Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
2,497
result(s) for
"National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine"
Sort by:
In-time aviation safety management : challenges and research for an evolving aviation system
by
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Aviation Safety Assurance Committee
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
in
Air traffic capacity.
,
Aeronautics, Commercial Technological innovations.
,
Air traffic control Automation.
\"Decades of continuous efforts to address known hazards in the national airspace system (NAS) and to respond to issues illuminated by analysis of incidents and accidents have made commercial airlines the safest mode of transportation. The task of maintaining a high level of safety for commercial airlines is complicated by the dynamic nature of the NAS. The number of flights by commercial transports is increasing; air traffic control systems and procedures are being modernized to increase the capacity and efficiency of the NAS; increasingly autonomous systems are being developed for aircraft and ground systems, and small aircraft--most notably unmanned aircraft systems--are becoming much more prevalent. As the NAS evolves to accommodate these changes, aviation safety programs will also need to evolve to ensure that changes to the NAS do not inadvertently introduce new risks. Real-time system-wide safety assurance (RSSA) is one of six focus areas for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) aeronautics program. NASA envisions that an RSSA system would provide a continuum of information, analysis, and assessment that supports awareness and action to mitigate risks to safety. Maintaining the safety of the NAS as it evolves will require a wide range of safety systems and practices, some of which are already in place and many of which need to be developed. This report identifies challenges to establishing an RSSA system and the high-priority research that should be implemented by NASA and other interested parties in government, industry, and academia to expedite development of such a system\"--Publisher's description.
A National Strategy to Reduce Food Waste at the Consumer Level
by
National Research Council (U.S.). Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
,
Schneeman, Barbara O.
,
Oria, Maria
in
Consumers
,
Consumers -- Food -- United States
,
Food
2020
Approximately 30 percent of the edible food produced in the United States is wasted and a significant portion of this waste occurs at the consumer level. Despite food's essential role as a source of nutrients and energy and its emotional and cultural importance, U.S. consumers waste an estimated average of 1 pound of food per person per day at home and in places where they buy and consume food away from home. Many factors contribute to this waste-consumers behaviors are shaped not only by individual and interpersonal factors but also by influences within the food system, such as policies, food marketing and the media. Some food waste is unavoidable, and there is substantial variation in how food waste and its impacts are defined and measured. But there is no doubt that the consequences of food waste are severe: the wasting of food is costly to consumers, depletes natural resources, and degrades the environment. In addition, at a time when the COVID-19 pandemic has severely strained the U.S. economy and sharply increased food insecurity, it is predicted that food waste will worsen in the short term because of both supply chain disruptions and the closures of food businesses that affect the way people eat and the types of food they can afford.
A National Strategy to Reduce Food Waste at the Consumer Level identifies strategies for changing consumer behavior, considering interactions and feedbacks within the food system. It explores the reasons food is wasted in the United States, including the characteristics of the complex systems through which food is produced, marketed, and sold, as well as the many other interconnected influences on consumers' conscious and unconscious choices about purchasing, preparing, consuming, storing, and discarding food. This report presents a strategy for addressing the challenge of reducing food waste at the consumer level from a holistic, systems perspective.
Reproducibility and replicability in science
by
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, author
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, author
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Board on Research Data and Information, author
in
Reproducible research United States.
,
Science United States Methodology.
,
Science United States Experiments.
\"One of the pathways by which the scientific community confirms the validity of a new scientific discovery is by repeating the research that produced it. When a scientific effort fails to independently confirm the computations or results of a previous study, some fear that it may be a symptom of a lack of rigor in science, while others argue that such an observed inconsistency can be an important precursor to new discovery. Concerns about reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media. As these concerns came to light, Congress requested that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct a study to assess the extent of issues related to reproducibility and replicability and to offer recommendations for improving rigor and transparency in scientific research. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science defines reproducibility and replicability and examines the factors that may lead to non-reproducibility and non-replicability in research. Unlike the typical expectation of reproducibility between two computations, expectations about replicability are more nuanced, and in some cases a lack of replicability can aid the process of scientific discovery. This report provides recommendations to researchers, academic institutions, journals, and funders on steps they can take to improve reproducibility and replicability in science\"--Publisher's description
Fostering Integrity in Research
by
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Responsible Science
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Policy and Global Affairs
in
Medical ethics
,
Medicine-Research-Moral and ethical aspects
,
Research -- Moral and ethical aspects
2017,2018
The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support - or distort - practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge.
The 1992 report Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process evaluated issues related to scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. It provided a valuable service in describing and analyzing a very complicated set of issues, and has served as a crucial basis for thinking about research integrity for more than two decades. However, as experience has accumulated with various forms of research misconduct, detrimental research practices, and other forms of misconduct, as subsequent empirical research has revealed more about the nature of scientific misconduct, and because technological and social changes have altered the environment in which science is conducted, it is clear that the framework established more than two decades ago needs to be updated.
Responsible Science served as a valuable benchmark to set the context for this most recent analysis and to help guide the committee's thought process. Fostering Integrity in Research identifies best practices in research and recommends practical options for discouraging and addressing research misconduct and detrimental research practices.
Enhancing urban sustainability with data, modeling, and simulation : proceedings of a workshop
by
Casola, Linda Clare, 1982- rapporteur
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics, author
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, author
in
Sustainable urban development United States Data processing Congresses.
,
Big data United States Congresses.
,
Computer simulation United States Congresses.
