Explore the vast range of titles available.

Sorafenib, an inhibitor of Raf-1 kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 is now an FDA approved drug for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, 22 but despite being well tolerated, it is inactive in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. 23 Growth factors and their receptors The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, also known as human EGF receptor 1 or HER 1) is a major therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer. Of these, EGFR-1, ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 have all been shown to be overexpressed in pancreatic cancer.), including the Ras-Raf-MEK signalling pathway (transmitting growth signals), the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway (mediates cell cycle progression and survival) and the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family of proteins (mediates a variety of features conducive to cancer cell survival progression, including cell division, motility, invasion and adhesion).

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is associated with elevated plasma levels of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and we have demonstrated reduced acinar cell autophagy in human CP tissue. Therefore, we investigated the role of autophagy in experimental endotoxin-induced pancreatic injury and aimed to identify LPS in human CP tissue. Pancreatic Atg7-deficient mice were injected with a single sub-lethal dose of LPS. Expression of autophagy, apoptosis, necroptosis, and inflammatory markers was determined 3 and 24 h later utilizing immunoblotting and immunofluorescence. The presence of LPS in pancreatic tissue from mice and from patients and healthy controls was determined using immunohistochemistry, immunoblots, and chromogenic assay. Mice lacking pancreatic autophagy exhibited local signs of inflammation and were particularly sensitive to the toxic effect of LPS injection as compared to control mice. In response to LPS, Atg 7 Δpan mice exhibited enhanced vacuolization of pancreatic acinar cells, increase in TLR4 expression coupled to enhanced expression of NF-κΒ, JNK, and pro-inflammatory cytokines by acinar cells and enhanced infiltration by myeloid cells (but not Atg 7 F/F controls). Cell death was enhanced in Atg 7 Δpan pancreata, but only necroptosis and trypsin activation was further amplified following LPS injection along with elevated pancreatic LPS. The presence of LPS was identified in the pancreata from all 14 CP patients examined but was absent in the pancreata from all 10 normal controls. Altogether, these results support a potential role for metabolic endotoxemia in the pathogenesis of CP. Moreover, the evidence also supports the notion that autophagy plays a major cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory role in the pancreas, and blunting metabolic endotoxemia-induced CP.

BACKGROUND Platelet activating factor (PAF) is believed to amplify the activity of key mediators of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in acute pancreatitis, resulting in multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. We tested the hypothesis that a potent PAF antagonist, lexipafant, could dampen SIRS and reduce organ failure in severe acute pancreatitis. METHODS We conducted a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre trial of lexipafant (100 mg/24 hours intravenously for seven days commenced within 72 hours of the onset of symptoms) involving 290 patients with an APACHE II score >6. Power calculations assumed that complications would be reduced from 40% to 24%. Secondary end points studied included severity of organ failure, markers of the inflammatory response, and mortality rate. FINDINGS Overall, 80/138 (58%) patients in the placebo group and 85/148 (57%) in the lexipafant group developed one or more organ failures. The primary hypothesis was invalidated by the unexpected finding that 44% of patients had organ failure on entry into the study; only 39 (14%) developed new organ failure. Organ failure scores were reduced in the lexipafant group only on day 3: median change −1 (range −4 to +8) versus 0 (−4 to +10) in the placebo group (p=0.04). Systemic sepsis affected fewer patients in the lexipafant group (13/138v 4/148; p=0.023). Local complications occurred in 41/138 (30%) patients in the placebo group and in 30/148 (20%) in the lexipafant group (20%; p=0.065); pseudocysts developed in 19 (14%) and eight (5%) patients, respectively (p=0.025). Deaths attributable to acute pancreatitis were not significantly different. Interleukin 8, a marker of neutrophil activation, and E-selectin, a marker of endothelial damage, decreased more rapidly in the lexipafant group (both p<0.05); however, absolute values were not different between the two groups. INTERPRETATION The high incidence of organ failure within 72 hours of the onset of symptoms undermined the primary hypothesis, and power calculations for future studies in severe acute pancreatitis will need to allow for this. Lexipafant had no effect on new organ failure during treatment. This adequately powered study has shown that antagonism of PAF activity on its own is not sufficient to ameliorate SIRS in severe acute pancreatitis

