Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objective To estimate the cumulative radiation exposure and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence associated with lung cancer screening using annual low dose computed tomography (CT).Design Secondary analysis of data from a lung cancer screening trial and risk-benefit analysis.Setting 10 year, non-randomised, single centre, low dose CT, lung cancer screening trial (COSMOS study) which took place in Milan, Italy in 2004-15 (enrolment in 2004-05). Secondary analysis took place in 2015-16.Participants High risk asymptomatic smokers aged 50 and older, who were current or former smokers (≥20 pack years), and had no history of cancer in the previous five years.Main outcome measures Cumulative radiation exposure from low dose CT and positron emission tomography (PET) CT scans, calculated by dosimetry software; and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence, calculated from the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII (BEIR VII) report.Results Over 10 years, 5203 participants (3439 men, 1764 women) underwent 42 228 low dose CT and 635 PET CT scans. The median cumulative effective dose at the 10th year of screening was 9.3 mSv for men and 13.0 mSv for women. According to participants’ age and sex, the lifetime attributable risk of lung cancer and major cancers after 10 years of CT screening ranged from 5.5 to 1.4 per 10 000 people screened, and from 8.1 to 2.6 per 10 000 people screened, respectively. In women aged 50-54, the lifetime attributable risk of lung cancer and major cancers was about fourfold and threefold higher than for men aged 65 and older, respectively. The numbers of lung cancer and major cancer cases induced by 10 years of screening in our cohort were 1.5 and 2.4, respectively, which corresponded to an additional risk of induced major cancers of 0.05% (2.4/5203). 259 lung cancers were diagnosed in 10 years of screening; one radiation induced major cancer would be expected for every 108 (259/2.4) lung cancers detected through screening.Conclusion Radiation exposure and cancer risk from low dose CT screening for lung cancer, even if non-negligible, can be considered acceptable in light of the substantial mortality reduction associated with screening.

Purpose To assess the noise characteristics of the new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR‐V) in comparison to ASiR. Methods A water phantom was acquired with common clinical scanning parameters, at five different levels of CTDIvol. Images were reconstructed with different kernels (STD, SOFT, and BONE), different IR levels (40%, 60%, and 100%) and different slice thickness (ST) (0.625 and 2.5 mm), both for ASiR‐V and ASiR. Noise properties were investigated and noise power spectrum (NPS) was evaluated. Results ASiR‐V significantly reduced noise relative to FBP: noise reduction was in the range 23%–60% for a 0.625 mm ST and 12%–64% for the 2.5 mm ST. Above 2 mGy, noise reduction for ASiR‐V had no dependence on dose. Noise reduction for ASIR‐V has dependence on ST, being greater for STD and SOFT kernels at 2.5 mm. For the STD kernel ASiR‐V has greater noise reduction for both ST, if compared to ASiR. For the SOFT kernel, results varies according to dose and ST, while for BONE kernel ASIR‐V shows less noise reduction. NPS for CT Revolution has dose dependent behavior at lower doses. NPS for ASIR‐V and ASiR is similar, showing a shift toward lower frequencies as the IR level increases for STD and SOFT kernels. The NPS is different between ASiR‐V and ASIR with BONE kernel. NPS for ASiR‐V appears to be ST dependent, having a shift toward lower frequencies for 2.5 mm ST. Conclusions ASiR‐V showed greater noise reduction than ASiR for STD and SOFT kernels, while keeping the same NPS. For the BONE kernel, ASiR‐V presents a completely different behavior, with less noise reduction and modified NPS. Noise properties of the ASiR‐V are dependent on reconstruction slice thickness. The noise properties of ASiR‐V suggest the need for further measurements and efforts to establish new CT protocols to optimize clinical imaging.

