Explore the vast range of titles available.

Only a subgroup of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) responds to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). To better understand lack of response to ICI, we analyze 681 TNBCs for spatial immune cell contextures in relation to clinical outcomes and pathways of T cell evasion. Excluded, ignored and inflamed phenotypes can be captured by a gene classifier that predicts prognosis of various cancers as well as anti-PD1 response of metastatic TNBC patients in a phase II trial. The excluded phenotype, which is associated with resistance to anti-PD1, demonstrates deposits of collagen-10, enhanced glycolysis, and activation of TGFβ/VEGF pathways; the ignored phenotype, also associated with resistance to anti-PD1, shows either high density of CD163+ myeloid cells or activation of WNT/PPARγ pathways; whereas the inflamed phenotype, which is associated with response to anti-PD1, revealed necrosis, high density of CLEC9A+ dendritic cells, high TCR clonality independent of neo-antigens, and enhanced expression of T cell co-inhibitory receptors. Only a subset of triple negative breast cancer patients respond to immunotherapy. Here, the authors analysed spatial immune contextures, which can be captured by a gene classifier, in relation to genomic alterations, mechanisms of T cell evasion and response to anti-PD1 treatment.

Background Breast cancer (BC) immune infiltrates play a critical role in tumor progression and response to treatment. Besides stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) which have recently reached level 1B evidence as a prognostic marker in triple negative BC, a plethora of methods to assess immune infiltration exists, and it is unclear how these compare to each other and if they can be used interchangeably. Methods Two experienced pathologists scored sTIL, intra-tumoral TIL (itTIL), and 6 immune cell types (CD3 + , CD4 + , CD8 + , CD20 + , CD68 + , FOXP3 + ) in the International Cancer Genomics Consortium breast cancer cohort using hematoxylin and eosin-stained ( n  = 243) and immunohistochemistry-stained tissue microarrays ( n  = 254) and whole slides ( n  = 82). The same traits were evaluated using transcriptomic- and methylomic-based deconvolution methods or signatures. Results The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between pathologists for sTIL was very good (0.84) and for cell-specific immune infiltrates slightly lower (0.63–0.66). Comparison between tissue microarray and whole slide pathology scores revealed systematically higher values in whole slides (ratio 2.60–5.98). The Spearman correlations between microscopic sTIL and transcriptomic- or methylomic-based assessment of immune infiltrates were highly variable ( r  = 0.01–0.56). Similar observations were made for cell type-specific quantifications ( r  = 0.001–0.54). We observed a strong inter-method variability between the omics-derived estimations, which is further cell type dependent. Finally, we demonstrated that most methods more accurately identify highly infiltrated (sTIL ≥ 60%; area under the curve, AUC, 0.64–0.99) as compared to lowly infiltrated tumors (sTIL ≤ 10%; AUC 0.52–0.82). Conclusions There is a lower inter-pathologist concordance for cell-specific quantification as compared to overall infiltration quantification. Microscopic assessments are underestimated when considering small cores (tissue microarray) instead of whole slides. Results further highlight considerable differences between the microscopic-, transcriptomic-, and methylomic-based methods in the assessment of overall and cell-specific immune infiltration in BC. We therefore call for extreme caution when assessing immune infiltrates using current methods and emphasize the need for standardized immune characterization beyond TIL.

Cancer disrupts intratumoral innate-adaptive immune crosstalk, but how the systemic immune landscape evolves during breast cancer progression remains unclear. We profiled circulating immune cells in stage I–III and stage IV triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients and healthy donors (HDs). Metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) patients had reduced T cells, dendritic cells, and differentiated B cells compared to non-metastatic TNBC patients and HDs, partly linked to prior chemotherapy. Vδ1 γδ T cells from mTNBC patients produced more IL17 than those from HDs. Chemotherapy-naïve mTNBC patients showed increased classical monocytes and neutrophils. Transcriptional, proteomic, and functional analyses revealed that neutrophils in mTNBC exhibited enhanced migratory capacity, elevated granule proteins, and higher ROS production. Some immune changes, such as reduced non-switched B cells and heightened neutrophil migration, were evident in earlier TNBC stages. This study comprehensively maps systemic immunity in TNBC, guiding future research on patient stratification and immunomodulation strategies.

Patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) benefit from treatment with atezolizumab, provided that the tumor contains ≥1% of PD-L1/SP142-positive immune cells. Numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) vary strongly according to the anatomic localization of TNBC metastases. We investigated inter-pathologist agreement in the assessment of PD-L1/SP142 immunohistochemistry and TILs. Ten pathologists evaluated PD-L1/SP142 expression in a proficiency test comprising 28 primary TNBCs, as well as PD-L1/SP142 expression and levels of TILs in 49 distant TNBC metastases with various localizations. Interobserver agreement for PD-L1 status (positive vs. negative) was high in the proficiency test: the corresponding scores as percentages showed good agreement with the consensus diagnosis. In TNBC metastases, there was substantial variability in PD-L1 status at the individual patient level. For one in five patients, the chance of treatment was essentially random, with half of the pathologists designating them as positive and half negative. Assessment of PD-L1/SP142 and TILs as percentages in TNBC metastases showed poor and moderate agreement, respectively. Additional training for metastatic TNBC is required to enhance interobserver agreement. Such training, focusing on metastatic specimens, seems worthwhile, since the same pathologists obtained high percentages of concordance (ranging from 93% to 100%) on the PD-L1 status of primary TNBCs.

The efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is low 1 – 5 , highlighting a need for strategies that render the tumor microenvironment more sensitive to PD-1 blockade. Preclinical research has suggested immunomodulatory properties for chemotherapy and irradiation 6 – 13 . In the first stage of this adaptive, non-comparative phase 2 trial, 67 patients with metastatic TNBC were randomized to nivolumab (1) without induction or with 2-week low-dose induction, or with (2) irradiation (3 × 8 Gy), (3) cyclophosphamide, (4) cisplatin or (5) doxorubicin, all followed by nivolumab. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate (ORR; iRECIST 14 ) was 20%. The majority of responses were observed in the cisplatin (ORR 23%) and doxorubicin (ORR 35%) cohorts. After doxorubicin and cisplatin induction, we detected an upregulation of immune-related genes involved in PD-1–PD-L1 (programmed death ligand 1) and T cell cytotoxicity pathways. This was further supported by enrichment among upregulated genes related to inflammation, JAK–STAT and TNF-α signaling after doxorubicin. Together, the clinical and translational data of this study indicate that short-term doxorubicin and cisplatin may induce a more favorable tumor microenvironment and increase the likelihood of response to PD-1 blockade in TNBC. These data warrant confirmation in TNBC and exploration of induction treatments prior to PD-1 blockade in other cancer types. A pick-the-winner clinical trial design in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer shows that immune induction with doxorubicin or cisplatin may improve clinical responses to PD-1 blockade and induce a more favorable tumor microenvironment.

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with chemotherapy is now the standard of care for stage II–III triple-negative breast cancer; however, it is largely unknown for which patients ICI without chemotherapy could be an option and what the benefit of combination ICI could be. The adaptive BELLINI trial explored whether short combination ICI induces immune activation (primary end point, twofold increase in CD8 + T cells or IFNG ), providing a rationale for neoadjuvant ICI without chemotherapy. Here, in window-of-opportunity cohorts A (4 weeks of anti-PD-1) and B (4 weeks of anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA4), we observed immune activation in 53% (8 of 15) and 60% (9 of 15) of patients, respectively. High levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlated with response. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that higher pretreatment tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells, follicular helper T cells and shorter distances between tumor and CD8 + T cells correlated with response. Higher levels of regulatory T cells after treatment were associated with nonresponse. Based on these data, we opened cohort C for patients with high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (≥50%) who received 6 weeks of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA4 followed by surgery (primary end point, pathological complete response). Overall, 53% (8 of 15) of patients had a major pathological response (<10% viable tumor) at resection, with 33% (5 of 15) having a pathological complete response. All cohorts met Simon’s two-stage threshold for expansion to stage II. We observed grade ≥3 adverse events for 17% of patients and a high rate (57%) of immune-mediated endocrinopathies. In conclusion, neoadjuvant immunotherapy without chemotherapy demonstrates potential efficacy and warrants further investigation in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03815890 . In the phase 2 adaptive BELLINI trial, patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer received neoadjuvant nivolumab with or without ipilimumab, showing immune activation, clearance of circulating tumor DNA and promising clinical response rates, especially in patients preselected based on high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

