Explore the vast range of titles available.

[...]in psoriasis patients, before the initiation of adalimumab therapy, MTX was discontinued. 3 Additionally, in ankylosing spondylitis patients with axial symptoms there is no proof for efficacy of MTX. 4 In a murine Pompe disease model, low dose administration of MTX (0.5 mg/kg) within 24 h after enzyme replacement treatment induced a significant reduction in antidrug antibody formation. 5 In this model, 0.5 mg/kg, administered three times, represented a human dose of 0.6 mg/week for a 5 kg infant, which is lower than the MTX dose prescribed for the treatment of adult RA. 5 Furthermore, this model showed that MTX should be initiated at the start of the immunogenic therapy because with MTX therapy it was not possible to abolish ongoing antidrug antibody formation. 5 6 In a human study with infliximab treated RA patients, 7.5 mg MTX weekly was sufficient in reducing immunogenicity of infliximab; however, in that study there was no comparison with other MTX doses. 7 The mechanism whereby MTX acts on the immune response remained unsolved; however, we hypothesise that suppression of early T and B cell expansion might be responsible for the modulation of the immune response.

The risk of cardiovascular disease is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with the general population owing to the influence of traditional and non-traditional risk factors. Inflammation has a pivotal contribution and can accelerate the atherosclerotic process. Although dampening inflammation with DMARDs should theoretically abrogate this process, evidence suggests that these drugs can also promote atherosclerosis directly and indirectly, hence adding to an increased cardiovascular burden. However, the extent and direction of the effects largely differ across drugs. Understanding how these drugs influence endothelial damage and vascular repair mechanisms is key to understanding these outcomes. NSAIDs and glucocorticoids can increase the cardiovascular risk. Conversely, conventional, biologic and targeted DMARDs control inflammation and reduce this risk, although some of these drugs can also aggravate traditional factors or thrombotic events. Given these data, the fundamental objective for clinicians should be disease control, in an individualized approach that considers the most appropriate drug for each patient, taking into account joint and cardiovascular outcomes. This Review provides a comprehensive analysis of the effects of DMARDs and other approved drugs on cardiovascular involvement in rheumatoid arthritis, from a clinical and mechanistic perspective, with a roadmap to inform the research agenda.Various drugs used in rheumatoid arthritis management have anti-inflammatory effects that can hinder atherosclerosis development and progression. However, these drugs can also concurrently have different pro-atherogenic effects, complicating the relationship between these drugs and cardiovascular involvement in rheumatoid arthritis.

Immunologic research into pathogenic mechanisms operating in autoimmune-mediated atherosclerosis initially focused on adaptive immunity. Current interest is directed to more basic inflammatory mechanisms. Chronic inflammation (innate immunity-associated) may trigger initial events that can lead to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This chronic inflammation may start early in life and be perpetuated by classic atherosclerosis risk factors. Lipid peroxidation of low-density lipoprotein seems to be a key event in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein triggers inflammatory and immunogenic events that promote endothelial dysfunction and the synthesis and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading to an autoimmune response capable of accelerating the intracellular accumulation of lipids within atherosclerotic plaques. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein binds β2-glycoprotein I to form circulating complexes found in both autoimmune and non-autoimmune atherosclerosis. It is likely that β2-glycoprotein I and/or these complexes contribute to early atherogenesis by stimulating pro-inflammatory innate immunity through endogenous sensors and inflammasome/interleukin-1 pathways. We discuss the chronic inflammatory (innate) and autoimmune (adaptive) responses operating in atherosclerosis to discern the role of autoimmunity in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

The use of NSAIDs in rheumatology could be improved by an appropriate risk scoring system that accounts for adverse events such as bleeding and thrombosis. Such a risk score has now been developed using data from the PRECISION trial, but is this score ready to be applied in clinical practice?

