Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Until recently, due to widespread prevalence of molecular markers associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and amodiaquine (AQ) resistance in east and southern Africa, seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) has not been used at scale in this region. This study assessed the protective effectiveness of monthly administration of SP + AQ (SPAQ) to children aged 3–59 months in Karamoja sub-region, Uganda, where parasite resistance is assumed to be high and malaria transmission is seasonal. Methods A two-arm quasi-experimental, open-label prospective non-randomized control trial (nRCT) was conducted in three districts. In two intervention districts, 85,000 children aged 3–59 months were targeted to receive monthly courses of SMC using SPAQ during the peak transmission season (May to September) 2021. A third district served as a control, where SMC was not implemented. Communities with comparable malaria attack rates were selected from the three districts, and households with at least one SMC-eligible child were purposively selected. A total cohort of 600 children (200 children per district) were selected and followed using passive surveillance for breakthrough confirmed malaria episodes during the five-month peak transmission season. Malaria incidence rate per person-months and number of malaria episodes among children in the two arms were compared. Kaplan–Meier failure estimates were used to compare the probability of a positive malaria test. Other factors that may influence malaria transmission and infection among children in the two arms were also assessed using multivariable cox proportional hazards regression model. Results The malaria incidence rate was 3.0 and 38.8 per 100 person-months in the intervention and control groups, respectively. In the intervention areas 90.0% (361/400) of children did not experience any malaria episodes during the study period, compared to 15% (29/200) in the control area. The incidence rate ratio was 0.078 (95% CI 0.063–0.096), which corresponds to a protective effectiveness of 92% (95% CI 90.0–94.0) among children in the intervention area. Conclusion SMC using SPAQ provided high protective effect against malaria during the peak transmission season in children aged 3–59 months in the Karamoja sub-region of Uganda.

Background Progress towards elimination and eventual eradication of malaria is threatened by challenges such as the rise in insecticide resistance and low coverage of existing vector control tools. Spatial repellents offer personal and household protection against biting mosquitoes by disseminating repellents into a given area. The trial described here aims to evaluate the efficacy of an active transfluthrin-based spatial repellent device (Mossie-GO™) against malaria in Uganda, using a placebo-controlled, double-blinded cluster randomised control trial. The study’s primary objective is to demonstrate and quantify the protective efficacy of Mossie-GO™ in reducing the prevalence of malaria infection in children ≤ 5 years of age. The study’s secondary objectives are to measure the impact of the intervention on entomological correlates of transmission, to determine user acceptance of the device and to quantify transfluthrin concentration in the air. Methods The trial has fifty-six clusters randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or placebo-control arm. One hundred children at baseline and sixty children ≤ 5 years of age will be sampled in each cluster at 6 and 12 months to measure the primary endpoint. Each child will be sampled from a different household to avoid within-house replication. A subset of households from each cluster will be selected for secondary endpoint sampling. All households enrolled into the study will be encouraged to continue use of other malaria control tools. Discussion Trial results will contribute to the growing research on spatial repellent efficacy in sub-Saharan Africa and will inform recommendations for the use of spatial repellents in malaria control, specific to rural and peri-urban contexts in Uganda. Information on household characteristics, behaviour related to malaria exposure and user acceptability of the intervention will also be collected to improve understanding of the intervention usage and impact. Following the trial, results will be publicly disseminated. Trial registration The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov 01/04/2024 unique identification (ID): NCT06232954.

Background Malaria remains the number one cause of morbidity and mortality in Uganda. In 2009, the United States President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI) funded an indoor residual spraying (IRS) project in 10 mid-northern districts, resulting in marked reductions in malaria prevalence over 5 years, from 62.5 percent to 7.2 percent. When the project ended and IRS withdrawn, malaria prevalence increased exponentially to pre-IRS level of 63 percent in 2016 and was characterized by frequent life-threatening upsurges that were exacerbated by a weak national led malaria surveillance system with delayed and piece meal responses. Malaria Consortium, in collaboration with Nwoya district local government implemented a district led malaria surveillance and response system. This study was conducted to compare the impact of District led and national led surveillance and response systems on overall malaria burden in two sub-counties in Nwoya district, Northern Uganda. Methods The assessment was conducted between week 41 of 2018 and week 10 of 2019 in Anaka and Alero sub counties following the shift from the national to district led malaria surveillance and response system. A district multi-sectoral malaria response taskforce team, known as the District Malaria Surveillance and Response Team (DMSRT), was formed by the Nwoya District Health Team (DHT). The DMSRT was trained and equipped with new surveillance tools for early detection of and response to malaria upsurges within the district, and were mandated to develop a costed district specific malaria response plan. Results All (18) targeted health facilities provided weekly malaria reports and continuously updated the malaria normal channel graphs. There was an overall reduction in weekly new malaria cases from 12.9 in week 41 of 2018 to 6.2 cases in week 10 of 2019. Malaria positivity rates (TPR) for Alero and Anaka sub-counties reduced from 76.0 percent and 69.3 percent at week 42 of 2018 to 28 percent and 30.3 percent, respectively at week 10 of 2019. Conclusions Malaria surveillance and response, with precisely targeted multipronged activities, when led and implemented by local district health authorities is an effective, efficient, and sustainable approach to prevent malaria upsurges and associated morbidity and mortality.