Providing effective personalized immunotherapy for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients requires a detailed understanding of the composition of the tumor microenvironment. Both the tumor cell and non-tumor components of TNBC can exhibit tremendous heterogeneity in individual patients and change over time. Delineating cellular phenotypes and spatial topographies associated with distinct immunological states and the impact of chemotherapy will be necessary to optimally time immunotherapy. The clinical successes in immunotherapy have intensified research on the tumor microenvironment, aided by a plethora of high-dimensional technologies to define cellular phenotypes. These high-dimensional technologies include, but are not limited to, single cell RNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, T cell repertoire analyses, advanced flow cytometry, imaging mass cytometry, and their integration. In this review, we discuss the cellular phenotypes and spatial patterns of the lymphoid-, myeloid-, and stromal cells in the TNBC microenvironment and the potential value of mapping these features onto tumor cell genotypes.

The small intestinal and colonic lamina propria are populated with forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)+CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) and interleukin-10-producing T cells that orchestrate intestinal tolerance to harmless microbial and food antigens. Expression of co-inhibitory receptors such as CTLA-4 and PD-1 serve as checkpoints to these cells controlling their T-cell receptor (TCR)-mediated and CD28-mediated activation and modulating the phenotype of neighboring antigen presenting cells. Recent discoveries on the diversity of co-inhibitory receptors and their selective cellular expression has shed new light on their tissue-dependent function. In this review, we provide an overview of the co-inhibitory pathways and checkpoints of Treg and effector T cells and their mechanisms of action in intestinal homeostasis. Better understanding of these inhibitory checkpoints is desired as their blockade harbors clinical potential for the treatment of cancer and their stimulation may offer new opportunities to treat chronic intestinal inflammation such as inflammatory bowel disease.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G is an immune modulating molecule that is present on fetal extravillous trophoblasts at the fetal-maternal interface. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 3 prime untranslated region (3′UTR) of the HLA-G gene can affect the level of HLA-G expression, which may be altered in women with recurrent miscarriages (RM). This case-control study included 23 women with a medical history of three or more consecutive miscarriages who delivered a child after uncomplicated pregnancy, and 46 controls with uncomplicated pregnancy. Genomic DNA was isolated to sequence the 3′UTR of HLA-G. Tissue from term placentas was processed to quantify the HLA-G protein and mRNA levels. The women with a history of RM had a lower frequency of the HLA-G 3′UTR 14-bp del/del genotype as compared to controls (Odds ratio (OR) 0.28; p = 0.039), which has previously been related to higher soluble HLA-G levels. Yet, HLA-G protein (OR 6.67; p = 0.006) and mRNA (OR 6.33; p = 0.010) expression was increased in term placentas of women with a history of RM as compared to controls. In conclusion, during a successful pregnancy, HLA-G expression is elevated in term placentas from women with a history of RM as compared to controls, despite a genetic predisposition that is associated with decreased HLA-G levels. These findings suggest that HLA-G upregulation could be a compensatory mechanism in the occurrence of RM to achieve an ongoing pregnancy.

In the version of this article originally published, there was an error in Fig. 3j. A label on the heatmap read “TGF-α signaling via NF-κB”. It should have read “TNF-α signaling via NF-κB”. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of this article.