Explore the vast range of titles available.

The goal of the study was to investigate how variations in ripple width influence the ripple density resolution. The influence of the ripple width was investigated with two experimental paradigms: (i) discrimination between a rippled test signal and a rippled reference signal with opposite ripple phases and (ii) discrimination between a rippled test signal and a flat reference signal. The ripple density resolution depended on the ripple width: the narrower the width, the higher the resolution. For distinguishing between two rippled signals, the resolution varied from 15.1 ripples/oct at a ripple width of 9% of the ripple frequency spacing to 8.1 ripples/oct at 64%. For distinguishing between a rippled test signal and a non-rippled reference signal, the resolution varied from 85 ripples/oct at a ripple width of 9% to 9.3 ripples/oct at a ripple width of 64%. For distinguishing between two rippled signals, the result can be explained by the increased ripple depth in the excitation pattern due to the widening of the inter-ripple gaps. For distinguishing between a rippled test signal and a non-rippled reference signal, the result can be explained by the increased ratio between the autocorrelated and uncorrelated components of the input signal.

Rippled-spectrum stimuli are used to evaluate the resolution of the spectro-temporal structure of sounds. Measurements of spectrum-pattern resolution imply the discrimination between the test and reference stimuli. Therefore, estimates of rippled-pattern resolution could depend on both the test stimulus and the reference stimulus type. In this study, the ripple-density resolution was measured using combinations of two test stimuli and two reference stimuli. The test stimuli were rippled-spectrum signals with constant phase or rippled-spectrum signals with ripple-phase reversals. The reference stimuli were rippled-spectrum signals with opposite ripple phase to the test or nonrippled signals. The spectra were centered at 2 kHz and had an equivalent rectangular bandwidth of 1 oct and a level of 70 dB sound pressure level. A three-alternative forced-choice procedure was combined with an adaptive procedure. With rippled reference stimuli, the mean ripple-density resolution limits were 8.9 ripples/oct (phase-reversals test stimulus) or 7.7 ripples/oct (constant-phase test stimulus). With nonrippled reference stimuli, the mean resolution limits were 26.1 ripples/oct (phase-reversals test stimulus) or 22.2 ripples/oct (constant-phase test stimulus). Different contributions of excitation-pattern and temporal-processing mechanisms are assumed for measurements with rippled and nonrippled reference stimuli: The excitation-pattern mechanism is more effective for the discrimination of rippled stimuli that differ in their ripple-phase patterns, whereas the temporal-processing mechanism is more effective for the discrimination of rippled and nonrippled stimuli.

The effects of prolonged sound stimuli (tone pip trains) on evoked potentials (the rate following response, RFR) were investigated in a beluga whale. The stimuli (rhythmic tone pips) were of 64 kHz frequency at levels from 80 to 140 dB re 1 μPa. During stimulation, every 1000 ms stimulus level either was kept constant (the steady-state stimulation) or changed up/down by 20 or 40 dB. With such stimulus presentation manner, RFR amplitude varied as follows. (i) After a stimulus level increase, the response amplitude increased quickly and then decayed slowly. The more the level increased, the higher the response amplitude increased. (ii) After a stimulus level decrease, the response amplitude was suppressed and then recovered slowly. The more the level decreased, the stronger was the response suppression. (iii) At the end of the 1000 ms window, the response amplitude approached, but did not reach, the amplitude characteristic of the steady-state stimulation. As a result, both after a sound level increase and decrease, the responses were almost stabilized during an analysis time as short as 1 s. This stabilization is attributed to an adaptation process. RFR decay after initial increase could be approximated by an exponent with a time constant of 59.4 ±1.8 (standard error) ms; RFR recovery after initial decrease could be approximated by an exponent with a time constant of 139.2 ±9.9 ms.

