Explore the vast range of titles available.

STUDY QUESTION How should premature/primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) be diagnosed and managed based on the best available evidence from published literature? SUMMARY ANSWER The current guideline provides 145 recommendations on symptoms, diagnosis, causation, sequelae, and treatment of POI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) presents a significant challenge to women’s health, with far-reaching implications, both physically and emotionally. The potential implications include adverse effects on quality of life; fertility; and bone, cardiovascular, and cognitive health. Although hormone therapy (HT) can mitigate some of these effects, many questions still remain regarding the optimal management of POI. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The guideline was developed according to the structured methodology for development of ESHRE guidelines. Key questions were determined by a group of experts and informed by a scoping survey of women and health care professionals. Literature searches and assessments were then performed. Papers published up to 30 January 2024 and written in English were included in the guideline. An integrity review was conducted for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on POI included in the guideline. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Based on the collected evidence, recommendations were formulated and discussed within the guideline development group until consensus was reached. Women with lived experience of POI informed the recommendations in general, and particularly on those on provision of care. A stakeholder review was organized after finalization of the draft. The final version was approved by the guideline development group and the ESHRE Executive Committee. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE New data indicate a higher prevalence of POI, 3.5%, than was previously thought. This guideline aims to help health care professionals to apply best practice care for women with POI. The recent update of the POI guideline covers 40 clinical questions on diagnosis of the condition, the different sequelae, including bone, cardiovascular, neurological and sexual function, fertility and general well-being, and treatment options, including HT. The list of clinical questions was expanded from the previous iteration of the guideline (2015) based on the scoping survey and appreciation of emerging knowledge of POI. Questions were added on the role of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in the diagnosis of POI, fertility preservation, muscle health, and specific considerations for HT in iatrogenic POI. Additionally, the topic on complementary treatments was extended with specific focus on non-hormonal treatments and lifestyle management options. Significant changes from the previous 2015 guideline include the recommendations that only one elevated FSH >25 IU is required for diagnosis of POI, and guidance that AMH testing, repeat FSH measurement, and/or AMH may be required where there is diagnostic uncertainty. Recommendations were also updated regarding genetic testing, estrogen doses and regimens, use of the combined oral contraceptive and testosterone therapy. Women with lived experience of POI informed the recommendations on provision of care. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The guideline describes different management options, but it must be acknowledged that for most of these options, supporting evidence is limited for POI. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The guideline provides health care professionals with clear advice on best practice in POI care, based on the best evidence currently available. In addition, a list of research recommendations is provided to guide further studies in POI. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), Centre for Research Excellence in Women's Health in Reproduction Life (CRE-WHiRL), and International Menopause Society (IMS), covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings, literature searches, and dissemination of the guideline. The guideline group members did not receive payments. N.P. declared grants from Bayer Pharma (research and consultancy) and NIHR—research POISE; consulting fees from Abbott, Astellas, Bayer, Besins, Lawley, Mithra, Theramex, Viatris; honoraria from Astellas, Bayer, Besins, Gedeon Richter, Theramex, Viatris; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Astellas, Bayer, Theramex, Viatris; President, International Menopause Society, Medical Advisory Committee member, British Menopause Society, Patron Daisy Network. A.J.V. declared grants from Amgen Australia, Australian NHMRC, and Australian MRFF; consulting fees from IQ Fertility; honoraria from the Australasian Menopause Society; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Astellas; Board Member of the International Menopause Society (2020 to current) and Past president of the Australasian Menopause Society (2017–2019); R.A.A. declared grants from Roche (Research support, to institution), and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board of Bayer. M.C. declared grants from NHI; payments or honoraria from Up-to-Date (as editor/reviewer); Board Member of American Society of Reproductive Medicine, and of American Gynecological and Obstetrical Society. M.D. declared (NIHR—HTA Reference Number: NIHR133461; NIHR—HTA Reference Number: NIHR128757; Action Medical Research and Borne: GN2818) consulting fees from a small personal medical practice, support for attending meetings and/or travel from ESHRE, Bayer and UCLH special Trustees; Participation on the Advisory Board of the British Menopause Society, UKSTORE project, the Progress Educational Trust, and the Turner Syndrome Support Society UK; Leadership or fiduciary roles in the British Fertility Society (Trustee), Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Hospital Charity (chair of Trustees), and the Essex Wynter charitable trust (Trustee). C.E. declared being Chair of a SIG from the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Integrative Medicine Specific Interest Group and Program Lead for Next Practice Western Sydney Integrative Health. C.H.G. declared grants from Novo Nordisk Foundation (Nos. NNF15OC0016474 and NNF20OC0060610), sygesikringen danmark (No 2022-0189), and the Independent Research Fund Denmark (Nos. 0134-00406 and 0134-00130B); consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Merck, and Astra Zeneca. S.K. declared grants from Roche diagnostics. A.K. declared grants from NIH R01 5R01HD101475; consulting fees as Medical Reviewer for Flo and for Healthline; honoraria as Medical Consultant for Summus; support for attending meetings from the Reproductive Scientist Development Program; Society for Reproductive Investigation Council Member and Society for Assisted Reproduction Registry/Validation Chair; R.E.N. declared consulting fees from Astellas, Bayer Pharma, Besins Healthcare, Fidia, Theramex; honoraria from Abbott, Astellas, Exeltis, Fidia, Gedeon Richter, Merck & Co, Novo Nordisk, Shionogi Limited, Theramex, Viatris; payment for expert testimony from Vichy Laboratories; Participation in Data Safety Monitoring Board of Advisory board from Astellas and Bayer Healthcare; President elect of the International Menopause Society (IMS). H.T. declared a grant from NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence for women’s health in reproductive life. A.B. declared being chair of the Daisy Network Charity. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. DISCLAIMER This guideline represents the views of ESHRE, ASRM, CRE-WHiRL, and IMS, which were achieved after careful consideration of the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. In the absence of scientific evidence on certain aspects, a consensus between the relevant stakeholders has been obtained. Adherence to these clinical practice guidelines does not guarantee a successful or specific outcome, nor does it establish a standard of care. Clinical practice guidelines do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type. The collaborating societies make no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the clinical practice guidelines and specifically exclude any warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular use or purpose. (Full disclaimer available at www.eshre.eu/guidelines.)

