≥ 20% and tissue size ≥ 4 mm2.ResultsThirty-three patients were enrolled. The procedural success rate was 100%, and the cytodiagnosis of class V was observed in all patients. The proportion of patients meeting the NOP analysis suitability criteria was 63.6% (95% CI 47.22–80.05), which satisfied the predefined criteria to be considered valid. Adverse events occurred in 9.0% of the patients.ConclusionsThe proportion of patients with UR-PC who met the NOP analysis suitability criteria for EUS-TA using a 19G FNB needle was effective for achieving the primary endpoint, making it a valid test method. Adverse events occurred at a higher rate than that previously reported.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a malignancy with limited treatment options in advanced stages. Recently, targeted therapies against fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions have emerged as a promising approach for selected patients. Tasurgratinib, a selective FGFR1–3 inhibitor, was approved in Japan in 2024 for second-line treatment of FGFR2 fusion-positive biliary tract cancer. We report the case of a 55-year-old female with advanced iCCA harboring an FGFR2-BICC1 fusion, who experienced a rapid clinical response to tasurgratinib following disease progression on gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab (GCD). Following the failure of GCD therapy, treatment with oral tasurgratinib was initiated at 140 mg/day and subsequently reduced to 105 mg/day due to Grade 2 diarrhea. Within weeks, imaging and tumor markers indicated a partial response, accompanied by a reduction in ascites, and improved performance status. The response sustained for several months without evidence of disease progression. Notably, no substantial clinical hyperphosphatemia or anorexia was observed during treatment. This is the first report to describe the real-world clinical efficacy of tasurgratinib in an iCCA patient with FGFR2-BICC1 fusion. Our findings suggest that tasurgratinib can provide a rapid and durable response with manageable toxicity in molecularly selected patients who have progressed on standard therapies.

IntroductionPreoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is often required for patients with pancreatic cancer accompanied by biliary obstruction to ensure the safe administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or to manage cholangitis and jaundice. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard approach for PBD, it carries a significant risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), particularly via hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), offers a promising alternative that avoids papillary manipulation. However, the clinical utility of EUS-BD as primary drainage for PBD remains unclear due to a lack of prospective studies. This multicentre prospective trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-HGS as primary drainage for PBD in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.Methods and analysisThis multicentre prospective study involves seven institutions in Japan. Eligible patients will undergo EUS-HGS using a 7Fr plastic stent. The primary endpoint is clinical success, defined by improvements in bilirubin or liver enzyme levels within 14 days postprocedure. Secondary endpoints include technical success rate, adverse event incidence, stent patency and surgical outcomes. A total of 30 patients will be enrolled, considering an expected clinical success rate of 90% and a 10% dropout allowance.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the National Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (Research No. 2024-084). The results of this study will be reported at an international conference and published in an international peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberUMIN ID: 000055173.

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may not provide adequate drainage for patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is a salvage method for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO); however, its effectiveness for MHBO remains unclear. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of EUS-HGS for MHBO. Design: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Methods: Unresectable patients who underwent initial EUS-HGS because of ERCP failure were recruited. Distal biliary stenosis or Bismuth types I and II–IV were defined as MDBO and MHBO, respectively. We defined EUS-HGS for MDBO as the control and analyzed the outcomes for MHBO. Results: The MDBO group (n = 208) was treated using EUS-HGS alone. In the MHBO group (n = 63), EUS-HGS alone (unilateral drainage, n = 26), EUS-HGS with bridging (EUS-HGSB, bilateral drainage, n = 21), and ERCP + EUS-HGS (bilateral drainage, n = 16) were performed. In EUS-HGS (MDBO), EUS-HGS (MHBO), EUS-HGSB, and ERCP + EUS-HGS, the technical success rates were 98.6%, 96.3%, 95.5%, and 94.1%; clinical success rates were 88.5%, 76.9%, 85.7%, and 75.0%; adverse event rates were 19.7%, 15.4%, 9.5%, and 25.0%; and non-recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rates at 180 days were 45.5%, 19.8%, 61.9%, and 68.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis of the MHBO group, EUS-HGSB tended to have a lower risk of RBO (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.39; p = 0.09), and ERCP + EUS-HGS showed a significantly lower risk (aHR, 0.25; p = 0.03) compared to EUS-HGS alone (unilateral drainage). Conclusion: ERCP + EUS-HGS followed by EUS-HGSB, providing bilateral drainage, can offer preferred palliation for MHBO. These drainages may serve as potential salvage options in the management of MHBO.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has greater spatial resolution than other diagnostic imaging modalities. In addition, if gallbladder lesions are found and gallbladder cancer is suspected, EUS is an indispensable modality, enabling detailed tests for invasion depth evaluation using the Doppler mode and ultrasound agents. Furthermore, for gallbladder lesions, EUS fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) can be used to differentiate benign and malignant forms of conditions, such as xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, and collect evidence before chemotherapy. EUS-FNA is also useful for highly precise and specific diagnoses. However, the prevention of bile leakage, an accidental symptom, is highly important. Advancements in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies facilitate the application of multiple parallel sequencing to EUS-FNA samples. Several biomarkers are expected to stratify treatment for gallbladder cancer; however, NGS can unveil potential predictive genomic biomarkers for the treatment response. It is believed that NGS may be feasible with samples obtained using EUS-FNA, further increasing the demand for EUS-FNA.

