Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: Medical faculty and residents have a key role in the reporting of adverse events associated with medical devices. However, at present, there are no published data regarding their knowledge, attitude, and practice about materiovigilance in India. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey done among medical faculty and residents of a tertiary care institution of national importance. The questionnaire consists of 15 questions pertaining to knowledge, attitude, and practice of materiovigilance. Results: The questionnaire was administered to 138 medical faculty and residents, out of which 105 responded constituting a 76% response rate. The mean knowledge score of medical faculty and residents was 2.09 ± 1.06 and 2.07 ± 1.02, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.9). The majority of the participants (92.63%) believed that medical device can cause adverse events; however, very few of them (20.13%) have reported it during their practice. Conclusion: Requisite knowledge and appropriate attitude are essential for developing healthy practice toward reporting of adverse events associated with medical devices. Our study revealed that the knowledge gap exists among medical professionals about the reporting of adverse events and the materiovigilance program. A continuous effort is required to make them aware of the materiovigilance by conducting various training programs such as continuous medical education and workshops by the coordinators of the medical device adverse events monitoring center.

Background: Medical management of adenomyosis is an emerging perspective in modern gynecology. Though levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG) effectively relieve symptoms in adenomyosis, neither has been approved for the same indication. Our study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these progestins in treating adenomyosis. Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of LNG-IUS versus DNG in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis. Design: Open-labeled, parallel, single-centered, randomized clinical trial. Methods: Patients with adenomyosis-associated pain with or without abnormal uterine bleeding were randomly allocated to either LNG-IUS group or DNG group. The primary outcome was a reduction in painful symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment measured by visual analog scale (VAS) score. Changes in menstrual blood loss (MBL), improvement in quality of life (QoL), and adverse drug reactions were also analyzed. Results: The VAS score significantly decreased from baseline in both groups. The baseline and post-treatment VAS scores in the LNG-IUS group were 6.41 ± 1.07 and 3.41 ± 1.04 (p = <0.001) and in the DNG group, were 6.41 ± 0.95 and 3.12 ± 1.40 (p = <0.001), respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the LNG-IUS group experienced lighter MBL as compared to the DNG group [27/30 (90%) in the LNG-IUS group versus 17/22 (77.2%) in the DNG group (p = 0.006)]. Both the groups had improvement in QOL scores calculated by the World Heath Organisation QOL scale (WHOQOL BREF) questionnaire; however, it was more pronounced in the DNG group [(28.76 ± 30.47 in the LNG-IUS group versus 48.26 ± 44.91 in the DNG group (p = 0.04)]. Both the agents were safe as there were no reported major adverse drug reactions. Conclusion: DNG can be an effective and safe alternative to LNG-IUS for the medical management of adenomyosis. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered at the clinical trial registry – India (CTRI) vide CTRI number CTRI/2020/05/025186. Plain language summary Comparison of effectiveness and safety of Mirena (LNG-IUS) with dienogest for treatment of adenomyosis Adenomyosis is a condition affecting women, typically aged 40–50, but its incidence is rising in younger women, impacting fertility. It causes painful symptoms like dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and heavy menstrual bleeding. Managing symptoms is crucial, and medical approaches include levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG). LNG-IUS is reversible contraception, approved for eight years, effectively treating symptoms. DNG, a newer progestin, is effective for endometriosis, but evidence for adenomyosis is limited. This single-center, open-label randomized clinical trial compared LNG-IUS and DNG in treating adenomyosis. Women over 20 with pelvic pain were diagnosed using ultrasound and met specific criteria. After informed consent, participants were assigned randomly to LNG-IUS or DNG groups. Treatment outcomes, including pelvic pain, quality of life (QoL), and adverse effects, were assessed over 12 weeks. Out of 84 assessed, 74 women were recruited, with 34 in each group analyzed. After 12 weeks, both groups showed significantly reduced pelvic pain (VAS scores), but no significant difference was found between the groups. LNG-IUS resulted in a significantly greater reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), whereas DNG showed better improvement in overall QOL. Adverse effects were similar in both groups, with hot flushes reported in the DNG group. This study is one of the few comparing LNG-IUS and DNG for adenomyosis, finding both effective for symptom relief. Although LNG-IUS was superior in reducing HMB, DNG showed better overall improvement in QoL. Safety profiles were similar. Previous studies support the efficacy of DNG in reducing adenomyosis symptoms. To conclude, both LNG-IUS and DNG effectively alleviate adenomyosis symptoms, with LNG-IUS superior in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding and DNG showing better overall improvement in QOL. DNG is a viable and effective alternative to LNG-IUS.