To evaluate the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to glucocorticoids. Retrospective analysis of exposure to glucocorticoids in a prospective cohort of 353 patients with rheumatoid arthritis followed from June 2001 up to November 2011 for incident cardiovascular disease in a hospital-based outpatient cohort in the Netherlands. Hazard ratios with 95%-confidence intervals were calculated for the association between different types of exposure to glucocorticoids and incident cardiovascular disease. Associations were adjusted for demographics, cardiovascular risk factors and disease related parameters. Recent and current exposure to glucocorticoids were associated with incident cardiovascular disease, as was a longer duration of exposure and cumulative exposure to glucocorticoids. Adjustment for disease activity and severity negated the association. In observational studies the finding of incident cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to glucocorticoids is strongly confounded by indication due to high disease activity. The adverse cardiovascular effects of glucocorticoids might be balanced by positive effects working through inflammation control.

To determine whether baseline CD4+ T helper (Th) cell subset proportions in blood may serve as predictive biomarkers for achieving remission 48 weeks after initiating CTLA-4Ig, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), or anti-interleukin 6 receptor (IL6R) treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (eRA). This study included 60 untreated eRA patients from the larger randomized treatment trial NORD-STAR. They were treated with methotrexate (MTX) combined with either CTLA-4Ig (n = 17), anti-TNF (n = 22), or anti-IL6R (n = 21). Disease activity was assessed by clinical disease activity index (CDAI), C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The primary outcome was remission (CDAI ≤ 2.8) at week 48, and the secondary outcomes were time to reach remission or sustained remission during the 48-week follow-up. CD4+ T cell subset proportions were analyzed fresh by flow cytometry at baseline and at 24 and 48 weeks. In CTLA-4Ig + MTX-treated patients, baseline Th2 together with PD1+ T follicular helper (TFh) cell proportions predicted CDAI remission at week 48 (AUC: 0.986, 95% CI 0.94-1.0). Survival analysis revealed that patients with Th2 proportions below 16.8% or PD1+ TFh proportions above 7.6% at baseline were more likely to achieve remission (log-rank p = 0.002 and p = 0.007, respectively), and sustained remission (log-rank p = 0.01 and p = 0.001, respectively), over the 48-week follow-up. CD4+ T cell subset proportions did not predict remission in patients treated with anti-TNF + MTX or anti-IL6R + MTX. Only CTLA-4Ig treatment reduced PD1+ TFh and PD1neg TFh fractions after 48 weeks. Circulating Th2 and PD1+ TFh cell proportions at baseline may serve as predictive biomarkers for achieving CDAI remission after 48 weeks of CTLA-4Ig treatment in eRA.

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of the non-reimbursement policy on vitamin D therapy discontinuation in patients from the general and rheumatic populations.DesignA cross-sectional study.SettingResearch institute specialised in health research and two outpatient pharmacies in the Netherlands.ParticipantsPatients from the general and rheumatic population with an active prescription for vitamin D supplementation therapy were included.Data collection and analysisData were collected between April and May 2023 through self-reported questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed using STATA V. 17. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of patients who discontinued vitamin D supplementation therapy following the implementation of the non-reimbursement policy. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported reasons for therapy discontinuation and the association between patient-related characteristics and the risk of therapy discontinuation. In addition, the proportion of patients who switched to an alternative supplement and whether this switch had been made in consultation with a healthcare provider was examined.ResultsOf the 4800 patients, 302 (6.4%) patients discontinued their vitamin D therapy. The three most frequently reported reasons for therapy discontinuation were the inability to afford supplements without reimbursement, not willing to pay for supplements without reimbursement and being unaware of the alternative vitamin D supplements to switch to. Younger age, financial constraints and limited health literacy were significantly associated with vitamin D therapy discontinuation (p<0.05). Among the 1478 patients that switched to an alternative supplement, 706 (17.9%) patients indicated that they made the switch in consultation with a healthcare provider.ConclusionThe implementation of the non-reimbursement policy resulted in a small proportion of patients discontinuing their vitamin D therapy. Elevated discontinuation rates were associated with specific patient-related characteristics including patients aged <50 years, those experiencing financial constraints and those with limited health literacy, suggesting the need for developing interventions and preventive strategies to support patients at risk of therapy discontinuation.