ObjectivesTo evaluate quantification of iodine uptake in metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) by dual-energy CT (DECT) and to assess if the distribution of iodine within LNs at DECT correlates with the pathological structure.MethodsNinety LNs from 37 patients (23 with lung and 14 with gynaecological malignancies) were retrospectively selected. Information of LNs sent for statistical analysis included Hounsfield units (HU) at different energy levels; decomposition material densities fat–iodine, iodine–fat, iodine–water, water–iodine. Statistical analysis included evaluation of interobserver variability, material decomposition densities and spatial HU distribution within LNs.ResultsInterobserver agreement was excellent. There was a significant difference in iodine–fat and iodine–water decompositions comparing metastatic and non-metastatic LNs (p < 0.001); fat–iodine and water–iodine did not show significant differences. HU distribution showed a significant gradient from centre to periphery within non-metastatic LNs that was significant up to 20–30% from the centre, whereas metastatic LNs showed a more homogeneous distribution of HU, with no significant gradient.ConclusionsDECT demonstrated a lower iodine uptake in metastatic compared to non-metastatic LNs. Moreover, the internal iodine distribution showed an evident gradient of iodine distribution from centre to periphery in non-metastatic LNs, and a more homogeneous distribution within metastatic LNs, which corresponded to the pathological structure.Key points• This study demonstrated a lower iodine uptake in metastatic than non-metastatic LNs.• Internal distribution of HU was different between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes.• The intranodal iodine distribution disclosed a remarkable correlation with the histological LN structure.

Standardized radiological reports stimulate debate in the medical imaging field. This review paper explores the advantages and challenges of standardized reporting. Standardized reporting can offer improved clarity and efficiency of communication among radiologists and the multidisciplinary team. However, challenges include limited flexibility, initially increased time and effort, and potential user experience issues. The efforts toward standardization are examined, encompassing the establishment of reporting templates, use of common imaging lexicons, and integration of clinical decision support tools. Recent technological advancements, including multimedia-enhanced reporting and AI-driven solutions, are discussed for their potential to improve the standardization process. Organizations such as the ACR, ESUR, RSNA, and ESR have developed standardized reporting systems, templates, and platforms to promote uniformity and collaboration. However, challenges remain in terms of workflow adjustments, language and format variability, and the need for validation. The review concludes by presenting a set of ten essential rules for creating standardized radiology reports, emphasizing clarity, consistency, and adherence to structured formats.

Background Breast cancer screening through mammography is crucial for early detection, yet the demand for mammography services surpasses the capacity of radiologists. Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in evaluating microcalcifications on mammography. We developed and tested an AI model for localizing and characterizing microcalcifications. Methods Three expert radiologists annotated a dataset of mammograms using histology-based ground truth. The dataset was partitioned for training, validation, and testing. Three neural networks (AlexNet, ResNet18, and ResNet34) were trained and evaluated using specific metrics including receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The reported metrics were computed on the test set (10% of the whole dataset). Results The dataset included 1,000 patients aged 21–73 years and 1,986 mammograms (180 density A, 220 density B, 380 density C, and 220 density D), with 389 malignant and 611 benign groups of microcalcifications. AlexNet achieved the best performance with 0.98 sensitivity, 0.89 specificity of, and 0.98 AUC for microcalcifications detection and 0.85 sensitivity, 0.89 specificity, and 0.94 AUC of for microcalcifications classification. For microcalcifications detection, ResNet18 and ResNet34 achieved 0.96 and 0.97 sensitivity, 0.91 and 0.90 specificity and 0.98 and 0.98 AUC, retrospectively. For microcalcifications classification, ResNet18 and ResNet34 exhibited 0.75 and 0.84 sensitivity, 0.85 and 0.84 specificity, and 0.88 and 0.92 AUC, respectively. Conclusions The developed AI models accurately detect and characterize microcalcifications on mammography. Relevance statement AI-based systems have the potential to assist radiologists in interpreting microcalcifications on mammograms. The study highlights the importance of developing reliable deep learning models possibly applied to breast cancer screening. Key points • A novel AI tool was developed and tested to aid radiologists in the interpretation of mammography by accurately detecting and characterizing microcalcifications. • Three neural networks (AlexNet, ResNet18, and ResNet34) were trained, validated, and tested using an annotated dataset of 1,000 patients and 1,986 mammograms. • The AI tool demonstrated high accuracy in detecting/localizing and characterizing microcalcifications on mammography, highlighting the potential of AI-based systems to assist radiologists in the interpretation of mammograms. Graphical Abstract