Ivermectin is one among several potential drugs explored for its therapeutic and preventive role in SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study was aimed to explore the association between ivermectin prophylaxis and the development of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers. A hospital-based matched case-control study was conducted among healthcare workers of AIIMS Bhubaneswar, India, from September to October 2020. Profession, gender, age and date of diagnosis were matched for 186 case-control pairs. Cases and controls were healthcare workers who tested positive and negative, respectively, for COVID-19 by RT-PCR. Exposure was defined as the intake of ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine and/or vitamin-C and/or other prophylaxis for COVID-19. Data collection and entry was done in Epicollect5, and analysis was performed using STATA version 13. Conditional logistic regression models were used to describe the associated factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ivermectin prophylaxis was taken by 76 controls and 41 cases. Two-dose ivermectin prophylaxis (AOR 0.27, 95% CI, 0.15-0.51) was associated with a 73% reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers for the following month. Those involved in physical activity (AOR 3.06 95% CI, 1.18-7.93) for more than an hour/day were more likely to contract SARS-CoV-2 infection. Type of household, COVID duty, single-dose ivermectin prophylaxis, vitamin-C prophylaxis and hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis were not associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two-dose ivermectin prophylaxis at a dose of 300 μg/kg with a gap of 72 hours was associated with a 73% reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers for the following month. Chemoprophylaxis has relevance in the containment of pandemic.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral triclofos (TRI), intranasal midazolam (INM), and intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) in achieving successful sedation in children undergoing MRI. This open-label, three-arm, randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital over 18-month period. Children scheduled for MRI were enrolled. Rate of successful/adequate sedation was assessed using the Paediatric Sedation State Scale (PSSS). The primary outcome was the efficacy (successful sedation or sedation rate) of the three drugs. One-hundred and ninety-five children were included for the MRI procedure. IND was found to be superior in terms of achieving successful sedation. INM had a shorter onset and duration of sedation compared to IND and TRI, but with an increased failure rate (88.3%). Keeping INM as the reference group, it was found that the odds of sedation increased 4.1 times on changing from INM to IND ( p  < 0.01), and 2.26 times on changing from INM to TRI ( p  < 0.01). Adverse events included nasal discomfort (18.3%) in INM group; and self-limited tachycardia (4.6%) and hypotension (10.8%) in the IND group. Conclusion : IND was more efficacious than INM or TRI for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI without any significant adverse events. Clinical trial registration : CTRI/2019/01/017257; date registered: 25/01/2019. What is Known: • Oral triclofos (TRI) and intranasal midazolam (INM) have been used for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI with variable success; but the experience with intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) is limited. What is New: • IND provides more effective sedation compared to INM or TRI for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI, without any significant adverse events.

The concept of defining essential medicines and establishing a list of them was aimed to improve the availability of affordable medicines for the world's poor. Access to essential medicines is a major determinant of health outcomes. Several countries have made substantial progress towards increasing access to essential medicines, but access to essential medicines in developing countries like India is not adequate. In this review we have tried to present the Indian scenario in respect to availability and accessibility of essential medicines over last one decade. To enhance the credibility of Indian healthcare system, procurement and delivery systems of essential medicines have to be strengthened through government commitment, careful selection, adequate public sector financing, efficient distribution systems, control on taxes and duties, and inculcating a culture of rational use of medicines in current and future prescribers.

Background and Aim There is regional variation in the eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) regimens depending on the local antibiotic resistance patterns. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of triple, quadruple and sequential antibiotic therapy in eradicating H. pylori infection. Methods A total of 296 H. pylori -positive patients were randomized to receive one of the three regimens (triple, quadruple or sequential antibiotic therapy) and eradication rate was assessed by H. pylori stool antigen test. Results The eradication rates of standard triple therapy, sequential therapy and quadruple therapy were 93%, 92.9% and 96.4%, respectively ( p = 0.57). Conclusion Fourteen days of standard triple therapy, 14 days of bismuth-based quadruple therapy and 10 days of sequential therapy are equally efficacious in eradicating H. pylori and all regimens have optimum H. pylori eradication rates. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: CTRI/2020/04/024929