Explore the vast range of titles available.

Concizumab is a monoclonal, humanized IgG4 antibody specific for the Kunitz-2 domain of Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI). Preclinical studies in vitro or on animal models and in vivo have demonstrated the ability of concizumab to restore thrombin generation, promoting the establishment of a procoagulant action; all these results were subsequently confirmed in the studies of EXPLORER program. Concizumab may represent a new opportunity for the treatment of persons with hemophilia, so there is much anticipation for the results of the ongoing trials still. This review retraces all the studies on concizumab published to date, with a brief discussion about the patient' perspectives.

Albutrepenonacog-alfa (Idelvion[R], CSL Behring) is a recombinant fusion protein in which the recombinant FIX (rFIX) links a recombinant human albumin, extending the half-life of rFIX even beyond 100 hours. In 2016, this drug was approved worldwide for the treatment of pediatric and adult persons with hemophilia B (PWH-B). Its efficacy and safety were described in the PROLONG-9FP program and subsequently confirmed in the real-world practice, even if to date there are not many manuscripts that extensively and completely deal with the use of albutrepenonacog-alfa in daily practice, also evaluating its impact on the quality of life of patients treated with this drug; this review therefore aims to analyze all the publications currently available regarding the real-world use of this extended half-life concentrate, also noting which topics need further study and research. Keywords: hemophilia B, recombinant FIX, albutrepenonacog-alfa, albumin-fusion proteins, extended half-life concentrates

Over the last decade, the world of hemophilia has experienced an unprecedented therapeutic advance, thanks to the progress in bioengineering technologies, leading to the introduction of drugs with novel mechanisms of action based on restoring thrombin generation or coagulation factor VIII mimicking. Apart from the bispecific monoclonal antibody emicizumab, already approved for patients with severe hemophilia A with and without inhibitors, novel non-replacement drugs designed to reduce the treatment burden of patients with hemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials. Thanks to their innovative mechanism of action and subcutaneous administration, these drugs promise to provide effective bleeding protection together with improved adherence and improve health-related quality of life for patients with hemophilia. On the other hand, rare thromboembolic events have been reported with some of these drugs and warrant continuous post-marketing surveillance and investigation of predisposing factors, although the overall safety profile of most of these drugs is good. Finally, new challenges need to be faced in the clinical and laboratory monitoring of the hemostatic status in patients treated with these innovative therapies. In this review, we provide an update on the available data on novel non-replacement drugs currently undergoing evaluation in clinical trials for patients with hemophilia.

The typical symptoms of COVID-19 mimic those of the common season flu. In addition, several changes in the coagulation processes have been observed. To date, it’s not fully clear how COVID-19 may affect patients with hereditary bleeding disorders. Anticoagulation in patients with haemophilia is still debated, but in this case could be needed. We are reporting a case of an elderly patient with mild haemophilia A hospitalized for Sars-Cov-2. On the 15th day of hospitalization, we observed an increase of all coagulation parameters. An antithrombotic prophylaxis at low dosage was immediately started, then increased at prophylactic dosage. Even if much more data are needed to ascertain the real thrombotic risk of haemophilia A in COVID-19 patients, it’s clear that the FVIII and vWF should be strictly monitored in order to promptly establish an adequate treatment and avoid the onset of thromboembolic events, even fatal, causing many deaths in COVID-19 patients.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder (1.4 per million inhabitants per year) caused by neutralizing antibodies against factor VIII. Although uncommon, these autoantibodies can cause a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Several conditions are linked with AHA; based on an EACH2 study, 3.8% of AHA could be connected to infection. In the last four years, most humans have contracted the SARS-CoV-2 infection or have been vaccinated against it. Whether or not COVID-19 immunization might induce AHA remains controversial. This review aims to evaluate the evidence about this possible association. Overall, 18 manuscripts (2 case series and 16 case reports) were included. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, as also happens with other vaccines, may stimulate an autoimmune response. However, older individuals with various comorbidities are both at risk of developing AHA and of COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the COVID-19 vaccine must always be administered because the benefits still outweigh the risks. Yet, we should consider the rare possibility that the activation of an immunological response through vaccination may result in AHA. Detailed registries and prospective studies would be necessary to analyze this post-vaccine acquired bleeding disorder, looking for possible markers and underlying risk factors for developing the disease in association with vaccination.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and costs associated with pharmacokinetics-driven (PK) prophylaxis based on the myPKFiT® device in patients affected by hemophilia A (HA) in Italy. Materials and Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted in three Italian hemophilia centers. All patients with moderate or severe HA, aged ≥ 18 years, capable of having PK estimated using the myPKFiT device, and who had had a clinical visit between 1 November 2019 and 31 March 2022 were included. Differences in clinical, treatment, health resources, and cost data were assessed comparing post-PK prophylaxis with pre-PK. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated as cost (EUR) per bleed avoided. Results: The study enrolled 13 patients with HA. The mean annual bleeding rate decreased by −1.45 (−63.80%, p = 0.0055) after the use of myPKFiT®. Overall, the consumption of FVIII IU increased by 1.73% during follow-up compared to the period prior the use of the myPKFiT. Prophylaxis based on the myPKFiT resulted in an ICER of EUR 5099.89 per bleed avoided. Conclusions: The results of our study support the idea that the use of PK data in clinical practice can be associated with an improvement in the management of patients, as well as clinical outcomes, with a reasonable increase in costs.

