Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
1 result(s) for "Oh, Maeng-kyo"
Sort by:
Antimony(III/V) removal from industrial wastewaters: treatment of spent catalysts formally used in the SOHIO acrylonitrile process
A treatment and volume reduction process for a spent uranium–antimony catalyst has been developed. Targeted removal, immobilization and disposal of the uranium component has been confirmed, thus eliminating the radiological hazard. However, significant concentrations of antimony ([Sb] ≥ 25–50 mg L−1) remain in effluent from the process, which require removal in compliance with Korean wastewater regulations. Antimony(III/V) removal via co-precipitation with iron has been considered with optimal pH, dose and kinetics being determined. The effect of selected anions – Cl−, SO42− and PO43− – have also been considered, the latter present due to a prior uranium removal step. Removal of Sb(III) from both Cl− and SO42− media and Sb(V) removal from Cl− media to below release limits were found to be effective within 5 minutes at an iron dose of 8 mM (molar ratio, [FeIII]/[Sb] = 20) and a target pH of 5.0. However, Sb(V) removal from SO42− was significantly hampered requiring significantly higher iron dosages for the same removal performance. Phosphate poses significant challenges for the removal of Sb(V) due to competition between PO43− and Sb(OH)6− species for surface binding sites, attributed to similarities in chemistries and a shared preference for an inner vs outer binding mechanism.