Explore the vast range of titles available.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cycle threshold (Ct) has been suggested as an approximate measure of initial viral burden. The utility of cycle threshold, at admission, as a predictor of disease severity has not been thoroughly investigated. We conducted a retrospective study of SARS-CoV-2 positive, hospitalized patients from 3/26/2020 to 8/5/2020 who had SARS-CoV-2 Ct data within 48 hours of admission (n = 1044). Only patients with complete survival data, discharged (n = 774) or died in hospital (n = 270), were included in our analysis. Laboratory, demographic, and clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to examine the relationship of patient mortality with Ct values while adjusting for established risk factors. Ct was analyzed as continuous variable and subdivided into quartiles to better illustrate its relationship with outcome. Cumulative incidence curves were created to assess whether there was a survival difference in the setting of the competing risks of death versus patient discharge. Mean Ct at admission was higher for survivors (28.6, SD = 5.8) compared to non-survivors (24.8, SD = 6.0, P<0.001). In-hospital mortality significantly differed (p<0.05) by Ct quartile. After adjusting for age, gender, BMI, hypertension and diabetes, increased cycle threshold was associated with decreased odds of in-hospital mortality (0.91, CI 0.89-0.94, p<0.001). Compared to the 4th Quartile, patients with Ct values in the 1st Quartile (Ct <22.9) and 2nd Quartile (Ct 23.0-27.3) had an adjusted odds ratio of in-hospital mortality of 3.8 and 2.6 respectively (p<0.001). The discriminative ability of Ct to predict inpatient mortality was found to be limited, possessing an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (CI 0.63-0.71). SARS-CoV-2 Ct was found to be an independent predictor of patient mortality. However, further study is needed on how to best clinically utilize such information given the result variation due to specimen quality, phase of disease, and the limited discriminative ability of the test.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) is a CD-19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell therapy approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. We treated ten patients with DLBCL post-FDA approval in an inner-city tertiary center in the Bronx. Eight patients (80%) had received ≥ 3 lines of therapy, six patients had received prior radiation, and seven had recurrent disease after prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHCT). Our cohort included one patient with HIV, two patients with hepatitis B, and two patients with CNS involvement of lymphoma. Axi-cel treatment led to significant responses with 8/10 patients achieving a complete remission at 3 months, including both patients with prior CNS involvement. The treatment was generally well tolerated with 20% of patients experiencing grade ≥ 2 CRS. One patient each with HIV and hepatitis B responded without significant toxicities. In conclusion, Axi-cel led to significant efficacy with manageable toxicity in DLBCL in a real-world setting.

While critical value procedures have been adopted in most areas of the clinical laboratory, their use in transfusion medicine has not been reviewed in detail. The results of this study present a comprehensive overview of critical value reporting and communication practices in transfusion medicine in the United States. A web-based survey was developed to collect data on the prevalence of critical value procedures and practices of communicating results. The survey was distributed via email to US hospital-based blood banks. Of 123 facilities surveyed, 84 (68.3%) blood banks had a critical value procedure. From a panel of 23 common blood bank results, nine results were selected by more than 70% of facilities as either a critical value or requiring rapid communication as defined by an alternate procedure. There was overlap among results communicated by facilities with and without a critical value procedure. The most frequently communicated results, such as incompatible crossmatch for RBC units issued uncrossmatched, delay in finding compatible blood due to a clinically significant antibody, and transfusion reaction evaluation suggestive of a serious adverse event, addressed scenarios associated with the leading reported causes of transfusion-related fatalities.

Abstract Background Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive disorder, which results from a point mutation in the β-globin gene. The production of mutant Hb S (V6E) leads to hemolytic anemia and numerous clinical complications. Patients homozygous for HbS gene (SS) typically rely on life-long transfusion therapy. Alloimmunization to foreign RBC antigens in multiply transfused patients is significantly more frequent in SS patients (observed in 7–47%) compared to patients with HbA (AA), and can pose a significant hurdle in finding compatible RBCs. However, the mechanism for enhanced alloimmunization in SS patients has not yet been elucidated. Patients heterozygous for HbS (SA) have a no distinct clinical phenotype and do not typically require transfusions. We investigated the rate of RBC antigen alloimmunization and specificity in SA patients. Aim The aim of this study was to determine and compare the rate and specificities of RBC antigen pregnancy-related alloimmunization in SA and AA patients. Methods In our retrospective study, we identified females who delivered a newborn between January 2014 to October 2019, for whom prenatal hemoglobin electrophoresis testing, and prenatal and perinatal antibody screening and identification was performed. R (V.3.6.2) statistical computing program was used for analysis. Results A total of 41735 subjects were identified: 40058 (AA) and 1677 (SA). African Americans were more prevalent in the SA compared to the AA group (55.8% vs 29.4%, P<0.01)and were more likely to have received ≥ 1 transfusion during pregnancy (4.5% vs 3.3%, P<0.01). A total number of 267 alloantibodies were detected in 246 patients (0.6% of the studied population) during pregnancy, 228 patients (0.6%) in the AA group and 18 patients (1.1%) in the SA group.229/246 (93%) of patients with antibodies did not receive transfusion during pregnancy, and thus antibodies were considered to represent pregnancy-related alloimmunization. In non-transfused subjects the SA group were more likely to have developed alloantibodies in pregnancy compared to the AA group [OR= 1.94, P=0.015]. The median age of patients with antibodies in the SA was older [33.5 vs 27 (p=0.008)] as compared to those in the AA group [29 vs 27 (p=0.002)]. The most common antibody identified was anti-E (SA 42% vs AA 28%), anti-Lea (SA 21% vs AA 13%) and anti-C (SA 5% vs AA 12%). Subjects with pre-existing alloantibodies had a 5.4x increased risk of forming a new allo-antibody. However only 0.1% of subjects had a history of prior allo-antibodies, with no significant difference identified between AA and SA. Conclusions SA patients were found to have an increased rate of pregnancy-related alloimmunization (OR 1.75, P=0.02) after adjusting for the effects of increasing age, RH type, ethnicity, number of previously existing antibodies and number of transfusions in pregnancy.

Abstract Objectives: While critical value procedures have been adopted in most areas of the clinical laboratory, their use in transfusion medicine has not been reviewed in detail. The results of this study present a comprehensive overview of critical value reporting and communication practices in transfusion medicine in the United States. Methods: A web-based survey was developed to collect data on the prevalence of critical value procedures and practices of communicating results. The survey was distributed via email to US hospital-based blood banks. Results: Of 123 facilities surveyed, 84 (68.3%) blood banks had a critical value procedure. From a panel of 23 common blood bank results, nine results were selected by more than 70% of facilities as either a critical value or requiring rapid communication as defined by an alternate procedure. Conclusions: There was overlap among results communicated by facilities with and without a critical value procedure. The most frequently communicated results, such as incompatible crossmatch for RBC units issued uncrossmatched, delay in finding compatible blood due to a clinically significant antibody, and transfusion reaction evaluation suggestive of a serious adverse event, addressed scenarios associated with the leading reported causes of transfusion-related fatalities.