Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundThe aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the tumor characteristics, surgical details, and survival distribution of surgically resected cases of gastric cancer from the nationwide registry of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.MethodsData from 118,367 patients with primary gastric carcinoma who underwent resection between 2001 and 2007 were included in the survival analyses. The 5-year survival rates were calculated for various subsets of prognostic factors.ResultsThe median age of the patients was 67 years. The proportions of patients with pathological stage (Japanese Gastric Cancer Association) IA, IB, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 44.0%, 14.7%, 11.7%, 9.5%, 5.0%, and 12.4% respectively. The death rate within 30 days of operation was 0.5%. The 5-year overall survival rate in the 118,367 patients who were treated by resection was 71.1%. The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with pathological stage IA, IB, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 91.5%, 83.6%, 70.6%, 53.6%, 34.8%, and 16.4% respectively. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates in the patients with pT1 (mucosa) disease after D1+ dissection of lymph node station no. 7 (D1 + α), D1+ dissection of lymph node station nos. 7, 8, and 9 (D1+ β), and D2 lymphadenectomy were 99.4%, 99.6%, and 99.1% respectively. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates in the patients with pT1 (submucosa) disease after D1 + α, D1 + β, and D2 lymphadenectomy were 97.3%, 98.1%, and 96.9% respectively.ConclusionDetailed analyses of the data from more than 100,000 patients show the recent trends of the outcomes of gastric cancer treatment in Japan and provide baseline information for use by medical communities around world.

BackgroundThe nationwide registry of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association collected data of surgically resected cases of gastric cancer between 2001 and 2013. These retrospective analyses aimed to delineate tumor characteristics, surgical history, and survival distribution.MethodsData from 254,706 patients with primary gastric cancer were included. The 5-year survival rates were calculated for various subsets of prognostic factors.ResultsThe number of patients over 70 years old increased from 2001 to 2013. The frequency with which laparoscopic gastrectomy was opted for increased dramatically (from 3.5 to 40.8%) in 13 years. We focused on the patients registered between 2010 and 2013, for whom data collection was based on the 3rd edition of the Japanese classification and guidelines. Five-year overall survival (OS) rate among 92,305 patients with resected tumors was 70.6%. The 5-year OS rates of patients with pathological stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, and IV disease were 89.6%, 83.2%, 77.6%, 68.1%, 59.3%, 45.6%, 29.9%, and 14.0%, respectively.ConclusionOur detailed analysis highlights the historical changes in outcomes of surgically treated gastric malignancies in Japan, and provides robust dataset for future analysis.

BackgroundEndoscopic resection has been limited to intestinal-type gastric cancer (cT1a) with a low risk of lymph node metastasis (T1a ≤2 cm, without ulcers). This single-arm confirmatory trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for >2 cm ulcer-negative and ≤3 cm ulcer-positive intestinal-type gastric cancer (cT1a).MethodsThe eligibility criteria included endoscopically diagnosed cT1a, a single primary intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma, an ulcer-negative lesion of any size or a ≤3 cm ulcer-positive lesion, cN0M0, and no prior treatment. If ESD resulted in noncurative resection, surgical resection was added. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS) (planned sample size was 470, with a one-sided alpha level of 2.5%). The threshold 5-year OS was 86.1%.ResultsWe enrolled 470 early gastric cancer patients [median tumor size, 25 (5–130) mm] from 29 institutions between June 2007 and October 2010. These patients had 152 ulcer-negative lesions (>2 and ≤3 cm), 111 ulcer-negative lesions (>3 cm), and 207 ulcer-positive lesions (≤3 cm). The success rate for en block resection was 99.1% (466/470). Additional gastrectomy was conducted in 131 patients (28%) who did not fulfill the curative resection criteria. The 5-year OS of all patients was 97.0% (95% confidence interval, 95.0–98.2%), which was higher than the threshold 5-year OS (86.1%). The 317 patients who satisfied the curative resection criteria had no recurrence. There were no ESD-related grade 4 adverse events.ConclusionESD for early gastric cancers that met the expanded criteria for intestinal-type gastric cancer (cT1a) was acceptable and should be the standard treatment instead of gastrectomy.