Background We investigated to what extent tube voltage, scanner model, and reconstruction algorithm affect radiomic feature reproducibility in a single-institution retrospective database of computed tomography images of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Methods This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (UID 2412). Images of 103 patients were considered, being acquired on either among two scanners, at 100 or 120 kVp. For each patient, images were reconstructed with six iterative blending levels, and 1414 features were extracted from each reconstruction. At univariate analysis, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was applied to evaluate feature differences within scanners and voltages, whereas the impact of the reconstruction was established with the overall concordance correlation coefficient (OCCC). A multivariable mixed model was also applied to investigate the independent contribution of each acquisition/reconstruction parameter. Univariate and multivariable analyses were combined to analyse feature behaviour. Results Scanner model and voltage did not affect features significantly. The reconstruction blending level showed a significant impact at both univariate analysis (154/1414 features yielding an OCCC < 0.85) and multivariable analysis, with most features (1042/1414) revealing a systematic trend with the blending level (multiple comparisons adjusted p < 0.05). Reproducibility increased in association to image processing with smooth filters, nonetheless specific investigation in relation to clinical endpoints should be performed to ensure that textural information is not removed. Conclusions Combining univariate and multivariable models is allowed to identify features for which corrections may be applied to reduce the trend with the algorithm and increase reproducibility. Subsequent clustering may be applied to eliminate residual redundancy.

The evaluation of radiation burden in vivo is crucial in modern radiology as stated also in the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom—Basic Safety Standard. Although radiation dose monitoring can impact the justification and optimization of radiological procedure, as well as effective patient communication, standardization of radiation monitoring software is far to be achieved. Toward this goal, the Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) published a report describing the state of the art and standard guidelines in radiation dose monitoring system quality assurance. This article reports the AIFM statement about radiation dose monitoring systems (RDMSs) summarizing the different critical points of the systems related to Medical Physicist Expert (MPE) activities before, during, and after their clinical implementation. In particular, the article describes the general aspects of radiation dose data management, radiation dose monitoring systems, data integrity, and data responsibilities. Furthermore, the acceptance tests that need to be implemented and the most relevant dosimetric data for each radiological modalities are reported under the MPE responsibility.

Background: Radiomics is changing clinical practice by providing quantitative information from images to improve diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning. This study aims to investigate a radiomics model developed from contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer (BC) patients. Methods: From January 2013 to December 2015, all consecutive BC patients who underwent CEM before biopsy at a referral center were enrolled. Clinical data included histological results, receptor profiles, and follow-up (DFS and OS). A region of interest (ROI) of the enhancing lesion was selected from recombined CEM images by experienced radiologists, and radiomic features were extracted. A Cox-LASSO model assigned coefficients to the features, generating patient radiomic scores (RSs), which were dichotomized for graphical representation. Model performance was assessed using the C index. Results: The study included 126 BC patients with predominantly “mass”-type lesions (95%) and a median follow-up of 6.88 years (IQR 3.10–8.15). The median age of the patients at the time of examination was 49.2 years (IQR: [42.33–56.98]). Radiomic and clinical–radiomic models showed significant associations between RS, DFS, and OS, with patients with RS below the median showing a better prognosis (p < 0.001). Bootstrap testing confirmed a good model fit for OS prediction, with median C-index values of 0.82 for the clinical model and 0.84 for the clinical–radiomic model. Conclusions: Radiomic analysis of CEM images may predict DFS and OS in BC patients, offering additional prognostic value beyond clinical models alone.