Background Large-scale scientific research studies are critical for advancing knowledge and innovation, but they require substantial human and financial resources. Given their scale, such studies also generate a notable environmental footprint. Aligning research practices with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3 (health and wellbeing), 12 (responsible consumption and production), and 13 (climate action) necessitates assessing and mitigating these impacts. This study investigates the carbon emissions associated with different participant recruitment strategies such as digital, hybrid, and in-person across a selected group of countries from the MARIE project. Methods Recruitment-related data were collected from Brazil, the United Kingdom, Nigeria, Ghana, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and India, covering a total of 3,875 participants. Emissions were estimated from paper use, printer electricity, participant and staff transportation, and IT device usage. Calculations applied internationally recognised emission factors alongside country-specific carbon intensity metrics. Statistical comparisons between recruitment modalities were conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test to account for small group sizes and non-normal data distributions. Results Digital recruitment demonstrated the lowest carbon emissions, ranging from 0.23 to 437 kg CO 2 e, largely attributable to the limited electricity consumption of IT devices. Hybrid recruitment generated moderate emissions (mean ≈ 126 kg CO 2 e) due to combined digital engagement with some travel and material use. In-person recruitment produced markedly higher emissions, ranging between 4,260 and 27,070 kg CO 2 e, with transportation accounting for more than 90% of the total footprint. While statistical analyses did not reveal significant differences across modalities ( p  > 0.05), likely due to small sample sizes, effect sizes suggested meaningful environmental variation. Findings Digital and hybrid recruitment strategies substantially reduce the carbon footprint compared to traditional in-person approaches, offering sustainable alternatives for large-scale research. These approaches can help research institutions meet global sustainability targets while maintaining efficiency. Nevertheless, considerations of equity, accessibility, and cultural appropriateness remain critical, particularly in low-resource settings, to ensure inclusivity and generalisability of study findings.