\"On January 30-31, 2019 the Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics, in collaboration with the Board on Energy and Environmental Systems and the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, convened a workshop in Washington, D.C. to explore the frontiers of mathematics and data science needs for sustainable urban communities. The workshop strengthened the emerging interdisciplinary network of practitioners, business leaders, government officials, nonprofit stakeholders, academics, and policy makers using data, modeling, and simulation for urban and community sustainability, and addressed common challenges that the community faces. Presentations highlighted urban sustainability research efforts and programs under way, including research into air quality, water management, waste disposal, and social equity and discussed promising urban sustainability research questions that improved use of big data, modeling, and simulation can help address. This publication summarizes the presentation and discussion of the workshop\"--Publisher's description.
The Space Science Decadal Surveys
by
Committee on survey of surveys : lessons learned from the decadal survey process, Space Studies Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, The National Academies Of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Space Studies Board
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Survey of Surveys : Lessons Learned from the Decadal Survey Process
in
Astronomy
,
Astronomy-Research-Forecasting
,
Astrophysics
2015
The National Research Council has conducted 11 decadal surveys in the Earth and space sciences since 1964 and released the latest four surveys in the past 8 years. The decadal surveys are notable in their ability to sample thoroughly the research interest, aspirations, and needs of a scientific community. Through a rigorous process, a primary survey committee and thematic panels of community members construct a prioritized program of science goals and objectives and define an executable strategy for achieving them. These reports play a critical role in defining the nation's agenda in that science area for the following 10 years, and often beyond.
The Space Science Decadal Surveys considers the lessons learned from previous surveys and presents options for possible changes and improvements to the process, including the statement of task, advanced preparation, organization, and execution. This report discusses valuable aspects of decadal surveys that could taken further, as well as some challenges future surveys are likely to face in searching for the richest areas of scientific endeavor, seeking community consensus of where to go next, and planning how to get there. The Space Science Decadal Surveys describes aspects in the decadal survey prioritization process, including balance in the science program and across the discipline; balance between the needs of current researchers and the development of the future workforce; and balance in mission scale - smaller, competed programs versus large strategic missions.
Improving data collection and measurement of complex farms
by
Kling, Catherine L.; Arbuckle Jr., J. Gordon; Bradburn, Norman M.; Dunn, Richard A.; Featherstone, Allen M.; Glauber, Joseph W.; Hueth, Brent; Katchova, Ani L.; Mold, Doris; Opsomer, Jean; Peterson, Greg; Poppe, Krijn J.; Sumner, Daniel A.; Wagner, James; Weber, Jeremy G.; Mackie, Christopher D
,
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0284-439X Glauber, Joseph
,
Kling, Catherine L., ed.; Mackie, Christopher D., ed.; Panel on Improving Data Collection and Reporting about Agriculture with Increasingly Complex Farm Structures; Committee on National Statistics; Division of behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
in
Agrarstatistik
,
Agricultural estimating and reporting
,
Agricultural estimating and reporting-United States
2018,2019
America's farms and farmers are integral to the U.S. economy and, more broadly, to the nation's social and cultural fabric. A healthy agricultural sector helps ensure a safe and reliable food supply, improves energy security, and contributes to employment and economic development, traditionally in small towns and rural areas where farming serves as a nexus for related sectors from farm machinery manufacturing to food processing. The agricultural sector also plays a role in the nation's overall economic growth by providing crucial raw inputs for the production of a wide range of goods and services, including many that generate substantial export value.
If the agricultural sector is to be accurately understood and the policies that affect its functioning are to remain well informed, the statistical system's data collection programs must be periodically revisited to ensure they are keeping up with current realities. This report reviews current information and makes recommendations to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) and Economic Research Service (ERS) to help identify effective methods for collecting data and reporting information about American agriculture, given increased complexity and other changes in farm business structure in recent decades.
Graduate STEM education for the 21st century
by
Leshner, Alan I., 1944- editor
,
Scherer, Layne editor
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Revitalizing Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century
in
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education Society Evaluation.
,
Graduate students Education United States 21st century.
,
Interdisciplinary approach in education United States 21st century.
The U.S. system of graduate education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has served the nation and its science and engineering enterprise extremely well. In many ways, it is the \"gold standard\" for graduate STEM education in the world as evidenced by, among other measures, the substantial number of international students coming to the United States to study. Over the course of their education, graduate students become involved in advancing the frontiers of discovery, as well as in making significant contributions to the growth of the U.S. economy, its national security, and the health and well-being of its people. However, continuous, dramatic innovations in research methods and technologies, changes in the nature and availability of work, shifts in demographics, and expansions in the scope of occupations needing STEM expertise raise questions about how well the current STEM graduate education system is meeting the full array of 21st-century needs. Indeed, recent surveys of employers and graduates and studies of graduate education suggest that many graduate programs do not adequately prepare students to translate their knowledge into impact in multiple careers.
Framing the Challenge of Urban Flooding in the United States
by
Board, Water Science and Technology
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
,
Studies, Division on Earth and Life
in
Cities and towns
,
Floods
,
United States
2019
Flooding is the natural hazard with the greatest economic and social impact in the United States, and these impacts are becoming more severe over time. Catastrophic flooding from recent hurricanes, including Superstorm Sandy in New York (2012) and Hurricane Harvey in Houston (2017), caused billions of dollars in property damage, adversely affected millions of people, and damaged the economic well-being of major metropolitan areas. Flooding takes a heavy toll even in years without a named storm or event. Major freshwater flood events from 2004 to 2014 cost an average of $9 billion in direct damage and 71 lives annually. These figures do not include the cumulative costs of frequent, small floods, which can be similar to those of infrequent extreme floods.
Framing the Challenge of Urban Flooding in the United States contributes to existing knowledge by examining real-world examples in specific metropolitan areas. This report identifies commonalities and variances among the case study metropolitan areas in terms of causes, adverse impacts, unexpected problems in recovery, or effective mitigation strategies, as well as key themes of urban flooding. It also relates, as appropriate, causes and actions of urban flooding to existing federal resources or policies.