Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The best treatment for bloodstream infections (BSI) due to chromosomal AmpC (c-AmpC) producing Enterobacterales is not clearly defined. Objectives To describe the clinical and microbiological outcomes of patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime or carbapenems for bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to c-AmpC beta-lactamase-producing strains. Data sources We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE to screen original reports published up to January 2024. Study eligibility criteria RCTs and observational studies investigating all-cause mortality, clinical failure, microbiological failure or rate of ADRs of patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime or carbapenems. Participants Patients with bloodstream infections due to c-AmpC producing bacteria. Interventions Piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime or carbapenems as targeted treatment. Assessment of risk of bias We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs, and the Newcastle Ottawa scale for observational studies. Methods of data synthesis We conducted a meta-analysis pooling Risk ratios (RRs) through random effect models. Results We screened 1,720 original reports, and 20 studies (1 RCTs, 1 case-control study, 18 cohort studies) were included in the analysis, for a total of 2,834 patients. When comparing piperacillin/tazobactam with alternative treatments (cefepime or carbapenems), no significant difference in mortality rate was observed between the treatment groups (RR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.76–1.58, p  = 0.61), while an higher rate of microbiological failure (RR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.15–2.82, p  = 0.01) and clinical failure (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.00-2.40, p  = 0.05) was observed among patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam. No difference was observed in microbiological and clinical failure rate among patients treated with cefepime or carbapenems, with a lower mortality rate in those receiving cefepime (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59–0.94, p  = 0.014). Conclusions Cefepime represents an excellent alternative to carbapenems for BSI due to AmpC-producing strains, whereas piperacillin/tazobactam is associated with a higher rate of clinical and microbiological failure. There is an urgent need for randomized clinical trials that aim to define the best carbapenem-sparing strategy in these infections.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to ascertain whether sotrovimab was effective in reducing COVID-19 related hospitalization and mortality also in Omicron BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants compared to other antivirals effective in index period. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the efficacy of early treatment with sotrovimab compared to other early treatment effective in index period, antivirals or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), in patients with COVID-19 during BA.2, BA.4, BA.5 waves, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library. Mortality and hospitalization were defined as outcomes. Four studies were included, allowing a meta-analysis of 8,041 patients. Meta-analysis showed no statistical difference between groups in hospitalization and mortality. Precisely, the RR of mortality showed no difference in the sotrovimab group compared to treatment with other drugs (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.10-1.49, p<0.166). As regards the rate of hospitalization, no significant difference resulted between the patients treated with sotrovimab and those with other drugs (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.41-6.66, p=0.477). In conclusion, this meta-analysis showed no significant difference between sotrovimab or other antivirals in reducing COVID-19 evolution in patients with a high risk of progression, considering both hospitalization and mortality.

Background At present, there is a continuous flow of immigrants from the south of the world to north-western countries. Often immigrants originate from areas of high-prevalence of viral hepatitis and pose a challenge to the healthcare systems of the host nations. Aims of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and virological and clinical characteristics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in immigrants and the strategies to identify and take care of the immigrants infected with HCV. Main body We conducted an electronic literature search in several biomedical databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, using different combinations of key words: “HCV infection; chronic hepatitis C, immigrants; low-income countries”. We included studies written in English indicating the epidemiological data of HCV infection in the immigrant population, studies that assessed the clinical presentation, clinical management and treatment with directly acting antiviral agent in immigrants, HCV infection is unevenly distributed in different countries, with worldwide prevalence in the general population ranging from 0.5 to 6.5%. In Western countries and Australia this rate ranges from 0.5 to 1.5%, and reaches 2.3% in countries of south-east Asia and eastern Mediterranean regions, 3.2% in China, 0.9% in India, 2.2% in Indonesia and 6.5% in Pakistan; in sub-Saharan Africa the prevalence of HCV infection varies from 4 to 9%. Immigrants and refugees from intermediate/high HCV endemic countries to less- or non-endemic areas are more likely to have an increased risk of HCV infection due to HCV exposure in their countries of origin. Because of the high HCV endemicity in immigrant populations and of the high efficacy of directly acting antiviral agent therapy, a campaign could be undertaken to eradicate the infection in this setting. Conclusions The healthcare authorities should support screening programs for immigrants, performed with the help of cultural mediators and including educational aspects to break down the barriers limiting access to treatments, which obtain the HCV clearance in 95% of cases and frequently prevent the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-pandemic-related overload of health systems has compromised the application of antimicrobial stewardship (AS) models and infection prevention and control (IPC) programs. We aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on antimicrobial consumption (AC) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the University Hospital of Modena. A time series analysis with an autoregressive integrated moving average model was conducted from January 2015 to October 2021 to evaluate the AC in the whole hospital and the intensive care unit (ICU), the incidence density (ID) of bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to the main multidrug-resistant organisms, and of C. difficile infections (CDIs). After an initial peak during the COVID-19 period, a decrease in the trend of AC was observed, both at the hospital (CT: −1.104, p = 0.025) and ICU levels (CT: −4.47, p = 0.047), with no significant difference in the single classes. Among the Gram-negative isolates, we observed a significant increase only in the level of BSIs due to carbapenem-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CL: 1.477, 95% CI 0.130 to 2.824, p = 0.032). Considering Gram-positive bacteria, an increase in the level of BSIs due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and in the trend of CDIs were observed, though they did not reach statistical significance (CL: 0.72, 95% CI −0.039 to 1.48, p = 0.062; CT: 1.43, 95% CI −0.002 to 2.863, p = 0.051; respectively). Our findings demonstrated that the increases in AMR and AC that appeared in the first COVID-19 wave may be later controlled by restoring IPC and AS programs to pre-epidemic levels. A coordinated healthcare effort is necessary to address the longer-term impact of COVID-19 on AC to avoid irreversible consequences on AMR.