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a life-changing diagnosis, with profound physical and psychological consequences. Unfortunately, there are many deficiencies in our understanding of the condition as the underlying etiology and optimum management strategies are poorly understood. Improved awareness of POI and its long-term implications has led to increased research interest in recent years. Current research has allowed a greater understanding of the changing epidemiology in POI, genetic factors in its etiology and randomized controlled trials of hormone therapy are underway to provide evidence for treatment. This article reviews the latest literature on POI to summarize current understanding and future directions.

In this trial involving women taking endocrine therapy for HR-positive breast cancer, elinzanetant (a neurokinin-targeted therapy) significantly reduced the frequency of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms.

The vision of the International Menopause Society (IMS) is that all women across the world will have easy and equitable access to evidence-based knowledge and health care, empowering them to make fully informed midlife health choices. The aim of this White Paper is to provide a well-balanced educational narrative of the menopause and menopause hormone therapy (MHT) from IMS experts, leading into World Menopause Day 2024. This is achieved by exploring the anthropology and history of menopause, the principles and controversies of prescribing MHT, and by placing this into regulatory and menopause society contexts. The White Paper also lays the groundwork for the forthcoming updated IMS recommendations on menopause and will act as a blueprint for the future ethical management of menopause from practical and aspirational perspectives. An important section of the paper is ‘The 5Ws of prescribing MHT’: WHO is MHT for; WHAT types and doses of MHT; WHEN should MHT be started and stopped; WHY is MHT important; WHERE can MHT be accessed? A key points summary of this information is provided for healthcare professionals and the public. The summary provides ‘easy to access’ advice regarding several recent controversial MHT prescribing issues in the healthcare and media spotlights.

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week trial among postmenopausal women not receiving estrogen therapy, treatment with a patch delivering 300 μg of testosterone per day resulted in a significant although modest increase in the 4-week frequency of satisfying sexual episodes (1.4 more episodes per month), but the women were also subject to more adverse events, including androgenic side effects. In postmenopausal women not receiving estrogen therapy, treatment with a patch delivering 300 '1;g of testosterone per day resulted in a significant although modest increase in the 4-week frequency of satisfying sexual episodes. The literature suggests that the prevalence of sexual problems among women ranges from 9 to 43%. 1 – 4 Among these women, hypoactive sexual desire disorder is a commonly reported, symptom-driven condition characterized by a decrease or absence of interest in sexual activity, causing distress. 5 Decreased libido is common after natural menopause 6 , 7 and bilateral oophorectomy. 8 – 10 Several studies have shown the efficacy and short-term safety of a transdermal patch delivering 300 μg of testosterone per day for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women who have undergone either surgically induced or natural menopause and who use concomitant estrogen. 11 – . . .

[...]of this, and despite the many accepted benefits of HRT, a significant proportion of women who could benefit from HRT are not using it. Ideally we need the definitive randomised prospective trial where women, given current knowledge, are treated with the correct hormones, for the correct indication, in the correct age group with sufficient power to study major benefits and risks. 18 The British Menopause Society position The British Menopause Society (BMS) has published observations and recommendations as part of the consultation process initiated by the Coalition Government to modernise the National Health Service. 19 The recommendations of the BMS represent a substantial position statement on how menopausal women's health should be optimised.

Testosterone is increasingly used as part of postmenopausal HRT regimens. Unfortunately, few androgenic preparations designed specifically for use in women have been approved by regulatory authorities. Ongoing concerns exist surrounding the potential long-term effects of testosterone therapy. Here, we review the most recent data on postmenopausal testosterone therapy, focusing particularly on the effects of testosterone on breast, endometrium and cardiovascular health.

Low sexual desire is a prevalent symptom, but not one frequently volunteered by women. When accompanied by distress, loss of libido is known as hypoactive sexual desire disorder, which can have a significant impact on a woman's wellbeing. The etiology of hypoactive sexual desire disorder is multifactorial and its management requires a combination of psychosocial and pharmacological interventions. This article outlines the assessment of patients presenting with the symptom of low sexual desire and discusses the evidence for pharmacological management.