Explore the vast range of titles available.

Isolated sinus node dysfunction with its pursuant long‐term risk for atrioventricular (AV) conduction disease poses a unique dilemma for proponents of CSP due to paucity of imprimatur guidelines. In such scenarios, the risk and prognosis of iatrogenic AV block is not well elucidated but is a valid concern. We report a case where CSP was complicated by iatrogenic AV block and peculiarly the rare phenomenon of intra‐Hisian Wenckebach.

Scar‐related ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation involves localizing the critical isthmuses by overdrive pacing maneuvers and three‐dimensional activation mapping. Implantable prosthetic devices have been known to complicate this by covering sites of potential isthmuses. We herein present a sentinel report of scar‐VT ablation with a protected isthmus localized over an endothelialized post‐myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect occluder device.

BackgroundHitherto, lumen less leads (LLLs) were routinely utilized for conduction system pacing (CSP). We report the largest experience using stylet-driven leads (SDLs) with a deflectable mapping catheter for CSP.MethodsPatients were prospectively and sequentially enrolled for CSP with SDL between June, 2021 and November, 2022 to (i) a novel deflectable mapping catheter (AgilisHisProTM, Abbott) (Group A) or (ii) a fixed curve sheath (Selectra3D, Biotronik) (Group B) in a 1:1 non-randomized fashion. The primary aim was to evaluate safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the CSP using SDL and deflectable mapping catheter (Group A) while reporting procedural success and intermediate-term follow-up.ResultsSeventy-nine patients (59.4%M, mean age 67.2+/−10.6 years) were allocated to either (i) Group A (n = 40) or (ii) Group B (n = 39). In Group A (n = 40, 50% M, mean age 67.2+/−9.5 years, follow-up 210.7 + 25.1days), His bundle pacing (HBP) was the default strategy with left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) for bailout. Procedural success with HBP was feasible in 17/40 (42.5%) patients with remaining 23/40 (57.5%) needing LBBaP bailout. After initial learning curve, a manual septal curve was introduced to successfully aid LBBaP in 6/23 (26.1%) cases. Procedural and follow-up parameters did not differ significantly in HBP vs. LBBaP. Head-to-head comparison was not performed between the groups owing to different default protocols (HBP−Group A, Discretionary−Group B).ConclusionsUse of SDL with single-curve deflectable mapping catheter was safe, feasible and yielded moderate procedural success with HBP and frequently needed a LBBaP bailout strategy. In approximately one-fourth of the latter, an out-of-plane manual septal curve was needed to optimize LBBaP.

Description Values Observed Code 1 Amount of Contrast Used Numerical Value Value in \"ml\" 2 Diabetes with Micro angiopathy Yes 1 No 0 3 Hypotension Yes 1 No 0 4 Peripheral Vascular Disease Yes 1 No 0 5 Albuminuria Yes 1 No 0 6 Glomerular Filtration Rate Numerical Value Value in 'ml/min/m2' Hemoglobin Laboratory Value Value in gm/dl Probability of CIN (%) Conclusion A simple risk scoring equation can be employed to predict the probability of CIN following PCI, applying it to each individual.

Background: Cardiac electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have become an established mode of treatment for patients with refractory arrhythmias. These procedures are carried out regularly at the cardiac catheterization laboratory of Madras Medical Mission India. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience with cardiac electrophysiologic studies (EPS) and RFA catheter of atrial fibrillation (AF). Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study carried out in the Cardiac Electrophysiology Department of the Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Madras Medical Mission, India. All cases diagnosed to have AF following cardiac EPS between January 2010 and April 2014 was selected for the study. The records, which were obtained from the Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinical Research Office of Madras Medical Mission, were reviewed. Forty-nine cases were chosen for analysis, using SPSS statistical software version 15. Results: There were 49 patients, 23 males and 26 females. The mean age was 57.53 years. Commonly associated diseases were diabetes mellitus 8 (16.3%), hypertension 18 (36.7%), and coronary heart disease 14 (28.5%). The ventricular rate was rapid most cases (91.2%). AF was diagnosed as being paroxysmal in 40 (81.6%), persistent in 5 (10.2%), chronic in 3 (6.1%), and lone in 1 (2.0%). Ablation was carried out in 28 (57.1%), the success rate being 90% for pulmonary vein isolation, and 90.9% for atrioventricular node ablation. Complication rate was 2.04%. Conclusions: Treatment of AF by RFA is highly effective and safe.