BackgroundSince few data are available in the literature on the prevalence of anti-Delta-positive subjects in immigrant populations, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the demographic and virological characteristics of HDV infection in a large cohort of immigrants living in southern Italy.MethodsBetween January 2012 and February 2020 all immigrants attending one of the 5 first- level centers were enrolled and screened for HBsAg, the HBsAg-positive for anti-Delta and if positive, for HDV-RNA and HDV genotype.ResultsOf the 3521 immigrants observed in the study period, 3417 (97.0%) agreed to be screened; they were mainly males (61%), with a median age of 27 years (IQR 8–74) and came prevalently (58%) from sub-Saharan Africa.Of the 3417 patients enrolled, 319 (9%) subjects were HBsAg-positive, and of those, 8 (2.5%) were anti-Delta-positive. No difference in the demographic and epidemiological characteristics was observed between the anti-Delta-negative vs -positive. Of the 8 anti-Delta-positive subjects, only one was HDV-RNA-positive (viral load: 7050 IU/mL), genotype 1, with clinical signs of cirrhosis.Conclusionsthe present study showed a prevalence of HDV of 2.5% in a large cohort of asymptomatic immigrants, suggesting the need for screening campaigns for viral infections including delta hepatitis in this population.

Bacterial infections are common events that significantly impact the clinical course of patients with cirrhosis. As in the general population, infections caused by multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are progressively increasing in cirrhotic patients, accounting for up to 30–35% of all infections. Nosocomial acquisition and prior exposure to antimicrobial treatment or invasive procedures are well-known risk factors for MDRO infections. Several studies have demonstrated that infections due to MDROs have a poorer prognosis and higher rates of treatment failure, septic shock, and hospital mortality. Due to the increasing rate of antimicrobial resistance, the approach to empirical treatment in cirrhotic patients with life-threatening infections has become significantly more challenging. In order to ensure a prompt administration of effective antibiotic therapy while avoiding unnecessary antibiotic exposure at the same time, it is of utmost importance to choose the correct antimicrobial therapy and administration schedule based on individual clinical characteristics and risk factors and rapidly adopt de-escalation strategies as soon as microbiological data are available. In the present paper, we aimed to provide an overview of the most frequent infections diagnosed in cirrhotic patients, the prevalence and impact of antimicrobial resistance, and potential therapeutic options in this population.

Antimicrobial resistance represents a serious threat for global health, causing an unacceptable burden in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. In particular, in 2017, carbapenem-resistant organisms were listed by the WHO among the group of pathogens for which novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Fortunately, several drugs and combinations have been introduced in recent years to treat multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, a correct use of these molecules is needed to preserve their efficacy. In the present paper, we will provide an overview on the epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of the most common MDR Gram-negative bacteria, proposing a treatment algorithm for the management of infections due to carbapenem-resistant bacteria based on the most recent clinical evidence.

The availability of all oral direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has revolutionized the management of HCV infections in recent years, allowing to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) in more than 95% of cases, irrespective of hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotype or staging of liver disease. Although rare, the failure to the latest-generation regimens (grazoprevir/elbasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, pibrentasvir/glecaprevir) represents a serious clinical problem, since the data available in the literature on the virological characteristics and management of these patients are few. The aim of the present narrative review was to provide an overview of the impact of baseline RASs in patients treated with the latest-generation DAAs and to analyze the efficacy of the available retreatment strategies in those who have failed these regimens.

Background: In the present study, our aim was to evaluate the clinical and microbiological characteristics of a cohort of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and investigate the independent predictors of mortality. Methods: All episodes of carbapenem-resistant E. coli (CREc) or K. pneumoniae (CRKp) BSI that were subject to a mandatory notification from January to December 2020 in all acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities of the Campania region in southern Italy were enrolled. All carbapenem-resistant strains were assessed through molecular tests for the presence of five carbapenemase gene families, i.e., K. pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC), oxacillinase-48 (OXA-48), New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), Verona integron encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) and Imipenemase (IMP). Results: During the study period, a total of 154 consecutive non-repeated CRE BSI, all due to CRKp, were reported. The most frequently identified genes were KPC in 108 cases (70.1%), followed by metallo-betalactamases (MBL) (16.2%), and OXA-48 (2.6%); in 17 isolates (11%) no carbapenemase was detected. The overall mortality at 90 days was 41.9%. Using a log-rank test, patients without risk factors for CRE infections showed a significantly lower cumulative mortality (p = 0.001). After multivariate logistic regression analysis, the presence of at least one risk factor was the only predictor of mortality (OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.2–6.1, p = 0.015). Conclusions. The study reported a non-negligible prevalence of MBL-producing organisms among CRKp isolated from blood cultures in our region. This data highlights the importance of molecular characterization of all clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant organisms.