The goal of the study was to enlarge knowledge of discrimination of complex sound signals by the auditory system in masking noise. For that, influence of masking noise on detection of shift of rippled spectrum was studied in normal listeners. The signal was a shift of ripple phase within a 0.5-oct wide rippled spectrum centered at 2 kHz. The ripples were frequency-proportional (throughout the band, ripple spacing was a constant proportion of the ripple center frequency). Simultaneous masker was a 0.5-oct noise below-, on-, or above the signal band. Both the low-frequency (center frequency 1 kHz) and on-frequency (the same center frequency as for the signal) maskers increased the thresholds for detecting ripple phase shift. However, the threshold dependence on the masker level was different for these two maskers. For the on-frequency masker, the masking effect primarily depended on the masker/signal ratio: the threshold steeply increased at a ratio of 5 dB, and no shift was detectable at a ratio of 10 dB. For the low-frequency masker, the masking effect primarily depended on the masker level: the threshold increased at a masker level of 80 dB SPL, and no shift was detectable at a masker level of 90 dB (for a signal level of 50 dB) or 100 dB (for a signal level of 80 dB). The high-frequency masker had little effect. The data were successfully simulated using an excitation-pattern model. In this model, the effect of the on-frequency masker appeared to be primarily due to a decrease of ripple depth. The effect of the low-frequency masker appeared due to widening of the auditory filters at high sound levels.

In normal-hearing listeners, rippled-spectrum discrimination was psychophysically investigated in both silence and with a simultaneous masker background using the following two paradigms: measuring the ripple density resolution with the phase-reversal test and measuring the ripple-shift threshold with the ripple-shift test. The 0.5-oct wide signal was centered on 2 kHz, the signal levels were 50 and 80 dB SPL, and the masker levels varied from 30 to 100 dB SPL. The baseline ripple density resolutions were 8.7 oct-1 and 8.6 oct-1 for the 50-dB and 80-dB signals, respectively. The baseline ripple shift thresholds were 0.015 oct and 0.018 oct for the 50-dB and 80-dB signals, respectively. The maskers were 0.5-oct noises centered on 2 kHz (on-frequency) or 0.75 to 1.25 oct below the signal (off-frequency maskers). The effects of the maskers were as follows: (i) both on- and low-frequency maskers reduced the ripple density resolution and increased the ripple shift thresholds, (ii) the masker levels at threshold (the ripple density resolution decrease down to 3 oct-1 or ripple shift threshold increased up to 0.1 oct) increased with increasing frequency spacing between the signal and masker, (iii) the masker levels at threshold were higher for the 80-dB signal than for the 50-dB signal, and (iv) the difference between the masker levels at threshold for the 50-dB and 80-dB signals decreased with increasing frequency spacing between the masker and signal. Within the 30-dB (from 50 to 80 dB SPL) signal level, the growth of the masker level at threshold was 27.8 dB for the on-frequency masker and 9 dB for the low-frequency masker. It is assumed that the difference between the on- and low-frequency masking of the rippled-spectrum discrimination reflects the cochlear compressive non-linearity. With this assumption, the compression was 0.3 dB/dB.

Short-latency auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) were recorded non-invasively in the bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus. The stimuli were two sound clicks that were played either monaurally (both clicks to one and the same acoustic window) or dichotically (the leading stimulus (masker) to one acoustic window and the delayed stimulus (test) to the other window). The ratio of the levels of the two stimuli was 0, 10, or 20 dB (at 10 and 20 dB, the leading stimulus was of a higher level). The inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) varied from 0.15 to 10 ms. The test response magnitude was assessed by correlation analysis as a percentage of the control (non-masked) response. At monaural stimulation, the test response was of a constant magnitude (5–6% of the control) at ISIs of 0.15–0.3 ms and recovered at longer ISIs. At dichotic stimulation, the deepest suppression of the test response occurred at ISIs of 0.5–0.7 ms. The response was slightly suppressed at short ISIs (0.15–0.3 ms) and recovered at ISIs longer than 0.5–0.7 ms. The relation of parameters of the forward masking to echolocation in dolphins is discussed.