Background: The potential prognostic value of several commonly investigated immunohistochemical markers in resected pancreatic cancer is variably reported. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of literature evaluating p53, p16, smad4, bcl-2, bax, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression as prognostic factors in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to conduct a subsequent meta-analysis to quantify the overall prognostic effect. Methods: Relevant literature was identified using Medline, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science. The primary end point was overall survival assessed on univariate analysis. Only studies analysing resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma were eligible for inclusion and the summary log e hazard ratio (logHR) and variance were pooled using an inverse variance approach. Evidence of heterogeneity was evaluated using the χ 2 test for heterogeneity and its impact on the meta-analysis was assessed by the I 2 statisic. Hazard ratios greater than one reflect adverse survival associated with positive immunostaining. Results: Vascular endothelial growth factor emerged as the most potentially informative prognostic marker (11 eligible studies, n =767, HR=1.51 (95% confidence interval, CI=1.18–1.92)) with no evidence of any significant publication bias (Egger's test, P =0.269). Bcl-2 (5 eligible studies, n =314, HR=0.51 (95% CI=0.38–0.68)), bax (5 studies, n =274, HR=0.63 (95% CI=0.48–0.83)) and p16 (3 studies, n =229, HR=0.63 (95% CI=0.43–0.92)) also returned significant overall survival differences, but in smaller patient series due to a lack of evaluable literature. Neither p53 (17 studies, n =925, HR=1.22 (95% CI=0.96–1.56)), smad4 (5 studies, n =540, HR=0.88 (95% CI=0.61–1.27)) nor EGFR (4 studies, n =250, HR=1.35 (95% CI=0.80–2.27)) was found to represent significant prognostic factors when analysing the pooled patient data. There was evidence of significant heterogeneity in four of the seven study groups. Conclusion: These results support the case for immunohistochemical expression of VEGF representing a significant and reproducible marker of adverse prognosis in resected pancreatic cancer.

This randomized trial of adjuvant therapy after resection of pancreatic cancer found a significant survival benefit for chemotherapy with fluorouracil. Chemoradiotherapy alone or followed by chemotherapy was not beneficial and even appeared to shorten survival. Chemoradiotherapy was not beneficial and even appeared to shorten survival. Pancreatic cancer, with an overall five-year survival rate ranging from 0.4 percent 1 to 4 percent, 2 has a poor prognosis and is one of the top 10 causes of death from cancer in the Western world. 3 , 4 Surgical resection improves the outlook, although only about 10 percent of patients with pancreatic cancer are eligible for the procedure. 5 – 9 Most treatment failures are due to local recurrence, hepatic metastases, or both and occur within one to two years after surgery. 10 – 12 Adjuvant (postoperative) therapy may improve long-term survival, 7 – 9 , 13 _ 16 but its routine use is not universal 8 because the results of . . .

The role of adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer remains uncertain. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) assessed the roles of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in a randomised study. After resection, patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (20 Gy in ten daily fractions over 2 weeks with 500 mg/m2 fluorouracil intravenously on days 1–3, repeated after 2 weeks) or chemotherapy (intravenous fluorouracil 425 mg/m2 and folinic acid 20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, monthly for 6 months). Clinicians could randomise patients into a two-by-two factorial design (observation, chemoradiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, or both) or into one of the main treatment comparisons (chemoradiotherapy versus no chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was death, and all analyses were by intention to treat. 541 eligible patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomised: 285 in the two-by-two factorial design (70 chemoradiotherapy, 74 chemotherapy, 72 both, 69 observation); a further 68 patients were randomly assigned chemoradiotherapy or no chemoradiotherapy and 188 chemotherapy or no chemotherapy. Median follow-up of the 227 (42%) patients still alive was 10 months (range 0–62). Overall results showed no benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (median survival 15·5 months in 175 patients with chemoradiotherapy vs 16·1 months in 178 patients without; hazard ratio 1·18 [95% Cl 0·90–1·55], p=0·24). There was evidence of a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy (median survival 19·7 months in 238 patients with chemotherapy vs 14·0 months in 235 patients without; hazard ratio 0·66 [0·52–0·83], p=0·0005). This study showed no survival benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy but revealed a potential benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy, justifying further randomised controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

