Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
80 result(s) for "Paraiso, D"
Sort by:
An overview of nanomedicines for neuron targeting
Medical treatments of neuron-related disorders are limited due to the difficulty of targeting brain cells. Major drawbacks are the presence of the blood–brain barrier and the lack of specificity of the drugs for the diseased cells. Nanomedicine-based approaches provide promising opportunities for overcoming these limitations. Although many previous reviews are focused on brain targeting with nanomedicines in general, none of those are concerned explicitly on the neurons, while targeting neuronal cells in central nervous diseases is now one of the biggest challenges in nanomedicine and neuroscience. We review the most relevant advances in nanomedicine design and strategies for neuronal drug delivery that might successfully bridge the gap between laboratory and bedside treatment in neurology.
Everolimus as second- or third-line treatment of advanced endometrial cancer: ENDORAD, a phase II trial of GINECO
Background: Patients with recurrent/metastatic endometrial cancer that progresses after chemotherapy have limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Preclinical data suggest the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus may provide clinical benefit in these patients. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study, patients with advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer refractory to one or two previous chemotherapy regimens received everolimus 10 mg per day until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the non-progressive disease rate at 3 months. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free, and overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled (median age, 65 years); 66% received one previous chemotherapy regimen. The 3-month non-progressive disease rate was 36% (95% confidence interval 22–52%), including two patients (5%) with partial response (PR). At 6 months, two additional patients experienced PR. Median duration of response was 3.1 months. Median progression-free and OS were 2.8 months and 8.1 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were anaemia (100%), fatigue (93%), hypercholesterolaemia (81%), and lymphopenia (81%). Conclusion: Everolimus demonstrated efficacy and acceptable tolerability in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer. These results support the further development of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-targeted therapies in endometrial cancer.
Foxi2 and Sox3 are master transcription regulators that control ectoderm germ layer specification in Xenopus
Germ layer specification represents a critical transition where pluripotent cells acquire lineage-specific identities. We identify the maternal transcription factors Foxi2 and Sox3 to be pivotal master regulators of ectodermal germ layer specification in Xenopus . Ectopic co-expression of Foxi2 and Sox3 in prospective endodermal tissue induces the expression of ectodermal markers while suppressing mesendodermal markers. Transcriptomic analyses reveal that Foxi2 and Sox3 jointly and independently regulate hundreds of ectodermal target genes. During early cleavage stages, Foxi2 and Sox3 pre-bind to key cis -regulatory modules (CRMs), marking sites that later recruit Ep300 and facilitate H3K27ac deposition, thereby shaping the epigenetic landscape of the ectodermal genome. These CRMs are highly enriched within ectoderm-specific super-enhancers (SEs). Our findings highlight the pivotal role of ectodermal SE-associated CRMs in precise and robust ectodermal gene activation, establishing Foxi2 and Sox3 as central architects of ectodermal lineage specification.
Sox17 and β-catenin co-occupy Wnt-responsive enhancers to govern the endoderm gene regulatory network
Lineage specification is governed by gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that integrate the activity of signaling effectors and transcription factors (TFs) on enhancers. Sox17 is a key transcriptional regulator of definitive endoderm development, and yet, its genomic targets remain largely uncharacterized. Here, using genomic approaches and epistasis experiments, we define the Sox17-governed endoderm GRN in Xenopus gastrulae. We show that Sox17 functionally interacts with the canonical Wnt pathway to specify and pattern the endoderm while repressing alternative mesectoderm fates. Sox17 and β-catenin co-occupy hundreds of key enhancers. In some cases, Sox17 and β-catenin synergistically activate transcription apparently independent of Tcfs, whereas on other enhancers, Sox17 represses β-catenin/Tcf-mediated transcription to spatially restrict gene expression domains. Our findings establish Sox17 as a tissue-specific modifier of Wnt responses and point to a novel paradigm where genomic specificity of Wnt/β-catenin transcription is determined through functional interactions between lineage-specific Sox TFs and β-catenin/Tcf transcriptional complexes. Given the ubiquitous nature of Sox TFs and Wnt signaling, this mechanism has important implications across a diverse range of developmental and disease contexts.
Gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combination for ovarian cancer resistant to taxane-platinum treatment: a phase II study from the GINECO group
Advanced ovarian carcinoma in early progression (<6 months) (AOCEP) is considered resistant to most cytotoxic drugs. Gemcitabine (GE) and oxaliplatin (OXA) have shown single-agent activity in relapsed ovarian cancer. Their combination was tested in patients with AOCEP in phase II study. Fifty patients pre-treated with platinum–taxane received q3w administration of OXA (100 mg m –2 , d1) and GE (1000 mg m –2 , d1, d8, 100-min infusion). Patient characteristics were a : median age 64 years (range 46–79),and 1 (84%) or 2 (16%) earlier lines of treatment. Haematological toxicity included grade 3–4 neutropaenia (33%), anaemia (8%), and thrombocytopaenia (19%). Febrile neutropaenia occurred in 3%. Non-haematological toxicity included grade 2–3 nausea or vomiting (34%), grade 3 fatigue (25%),and grade 2 alopecia (24%). Eighteen (37%) patients experienced response. Median progression-free (PF) and overall survivals (OS) were 4.6 and 11.4 months, respectively. The OXA–GE combination has high activity and acceptable toxicity in AOCEP patients. A comparison of the doublet OXA–GE with single-agent treatment is warranted.
Intensified dose of cyclophosphamide with G-CSF support versus standard dose combined with platinum in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer a randomised study from the GINECO group
ICON3 trial results have suggested that CAP and carboplatin–taxol regimens as first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) yield similar survival. We explored the impact of increased dose of cyclophosphamide in a modified CAP regimen on the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of AOC patients. From February 1994 to June 1997, 164 patients were randomised to receive six cycles every 3 weeks of either standard CEP (S) combining cyclophosphamide (C), 500 mg m −2 , epirubicin (E) 50 mg m −2 , and cisplatin (P) 75 mg m −2 or intensive CEP (I) with E and P at the same doses, but with (C) 1800 mg m −2 and filgrastim 5  μ g kg −1 per day × 10 days. Response was evaluated at second-look surgery. Patient characteristics were well balanced. Except for grade 3–4 neutropaenia (S: 54%, I: 38% of cycles), Arm1 presented a significantly more important toxicity: infection requiring antibiotics, grade 3–4 thrombocytopaenia, anaemia, nausea-vomiting, diarrhoea, mucositis. Median follow-up was 84 months. DFS (15.9 vs 14.8 months) and OS (33 vs 30 months) were not significantly different between S and I ( P >0.05). Increasing cyclophosphamide dose by more than 3 times with filgrastim support in the modified CAP regimen CEP induces more toxicity but not better efficacy in AOC.
Treatment of FIGO stage IV ovarian carcinoma: results of primary surgery or interval surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
The objective of the study is to determine whether surgery influences the outcome of stage IV ovarian cancer. The study design is as follows: From May 1995 to December 2000, 129 patients with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer, recruited in 42 centers, were prospectively included in GINECO first-line randomized studies of platinum-based regimens with paclitaxel administered simultaneously or sequentially. In all, 109 were eligible for this study. Standard peritoneal cytoreductive surgery was defined as a procedure including at least total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and peritoneal debulking. Surgery was considered optimal if residual lesions were smaller than 1 cm. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare survival. Initial abdominopelvic cytoreductive surgery was considered standard in 55 (54%) patients. Abdominopelvic surgery was optimal in 29 patients and nonoptimal in 26. Twenty-two (22%) patients had a simple biopsy, and 25 (24%) patients underwent substandard surgery. Twenty-two of these 47 patients without initial standard surgery underwent a second surgical procedure, and 17 of the 22 patients completed standard surgery. The median overall survival time in the entire population was 24.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.5–29.1 months). Patients treated without a cytoreductive surgical procedure had significantly worse median survival (15.1 months; 95% CI, 5.4–24.9 months) than patients who had optimal primary surgery (22.9 months; 95% CI, 15.6–30.1 months), nonoptimal primary surgery (27.1 months; 95% CI, 21.2–32.9 months), or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (45.5 months; 95% CI, 23.5–67.5 months) (P= .001). In conclusion, this study shows a significant benefit of debulking surgery in stage IV ovarian cancer patients who responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can help to select patients for surgery.