Background Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women and the second cause of cancer death. In recent years, there has been a strong development in artificial intelligence (AI) applications in medical imaging for several tasks. Our aim was to evaluate the potential of transfer learning with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in discriminating suspicious breast lesions on ultrasound images. Methods Transfer learning performances of five different CNNs (Inception V3, Xception, Densenet121, VGG 16, and ResNet50) were evaluated on a public and on an institutional dataset (526 and 392 images, respectively), customizing the top layers for the specific task. Institutional images were contoured by an expert radiologist and processed to feed the CNNs for training and testing. Postimaging biopsies were used as a reference standard for classification. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was used to assess diagnostic performance. Results Networks performed very well on the public dataset (AUROC 0.938–0.996). The direct generalization to the institutional dataset resulted in lower performances (max AUROC 0.676); however, when tested on BI-RADS 3 and BI-RADS 5 only, results were improved (max AUROC 0.792). Good results were achieved on the institutional dataset (AUROC 0.759–0.818) and, when selecting a threshold of 2% for classification, a sensitivity of 0.983 was obtained for three of five CNNs, with the potential to spare biopsy in 15.3%–18.6% of patients. Conclusion In conclusion, transfer learning with CNNs may achieve high sensitivity and might be used as a support tool in managing suspicious breast lesions on ultrasound images. Relevance statement Transfer learning is a powerful technique to exploit the performances of well-trained CNNs for image classification. In a clinical scenario, it might be useful for the management of suspicious breast lesions on breast ultrasound, potentially sparing biopsy in a non-negligible number of patients. Key Points Properly trained CNNs with transfer learning are highly effective in differentiating benign and malignant lesions on breast ultrasound. Setting clinical thresholds increased sensitivity. CNNs might be useful as support tools in managing suspicious lesions on breast ultrasound. Graphical Abstract

Radiomics is emerging as a promising tool to extract quantitative biomarkers—called radiomic features—from medical images, potentially contributing to the improvement in diagnosis and treatment of oncological patients. However, technical limitations might impair the reliability of radiomic features and their ability to quantify clinically relevant tissue properties. Among these, sampling the image signal in a too-small region can reduce the ability to discriminate tissues with different properties. However, a volume threshold guaranteeing a reliable analysis, which might vary according to the imaging modality and clinical scenario, has not been assessed yet. In this study, an MRI phantom specifically developed for radiomic investigation of gynecological malignancies was used to explore how the ability of radiomic features to discriminate different image textures varies with the volume of the analyzed region. The phantom, embedding inserts with different textures, was scanned on two 1.5T and one 3T scanners, each using the T2-weighted sequence of the clinical protocol implemented for gynecological studies. Within each of the three inserts, six cylindrical regions were drawn with volumes ranging from 0.8 cm3 to 29.8 cm3, and 944 radiomic features were extracted from both original images and from images processed with different filters. For each scanner, the ability of each feature to discriminate the different textures was quantified. Despite differences observed among the scanner models, the overall percentage of discriminative features across scanners was >70%, with the smallest volume having the lowest percentage of discriminative features for all scanners. Stratification by feature class, still aggregating data for original and filtered images, showed statistical significance for the association between the percentage of discriminative features with VOI sizes for features classes GLCM, GLDM, and GLSZM on the first 1.5T scanner and for first-order and GLSZM classes on the second 1.5T scanner. Poorer results in terms of features’ discriminative ability were found for the 3T scanner. Focusing on original images only, the analysis of discriminative features stratified by feature class showed that the first-order and GLCM were robust to VOI size variations (>85% discriminative features for all sizes), while for the 1.5T scanners, the GLSZM and NGTDM feature classes showed a percentage of discriminative features >80% only for volumes no smaller than 3.3 cm3, and equal or larger than 7.4 cm3 for the GLRLM. As for the 3T scanner, only the GLSZM showed a percentage of discriminative features >80% for all volume sizes above 3.3 cm3. Analogous considerations were obtained for each filter, providing useful indications for feature selection in this clinical case. Similar studies should be replicated with suitably adapted phantoms to derive useful data for other clinical scenarios and imaging modalities.