The aim of this study was to investigate the worldwide evidence of the roles of adjuvant chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in potentially curative resected pancreatic cancer. Five randomised controlled trials of adjuvant treatment in patients with histologically proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were identified, of which the four most recent trials provided individual patient data (875 patients). This meta-analysis includes previously unpublished follow-up data on 261 patients. The pooled estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) indicated a 25% significant reduction in the risk of death with chemotherapy (HR=0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64, 0.90, P -values stratified ( P strat )=0.001) with median survival estimated at 19.0 (95% CI: 16.4, 21.1) months with chemotherapy and 13.5 (95% CI: 12.2, 15.8) without. The 2- and 5-year survival rates were estimated at 38 and 19%, respectively, with chemotherapy and 28 and 12% without. The pooled estimate of the HR indicated no significant difference in the risk of death with chemoradiation (HR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.32, P strat =0.43) with median survivals estimated at 15.8 (95% CI: 13.9, 18.1) months with chemoradiation and 15.2 (95% CI: 13.1, 18.2) without. The 2- and 5-year survival rates were estimated at 30 and 12%, respectively, with chemoradiation and 34 and 17% without. Subgroup analyses estimated that chemoradiation was more effective and chemotherapy less effective in patients with positive resection margins. These results show that chemotherapy is effective adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer but not chemoradiation. Further studies with chemoradiation are warranted in patients with positive resection margins, as chemotherapy appeared relatively ineffective in this patient subgroup.

ObjectivesSerous cystic neoplasm (SCN) is a cystic neoplasm of the pancreas whose natural history is poorly known. The purpose of the study was to attempt to describe the natural history of SCN, including the specific mortality.DesignRetrospective multinational study including SCN diagnosed between 1990 and 2014.Results2622 patients were included. Seventy-four per cent were women, and median age at diagnosis was 58 years (16–99). Patients presented with non-specific abdominal pain (27%), pancreaticobiliary symptoms (9%), diabetes mellitus (5%), other symptoms (4%) and/or were asymptomatic (61%). Fifty-two per cent of patients were operated on during the first year after diagnosis (median size: 40 mm (2–200)), 9% had resection beyond 1 year of follow-up (3 years (1–20), size at diagnosis: 25 mm (4–140)) and 39% had no surgery (3.6 years (1–23), 25.5 mm (1–200)). Surgical indications were (not exclusive) uncertain diagnosis (60%), symptoms (23%), size increase (12%), large size (6%) and adjacent organ compression (5%). In patients followed beyond 1 year (n=1271), size increased in 37% (growth rate: 4 mm/year), was stable in 57% and decreased in 6%. Three serous cystadenocarcinomas were recorded. Postoperative mortality was 0.6% (n=10), and SCN's related mortality was 0.1% (n=1).ConclusionsAfter a 3-year follow-up, clinical relevant symptoms occurred in a very small proportion of patients and size slowly increased in less than half. Surgical treatment should be proposed only for diagnosis remaining uncertain after complete workup, significant and related symptoms or exceptionally when exists concern with malignancy. This study supports an initial conservative management in the majority of patients with SCN.Trial registration numberIRB 00006477.

The ESPAC-1, ESPAC-1 plus, and early ESPAC-3(v1) results (458 randomized patients; 364 deaths) were used to estimate the effectiveness of adjuvant 5FU/FA vs resection alone for pancreatic cancer using meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio of 0.70 (95% CI=0.55–0.88) P =0.003, and the median survival of 23.2 (95% CI=20.1–26.5) months with 5FU/FA vs 16.8 (95% CI=14.3–19.2) months with resection alone supports the use of adjuvant 5FU/FA in pancreatic cancer.

There is no consensus on the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer, with either chemotherapy or combined modality approaches being employed (Maheshwari and Moser, 2005). No published meta-analysis (Fung et al , 2003; Banu et al , 2005; Liang, 2005; Bria et al , 2006; Milella et al , 2006) has included randomised controlled trials employing radiation therapy. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the following: (i) chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy (combined modality therapy) vs best supportive care (ii) radiotherapy vs chemoradiation (iii) radiotherapy vs combined modality therapy (iv) chemotherapy vs combined modality therapy (v) 5FU-based combined modality treatment vs another-agent-based combined modality therapy. Relevant randomised controlled trials were identified by searching databases, trial registers and conference proceedings. The primary end point was overall survival and secondary end points were progression-free survival/time-to-progression, response rate and adverse events. Survival data were summarised using hazard ratio (HR) and response-rate/adverse-event data with relative risk. Eleven trials involving 794 patients met the inclusion criteria. Length of survival with chemoradiation was increased compared with radiotherapy alone (two trials, 168 patients, HR 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.94), but chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy did not lead to a survival advantage over chemotherapy alone (two trials, 134 patients, HR 0.79; CI 0.32–1.95). Meta-analyses could not be performed for the other comparisons. A survival benefit was demonstrated for chemoradiation over radiotherapy alone. Chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy did not demonstrate any survival advantage over chemotherapy alone, but important clinical differences cannot be ruled out due to the wide CI.