Explore the vast range of titles available.

Airborne Laser Scanners (ALS) and Terrestrial Laser Scanners (TLS) are two lidar systems frequently used for remote sensing forested ecosystems. The aim of this study was to compare crown metrics derived from TLS, ALS, and a combination of both for describing the crown structure and fuel attributes of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) dominated forest located at Eglin Air Force Base (AFB), Florida, USA. The study landscape was characterized by an ALS and TLS data collection along with field measurements within three large (1963 m2 each) plots in total, each one representing a distinct stand condition at Eglin AFB. Tree-level measurements included bole diameter at breast height (DBH), total height (HT), crown base height (CBH), and crown width (CW). In addition, the crown structure and fuel metrics foliage biomass (FB), stem branches biomass (SB), crown biomass (CB), and crown bulk density (CBD) were calculated using allometric equations. Canopy Height Models (CHM) were created from ALS and TLS point clouds separately and by combining them (ALS + TLS). Individual trees were extracted, and crown-level metrics were computed from the three lidar-derived datasets and used to train random forest (RF) models. The results of the individual tree detection showed successful estimation of tree count from all lidar-derived datasets, with marginal errors ranging from −4 to 3%. For all three lidar-derived datasets, the RF models accurately predicted all tree-level attributes. Overall, we found strong positive correlations between model predictions and observed values (R2 between 0.80 and 0.98), low to moderate errors (RMSE% between 4.56 and 50.99%), and low biases (between 0.03% and −2.86%). The highest R2 using ALS data was achieved predicting CBH (R2 = 0.98), while for TLS and ALS + TLS, the highest R2 was observed predicting HT, CW, and CBD (R2 = 0.94) and HT (R2 = 0.98), respectively. Relative RMSE was lowest for HT using three lidar datasets (ALS = 4.83%, TLS = 7.22%, and ALS + TLS = 4.56%). All models and datasets had similar accuracies in terms of bias (<2.0%), except for CB in ALS (−2.53%) and ALS + TLS (−2.86%), and SB in ALS + TLS data (−2.22%). These results demonstrate the usefulness of all three lidar-related methodologies and lidar modeling overall, along with lidar applicability in the estimation of crown structure and fuel attributes of longleaf pine forest ecosystems. Given that TLS measurements are less practical and more expensive, our comparison suggests that ALS measurements are still reasonable for many applications, and its usefulness is justified. This novel tree-level analysis and its respective results contribute to lidar-based planning of forest structure and fuel management.

In so doing, we have explained that 'the purpose of the equal protection clause [sic] of the Fourteenth Amendment is to secure every person within the State's jurisdiction against intentional and arbitrary discrimination, whether occasioned by express terms of a statute or by its improper execution through duly constituted agents.' This article considers whether Olech infers that unreasoned zoning decisions violate the Equal Protection Clause, and explores the meaning of similarly situated. Equal Protection and Means-End Analysis The classic formulation of the problem of equal protection under the law was provided by Tussman and tenBroek.20 Their simple yet powerful insight was that the reasonableness of a legal classification, defined as whether it treats \"similarly\" those who are \"similarly situated,\" hinges upon the adequacy of the coupling between the legislative purpose and the means employed to accomplish that purpose.21 As Tussman and tenBroek conceptualized it, a classification is reasonable and, therefore, passes constitutional muster if an appropriate fit exists between a class T (those burdened because they possess the classificatory trait) and a class M (those the law intended to burden because they create the mischief the law is designed to address).22 For example, assume a height restriction is intended to minimize the dangers of an architectural rigmarole posed by burgeoning development in an urban area.