Background The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) started a new nationwide gastric cancer registration in 2008. Methods From 208 participating hospitals, 53 items including surgical procedures, pathological diagnosis, and survival outcomes of 13,626 patients with primary gastric cancer treated in 2002 were collected retrospectively. Data were entered into the JGCA database according to the JGCA classification (13th edition) and UICC TNM classification (5th edition) using an electronic data collecting system. Finally, data of 13,002 patients who underwent laparotomy were analyzed. Results The 5-year follow-up rate was 83.3 %. The direct death rate was 0.48 %. UICC 5-year survival rates (5YEARSs)/JGCA 5YEARSs were 92.2 %/92.3 % for stage IA, 85.3 %/84.7 % for stage IB, 72.1 %/70.0 % for stage II, 52.8 %/46.8 % for stage IIIA, 31.0 %/28.8 % for stage IIIB, and 14.9 %/15.3 % for stage IV, respectively. The proportion of patients more than 80 years old was 7.8 %, and their 5YEARS was 51.6 %. Postoperative outcome of the patients with primary gastric carcinoma in Japan have apparently improved in advanced cases and among the aged population when compared with the archival data. Further efforts to improve the follow-up rate are needed. Conclusions Postoperative outcome of the patients with primary gastric carcinoma in Japan have apparently improved in advanced cases and among the aged population when compared with the archival data. Further efforts to improve the follow-up rate are needed.

BackgroundWhile endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recognized as a minimally invasive standard treatment for differentiated early gastric cancers (EGCs), it has not been indicated for undifferentiated EGC (UD-EGC) because of a relatively high risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, patients with surgically resected mucosal (cT1a) UD-EGC ≤ 2 cm in size with no lymphovascular invasion or ulceration are reported to be at a very low risk of LNM. This multicenter, single-arm, confirmatory trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD for UD-EGC.MethodsThe key eligibility criteria were endoscopically diagnosed cT1a/N0/M0, single primary lesion, size ≤ 2 cm, no ulceration and histologically proven components of undifferentiated adenocarcinoma on biopsy. Based on the histological findings after ESD, additional gastrectomy was indicated if the criteria for curative resection were not satisfied. The subjects of the primary analysis were patients with UD-EGC as the dominant component. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with UD-EGC.ResultsThree hundred 46 patients were enrolled from 49 institutions. The proportion of en bloc resection was 99%. No ESD-related Grade 4 adverse events were noted. Delayed bleeding and intraoperative and delayed perforation occurred in 25 (7.3%), 13 (3.8%), and 6 (1.7%) patients, respectively. Among the 275 patients who were the subjects of the primary analysis, curative resection was achieved in 195 patients (71%), and 5-year OS was 99.3% (95% CI: 97.1–99.8).ConclusionsESD can be a curative and less invasive treatment for UD-EGC for patients meeting the eligibility criteria of this study.

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted and minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) without the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, undifferentiated-type EGC (UD-EGC) is considered to have a relatively high risk of LNM. Recently, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group conducted a nonrandomized confirmatory trial (JCOG1009/1010) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD for UD-EGC. Herein, we review the results of JCOG1009/1010 and the possibility of further expanding the indications for ESD. Summary: JCOG1009/1010 showed excellent technical results and 5-year overall survival in patients with UD-EGC. Based on the results, ESD for UD-EGC (cT1a) of ≤2 cm without ulceration was technically feasible and acceptable for standard treatment instead of gastrectomy with lymph node dissection. A review of the EGC of mixed histological type (mixed EGC) suggested that the mixed EGC might have worse biological behavior than the pure histological type. In cases of intramucosal EGC with pure signet-ring cell carcinoma or presenting a double-layer structure, the risk of LNM might be relatively low. Thus, there is a possibility of further expanding the indications or curative evaluations. In the case of UD-EGC after noncurative resection, the data suggest that the eCura system may be applicable to UD-EGC; however, due to the small number of cases, further study is warranted. Key Message: This review summarizes the present knowledge regarding indications for UD-EGC and the possibility of further expanding them.

INTRODUCTION:One-piece endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for lesions >15 mm is still unsatisfactory, and attempted 1-piece EMR for lesions >25 mm can increase perforation risk. Therefore, modifications to ensure 1-piece EMR of 15- to 25-mm lesions would be beneficial. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Tip-in EMR, which anchors the snare tip within the submucosal layer, increases en bloc resection for 15- to 25-mm colorectal lesions compared with EMR.METHODS:In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients with nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms of 15–25 mm in size were recruited and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo Tip-in EMR or standard EMR, stratified by age, sex, tumor size category, and tumor location. The primary endpoint was the odds ratio of en bloc resection adjusted by location and size category. Adverse events and procedure time were also evaluated.RESULTS:We analyzed 41 lesions in the Tip-in EMR group and 41 lesions in the EMR group. En bloc resection was achieved in 37 (90.2%) patients undergoing Tip-in EMR and 30 (73.1%) who had EMR. The adjusted odds ratio of en bloc resection in Tip-in EMR vs EMR was 3.46 (95% confidence interval: 1.06–13.6, P = 0.040). The Tip-in EMR and EMR groups did not differ significantly in adverse event rates (0% vs 4.8%) or median procedure times (7 vs 5 minutes).DISCUSSION:In this single-center randomized controlled trial, we found that Tip-in EMR significantly improved the en bloc resection rate for nonpolypoid lesions 15–25 mm in size, with no increase in adverse events or procedure time.