Background Across the developing world, countries are increasingly adopting the integrated community case management of childhood illnesses (iCCM) strategy in efforts to reduce child mortality. This intervention’s effectiveness is dependent on community adoption and changes in care-seeking practices. We assessed the implementation process of a theory-driven community dialogue (CD) intervention specifically designed to strengthen the support and uptake of the newly introduced iCCM services and related behaviours in three African countries. Methods A qualitative process evaluation methodology was chosen and used secondary project data and primary data collected in two districts of each of the three countries, in purposefully sampled communities. The final data set included 67 focus group discussions and 57 key informant interviews, totalling 642 respondents, including caregivers, CD facilitators community leaders, and trainers. Thematic analysis of the data followed the ‘Framework Approach’ utilising both a deduction and induction process. Results Results show that CDs contribute to triggering community uptake of and support for iCCM services through filling health information gaps and building cooperation within communities. We found it to be an effective approach for addressing social norms around child care practices. This approach was embraced by communities for its flexibility and value in planning individual and collective change. Conclusions Regular CDs can contribute to the formation of new habits, particularly in relation to seeking timely care in case of child sickness. This study also confirms the value of process evaluation to unwrap the mechanisms of community mobilisation approaches in context and provides key insights for improving the CD approach.

Successful scale-up in the use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) requires that patients accept testing and treatment based on RDT results and that healthcare providers treat according to test results. Patient-provider communication is a key component of quality care, and leads to improved patient satisfaction, higher adherence to treatment and better health outcomes. Voiced or perceived patient expectations are also known to influence treatment decision-making among healthcare providers. While there has been a growth in literature on provider practices around rapid testing for malaria, there has been little analysis of inter-personal communication around the testing process. We investigated how healthcare providers and patients interact and engage throughout the diagnostic and treatment process, and how the testing service is experienced by patients in practice. This research was conducted alongside a larger study which explored determinants of provider treatment decision-making following negative RDT results in a rural district (Kibaale) in mid-western Uganda, ten months after RDT introduction. Fifty-five patients presenting with fever were observed during routine outpatient visits at 12 low-level public health facilities. Observation captured communication practices relating to test purpose, results, diagnosis and treatment. All observed patients or caregivers were immediately followed up with in-depth interview. Analysis followed the 'framework' approach. A summative approach was also used to analyse observation data. Providers failed to consistently communicate the reasons for carrying out the test, and particularly to RDT-negative patients, a diagnostic outcome or the meaning of test results, also leading to confusion over what the test can detect. Patients appeared to value testing, but were frustrated by the lack of communication on outcomes. RDT-negative patients were dissatisfied by the absence of information on an alternative diagnosis and expressed uncertainty around adequacy of proposed treatment. Poor provider communication practices around the testing process, as well as limited inter-personal exchange between providers and patients, impacted on patients' perceptions of their proposed treatment. Patients have a right to health information and may be more likely to accept and adhere to treatment when they understand their diagnosis and treatment rationale in relation to their perceived health needs and visit expectations.

Background The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine (SPAQ) for children aged 3 to 59 months, living in areas where malaria transmission is highly seasonal. However, due to widespread prevalence of resistance markers, SMC has not been implemented at scale in East and Southern Africa. An initial study in Uganda showed that SMC with SPAQ was feasible, acceptable, and protective against malaria in eligible children in Karamoja region. Nonetheless, exploration of alternative regimens is warranted since parasite resistance threats persist. Objective The study aims to test the effectiveness of SMC with Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) or SPAQ (DP-SMC & SPAQ-SMC), chemoprevention efficacy as well as the safety and tolerability of DP compared to that of SPAQ among 3-59 months old children in Karamoja region, an area of Uganda where malaria transmission is highly seasonal. Methods A Type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design consisting of four components: 1) a cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) using passive surveillance to establish confirmed malaria cases in children using both SPAQ and DP; 2a) a prospective cohort study to determine the chemoprevention efficacy of SPAQ and DP (if SPAQ or DP clears sub-patent infection and provides 28 days of protection from new infection) and whether drug concentrations and/or resistance influence the ability to clear and prevent infection; 2b) a sub study examining pharmacokinetics of DP in children between 3 to <6 months; 3) a resistance markers study in children 3–59 months in the research districts plus the standard intervention districts to measure changes in resistance marker prevalence over time and finally; 4) a process evaluation. Discussion This study evaluates the effects of SPAQ-SMC versus DP-SMC on clinical malaria in vulnerable children in the context of high parasite SP resistance, whilst informing on the best implementation strategies. Conclusion This study will inform malaria policy in high-burden countries, specifically on utility of SMC outside the sahel, and contribute to progress in malaria control.

Please be advised that one of the author names is incorrectly spelled in the published article: 'Irene Kyomuhagi' should be 'Irene Kyomuhangi'.Please be advised that one of the author names is incorrectly spelled in the published article: 'Irene Kyomuhagi' should be 'Irene Kyomuhangi'.

Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine combined with amodiaquine (SPAQ) effectively protects eligible children from malaria in areas of high and seasonal transmission. However, concerns about parasite resistance to sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine in East and Southern Africa necessitate evaluating alternative drug regimens. This study assessed the effectiveness of SPAQ and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine for SMC in Uganda. This three-arm, open-label, non-inferiority and superiority, cluster-randomised, controlled trial was conducted in Karamoja subregion, Uganda, among children aged 3–59 months and 6–59 months for SPAQ and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine, respectively. Of 427 villages, 380 were randomly assigned (1:1) to the SPAQ group and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine group, and 47 were assigned to the control group (no SMC). The superiority component compared the SPAQ and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine groups with the control group, whereas the non-inferiority component compared the dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine group with the SPAQ group. The primary endpoint was confirmed malaria incidence using rapid diagnostic tests or microscopy. Survival analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis (in all randomised participants), with adjustments made for covariate imbalances at baseline. Additionally, molecular markers associated with resistance to sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine and amodiaquine were analysed on 750 malaria-positive blood samples from children younger than 5 years before and after five SMC cycles. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05323721, and has been completed. During June 18–30, 2022, 3881 children were enrolled; 1755 in SPAQ, 1736 in dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine, and 390 in control villages. Of these children, 3629 were analysed. Incidence rates were 0·90 cases per 100 person-months in the SPAQ group, 0·80 cases per 100 person-months in the dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine group, and 18·26 cases per 100 person-months in the control group. SPAQ and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine reduced malaria risk by 94% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·06 [95% CI 0·04–0·08]; p<0·001) and 96% (0·04 [0·03–0·06]; p<0·001), respectively. Based on the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1·4, there was non-inferiority between the protective effectiveness of dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine and that of SPAQ (HR 0·90 [95% CI 0·58–1·39]). Prevalence of mutations linked to moderate (Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase [PfDHFR] and P falciparum dihydropteroate synthetase reductase [PfDHPS]) and high (PfDHFR Ile164Leu and PfDHPS Ala581Gly) sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine resistance were more than 88% and less than 5%, respectively. Mutations associated with 4-aminoquinolone resistance (P falciparum multidrug resistance protein-1 [PfMDR1] Asp1246Tyr and PfMDR1 Asn86Tyr) were less than 1%. There was no significant increase in the prevalence of antifolate and artemisinin partial resistance-associated mutations, but a decrease was observed for key aminoquinoline resistance-associated alleles: P falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter protein Lys76Thr, P falciparum multidrug resistance protein Asn86Tyr, and PfMDR1 Asp1246Tyr (p<0·001). No serious or fatal adverse events were reported. SPAQ and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine effectively reduced malaria in children younger than 5 years, with no safety concerns. There was no evidence of resistance selection by SMC. Although these findings support SPAQ-based SMC in Eastern and Southern Africa, ongoing resistance surveillance and efficacy monitoring are essential for sustained impact. GiveWell. For the Swahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Background The large-scale introduction of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) promises to improve management of fever patients and the rational use of valuable anti-malarials. However, evidence on the impact of RDT introduction on the overprescription of anti-malarials has been mixed. This study explored determinants of provider decision-making to prescribe anti-malarials following a negative RDT result. Methods A qualitative study was conducted in a rural district in mid-western Uganda in 2011, ten months after RDT introduction. Prescriptions for all patients with negative RDT results were first audited from outpatient registers for a two month period at all facilities using RDTs (n = 30). Facilities were then ranked according to overall prescribing performance, defined as the proportion of patients with a negative RDT result prescribed any anti-malarial. Positive and negative deviant facilities were sampled for qualitative investigation; positive deviants (n = 5) were defined ex post facto as <0.75 % and negative deviants (n = 7) as >5 %. All prescribing clinicians were targeted for qualitative observation and in-depth interview; 55 fever cases were observed and 22 providers interviewed. Thematic analysis followed the ‘framework’ approach. Results 8344 RDT-negative patients were recorded at the 30 facilities (prescription audit); 339 (4.06 %) were prescribed an anti-malarial. Of the 55 observed patients, 38 tested negative; one of these was prescribed an anti-malarial. Treatment decision-making was influenced by providers’ clinical beliefs, capacity constraints, and perception of patient demands. Although providers generally trusted the accuracy of RDTs, anti-malarial prescription was driven by perceptions of treatment failure or undetectable malaria in patients who had already taken artemisinin-based combination therapy prior to facility arrival. Patient assessment and other diagnostic practices were minimal and providers demonstrated limited ability to identify alternative causes of fever. Provider perceptions of patient expectations sometimes appeared to influence treatment decisions. Conclusions The study found high provider adherence to RDT results, but that providers believed in certain clinical exceptions and felt they lacked alternative options. Guidance on how the RDT works and testing following partial treatment, better methods for assisting providers in diagnostic decision-making, and a context-appropriate provider behaviour change intervention package are needed.