BackgroundFor non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) ≤ 20 mm, most guidelines consider follow-up observations as an option; however, the various treatment strategies are defined by size alone, even though the Ki-67 index is important for malignancy grading. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is the standard for the histopathological diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions; however, recent results for small lesions remain unclear. Therefore, we examined the efficacy of EUS-TA for solid pancreatic lesions ≤ 20 mm suspected as pNETs or requiring differentiation and the non-increase rate in tumor size in follow-up cases.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data of 111 patients (median age = 58 years) with lesions ≤ 20 mm suspected as pNETs or requiring differentiation who underwent EUS-TA. All patients underwent specimen evaluation by rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE).ResultsEUS-TA led to a diagnosis of pNETs in 77 patients (69.4%) and tumors other than pNETs in 22 patients (19.8%). The histopathological diagnostic accuracy of EUS-TA was 89.2% (99/111) overall, 94.3% (50/53) for 10–20 mm lesions, and 84.5% (49/58) for ≤ 10 mm lesions, with no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy (p = 0.13). The Ki-67 index was measurable in all patients with a histopathological diagnosis of pNETs. Among 49 patients with a diagnosis of pNETs who were followed up, one patient (2.0%) showed tumor enlargement.ConclusionsEUS-TA for solid pancreatic lesions ≤ 20 mm suspected as pNETs or requiring differentiation is safe and has adequate histopathological diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that follow-up observations of pNETs with a histological pathologic diagnosis are acceptable in the short term.

In recent years, cancer genomic medicine centered on comprehensive genome profile (CGP) analysis has become widely used in the field of pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has played an important role in pancreatic cancer, and recently, more EUS-TA tissue samples are considered for CGP analysis. Differences exist between the Oncoguide NCC Oncopanel System and Foundation One CDx Cancer Genome Profile, which are CGP tests approved by insurance programs in Japan, including the analysis criteria, optimal needle selection for meeting these criteria, and puncture target. It is important to understand not only the specimen collection factors, but also the specimen processing factors that can increase the success rate of CGP testing. Furthermore, cancer genome medicine is expected to enter an era of increasing turbulence in the future, and endoscopists need to respond flexibly to these changes. Herein, we review the current status of cancer genome medicine in pancreatic and biliary tract cancers and cancer gene panel testing using EUS-TA.

Objectives The safety and effectiveness of propofol in more complex endoscopic procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, remain unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate propofol sedation during endoscopic cholangiopancreatography, ultrasound‐guided intervention, and gastroduodenal stenting and examine risk factors for excessive sedation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 870 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment with propofol sedation for biliary and pancreatic disease between October 2020 and September 2021. Sedation included propofol and fentanyl, with continuous monitoring of vital signs and the bispectral index. The assessed risk factors included age, complications, body mass index, treatment duration, and specialty. Results Distal bile duct treatment (n = 367), hilar bile duct treatment (n = 197), post‐small‐intestinal reconstruction treatment (n = 75), endoscopic ultrasound‐guided intervention (n = 140), and gastrointestinal obstruction treatment (n = 91) were performed. The rates of excessive sedation, hypoxemia, and hypotension were 7.8%, 6.0%, and 1.8%, respectively. Post‐small‐intestinal reconstruction treatment had the highest incidence rate of excessive sedation (16%), whereas endoscopic ultrasound‐guided intervention had the lowest incidence rate (4.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between excessive sedation and comorbid sleep apnea, obesity, and prolonged procedural time. Conclusions Obesity, sleep apnea syndrome, and prolonged procedure time are risk factors for excessive sedation related to propofol use. Thus, sedation techniques should be tailored for these patients.

Tissue sampling in biliary tract cancer (BTC) is generally performed through transpapillary biopsy (TPB) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA). For the first time, we compared the suitability of specimens obtained using TPB and EUS-TA to determine the optimal tissue-sampling method for comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) analysis in patients with unresectable BTC (UR-BTC). Pathology precheck criteria for CGP analysis comprised the OncoGuide NCC Oncopanel System (NCCOP) and FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx). Seventy-eight patients with UR-BTC (35 TPB and 43 EUS-TA) were included. The NCCOP analysis suitability achievement rate was higher in EUS-TA specimens than in TPB specimens (34.9% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.007), whereas that of F1CDx was 0% in both groups. EUS-TA was identified as an independent factor that contributed to the suitability of the NCCOP analysis. The suitability of the NCCOP analysis of EUS-TA specimens showed a tendency to be higher for mass lesions (43.8% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.065), especially for target size ≥ 18.5 mm, and lower for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (0% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.077). In TPB, papillary-type lesions (66.7% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.016) and peroral cholangioscopy-assisted biopsies (50.0% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.029) showed better potential for successful NCCOP analysis. EUS-TA is suitable for NCCOP analysis in UR-BTC and may be partially complemented by TPB.

BackgroundUGT1A1 polymorphisms should be considered when using irinotecan-containing regimens, especially in patients with a double-variant-type (DV), including homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 and heterozygous for both UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6. We investigated the safety and efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) (irinotecan 80 mg/m2) in patients having DV.MethodsPatients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had received FOLFIRINOX between January 2015 and December 2019 were included in this study. Non-DV patients received the standard mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 150 mg/m2) as first-line (non-DV1) or second-line therapy (non-DV2); however, DV patients received mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 80 mg/m2) as the second-line therapy (DV2). We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of the lowered irinotecan dose in the DV2 group relative to the non-DV1 (safety) or non-DV2 (safety and efficacy) groups.ResultsA total of 235 patients were eligible for this study with 118 patients in the non-DV1, 106 in the non-DV2, and 11 in the DV2 groups. Major grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (33.9, 31.1, and 18.2%) and febrile neutropenia (6.8, 3.8, and 9.1%) in the non-DV1, non-DV2, and DV2 groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 months in the non-DV2 group, and 4.4 months in the DV2 group. The overall survival from the date of starting second-line chemotherapy was 8.8 months in the non-DV2 group and 11.5 months in the DV2 group.ConclusionsBased on our findings, the safety and efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 80 mg/m2) in DV patients were comparable with the standard mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 150 mg/m2) in non-DV patients.