A multicenter phase II study of cisplatin and docetaxel (Taxotere) in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a GINECO study
A multicenter phase II study to evaluate the antitumor effect and safety of docetaxel in combination with cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Enrolled in the study were 45 patients who were to receive six courses of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days with hydration and steroid prophylaxis after initial debulking surgery. Imaging techniques and radiography were used to assess clinical tumor response, and second-look surgery was required for patients with complete clinical responses and for those without clinically measurable disease. The overall clinical response rate in 29 patients with clinically measurable disease was 58% (41% complete response). A complete pathologic response was seen in 9 of 34 patients who underwent second-look laparotomy, while microscopic disease was found in 10 patients. The median time to progression was 14.4 months (95% CI 8.4-20.4 months), with a median overall survival of 43 months (95% CI 21.1-65.0 months). Patients received a median number of six cycles at a dose intensity of 98%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was seen in 80% of patients, but was manageable. No patients withdrew because of fluid retention. The combination of docetaxel with cisplatin confers high clinical and pathologically verified tumor response rates and is well tolerated in the first-line management of advanced ovarian cancer.
cloneXplorer: A high-throughput clone discovery platform based on conical microwell arrays
Antigen-specific T cell populations are of great value for studying immune recognition but tedious to generate by limiting dilution or cloning. Here, we develop a streamlined approach to generate antigen-specific T cell clones directly from peripheral blood using the cloneXplorer, a live-cell analysis and clone isolation platform based on conical microwell arrays. This platform continuously monitors cell proliferation, cytokine secretion, and surface markers in up to 100,000 single cell co-cultures, enabling the identification of rare, functionally defined T cells, which can be recovered for clonal expansion or sequence analysis. We benchmark the platform by performing several key demonstrations. First, we show that this platform can efficiently generate monoclonal cell populations from cell lines and human T cells. Next, we demonstrate that antigen-specificity can be identified at single cell resolution using a co-culture of Jurkat cells expressing NFAT-GFP, CD8, and a T cell receptor and K562 antigen presenting cells (APC) expressing a peptide library. Thereafter, we show that immune activation in mouse and human primary samples can be monitored by time lapse analysis of Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) secretion in individual microwell co-cultures using a fluorescent sandwich assay. Finally, we combine these capabilities in a proof-of-concept demonstration, which uses IFN-γ secretion and the presence of CD8 surface markers as hierarchical gates to isolate and expand antigen-specific T cells from human peripheral blood, and we verify their specificity by tetramer staining. Together, these results showcase potential applications of the cloneXplorer platform in cell line development, and in screening and validating immune receptor interactions with specific antigens.
A GINECO randomized phase II trial of two capecitabine and weekly paclitaxel schedules in metastatic breast cancer
To determine whether capecitabine schedule adaptation improves the tolerability of capecitabine–paclitaxel combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), patients with anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative MBC were randomized to either arm A (21-day cycles: capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 twice daily, days 1–14; paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 , days 1, 8, and 15) or arm B (28-day cycles: capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 twice daily, days 1–5, 8–12, and 15–19; paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 , days 1, 8, and 15). The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose reductions or delays >1 week for grade 3/4 toxicity. Secondary endpoints were efficacy and safety. All 130 randomized patients were evaluable for safety. Dose reduction or delay for grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 39% of patients in arm A and 34% in arm B during cycles 1–6. In arm A, there were significantly more toxicity-related dose reductions (cycles 1–6: 82 vs. 67%, respectively; P  = 0.05) and discontinuations (29 vs. 8%, respectively). Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 12 and 0%, respectively, and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 12 versus 9%, respectively (grade 4 not applicable). There were no detectable differences in efficacy. Weekday capecitabine dosing with weekly paclitaxel may improve tolerability without a detrimental effect on efficacy, and merits further evaluation in patients suited to combination chemotherapy.