Background: A substantial proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not respond, or lose initial response, to adalimumab treatment. One explanation for non-response is that patients develop anti-adalimumab antibodies. Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of formation of antibody against adalimumab and the association with serum adalimumab concentrations and clinical response. Methods: In a cohort of 121 consecutive patients with RA treated with adalimumab, serum adalimumab concentrations and antibodies against adalimumab were measured together with clinical response variables before and up to 28 weeks after the start of treatment. Results: Anti-adalimumab antibodies were detected in 21 patients (17%) during 28 weeks of treatment. EULAR non-responders had antibodies significantly more often than good responders (34% vs 5%; p = 0.032). Patients with antibodies showed less improvement in disease activity (mean (SD) delta DAS28 0.65 (1.35)) than patients without antibodies (mean delta DAS28 1.70 (1.35)) (p = 0.001). Patients with antibodies during follow-up had lower serum adalimumab concentrations at 28 weeks than patients without antibodies (median 1.2 mg/l, range 0.0–5.6 vs median 11.0 mg/l, range 2.0–33.0, respectively; p<0.001). Good responders had higher serum adalimumab concentrations than moderate responders (p = 0.021) and non-responders (p = 0.001). Concomitant methotrexate use was lower in the group with anti-adalimumab antibodies (52%) than in the group without antibodies (84%) (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Serum antibodies against adalimumab are associated with lower serum adalimumab concentrations and non-response to adalimumab treatment.

Telemonitoring disease activity with electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may reduce the workload of rheumatic care by decreasing outpatient clinic visits. However, low adherence to reporting ePROs is frequently observed. Our objective was to identify facilitators and barriers to weekly monitoring of disease activity with ePROs. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who recently participated in one of the two telemonitoring studies with ePROs completed in a smartphone app, were invited to participate in focus group discussions (FGD). Thematic analysis was used to identify themes that play a role in the decision to continue or stop reporting weekly ePROs. A total of 22 patients participated in three FGDs. Five themes were identified that were of importance to adhere to telemonitoring: (1) questionnaire frequency, (2) discussing results of completed ePROs, (3) physical consultations, (4) patient insight into disease activity and (5) user experience of the app. All themes contained both barrier and facilitator elements. The results suggest that to improve adherence to telemonitoring of disease activity with ePROs, the perceived benefits of completing ePROs should be maximized. This can be done by providing patients the ability to skip (unneeded) physical consultations in case of low disease activity, and training clinicians to always discuss the completed ePROs. In addition, it is essential to reduce the effort to report ePROs, by tailoring the frequency of ePROs based on the patients’ disease activity or preference, aiming for optimal app functionality as well as by sending notifications when new ePROs are available.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk which may start even before diagnosis. To explore this CVD risk prior to RA, we determined multiple risk factors and two 10-year clinical risk scores in a cohort of individuals at-risk of RA. We also analyzed associations with arthritis development and autoantibody status and compared a subset of at-risk individuals to an age and sex matched seronegative control group. In a cohort of 555 consecutive arthralgia patients positive for rheumatoid factor (RF) and / or anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) we retrospectively identified patients with preclinical arthritis (i.e. those who developed arthritis), and non-arthritis patients (those without arthritis development during maximum 5 years follow up). Demographics, CVD risk factors and the 10-year cardiovascular risk according to the SCORE and QRISK3 system were determined at baseline. Preclinical arthritis patients (n = 188) had a higher heart rate (68 vs 63 bpm, p = 0.048) and lower cholesterol (5.2 mmol/l vs 5.5, p = 0.006), HDL (1.0 mmol/l vs 1.1, p0.003) and ApoB (0.85 g/l vs 0.91, p = 0.011) compared to non-arthritis patients (n = 367). Lipid levels were associated with ACPA status in both the preclinical arthritis and non-arthritis group. Ten-year CVD risk scores did not differ between preclinical arthritis and non-arthritis patients, in total, 7% (SCORE) and 8% (QRISK3) of seropositive arthralgia patients were classified as high risk. Seropositive at-risk patients (n = 71) had higher total cholesterol (5.4 vs 4.9, p<0.001), TC/HDL ratio (4.0 vs 3.0, p<0.001), triglycerides (1.4 vs 1.0, p = 0.001), ApoB (1.0 vs 0.9, p = 0.019) and 10-year risk scores (median SCORE 1.0 vs 0.0, p = 0.030 and median QRISK3 4.4 vs 3.1, p<0.001) compared to seronegative controls. Our results suggest that lipid changes commence prior to RA diagnosis and that ACPAs might play a role.