Background: Although the incidence and mortality have decreased, gastric cancer (GC) is still a public health issue globally. An international study reported higher survival in Korea and Japan than other countries, including the United States. We examined the determinant factors of the high survival in Japan compared with the United States. Methods: We analysed data on 78,648 cases from the nationwide GC registration project, the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA), from 2004–2007 and compared them with 16,722 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), a United States population-based cancer registry data from 2004–2010. We estimated 5-year relative survival and applied a multivariate excess hazard model to compare the two countries, considering the effect of number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined. Results: Five-year relative survival in Japan was 81.0%, compared with 45.0% in the United States. After controlling for confounding factors, we still observed significantly higher survival in Japan. Among N2 patients, a higher number of LNs examined showed better survival in both countries. Among N3 patients, the relationship between number of LNs examined and differences in survival between the two countries disappeared. Conclusion: Although the wide differences in GC survival between Japan and United States can be largely explained by differences in the stage at diagnosis, the number of LNs examined may also help to explain the gaps between two countries, which is related to stage migration.

BackgroundThe proportion of elderly patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer is increasing. However, limited number of therapeutic outcomes in the elderly has been reported. Here we examined the surgical results based on a nationwide survey of elderly patients who underwent surgery for Stage I gastric cancer.MethodsData from 68,353 Stage I patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2001 and 2007 were retrospectively collected. The accumulated data were reviewed and analyzed by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association registration committee. We first classified the patients as those aged ≤ 74 years and ≥ 75 years. We further classified those patients aged ≥ 75 years into groups by 5-year increments to examine their short- and long-term postoperative outcomes.ResultsPatients aged ≥ 75 years accounted for 46.5%. The 30-day mortality rate was < 0.7% for any age group, but for those aged ≥ 75 years, the 60-day and 90-day mortality rates were 0.9–2.3% and 1.2–5.1%, respectively. An examination of long-term survival indicated that, as the class of age increased, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 47.0–93.1% and disease-specific survival (DSS) was 91.4–98.2%, respectively. Although high DSS rates of ≥ 90% were found for all age groups, OS only accounted for ≤ 82% of patients aged ≥ 75 years.ConclusionAmong elderly patients with Stage I gastric cancer, deaths due to other diseases were frequently observed in the long term. Thus, for elderly patients, it may be appropriate to reconsider the treatment strategy with respect to the balance between the invasiveness of the treatment and the prognosis.

BackgroundIn endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), reduction of pressure inside of the bile duct by bile aspiration is a well-known method to lower the rate of adverse events (AEs) including cholangitis. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has been introduced as an alternative to ERCP. The use of self-expandable metallic stents is recommended in EUS-HGS to reduce bile leak; however, other methods to reduce the rate of AEs including bile leak, abdominal pain, fever, and sepsis, have not been elucidated yet. This study investigated whether bile aspiration during EUS-HGS decreased the rate of postprocedural AEs.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between July 2016 and April 2020 were retrospectively evaluated in this study. EUS-HGS was performed at a tertiary cancer center. Patient characteristics, site of biliary obstruction, the quantity of bile aspirated during EUS-HGS, type of stent, whether or not antegrade stenting (AS) was performed, procedure time, and AEs were assessed based on a prospectively recorded institutional endoscopy database. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting postprocedural AEs.ResultsNinety-six patients were included in the study. EUS-guided HGS with and without AS was performed in 45 and 51 patients, respectively. Bile was aspirated in 71 patients (74%). The quantity of bile aspirated was 0–10 mL and > 10 mL in 40 and 56 patients, respectively. AEs including fever, abdominal pain, postprocedural cholangitis, sepsis, acute pancreatitis, and bleeding occurred in 45 patients (47%). The AE rates were 65% (26/40) and 34% (19/56), for 0–10 mL and > 10 mL bile, respectively (p = 0.004). Using multivariate analysis, the only independent factor affecting the occurrence of AEs was found to be an aspirated bile amount of 0–10 mL (odds ratio: 4.16; 95% CI 1.6–10.8).ConclusionsBile aspiration of more than 10 mL during EUS-HGS contributes to reducing the rate of postprocedural AEs.