Background:Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vein disease and an important cause of blindness and visual morbidity. Many conditions are associated with RVO but the real role of the thrombophilic mutations is still unclear.Aim:To evaluate the potential role of thrombophilic mutations in RVO.Methods:We have evaluated 113 patients with RVO and compared with 104 volunteer controls. The controls were all healthy blood donors without previous venous thromboembolism episode or arterial thromboembolism episode. All patients were tested for 5 gene variants (here all named as mutations): factor V (FV) Leiden (G1691A), factor II (FII; G20210A), 5,1-methylenetetra-hydrofolate reductase (MTHFR; C677T), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1; 4G/5G), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE; Del/Ins). Statistical analysis were performed by the 2-tailed chi-square test.Results:Statistical test showed that TT homozygous patients of the MTHFR C677T mutation (P = .017) and heterozygous GA patients of the FII G20210A mutation (P = .018) were significantly higher than that in controls. For FV Leiden, even if the values were higher in patients than in controls, P value was not statistically significant. Conversely, for the ACE (Ins/Del) and PAI-1 (4G/5G) mutations, no difference was observed among genotypes of patients with RVO and control participants.Conclusions:In our study, the FII G20210A and the MTHFR C677T mutations resulted significantly higher in patients than in controls; in contrast, thrombophilic mutation of FV, ACE, and PAI-1 genes was not statistically correlated with RVO. In spite of having found an association between some thrombophilic mutations and RVO, more studies with a major number of patients are necessary to determine the final role of these gene variants.

BackgroundFXIII deficiency is a very rare coagulation disorder that can affect equally males and females with an estimated incidence of 1 in 2 million persons worldwide. Due to this rarity, there are only few clinical and pharmacokinetic (PK) data deriving from the real-world.AimThe aim of this report is to compare head-to-head the pharmacokinetic data of catridecacog derived from the MENTORTM2 trial with our real-world (RW) study.MethodsThe PK-profiles of all patients with FXIII deficiency treated with catridecacog at eleven Italian Hemophilia Centers were compared with PK data obtained by Kerlin et al. in the MENTORTM2.ResultsOverall 18 real-world PK were compared with 23 PK derived from the pivotal study. In the RW 55.6% of patients were females, 26.2% in the MENTORTM2 (p < 0.05). The mean dosage of drug used for the PK assessment was 35 IU/kg in the MENTORTM2, and 33.9 IU/kg in the RW study.

Background: Factor X (FX) deficiency is a serious, rare bleeding disorder, with 1 in 500 000 affected people. Hemorrhages, hematuria, epistaxis, and other bleeding complications are frequent. Case Report: Now, we report a case of a well-known 77-year-old FX-deficient patient (Friuli variant, level <1%, mutation Pro343→Ser, exon VIII) with hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic gastritis, admitted many times to hospital due to surgical complications after aortic abdominal aneurysm (AAA) repair. Use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) such as hemostatic therapy during surgeries and prophylaxis after discharge is shown in this article. Three consecutive surgeries were considered. First, endoleak postendoprosthesis; second, AAA breakage; and third, planned surgery, a new endovascular prosthesis positioning and femur-femoral bypass. No adverse events due to PCC were found by local physicians. Discussion: We discuss the methods commonly used in the treatment and prophylaxis of patients with FX deficiency to reduce hemorrhagic risk and to improve their quality of life. Conclusion: Waiting for specific therapeutic options for FX deficiency, currently, the best treatment is represented by PCC. Its correct use permits an improvement in life quality and a reduction in bleeding frequency in FX-deficient patients.