Explore the vast range of titles available.

This study aimed to investigate whether muscle synergy differs between swimmers with and without swimmer's shoulder in the butterfly technique. Muscle synergies, which can assess muscle coordination, were analyzed using surface electromyography. Twenty elite swimmers were included in this study (swimmer's shoulder: n = 8; control: n = 12). The motions involved in executing the butterfly technique were classified into the early pull-through, late pull-through, and recovery phases. Muscle synergy data analyzed using the nonnegative matrix factorization method were compared between the two groups. The swimming velocities were 1.66 ± 0.09 m・s −1 and 1.69 ± 0.06 m・s −1 for the control and swimmer's shoulder groups, respectively. Four muscle synergies in both groups were identified: synergy #1, which was involved in the early pull; synergy #2, involved in the late pull; synergy #3, involved in the early recovery; and synergy #4, involved in pre- and posthand entry. Compared to the control group, the swimmer's shoulder group had a small contribution from the pectoralis major ( p  = 0.032) and a high contribution from the rectus femoris during the early pull phase ( p  = 0.036). In the late pull phase, the contribution of the lower trapezius muscle in the swimmer's shoulder group was low ( p  = 0.033), while the contribution of the upper trapezius muscle in the pre- and postentry phases was high ( p  = 0.032). In the rehabilitation of athletes with swimmer's shoulder, it is therefore important to introduce targeted muscle rehabilitation in each phase.

This study aimed to validate the KOJI AWARENESS™, a self-screening movement test, and compare it with the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Fifty-seven healthy participants completed the KOJI AWARENESS™ and functional movement screening. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess the validity of the test. Subsequently, partial correlation analysis was used to determine the associations between age, sex, body mass index, and sports level as control variables and motor function. Correlation and partial correlation analyses showed a strong positive correlation between the functional movement screening and the KOJI AWARENESS™ scores. This study found that the KOJI AWARENESS™ test is valid and comparable to functional movement screening. It can be used for self-screening of movement.

Perturbation exercises enhance lower limb and trunk muscles, and adding swing perturbation while loading during exercise might improve muscle activation or strength. This study aimed to check variations in trunk and lower limb muscle activity during conventional isometric squats, and whether it will change with or without swing using the Hammerobics-synchronized squat method. Twelve healthy men participated in this study. Activities for the abductor hallucis, tibialis anterior, tibialis posterior, peroneus longus, rectus femoris, biceps femoris long head, semitendinosus, gluteus maximus, multifidus, and internal oblique muscles were measured using surface electromyography during a Hammerobics-synchronized squat and conventional isometric squat. Muscle activities were statistically compared between squat methods. Hammerobics-synchronized squats significantly activated the abductor hallucis, tibialis anterior, tibialis posterior, peroneus longus, semitendinosus, and multifidus muscles, in both phases, compared with the conventional isometric squats. The Hammerobics-synchronized squat exercise can be considered for trunk and foot stability exercise.

Background: Improvements in motor control of the scapular muscles are important for the prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder and elbow injuries in overhead athletes. Purpose: To clarify scapular muscle activity during multijoint compound movement exercises using fine-wire and surface electrodes. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Sixteen healthy men performed 5 types of exercises (cat and dog, trunk rotation, A-exercise, T-exercise, and Y-exercise). Muscle activity was measured as percentage of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC) by using fine-wire electrodes in the rhomboid major (Rhom) and using surface electrodes in the upper (UT), middle (MT), and lower (LT) trapezius and serratus anterior (SA) muscles. The Rhom/UT, MT/UT, LT/UT, and SA/UT muscle activity ratios were calculated. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the %MVIC and muscle activity ratios between exercises. Results: There was no significant difference in Rhom activity between the exercises (34.6-54.2%MVIC; P = .25). LT activity was significantly greater in the trunk rotation (58.0 ± 24.6%MVIC) and Y-exercise (63.2 ± 40.1%MVIC) than in the cat and dog scapular retraction (19.6 ± 9.3%MVIC) and A-exercise (28.2 ± 14.2%MVIC) (P < .05). SA activity was significantly greater in the cat and dog scapular protraction (26.7 ± 11.0%MVIC) and Y-exercise (25.6 ± 19.3%MVIC) than in the other exercises (P < .05). The SA/UT activity ratio in the cat and dog scapular protraction exercise (9.64 ± 8.48) was significantly higher than in the other exercises (P < .05). Conclusion: All the exercises were effective for activating the Rhom. The trunk rotation and Y-exercise were effective for activating the LT, and the cat and dog scapular protraction exercise was effective for activating the SA while suppressing the UT. Clinical Relevance: These results enable exercise selection based on muscle activity characteristics (moderate [20%-50%MVIC] and high [>50%MVIC] levels contribute to muscle activation) to prevent and rehabilitate shoulder and elbow injuries.

