Explore the vast range of titles available.

Proper assembly of the spindle apparatus is crucially important for faithful chromosome segregation during anaphase. Thanks to the effort over the last decades, we have very detailed information about many events leading to spindle assembly and chromosome segregation, however we still do not understand certain aspects, including, for example, spindle length control. When tight regulation of spindle size is lost, chromosome segregation errors emerge. Currently, there are several hypotheses trying to explain the molecular mechanism of spindle length control. The number of kinetochores, activity of molecular rulers, intracellular gradients, cell size, limiting spindle components, and the balance of the spindle forces seem to contribute to spindle size regulation, however some of these mechanisms are likely specific to a particular cell type. In search for a general regulatory mechanism, in our study we focused on the role of cell size and nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio in this process. To this end, we used relatively large cells isolated from 2-cell mouse embryos. Our results showed that the spindle size upper limit is not reached in these cells and suggest that accurate control of spindle length requires balanced ratio between nuclear and cytoplasmic volumes.

Patients with functional neurological disorders (FND) often present with multiple motor, sensory, psychological and cognitive symptoms. In order to explore the relationship between these common symptoms, we performed a detailed clinical assessment of motor, non-motor symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disability in a large cohort of patients with motor FND. To understand the clinical heterogeneity, cluster analysis was used to search for subgroups within the cohort. One hundred fifty-two patients with a clinically established diagnosis of motor FND were assessed for motor symptom severity using the Simplified Functional Movement Disorder Rating Scale (S-FMDRS), the number of different motor phenotypes (i.e. tremor, dystonia, gait disorder, myoclonus, and weakness), gait severity and postural instability. All patients then evaluated each motor symptom type severity on a Likert scale and completed questionnaires for depression, anxiety, pain, fatigue, cognitive complaints and HRQoL. Significant correlations were found among the self-reported and all objective motor symptoms severity measures. All self-reported measures including HRQoL correlated strongly with each other. S-FMDRS weakly correlated with HRQoL. Hierarchical cluster analysis supplemented with gap statistics revealed a homogenous patient sample which could not be separated into subgroups. We interpret the lack of evidence of clusters along with a high degree of correlation between all self-reported and objective measures of motor or non-motor symptoms and HRQoL within current neurobiological models as evidence to support a unified pathophysiology of 'functional' symptoms. Our results support the unification of functional and somatic syndromes in classification schemes and for future mechanistic and therapeutic research.

We aimed to compare knowledge, opinions, and clinical experiences among Czech, Slovak, and Italian neurologists to identify potential educational gaps and unify understanding. Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a disabling condition characterised by motor, sensory, or cognitive symptoms which are incompatible with other neurological disorders. Novel diagnostic and treatment approaches have improved FND management. However, the extent of their adoption, and any differences or similarities across European communities, remain to be established. Members of the Czech and Slovak Neurological Societies were invited via e-mail to participate in a 14- -item web-based survey investigating their approach to FND. This data was compared to results from a previous study involving 492 Italian neurologists. 232 questionnaires were completed by Czech and Slovak neurologists (CZ-SK). Similarities were found between CZ- -SK and Italian neurologists in their preference for the term 'FND' over other psychological-related terms and in explaining symptoms as due to abnormal functioning of the nervous system rather than attributing them to mental illness. However, only fewer than 5% in both groups thought that simulation was highly unlikely. Both groups reported relying on positive signs (e.g. inconsistency, distractibility) according to the current diagnostic criteria, but also a tendency to perform additional tests to exclude other causes. However, some differences were observed: Italian neurologists placed a greater emphasis on psychological factors including litigation. CZ-SK neurologists were more likely to suggest physiotherapy as a treatment option and to provide educational intervention for patients and their relatives. Overall, our findings suggest that although Czech, Slovak, and Italian neurologists have adopted some new developments in the field of FND, significant gaps still exist in their understanding and common practices regarding conceptualisation, diagnosis, and treatment. Our results suggest that promoting knowledge through postgraduate curricula and teaching courses for neurologists is necessary to optimise patient management in various European countries.

Ancient water structures, such as Roman aqueducts and Persian qanats, reflect past civilizations’ sophisticated engineering and resource management skills. Roman aqueducts supported urban, agricultural, and sanitary systems through precise design and extensive networks, while Persian qanats provided consistent access to groundwater in arid climates. Both structures, recognized by UNESCO as World Heritage sites, embody significant cultural, historical, and technical values. This study focuses on a selection of these ancient systems, chosen for their exemplary representation of diverse approaches to water management, to explore their sustainable principles, adaptive reuse, and integration into modern environments. The study highlights their continued relevance in landscape architecture and water management practices while acknowledging the limitations of the study’s scope to specific ancient examples.

Proper assembly of the spindle apparatus is crucially important for faithful chromosome segregation during anaphase. Thanks to the effort over the last decades, we have very detailed information about many events leading to spindle assembly and chromosome segregation, however we still do not understand certain aspects, including, for example, spindle length control. When tight regulation of spindle size is lost, chromosome segregation errors emerge. Currently, there are several hypotheses trying to explain the molecular mechanism of spindle length control. The number of kinetochores, activity of molecular rulers, intracellular gradients, cell size, limiting spindle components, and the balance of the spindle forces seem to contribute to spindle size regulation, however some of these mechanisms are likely specific to a particular cell type. In search for a general regulatory mechanism, in our study we focused on the role of cell size and nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio in this process. To this end, we used relatively large cells isolated from 2-cell mouse embryos. Our results showed that the spindle size upper limit is not reached in these cells and suggest that accurate control of spindle length requires balanced ratio between nuclear and cytoplasmic volumes.

The authors not only note the formation of royal ideology, but also the reaction of the empire's population to its spread, and in many cases re-evaluate the dynasty's relationship with different social groups (from ordinary people to provincial administrators and soldiers). The size of the domain, the multi-ethnic population and the cultural diversity posed a challenge for the Seleucid monarchs, but they offered certain advantages: the decentralisation of the empire's political and economic governance did not necessarily mean its decline. From the King's Peace to the Treaty of Apamea, the Temenids and the Seleucids, as well as the Ptolemies and the Romans, took on a role as guardians of the ‘freedom’ of Greek communities on the coast. The designation ‘Great King’ still symbolised the central position of power here, but it seems that this title was regionally limited (A. Mehl: ‘How to understand Seleukids as Babylonian “Great Kings”’).