Explore the vast range of titles available.

Inadequate discharge documentation at Almanagil Teaching Hospital posed significant risks to patient safety and continuity of care, consistent with challenges seen in similar healthcare settings. The hospital aimed to address these gaps by enhancing the completeness, accuracy, and clarity of surgical discharge documentation through the development and implementation of a standardized discharge card, coupled with targeted staff training. A prospective quality improvement project was conducted in two cycles (May-June 2025), involving audits of 44 (First Cycle) and 51 (Second Cycle) surgical discharge cards. Following baseline assessments, a structured discharge card was developed and implemented, along with targeted clinical staff training. Post-intervention audits revealed substantial improvements. Documentation of telephone number and address rose from 0 (0%) to 47 (92.2%) and 49 (96.1%), respectively. The number of hospital file entries increased from 29 (65.9%) to 49 (96.1%). Referrers' names, roles, organizations, and contact details improved from less than three (6.8%) to 51 (100%). Clinical elements, such as documentation of intraoperative and postoperative complications, rose from nine (20.5%) and eight (18.2%) to 51 (100%). Overall compliance increased from 52.9% to 94.6%, marking a 41.7% gain. The intervention significantly enhanced discharge documentation quality, reinforcing standardization, patient safety, and accountability. The model is scalable to similar resource-limited settings and warrants sustained auditing and ongoing training for long-term impact.

Background The involvement of the undergraduates in the research field requires a better view of their potential and the anticipated barriers facing them. This study aims to assess the undergraduates' knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceived barriers towards research in six Arab countries. Methods A cross sectional study included medical students from six Arab countries, where a self-administered five-section questionnaire was used to assess the students' demographics, knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceived barriers. The questionnaire was distributed in the online educational platforms of the participating medical schools in the six included countries. Results The total sample of recruited students was 2989, the majority of students (91.6%) showed poor level of knowledge regarding research. Generally high levels of positive attitudes towards research, research relevance and usefulness were found, with moderate levels of perception of research anxiety and difficulty. 33.7% ( n  = 1006) participated in an actual research project before with a mean of .5 publications per student. Cross-sectional studies were the most common type of studies conducted by students (38.6%), followed by case reports (23.9%). Lack of access to lab equipment for lab research (68.1%), the priority of education over research (66.8%), and lack of time because of educational tasks (66.1%) were generally the top perceived barriers towards research practice. Conclusion In the current study, the participants showed a poor knowledge level with associated positive attitudes towards research. One third of the students participated in research projects that mostly were cross-sectional studies and case reports. Educational tasks and lack of support were the most prevalent barriers. The students' positive attitudes towards research need to be translated into better knowledge and appropriate practice, which can be done by development of better training systems and more structured mentoring.