Background Medial tibial stress syndrome is a common sports related injury. Altered foot kinematics can be a risk factor for the injury. Since foot segments can move independently, intersegment coordination is important for proper foot function. This study aimed to compare the foot intersegmental coordination pattern and single segment kinematics between female lacrosse players with and without a history of medial tibial stress syndrome during drop jump. Methods Twelve players with a medial tibial stress syndrome history and 12 players with no history were enrolled. Foot kinematics, including angle at landing and peak angle and excursion at the rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot during single-leg drop jumps were analysed. Each segment motion data from landing to leaping was time-scaled to 100% to analyse the intersegmental coordination with a modified vector coding technique. Instant intersegmental coordination of every 1% was classified into four patterns (in-phase, two segments rotate in the same direction with similar amplitudes; anti-phase, two segments rotate in opposite directions; proximal phase, proximal segment dominantly rotates in the same direction compared to the distal segment; and distal phase, distal segment dominantly rotates in the same direction compared to the proximal segment). The percentage of intersegmental coordination pattern and kinematics in each segment were compared between the groups using the Student’s t test. Results Groups with a history of medial stress syndrome showed a significantly higher percentage of proximal phase between the rearfoot and midfoot in the sagittal (Mean ± SD; history, 52.2 ± 17.9%, no history, 29.3 ± 16.7%; p  = 0.004) and coronal planes (history, 40.3 ± 22.0%, no history, 15.9 ± 9.1%; p  = 0.004). Dorsiflexion excursion (history, 34.5 ± 4.5°, no history, 29.6 ± 2.1°; p  = 0.003) were significantly larger in a history of medial tibial stress syndrome group compared to no history group. Conclusions Rearfoot dominant motion pattern relative to the midfoot may be related to medial tibial stress syndrome. Intersegmental coordination analysis may be useful for detecting abnormal foot coordination patterns. Also, stabilization for the rearfoot may be required rather than the midfoot for intervention.

Psychological pressure during sports competition disturbs the ideal physical movement and causes injury. Baseball batting frequently causes trunk injuries. This study aimed to examine the influence of psychological pressure on the lumbar kinematics and trunk muscle activity during the baseball batting. Fourteen collegiate baseball players participated in this study. The participants performed bat swings under three different psychological conditions (non-pressure, pressure, and emphasized pressure). The lumbar kinematics and trunk muscle activity were measured during each bat swing. One- and two-way analyses of variance were performed to compare the lumbar kinematics and trunk muscle activity among different psychological pressure conditions. The lumbar flexion angle throughout the bat swing in the swing phase, from the moment of ground contact of the lead foot to the moment of ball contact, was significantly larger under the pressure and emphasized pressure conditions than under the non-pressure condition (P<0.05). The bilateral lumbar erector spinae (LES) activities in the swing and follow-through phases were significantly higher under the emphasized pressure condition than under the non-pressure condition (P<0.05). These results indicate that the baseball batting under psychological pressure influenced the lumbar kinematics and bilateral LES activities and may be related to the development of low back pain.

Problem Statement: Muscle synergy differs between scored and missed shots during free-throw shooting that is, four synergies during a scored shot and three synergies during a missed shot. The synergy of a missed shot functions similarly to the synthesis of two synergies during a scored shot to transfer energy from the lower to the upper limb. However, whether or not a difference in the view of goal influences muscle synergy remains unclear. Therefore, this study investigated synergy during basketball free-throw shooting and compared the synergies of five positions. Approach: Six male collegiate basketball players (age: 20.2 ± 0.8 years; height: 1.74 ± 0.03 m; weight: 63.7 ± 4.5 kg; duration of playing basketball: 9.7 ± 2.3 years). The distance from all shooting positions to the goal was the same as the free-throw distance. The study used a wireless electromyographic system to measure 16 muscle activities during free-throw shooting and analyzed three success and failure shots in each position to extract the synergies using non-negative matrix factorization. Results: The difference between the success and failure shots was the number of synergies. The study extracted four and three synergies during the success and missed shots, respectively, in each position. Additionally, the synergies remained the same despite the different positions. Conclusion: These results are in agreement with those of a previous study and suggested that the view of the goal did not influence the factor of success or failure shots if the distance from the shooting positions to the goal remained the same. Thus, understanding not only the evaluation of success or failure of a shot but also its potentially located muscle synergy can aid in the improvement of shooting performance.

We previously reported that a Hammerobics exercise using weights can enhance trunk and lower extremity muscles, some studies suggested that training effects could also be expected without heavy weights. If the muscle activity induced by Hammerobics swinging with a 'light plastic ball' equals or surpasses that of the isometric static squat and synchronized squat with a heavy ball, this training approach could alleviate joint strain, fostering an exercise regimen universally accessible across generations, benefit for workouts sports and rehabilitation. Fifteen healthy men participated in this study. By using surface electromyography, muscle activities for the abductor hallucis, tibialis anterior, tibialis posterior, peroneus longus, rectus femoris, biceps femoris long head, semitendinosus, gluteus maximus, multifidus, and internal oblique muscles were measured during a light Hammerobics synchronized squat (HSS-light), Hammerobics synchronized squat, and conventional isometric squat, and statistically compared. The front-to-back tibialis anterior activity of HSS-light was significantly higher than that of conventional isometric squat. The activities of all other muscles, except for the multifidus, were not significantly different between these exercises in the front-to-back and back-to-front phases. Compared to the Hammerobics synchronized squat, the light Hammerobics synchronized squat showed no differences in front-to-back tibialis anterior, rectus femoris, biceps femoris long head, and internal oblique activities and back-to-front abductor hallucis, tibialis anterior, rectus femoris, and internal oblique activities. The HSS-light could stimulate muscles to the same level as the conventional isometric squat without weight bearing. While the HSS-light was less effective than the Hammerobics synchronized squat, there was no significant difference in internal oblique, rectus femoris, and tibialis anterior activities between these exercises. Hence, the HSS-light is an exercise method that can be viable approach to promoting accessible workouts sports and rehabilitation.