Forward masking was investigated by the auditory evoked potentials (AEP) method in a bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus using stimulation by two successive acoustic pulses (the masker and test) projected from spatially separated sources. The positions of the two sound sources either coincided with or were symmetrical relative to the head axis at azimuths from 0 to ± 90°. AEPs were recorded either from the vertex or from the lateral head surface next to the auditory meatus. In the last case, the test source was ipsilateral to the recording side, whereas the masker source was either ipsi- or contralateral. For lateral recording, AEP release from masking (recovery) was slower for the ipsi- than for the contralateral masker source position. For vertex recording, AEP recovery was equal both for the coinciding positions of the masker and test sources and for their symmetrical positions relative to the head axis. The data indicate that at higher levels of the auditory system of the dolphin, binaural convergence makes the forward masking nearly equal for ipsi- and contralateral positions of the masker and test.

The goal of the study was to investigate the role of combination products in the higher ripple-density resolution estimates obtained by discrimination between a spectrally rippled and a nonrippled noise signal than that obtained by discrimination between two rippled signals. To attain this goal, a noise band was used to mask the frequency band of expected low-frequency combination products. A three-alternative forced-choice procedure with adaptive ripple-density variation was used. The mean background (unmasked) ripple-density resolution was 9.8 ripples/oct for rippled reference signals and 21.8 ripples/oct for nonrippled reference signals. Low-frequency maskers reduced the ripple-density resolution. For masker levels from −10 to 10 dB re. signal, the ripple-density resolution for nonrippled reference signals was approximately twice as high as that for rippled reference signals. At a masker level as high as 20 dB re. signal, the ripple-density resolution decreased in both discrimination tasks. This result leads to the conclusion that low-frequency combination products are not responsible for the task-dependent difference in ripple-density resolution estimates.

At suprathreshold sound levels, interactions between masking noise and sound signals are liable to compressive nonlinearity in the auditory system. The compressive nonlinearity is a property of the “active” cochlear mechanism. It is not known whether this mechanism is capable to function at frequencies close to or above 100 kHz that are available to odontocetes (toothed whales, dolphins, and porpoises). This question may be answered by the use of the frequency-specific masking. Auditory evoked potentials to sound stimuli in a bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus, were recorded in the presence of simultaneous maskers. Stimulus frequencies were 45, 64, or 90 kHz. Maskers were on-frequency bandlimited noise or low-frequency noise of frequencies 0.25–1 oct below the stimulus frequency. The stimuli provoked responses as a series of brain-potential waves following the pip-train rate. For the on-frequency masker, the masker level at threshold dependence on the signal level was 1.1 dB/dB. For maskers of 1 oct below the stimulus, the dependence was 0.53–0.57 dB/dB. The data considered evidence for the compressive nonlinearity of responses to stimuli, and therefore, are indicative of the functioning of the active mechanism at frequencies up to 90 kHz.

The “active” cochlear mechanism of hearing manifests in the cochlear compression. Investigations of compression in odontocetes help to determine the frequency limit of the active mechanism. The compression may be evaluated by comparison of low- and on-frequency masking. In a bottlenose dolphin, forward masking of auditory evoked potentials to tonal pips was investigated. Measurements were performed for test frequencies of 45 and 90 kHz. The low-frequency maskers were − 0.25 to − 0.75 oct relative the test. Masking efficiency was varied by masker-to-test delay variation from 2 to 20 ms, and masker levels at threshold (MLTs) were evaluated at each of the delays. It was assumed that low-frequency maskers were not subjected or little subjected to compression whereas on-frequency maskers were subjected equally to the test. Therefore, the compression rate was assessed as the slope of low-frequency MLT dependence on on-frequency MLT. For the 90-kHz test, the slopes were 0.63 and 0.18 dB/dB for masker of − 0.25 and − 0.5 oct, respectively. For the 45 kHz test, the slopes were 0.69 and 0.39 dB/dB for maskers of − 0.25 and − 0.5 oct. So, compression did not decay at the upper boundary of the hearing frequency range in the dolphin.